Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 1003.23 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 1003.23 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 1003.23

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XLVIII
EARLY LEARNING-20 EDUCATION CODE
Chapter 1003
PUBLIC K-12 EDUCATION
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 1003.23
1003.23 Attendance records and reports.
(1) The attendance of all public K-12 school students shall be checked each school day in the manner prescribed by rules of the State Board of Education and recorded in the teacher’s register or by some approved system of recording attendance. Students may be counted in attendance only if they are actually present at school or are away from school on a school day and are engaged in an educational activity which constitutes a part of the school-approved instructional program for the student.
(2) All officials, teachers, and other employees in public, parochial, religious, denominational, and private K-12 schools, including private tutors, shall keep all records and shall prepare and submit promptly all reports that may be required by law and by rules of the State Board of Education and district school boards. Such records shall include a register of enrollment and attendance and all persons described above shall make these reports therefrom as may be required by the State Board of Education. The enrollment register shall show the absence or attendance of each student enrolled for each school day of the year in a manner prescribed by the State Board of Education. The register shall be open for the inspection by the designated school representative or the district school superintendent of the district in which the school is located. Violation of the provisions of this section shall be a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided by law. This section shall not apply to home education programs provided in s. 1002.41.
History.s. 118, ch. 2002-387.

F.S. 1003.23 on Google Scholar

F.S. 1003.23 on Casetext

Amendments to 1003.23


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 1003.23
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S1003.23 2 - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - SCH FAIL KEEP ATTEND RECORDS FILE REPORT - M: S



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, v. THURAISSIGIAM, 140 S. Ct. 1959 (U.S. 2020)

. . . . §§ 103.5(a)(1), (5), and 1003.23(b)(1), and the Executive always has discretion not to remove, see . . .

NANTUME, v. P. BARR,, 931 F.3d 35 (1st Cir. 2019)

. . . . § 1003.23(b). . . .

MENENDEZ- GONZALEZ, v. P. BARR,, 929 F.3d 1113 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . days of a final order of removal, or on or before September 30, 1996, whichever comes later. 8 C.F.R § 1003.23 . . . at any time, or upon motion of the Service or the alien, reopen or reconsider any case." 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23 . . .

PINOS GONZALEZ, v. P. BARR,, 929 F.3d 595 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . . § 1003.23(b)(4)(iii)(A)(2). . . .

RIVERA- GUERRERO v. P. BARR,, 926 F.3d 1050 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . . § 1003.23(b)(4). . . .

QORANE, v. P. BARR, U. S., 919 F.3d 904 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . . § 1003.23(b)(1). . . .

COMPERE v. RIORDAN,, 368 F. Supp. 3d 164 (D. Mass. 2019)

. . . . §§ 1003.2(c), 1003.2(f), 1003.23(b)(1)(v), 1003.23(b)(3). . . .

WANJIKU, v. P. BARR,, 918 F.3d 215 (1st Cir. 2019)

. . . . §§ 1003.2(c)(2) ; 1003.23(b)(4)(i). . . .

TAY- CHAN, v. P. BARR,, 918 F.3d 209 (1st Cir. 2019)

. . . . § 1003.23(b)(4)(iii)(A)(1) ). . . .

THOUNG, v. UNITED STATES, 913 F.3d 999 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . . § 1003.23 (2018) (immigration judge authority to reopen and reconsider); id. § 1003.2 (Board of Immigration . . .

HAMAMA, v. ADDUCCI,, 912 F.3d 869 (6th Cir. 2018)

. . . . §§ 1003.2(c)(1) and 1003.23(b)(3). A motion to reopen does not automatically stay removal. . . . eligibility for relief, and (3) include evidence of the changed circumstances, 8 C.F.R. §§ 1003.2(c) ; 1003.23 . . .

BARTOLOME, T. B. H. v. B. SESSIONS III, v. B. III,, 904 F.3d 803 (9th Cir. 2018)

. . . . § 1003.23(b)(2), (3). . . . To the contrary, § 1003.23(b)(1) provides that an IJ has sua sponte jurisdiction to reopen "any case . . .

DEGBE, v. B. SESSIONS, III, F., 899 F.3d 651 (8th Cir. 2018)

. . . . § 1003.23(b)(3) ). . . .

