Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 1003.29 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 1003.29 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 1003.29

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XLVIII
EARLY LEARNING-20 EDUCATION CODE
Chapter 1003
PUBLIC K-12 EDUCATION
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 1003.29
1003.29 Notice to schools of court action.If a court takes action that directly involves a student’s school, including, but not limited to, an order that a student attend school, attend school with his or her parent, perform at grade level, or perform community service hours at the school, the office of the clerk of the court shall provide notice to the school of the court’s action.
History.s. 124, ch. 2002-387.

F.S. 1003.29 on Google Scholar

F.S. 1003.29 on Casetext

Amendments to 1003.29


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 1003.29
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 1003.29.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

PLEITEZ- LOPEZ, v. P. BARR,, 935 F.3d 716 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . . § 1003.29. We agree and grant the petition. . . . on the lawyer's advice may constitute the requisite "good cause" for a continuance under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.29 . . .

TOURE, v. P. BARR,, 926 F.3d 403 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . . § 1003.29. . . . "The Immigration Judge may grant a motion for continuance for good cause shown." 8 C.F.R. § 1003.29. . . .

C. J. L. G. A v. P. BARR,, 923 F.3d 622 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . bright-line, one-size-fits-all definitions"); see also id . at 413 ("The good-cause standard in section 1003.29 . . .

MENDOZA- GARCIA, v. P. BARR,, 918 F.3d 498 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . . § 1003.29. B. . . .

UNITED STATES v. NIEBLA- AYALA, 342 F. Supp. 3d 733 (W.D. Tex. 2018)

. . . . § 1003.29, the Attorney General recently reiterated the BIA's important power in reviewing the IJ's . . .

MARTINEZ- CEDILLO, v. B. SESSIONS III,, 896 F.3d 979 (9th Cir. 2018)

. . . . § 1003.29. "We review the denial of a continuance for an abuse of discretion." Id. . . .

OSORIO- MARTINEZ D. S. R. O. A. D. M. L. J. E. L. M. V. G. R. A. v. ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 893 F.3d 153 (3rd Cir. 2018)

. . . . § 1003.29 ). . . .

OCHIRBAT, AKA v. B. SESSIONS III,, 714 F. App'x 786 (9th Cir. 2018)

. . . . § 1003.29). . . .

VALLADARES- GOMEZ, v. B. SESSIONS III,, 713 F. App'x 599 (9th Cir. 2018)

. . . . § 1003.29; Padilla-Martinez v. . . .

TORRES- REVILLA, AKA AKA AKA v. B. SESSIONS III,, 713 F. App'x 614 (9th Cir. 2018)

. . . . § 1003.29; Ahmed, 569 F.3d at 1012 (outlining factors for the reviewing court to consider when reviewing . . .

NAZARI- HERNANDEZ, AKA v. B. SESSIONS III,, 712 F. App'x 704 (9th Cir. 2018)

. . . . §§ 1003.29, 1003.31(c); Ahmed, 569 F.3d at 1012 (listing factors to consider); Lata v. . . .

ROJAS- CRUZ, v. B. SESSIONS III,, 712 F. App'x 716 (9th Cir. 2018)

. . . . §§ 1003.29 (an IJ “may grant a motion for continuance for good cause shown”); 1003.31(c) (applications . . .

MARUBE, v. B. SESSIONS III,, 712 F. App'x 246 (4th Cir. 2018)

. . . . § 1003.29 (2017). We review the denial of a motion for a continuance for abuse of discretion. . . .

SIGUA, v. B. SESSIONS III,, 709 F. App'x 472 (9th Cir. 2018)

. . . . § 1003.29; Ahmed, 569 F.3d at 1012 (factors considered in determining whether the denial of a continuance . . .

BARRAZA, v. B. SESSIONS III,, 709 F. App'x 478 (9th Cir. 2018)

. . . . §§ 1003.29, 1003.31(c); Taggar v. . . .

HONGJIANG CHUAI, v. B. SESSIONS III,, 708 F. App'x 447 (9th Cir. 2018)

. . . Consistent with due process and 8 C.F.R, § 1003.29’s “good cause” requirement, the IJ denied Chuai’s . . .

PHICHITH, v. B. SESSIONS III,, 708 F. App'x 357 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.29; Ahmed v. . . .

URCINO, v. B. SESSIONS III,, 707 F. App'x 918 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.29, an IJ “may grant a motion for continuance for good cause shown.” . . .

HERNANDEZ, AKA AKA AKA A. AKA v. B. SESSIONS III,, 706 F. App'x 911 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . See 8 C.F.R § 1003.29 (IJ has authority to grant continuance upon showing of good cause); Salviejo-Fernandez . . .

