The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . This requirement is repeated in section 985.43(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2018), which provides that a . . . See § 985.43(1)(c), Fla. Stat. . . .
. . . Section 985.43(1)(a), Florida Statutes (2017), provides that a predisposition report is required when . . . justice system; nonetheless, the trial court erred in failing to order a PDR as required by section 985.43 . . .
. . . Part VII' of this chapter (sections 985.43-985.494) addresses the disposition process. . . .
. . . The trial court requested that DJJ prepare a predisposition report (“PDR”) pursuant to section 985.43 . . . See § 985.43(l)(a), Fla. Stat. . . .
. . . Section 985.43(2) mandates that the court “consider the child’s entire assessment and predisposition . . . report” prior to making a final disposition of the case. § 985.43(2), Fla. . . . Here, the trial court failed to strictly comply with section 985.43 when it entered its disposition order . . .
. . . We do not have to decide whether section 985.43S(7)(b) applies to a proceeding under section 985.475, . . .
. . . .” § 985.43S(7)(b), Fla. Stat. (2007) (emphasis supplied). . . .
. . . alleged to have committed a delinquent act or violation of law. (5) (a) Notwithstanding ss. 743.07, 985.43 . . .
. . . Stat. (2007) (emphasis supplied); see also § 985.43(l)(a), Fla. . . . Stat. (2007); see § 985.43(l)(a)-(b), Fla. Stat. (2007). . . . Stat. (2007) (emphasis supplied); see also § 985.43(3), Fla. Stat. (2007). . . . Part VII of this chapter (sections 985.43-985.494) addresses the disposition process. . . . See §§ 985.43(2), 985.438(3), Fla. Stat. (2007); Fla. R. Juv. P. 8.115(a). . . .
. . . ordered defendants to pay costs of $25,038.08, but denied plaintiffs’ request for copying costs of $985.43 . . . Plaintiffs appealed the Court Clerks’s order and the Court awarded plaintiffs an additional $985.43 for . . . District Court, which affirmed the amount of costs awarded by the Court Clerk but added an additional $985.43 . . .
. . . for representing them in routine Chapter 7 matters, they received a bill, dated July 8, 1996, for $985.43 . . .