PAYERAS, v. B. SESSIONS, III,, 899 F.3d 593 (8th Cir. 2018)

. . . . § 1003.23(b)(1) : "A motion to reopen or to reconsider shall not be made by or on behalf of a person . . . See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23(b)(1). . . .

DOE, v. SMITH,, 324 F. Supp. 3d 214 (D. Mass. 2018)

. . . . §§ 1003.2(c), 1003.23(b)(3). They can also grant stays of removal. . . . . §§ 1003.2(f), 1003.23(b)(1)(v). . . . The authority to reopen proceedings lies with the immigration courts and BIA. 8 C.F.R. §§ 1003.2(c), 1003.23 . . .

DHAKAL, v. B. SESSIONS III,, 895 F.3d 532 (7th Cir. 2018)

. . . . §§ 1003.23 (immigration judge), 1003.2 (Board). . . .

BERMUDEZ- ARIZA, v. B. SESSIONS III,, 893 F.3d 685 (9th Cir. 2018)

. . . . § 1003.23(b)(1). . . . has made a decision, unless jurisdiction is vested with the Board of Immigration Appeals." 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23 . . . limited the scope of remand, the IJ had jurisdiction to reconsider his earlier decisions under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23 . . .

ALAM, v. NIELSEN,, 312 F. Supp. 3d 574 (S.D. Tex. 2018)

. . . . § 1003.23(b)(1) (Immigration Judges); id. § 1003.2(a) (Board). . . . did not deprive the courts of jurisdiction. 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(d) (departure bar for the Board); id. § 1003.23 . . .

GONZALEZ- ALARCON, v. P. MACIAS, El, 884 F.3d 1266 (10th Cir. 2018)

. . . . § 1003.23(b). . . . . § 1003.23(b)(1). . . . Consequently, he should file a motion to reopen under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23 with the Immigration Court having . . . as we have explained, the motion would now be untimely: 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7)(C)(i) and 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23 . . . deportation, or exclusion proceedings subsequent to his or her departure from the United States." 8 C.F.R. 1003.23 . . . . § 1003.23(b)(1) (setting a ninety-day deadline for motions to reopen and prohibiting such motions from . . .

JUAREZ- LORENZO, v. B. SESSIONS III,, 713 F. App'x 567 (9th Cir. 2018)

. . . . §§ 1003.2(c)(3), 1003.23(b)(4)(ii) (a motion to reopen to rescind an in absentia deportation order . . .

MEJIA- URBINA, v. B. SESSIONS, III, U. S., 712 F. App'x 469 (5th Cir. 2018)

. . . . § 1003.23(b)(4)(iii)(D). . . .

NUNEZ, v. B. SESSIONS, III, U. S., 882 F.3d 499 (5th Cir. 2018)

. . . . § 1003.23(b)(4)(i). . . . . § 1003.23(b)(3). . . .

DEVITRI, v. CRONEN,, 289 F. Supp. 3d 287 (D. Mass. 2018)

. . . . §§ 1003.2(c)(3), 1003.23(b)(4). . . .

BING QUAN LIN, v. U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,, 881 F.3d 860 (11th Cir. 2018)

. . . . § 1003.23(b)(1), (b)(4)(h). . . . presents evidence that is new, material, and unavailable when the removal order was entered. 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23 . . . where the movant has made a prima facie case that reopening would otherwise be appropriate. 8 C.P.R. § 1003.23 . . . In context; this notation almost certainly references 8 C.F.R, § 1003.23(b)(1) ("[A] party may file only . . . was not available and could not have been discovered or presented at the former hearing.” 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23 . . .

TING XU, v. B. SESSIONS III,, 709 F. App'x 86 (2d Cir. 2018)

. . . . §§ 1003.2(c)(2), 1003.23(b)(1) (same). . . . . §§ 1003.2(c)(3)(ii), 1003.23(b)(4)(i), as discussed below, the BIA’s conclusion that Xu failed, to . . .

SANDOVAL- CHAVEZ, v. B. SESSIONS, III, U. S., 707 F. App'x 814 (5th Cir. 2018)

. . . . §§ 1003.23(b) or 1003.2(a). . . .