TASAYCO- JOHNSTON, AKA v. B. SESSIONS III,, 707 F. App'x 878 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.29; Sandoval-Luna, 526 F.3d at 1247 (no abuse of discretion to deny a continuance where relief . . .

RAMOS- MARROQUIN, v. B. SESSIONS III,, 707 F. App'x 900 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.29; Ahmed, 569 F.3d at 1012 (outlining factors for the reviewing court to consider when reviewing . . .

WANNARAT, v. B. SESSIONS III,, 705 F. App'x 180 (4th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.29 (2017). We review the denial of a motion for a continuance for abuse of discretion. . . .

PRADO- ACOSTA, v. B. SESSIONS III,, 703 F. App'x 588 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . . §§ 1003.29, 1003.31(c); Ahmed, 569 F.3d at 1012 (listing factors to consider). . . .

RAMIREZ- JUAREZ, v. B. SESSIONS III,, 702 F. App'x 659 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.29 (an IJ “may grant a motion for continuance for good cause shown”); Sandoval-Luna, 526 F.3d . . .

B. SEKA, a k a v. B. SESSIONS, III,, 714 F. App'x 901 (10th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.29, we possess jurisdiction to consider the denial of a motion for continuance....”). . . . .

GARCIA- MORALES, v. B. SESSIONS III, U. S., 712 F. App'x 559 (6th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.29. A prior continuance may justify a denial, see Al-Najar v. . . .

BALBUENA, v. B. SESSIONS III,, 700 F. App'x 85 (2d Cir. 2017)

. . . An IJ may grant a continuance for “good cause shown," 8 C.F.R, § 1003.29. . . .

RIVAS, v. B. SESSIONS III,, 700 F. App'x 680 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.29; Sandoval-Luna, 526 F.3d at 1247 (finding the agency did not abuse its discretion in denying . . .

KOO SOO KIM, v. B. SESSIONS III,, 698 F. App'x 374 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.29; Ahmed v. . . .

LOZA, v. B. SESSIONS III,, 698 F. App'x 551 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.29. . . .

MIRANDA v. B. SESSIONS III,, 698 F. App'x 491 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . . §§ 1003.29, 1003.31(c); Ahmed, 569 F.3d at 1012 (listing factors to consider). . . .

ROBERTS, v. B. SESSIONS III,, 709 F. App'x 68 (2d Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.29, and only “abuse[s] his discretion in denying a continuance if (1) [his] decision rests on . . .

QUINTANILLA, v. B. SESSIONS III,, 695 F. App'x 296 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . 1247 (no abuse of discretion where no relief was immediately available to the petitioner); 8 C.F.R § 1003.29 . . .

ISLAM, v. B. SESSIONS III,, 695 F. App'x 297 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.29 (an IJ “may grant a motion for continuance for good cause shown”); cf. Garcia v. . . .

MONTERROSO, v. B. SESSIONS III,, 695 F. App'x 226 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.29; Ahmed v. . . .

VALENZUELA- ABRIL, v. B. SESSIONS III,, 694 F. App'x 532 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.29; Ahmed, 569 F.3d at 1012 (listing factors to consider when reviewing the denial of a continuance . . .

NOVIKOV, v. B. SESSIONS III,, 692 F. App'x 913 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.29; Ahmed v. . . .

CRUZ- MONTOYA, v. B. SESSIONS III,, 692 F. App'x 400 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . . §§ 1003.29, 1003.31(c); Ahmed, 569 F.3d at 1012 (factors considered in determining whether the denial . . .

RIOS, v. B. SESSIONS III,, 692 F. App'x 403 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.29 (an IJ may grant a continuance for good cause shown); Sandoval-Luna, 526 F.3d at 1247 (no . . .

RUELAS- RODRIGUEZ, v. B. SESSIONS III,, 692 F. App'x 403 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.29; Singh v. . . .

HERNANDEZ, v. B. SESSIONS III,, 691 F. App'x 888 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.29; Singh, 638 F.3d at 1274 (IJ not required to grant a continuance based on speculation); Garcia . . .

GAMEZ CASTELLANOS, AKA v. B. SESSIONS III,, 691 F. App'x 501 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.29; Ahmed, 569 F.3d at 1012 (factors considered in determining whether the denial of a continuance . . .

RESENDIZ- GARCIA, v. B. SESSIONS III,, 688 F. App'x 447 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.29, an IJ ‘may grant a motion for continuance for good cause shown.’ ”). . . .

ANKOMAH- DAMOAH, v. B. SESSIONS III,, 684 F. App'x 1 (2d Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.29. . . .

GOMEZ- RAMOS, v. B. SESSIONS, III,, 682 F. App'x 68 (2d Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.29, which may be shown by “a diligent good faith effort to be ready to proceed and that any . . .

