Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 1003.28 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 1003.28 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 1003.28

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XLVIII
EARLY LEARNING-20 EDUCATION CODE
Chapter 1003
PUBLIC K-12 EDUCATION
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 1003.28
1003.28 Continuation of truancy remedial activities upon transfer of student; retention of legal jurisdiction.
(1) If, during the activities designed to remedy truant behavior as described in s. 1003.27, the parent of the student who is the subject of such activities transfers the student to another school district in this state in an attempt to circumvent the remedial procedures which have already begun, the administration of the school from which the student transferred shall provide to the administration of the new school, at no charge, copies of all available records and documents relevant to such remedial activities, and the administration of the new school shall begin remedial activities in the program that most closely meets the transfer student’s needs.
(2) In the event that a legal proceeding has commenced, as provided in s. 1003.27, against a student who has been determined to be a habitual truant, the movement of the student who is the subject of such proceeding to another circuit court district in this state will not affect the jurisdiction of the court to proceed with the case under the law.
History.s. 123, ch. 2002-387.

F.S. 1003.28 on Google Scholar

F.S. 1003.28 on Casetext

Amendments to 1003.28


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 1003.28
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 1003.28.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

OTIATO, v. B. SESSIONS III,, 710 F. App'x 137 (4th Cir. 2018)

. . . . § 1003.28(b) (2017). . . .

GALVAN- AVILA, AKA v. UNITED STATES AKA v. B. III,, 714 F. App'x 693 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.28. 2. . . .

PEREZ, v. B. SESSIONS III,, 686 F. App'x 59 (2d Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.28(b)(1) (same). . . .

DUKU, v. H. HOLDER, JR., 589 F. App'x 158 (4th Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 1003.28(b)(1) (2014). . . .

De PEDROZA, v. H. HOLDER, Jr., 585 F. App'x 323 (9th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 1003.28(b)(4)(ii), and Estrada Pedroza failed to demonstrate the due diligence required for equitable . . .

ZURITA- ESPINOZA, a k a v. H. HOLDER, JR., 565 F. App'x 165 (4th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 1003.28(b)(1) (2013). . . .

FERNANDO, v. U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,, 554 F. App'x 852 (11th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 1003.28(b)(1). . . .

RAMOS- RODRIGUEZ, v. H. HOLDER, Jr., 549 F. App'x 576 (7th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 1003.28(b)(4)(ii). . . .

YAQOOB, v. ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES, 533 F. App'x 136 (3d Cir. 2013)

. . . . § 1003.28(b)(4)(i). . . .

DAHAL, v. H. HOLDER, Jr., 489 F. App'x 470 (1st Cir. 2012)

. . . . § 1003.28. . . .

LIN LEE, v. ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES,, 447 F. App'x 353 (3d Cir. 2011)

. . . . § 1003.28(b)(1), for the purpose of submitting another application for asylum. . . .

SINGH, v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF UNITED STATES, 430 F. App'x 157 (3d Cir. 2011)

. . . . § 1003.28(b)(1). . . .

DELEON- GRAMAJO, v. H. HOLDER, Jr., 397 F. App'x 422 (9th Cir. 2010)

. . . . § 1003.28(b)(1), and Deleon-Gramajo failed to establish she acted with the due diligence required for . . .

RAMIREZ, v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF UNITED STATES,, 387 F. App'x 263 (3d Cir. 2010)

. . . . § 1003.28(b)(3), the BIA declined to reopen the proceedings, concluding that the submitted evidence . . .

LIN, v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF UNITED STATES,, 381 F. App'x 200 (3d Cir. 2010)

. . . . § 1003.28(b)(1). . . .

ONWUAMAEGBU, v. H. HOLDER, Jr., 324 F. App'x 13 (1st Cir. 2009)

. . . . § 1003.28(b)(3). . . .

MIRZA, v. H. HOLDER, Jr., 313 F. App'x 409 (2d Cir. 2009)

. . . . § 1003.28(b) (4) (i). . . .

CONTRERAS- RODRIGUEZ, v. U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,, 462 F.3d 1314 (11th Cir. 2006)

. . . . § 1003.28(b) (4) (ii), and that there were due process concerns in his deportation proceeding because . . .

KHAN, v. R. GONZALES,, 187 F. App'x 624 (7th Cir. 2006)

. . . . § 1003.28(b)(3), and that because he was informed of the consequences of failing to appear he was not . . .

PATEL, v. ASHCROFT,, 123 F. App'x 72 (3d Cir. 2005)

. . . . § 1003.28(b)(3) (“Any motion to reopen for the purpose of acting on an application for relief must . . .