NASSIRI, v. B. SESSIONS, III, U. S., 706 F. App'x 201 (5th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.23(b) or 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a); or (2) he can invoke his statutory right to reopen proceedings . . .

MENDIAS- MENDOZA, v. B. SESSIONS, III, U. S., 877 F.3d 223 (5th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.23(b)(3). . . . See Altamirano-Lopez, 435 F.3d at 550; 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23(b)(1)(iv). . . . As a preliminary matter, 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23(b)(1) provides that a "motion to reopen must be filed within . . . Accordingly, Cruz-Garcia would not dictate the application of § 1003.23(b)(1) to Mendias-Mendoza’s case . . . Gonzales, 413 F.3d 462, 469 (5th Cir. 2005); 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23(b)(3). . . . .

JENG, v. U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,, 704 F. App'x 915 (11th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.23(b)(4)(ii). . . .

DEVITRI, v. CRONEN,, 290 F. Supp. 3d 86 (D. Mass. 2017)

. . . . §§ 1003.2(c)(3), 1003.23(b)(4). . . . to filing, a motion to reopen cannot be made by the alien or on her behalf. 8 C.F.R. §§ 1003.2(d), 1003.23 . . . Id. §§ 1003.2(d), 1003.23(b)(1). . . . may be eligible for asylum, which can be raised in a motion to reopen, see 8 C.F.R. §§ 1003.2(c)(3), 1003.23 . . .

SINGH, v. B. SESSIONS III,, 703 F. App'x 606 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.23(b)(1), and where Singh failed to establish materially changed circumstances in India to qualify . . . for the regulatory exception to the time limitation, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23(b)(4)(i); Najmabadi, 597 . . .

MOLINA- ALVARADO, v. B. SESSIONS III,, 703 F. App'x 546 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.23(b)(1), (4)(iii)(A)(l) (an order of deportation entered in absentia may only be rescinded . . .

MEIXIA FENG, v. B. SESSIONS III,, 702 F. App'x 657 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.23(b)(4), and Feng failed to establish the due diligence required for equitable tolling of the . . .

NAJERA- MEJIA, v. B. SESSIONS, III, U. S., 702 F. App'x 238 (5th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.23(b)(4)(ii), Najera-Mejia has abandoned any such challenge. See Soadjede v. . . .

HERNANDEZ- CASTILLO, v. B. SESSIONS, III, U. S., 875 F.3d 199 (5th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.23(b). . . . . § 1003.2(a); An immigration judge’s regulatory authority is governed by § 1003.23(b), while the BIA . . .

BARCZAK, v. B. SESSIONS III,, 700 F. App'x 78 (2d Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.23(b)(4)(ii). “ ‘[Exceptional circumstances’ refers to exceptional circumstances (such as battery . . . compelling circumstances) beyond the control of the alien.” 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(e)(l); see also 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23 . . . See 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(b)(5)(C)(i), (e)(1); see also 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23(b)(4)(ii). . . .

O. ACQUAAH, v. B. SESSIONS III,, 874 F.3d 1010 (7th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.23(b)(1) (“In general. . . . deportation proceedings, when the basis of the motion is fraud in the original proceeding”);, id § 1003.23 . . .

TAJUDEEN, v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF UNITED STATES, 699 F. App'x 139 (3d Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.23(b)(1) (reopening by the IJ at any time). . . .

SANCHEZ, v. B. SESSIONS III,, 698 F. App'x 430 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.23(b)(4)(ii);' 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(e)(l) (defining exceptional circumstances as circumstances beyond . . .

KAUR, AKA v. B. SESSIONS III,, 698 F. App'x 486 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.23(b)(4)(iii); Avagyan v. . . .

IBRAHIM, v. ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,, 708 F. App'x 740 (3d Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.23(b)(1); see also 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7)(C)(i). . . . . § 1003.23(b)(4)(i); see also Pllumi v. Att’y Gen., 642 F.3d 155, 161 (3d Cir. 2011). . . . hot with his motion to reopen, which was properly before the IJ in the first instance, see 8 C.F.R; § 1003.23 . . .