VENTURA, a k a v. B. SESSIONS, III,, 680 F. App'x 192 (4th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.29 (2016). We review the denial of a motion for a continuance for abuse of discretion. . . .

ARANA- MEJIA, v. SESSIONS,, 680 F. App'x 22 (2d Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.29. . . .

DE LA ROSA LOZANO, AKA De La AKA AKA v. B. SESSIONS,, 677 F. App'x 423 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.29 (an IJ may grant a continuance for good cause shown); Gutierrez v. . . .

MENDOZA DE RAMIREZ, v. B. SESSIONS, III,, 677 F. App'x 446 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.29; Medina-Nunez v. . . .

SALMON, v. SESSIONS,, 677 F. App'x 19 (2d Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.29 (providing that agency “may grant a motion for continuance for good cause shown”). . . .

MARTINEZ- TOVAR, a. k. a. v. U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,, 679 F. App'x 905 (11th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.29; Zafar v. U.S. Att’y Gen., 461 F.3d 1357, 1362 (11th Cir. 2006). . . .

TANG, v. E. LYNCH,, 674 F. App'x 754 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.29 (an IJ may grant a continuance for good cause shown); Sandoval-Luna, 526 F.3d at 1247 (“The . . .

MEZA- RIVAS, AKA AKA AKA F. v. E. LYNCH,, 674 F. App'x 767 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.29 (an IJ may grant a motion for a continuance for good cause); Ahmed v. . . .

RAMOS- GORRIN, v. E. LYNCH,, 675 F. App'x 13 (2d Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.29, The IJ abuses his discretion only if his “decision rests on an error of law (such as application . . .

COJOM, d b a v. E. LYNCH,, 672 F. App'x 310 (4th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.29 (2016). We review the denial of a motion for a continuance for abuse of discretion. . . .

PATEL, v. ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,, 674 F. App'x 158 (3d Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.29) (internal quotation marks omitted). . Ponce-Leiva v. . . .

GUTIERREZ- MEXICANO, AKA v. E. LYNCH,, 673 F. App'x 744 (9th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 1003.29; Ahmed, 569 F.3d at 1012 (listing factors to consider when reviewing the denial of a continuance . . .

GUTIERREZ, AKA v. E. LYNCH,, 671 F. App'x 655 (9th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 1003.29 (an IJ may grant a motion for a continuance for good cause). . . .

NOCELOTL, v. E. LYNCH,, 671 F. App'x 658 (9th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 1003.29; Sandoval-Luna, 526 F.3d at 1247 (no abuse of discretion in denying a motion for a continuance . . .

SEGURA, v. E. LYNCH,, 670 F. App'x 642 (9th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 1003.29 (“The Immigration Judge may grant a motion for continuance for good cause shown.”). . . .

CORREA, v. E. LYNCH,, 670 F. App'x 519 (9th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 1003.29 (an IJ may grant a continuance for good cause shown); Singh v. . . .

ZARCENO, v. E. LYNCH,, 670 F. App'x 475 (9th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 1003.29 (an IJ may grant a continuance for good cause shown); Garcia v. . . .

MD TALUKDER, v. E. LYNCH,, 662 F. App'x 23 (2d Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 1003.29, and “abuse[s] his discretion in denying a continuance if ‘(1) [his] decision rests on an . . .

DY, v. E. LYNCH,, 669 F. App'x 451 (9th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 1003.29; Ahmed, 569 F.3d at 1012 (outlining factors for the reviewing court to consider when reviewing . . .

JIMENEZ- MUNIZ, v. E. LYNCH,, 669 F. App'x 452 (9th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 1003.29; Ahmed, 569 F.3d at 1012 (outlining factors to consider when reviewing the agency’s denial . . .

YU, v. E. LYNCH,, 669 F. App'x 453 (9th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 1003.29; Sandoval-Luna, 526 F.3d at 1247 (no abuse of discretion or denial of due process to deny . . .

MI JA CHO, v. U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,, 661 F. App'x 568 (11th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 1003.29. . . .

CADAVEDO, v. E. LYNCH,, 835 F.3d 779 (7th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 1003.29. . . .

PACHECO- GARCIA, v. E. LYNCH,, 668 F. App'x 707 (9th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 1003.29; Ahmed, 569 F.3d at 1012 (factors considered in determining whether the denial of a continuance . . .

RODRIGUEZ- GARCIA, A. v. E. LYNCH,, 668 F. App'x 305 (9th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 1003.29; Singh v. . . .

RODRIGUEZ, v. E. LYNCH,, 668 F. App'x 317 (9th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 1003.29; Ahmed, 569 F.3d at 1012 (listing factors to consider when reviewing the denial of a continuance . . .

SINGH, v. E. LYNCH,, 657 F. App'x 39 (2d Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 1003.29, and has the authority to set deadlines for the submission of documents, id. § 1003.31(c) . . .