DOMINGUEZ, v. B. SESSIONS, III, U. S., 708 F. App'x 808 (5th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.23(b). Lugo-Resendez v. Lynch, 831 F.3d 337, 340-41 (5th Cir. 2016). . . . ., a regulatory motion to reopen), the alien can file at any time. 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a); 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23 . . . of Federal Regulations governing regulatoiy motions to reopen, 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) and 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23 . . .

GUEVARA, v. B. SESSIONS, III, U. S., 697 F. App'x 340 (5th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.23(b)(4)(ii). . . .

TARANGO, v. B. SESSIONS, III, U. S., 697 F. App'x 318 (5th Cir. 2017)

. . . . §§ 1003.2(a), 1003.23(b). . . . who were ordered removed in absentia. 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7)(C)(ii)-(iv); 8 C.F.R. §§ 1003.2(c)(3), 1003.23 . . .

CUICHAO HUANG, v. B. SESSIONS III,, 695 F. App'x 232 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . . §§ 1003.23(b)(3), 1003.47(c) (“Failure to file necessary documentation and comply with the requirements . . .

DE LEON LOPEZ, v. B. SESSIONS III,, 695 F. App'x 277 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.23(b)(2). . . .

ORTIZ, v. B. SESSIONS, III, U. S., 694 F. App'x 970 (5th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.23(b)(1); that bar prohibits an alien’s filing a motion to reopen invoking the IJ’s sua sponte . . . specifically allow an alien to file a motion to reopen pursuant to the IJ’s sua sponte authority. § 1003.23 . . .

SALMERON- SALMERON, v. B. SESSIONS III,, 694 F. App'x 196 (4th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.23(b) (2017). . . .

GONZALEZ- CANTU, v. B. SESSIONS, III, U. S., 866 F.3d 302 (5th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.23(b)(1). She pointed to Garcia-Carias v. . . . he can invoke the court’s regulatory power to sua sponte reopen proceedings under either 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23 . . . “The Immigration Court’s regulatory authority is governed by § 1003.23(b) while the BIA’s regulatory . . .

J. HAMAMA, v. ADDUCCI,, 261 F. Supp. 3d 820 (E.D. Mich. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.23(b)(4) (“time and numerical limitations” do not apply to motions to reopen based on 8 U.S.C . . . Title 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23(b)(l)(v) states that “[ejxcept in cases involving in absen-tia orders, the filing . . .

SANCHEZ, v. B. SESSIONS III,, 698 F. App'x 740 (4th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.23(b)(3). . . . grant or deny a motion to reopen ... is within the discretion of the Immigration Judge.” 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23 . . .

BARAJAS- FLORES, v. B. SESSIONS, III, U. S., 702 F. App'x 193 (5th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.23(b) or 8 C.F. . . . Holder, 603 F.3d 282, 287-88 (5th Cir. 2010) (applying § 1003.23(b)(1) concerning IJ reopening); Ovalles . . .

JATTA, v. B. SESSIONS, III,, 698 F. App'x 818 (6th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.23(b)(1). . . . . § 1003.23(b)(3). . . . of entry of a final administrative order of removal. 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7)(A), (C)(1); 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23 . . .

CARRASCO- PALOS, v. B. SESSIONS, III,, 695 F. App'x 992 (8th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.23(b)(1). . . . See 8 U.S.C. § 1231(a)(5); 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23(b)(1). . . . Motions to reopen before the IJ are governed by 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23, which provides that the IJ "may upon . . . deportation, or exclusion proceedings subsequent to his or her departure from the United States.” 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23 . . .

MARTINEZ, v. B. SESSIONS III,, 691 F. App'x 775 (4th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.23(b) (2016). . . .

KHEMLALL, v. B. SESSIONS III,, 697 F. App'x 739 (2d Cir. 2017)

. . . . §§ 1003.2(c)(1), 1003.23(b)(3). . . .

CELADA, AKA De v. B. SESSIONS III,, 692 F. App'x 393 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . . §§ 1003.2(c)(2), 1003.23, and he has not demonstrated the due diligence necessary to warrant equitable . . .

BARRIOS BARRIOS, v. B. SESSIONS III,, 691 F. App'x 502 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.23(b)(1), and he did not demonstrate changed country conditions to qualify for the regulatory . . .

LINQING WANG, v. B. SESSIONS III,, 690 F. App'x 784 (2d Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.23(b)(3). . . .