GARCIA- PEREZ, v. E. LYNCH,, 656 F. App'x 347 (9th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 1003.29; Sandoval-Luna v. . . .

ARNOBIT, v. E. LYNCH,, 667 F. App'x 554 (7th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 1003.29; Palma-Martinez, 785 F.3d at 1150-51. . . .

ACUNA- HINOJOSA, v. E. LYNCH,, 653 F. App'x 463 (7th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 1003.29. . . .

MAGANA- CORTEZ, v. E. LYNCH,, 667 F. App'x 194 (9th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 1003.29; Singh v. . . .

MAGANA- VILLALVAZO, v. E. LYNCH,, 654 F. App'x 306 (9th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 1003.29 (an IJ may grant a motion for a continuance for good cause shown); Ahmed, 569 F.3d at 1012 . . .

HERNANDEZ- CHAVEZ, v. E. LYNCH,, 650 F. App'x 532 (9th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 1003.29, and deemed Petitioner’s opportunity to file an application for relief waived in light of . . .

RANGEL, v. E. LYNCH,, 648 F. App'x 686 (9th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 1003.29 (an IJ may grant a motion for a continuance for good cause shown); Sandoval-Luna, 526 F.3d . . .

RAMOS- ALEJO, v. E. LYNCH,, 648 F. App'x 667 (9th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 1003.29 (“The Immigration Judge may grant a motion for continuance for good cause shown,”); Sandoval-Luna . . .

TIJERINO, v. E. LYNCH,, 648 F. App'x 668 (9th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 1003.29; Singh v. . . .

MARTINEZ- NAVARRO, v. E. LYNCH,, 648 F. App'x 690 (9th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 1003.29 (an IJ may grant a motion for a continuance for good cause shown). . . .

MARTINEZ- GARDUNO, v. E. LYNCH,, 638 F. App'x 521 (7th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 1003.29, and the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) affirmed. . . . argue that this situation constituted the required “good cause” for a continuance under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.29 . . .

SINGH, v. E. LYNCH,, 646 F. App'x 528 (9th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 1003.29 (an IJ may grant a continuance for good cause shown). . . .

AVELAR, v. E. LYNCH,, 645 F. App'x 552 (9th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 1003.29; Ahmed, 569 F.3d at 1012 (factors considered in determining whether the denial of a continuance . . .

SERAFIN, v. E. LYNCH,, 643 F. App'x 656 (9th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 1003.29; Singh v. . . .

CARRILLO- PALENCIA, v. E. LYNCH,, 644 F. App'x 9 (2d Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 1003.29, and abuses his or her discretion only if his or her “decision rests on an error of law ( . . .

BANANO, a k a De La v. E. LYNCH,, 641 F. App'x 254 (4th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 1003.29 (2015). We review the denial of a motion for a continuance for abuse of discretion. . . .

RIVAS- CANAS, A. v. E. LYNCH,, 641 F. App'x 769 (9th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 1003.29; Ahmed v. . . .

HUSSAINI v. E. LYNCH, U. S., 644 F. App'x 403 (6th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 1003.29, we have jurisdiction to review an IJ’s denial of such a motion.” Young Hee Kwak v. . . . powerless to objectively and independently evaluate subsequent motions to continue under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.29 . . .

MD TOUKIR, v. ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES, 642 F. App'x 177 (3d Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 1003.29. . . .

SILVA, v. E. LYNCH,, 636 F. App'x 1 (1st Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 1003.29. . . .

GARCIA- DELGADO, v. E. LYNCH,, 633 F. App'x 388 (9th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 1003.29 (an IJ may grant a motion for a continuance for good cause shown); Sandoval-Luna v. . . .

ACEVEDO- ROJAS, v. E. LYNCH,, 632 F. App'x 397 (9th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 1003.29 (an IJ may grant a motion for a continuance for good cause shown). . . .

DAVIS, v. U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,, 638 F. App'x 863 (11th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 1003.29. . . .

JOHNSON, v. E. LYNCH,, 626 F. App'x 18 (2d Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 1003.29, and “abuse[s] his discretion in denying a continuance if (1) his decision rests on an error . . .

GARCIA- VELAZQUEZ, v. E. LYNCH,, 634 F. App'x 813 (2d Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 1003.29. . . .

GALARZA- ARIAS, v. E. LYNCH,, 624 F. App'x 55 (2d Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 1003.29, and “abuse[s] his discretion in denying a continuance if (1) his decision rests on an error . . .

CHIQUETE- VERDUGO, v. E. LYNCH,, 626 F. App'x 201 (9th Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 1003.29; Ahmed v. . . .

DURUJI, v. E. LYNCH, U. S., 630 F. App'x 589 (6th Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 1003.29. . . .