LAINEZ- URQUILLA, v. B. SESSIONS III,, 691 F. App'x 347 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.23(b)(1). . . .

SINGH, v. SESSIONS,, 688 F. App'x 581 (10th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.23(b)(4)(h). It is beyond dispute that in the absence of equitable tolling Mr. . . .

MOLINA, v. B. SESSIONS, III, U. S., 689 F. App'x 333 (5th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.23(b)(1) eliminated the IJ’s jurisdiction to consider Molina’s motion. . . .

XIAO YAN XIA, v. B. SESSIONS III,, 690 F. App'x 43 (2d Cir. 2017)

. . . . §§ 1003.2(c)(2), 1003.23(b)(1). . . . . §§ 1003.2(c)(3), 1003.23(b)(4)(i). . . . See 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7)(C); 8 C.F.R. §§ 1003.2(c), 1003.23(b). . . .

AYALA, AKA AKA AKA AKA v. B. SESSIONS III,, 855 F.3d 1012 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.23(2), (3); accord Iturribarria v. I.N.S., 321 F.3d 889, 895 (9th Cir. 2003). . . .

MARTIN- FUNES, v. B. SESSIONS III,, 689 F. App'x 477 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.23(b)(4)(iii)(A)(2) (a motion to reopen to rescind an in absen-tia order may be filed at any . . .

NAVARRETE- PRADO, v. B. SESSIONS III,, 688 F. App'x 450 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.23(b)(1) (“A motion to reopen must be filed within 90 days of the date of entry of a final administrative . . .

XHUTI, v. B. SESSIONS III,, 686 F. App'x 42 (2d Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.23(b)(1). . . . . § 1003.23(b)(4)(i). The agency reasonably concluded that Dr. . . .

ALVARADO- ARENAS, v. B. SESSIONS, III,, 851 F.3d 827 (8th Cir. 2017)

. . . . §§ 1003.23(b)(1), 1003.2(a), we lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s discretionary decision. . . .

HE ZI CHEN, v. B. SESSIONS III,, 682 F. App'x 571 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.23(b)(4)(iii)(B). . . .

AYALA- PEREZ, v. B. SESSIONS III,, 682 F. App'x 590 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.23(b)(1), and Ayala-Perez failed to establish the due diligence required for equitable tolling . . .

CRUZ, v. B. SESSIONS III,, 682 F. App'x 591 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.23(b)(4)(ii) (a motion to reopen in absentia proceedings based on lack of notice may be filed . . .

CONG THANH CHAU, v. B. SESSIONS III,, 682 F. App'x 599 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.23(b)(1), and Chau failed to establish any exception to the filing deadline, see 8 C.F.R. § . . . 1003.23(b)(4). . . .

TOLEDO, v. B. SESSIONS III,, 682 F. App'x 601 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.23(b)(4)(i); Toufighi v. . . .

RUBALLOS, v. B. SESSIONS, III,, 682 F. App'x 59 (2d Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.23(b)(4)(iii)(A)(2); 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(b)(5)(C)(ii). . . . not subject to any time limitation, see 232 F.3d at 134; 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(b)(5)(C)(ii); 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23 . . .

FRANCO- GUARDADO, v. B. SESSIONS, III, U. S., 678 F. App'x 240 (5th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.23(b)(4)(i). . . .

ALVARADO- MELENDEZ v. B. SESSIONS, III,, 678 F. App'x 551 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.23(b)(4)(ii); 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(e)(1); Valencia-Fragoso v. . . .

ZARAGOZA, v. B. SESSIONS, III,, 677 F. App'x 413 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.23(b)(4)(ii), and failed to establish the due diligence required to warrant equitable tolling . . .

PANTOJA, v. B. SESSIONS, III,, 677 F. App'x 439 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.23(b)(1). . . . See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23 (“A motion to reopen proceedings shall state the new facts that will be proven . . .

SHUNEVYCH, v. B. SESSIONS, III,, 677 F. App'x 450 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.23(b)(4)(i), (ii) (setting 180-day deadline for motions to reopen in absentia removal orders . . .

PEREZ- LOPEZ, v. B. SESSIONS,, 677 F. App'x 348 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § ■ 1003.23(b)(4)(ii) (providing that an in ab-sentia order may be rescinded “if the alien demonstrates . . .

ALKHAMRI v. B. SESSIONS,, 676 F. App'x 641 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . See 8 C.F.R, § 1003.23(b)(1), (b)(4)© (motions to reopen before the IJ need not be filed within 90 days . . .

UNITED STATES v. PERALTA- SANCHEZ,, 847 F.3d 1124 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.23(b)(1))). . . .

SILVERIO- DA SILVA, v. BOENTE, U. S., 675 F. App'x 487 (5th Cir. 2017)

. . . properly construed as a request for the IJ to exercise his sua sponte authority to reopen under 8 C.F.R. 1003.23 . . .

MARTINEZ- RIVERA, v. U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,, 678 F. App'x 950 (11th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.23(b)(1); id. § 1003.2(a). . . . Sua sponte reopening is not subject to the statutory-time bar for motions to reopen. 8 C.F.R, § 1003.23 . . .

COBOS- LUNA, v. J. BOENTE,, 678 F. App'x 498 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.23(b). . . .

KIM, v. E. LYNCH,, 674 F. App'x 768 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.23(b)(1) (a motion to reopen must be filed within 90 days of a final order of removal), he concedes . . . and he does not assert any exceptional circumstance exception to the filing deadline, see 8 C.F.R, § 1003.23 . . .

SANTOS- PORTILLO, AKA v. E. LYNCH,, 675 F. App'x 747 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.23(b)(4)(h); 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(e)(1); Valencia-Fragoso v. . . .

VALUS, v. E. LYNCH,, 675 F. App'x 762 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.23(b)(4)(ii) (a motion to reopen in absentia .proceedings based on lack of notice may be filed . . .

GARCIA- VARELA, v. E. LYNCH,, 675 F. App'x 764 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.23(b)(i); Avagyan v. . . .

ADUTWUMWA, a k a v. E. LYNCH,, 673 F. App'x 318 (4th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.23(b) (2016); Mosere v. Mukasey, 552 F.3d 397, 400 (4th Cir. 2009). . . . motion is granted and shall be supported by affidavits and other evidentiary material.” 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23 . . .

TOVAR, v. E. LYNCH,, 674 F. App'x 691 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.23(b)(1), it is time-barred unless relief is “based on changed country conditions arising in . . .

LIMA, v. E. LYNCH,, 672 F. App'x 697 (9th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 1003.23(b)(1) & (b)(4) (iii)(A) (2); 8 U.S.C. § 1252b(a)(2)(A) (1994) (notice of hearing shall be . . .

A. PAZ, v. E. LYNCH,, 673 F. App'x 97 (2d Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 1003.23(b)(4)(iii)(A); see 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(b)(5)(C). . . .

De PADILLA v. E. LYNCH,, 671 F. App'x 634 (9th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 1003.23 (b)(1), and Plan-carte-De Padilla failed to establish the due diligence required for equitable . . .

MUNOZ- HERNANDEZ, v. E. LYNCH,, 671 F. App'x 579 (9th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 1003.23(b)(4)(ii) and 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(b)(5)(C)(ii). . . .

BARRIENTOS, v. E. LYNCH,, 671 F. App'x 600 (9th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 1003.23(b)(1), and she has not demonstrated the due diligence necessary to warrant equitable tolling . . .

IANCU, v. E. LYNCH,, 671 F. App'x 600 (9th Cir. 2016)

. . . . §§ 1003.23(b)(l)-(2), but contends the IJ erred and abused her discretion in not construing her motion . . .

MARTINES- CASTANEDA, v. E. LYNCH,, 665 F. App'x 118 (2d Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 1003.23(b)(4)(ii). . . .

AHIR, v. E. LYNCH,, 665 F. App'x 84 (2d Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 1003.23(b)(4)(iii)(B). . . . considered whether Ahir had “reasonable cause” for her failure to appear at the initial hearing, 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23 . . .

KAUR v. E. LYNCH,, 670 F. App'x 952 (9th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 1003.23(b)(4)(ii) (a motion to reopen to rescind an in absentia removal order may be “filed at any . . . petitioners filed their motion more than nine years after their final orders of removal, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23 . . .