The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . . § 1003.29. We agree and grant the petition. . . . on the lawyer's advice may constitute the requisite "good cause" for a continuance under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.29 . . .
. . . . § 1003.29. . . . "The Immigration Judge may grant a motion for continuance for good cause shown." 8 C.F.R. § 1003.29. . . .
. . . bright-line, one-size-fits-all definitions"); see also id . at 413 ("The good-cause standard in section 1003.29 . . .
. . . . § 1003.29. B. . . .
. . . . § 1003.29, the Attorney General recently reiterated the BIA's important power in reviewing the IJ's . . .
. . . . § 1003.29. "We review the denial of a continuance for an abuse of discretion." Id. . . .
. . . . § 1003.29 ). . . .
. . . . § 1003.29). . . .
. . . . § 1003.29; Padilla-Martinez v. . . .
. . . . § 1003.29; Ahmed, 569 F.3d at 1012 (outlining factors for the reviewing court to consider when reviewing . . .
. . . . §§ 1003.29, 1003.31(c); Ahmed, 569 F.3d at 1012 (listing factors to consider); Lata v. . . .
. . . . §§ 1003.29 (an IJ “may grant a motion for continuance for good cause shown”); 1003.31(c) (applications . . .
. . . . § 1003.29 (2017). We review the denial of a motion for a continuance for abuse of discretion. . . .
. . . . § 1003.29; Ahmed, 569 F.3d at 1012 (factors considered in determining whether the denial of a continuance . . .
. . . . §§ 1003.29, 1003.31(c); Taggar v. . . .
. . . Consistent with due process and 8 C.F.R, § 1003.29’s “good cause” requirement, the IJ denied Chuai’s . . .
. . . . § 1003.29; Ahmed v. . . .
. . . . § 1003.29, an IJ “may grant a motion for continuance for good cause shown.” . . .
. . . See 8 C.F.R § 1003.29 (IJ has authority to grant continuance upon showing of good cause); Salviejo-Fernandez . . .
. . . . § 1003.29; Sandoval-Luna, 526 F.3d at 1247 (no abuse of discretion to deny a continuance where relief . . .
. . . . § 1003.29; Ahmed, 569 F.3d at 1012 (outlining factors for the reviewing court to consider when reviewing . . .
. . . . § 1003.29 (2017). We review the denial of a motion for a continuance for abuse of discretion. . . .
. . . . §§ 1003.29, 1003.31(c); Ahmed, 569 F.3d at 1012 (listing factors to consider). . . .
. . . . § 1003.29 (an IJ “may grant a motion for continuance for good cause shown”); Sandoval-Luna, 526 F.3d . . .
. . . . § 1003.29, we possess jurisdiction to consider the denial of a motion for continuance....”). . . . .
. . . . § 1003.29. A prior continuance may justify a denial, see Al-Najar v. . . .
. . . An IJ may grant a continuance for “good cause shown," 8 C.F.R, § 1003.29. . . .
. . . . § 1003.29; Sandoval-Luna, 526 F.3d at 1247 (finding the agency did not abuse its discretion in denying . . .
. . . . § 1003.29; Ahmed v. . . .
. . . . § 1003.29. . . .
. . . . §§ 1003.29, 1003.31(c); Ahmed, 569 F.3d at 1012 (listing factors to consider). . . .
. . . . § 1003.29, and only “abuse[s] his discretion in denying a continuance if (1) [his] decision rests on . . .
. . . 1247 (no abuse of discretion where no relief was immediately available to the petitioner); 8 C.F.R § 1003.29 . . .
. . . . § 1003.29 (an IJ “may grant a motion for continuance for good cause shown”); cf. Garcia v. . . .
. . . . § 1003.29; Ahmed v. . . .
. . . . § 1003.29; Ahmed, 569 F.3d at 1012 (listing factors to consider when reviewing the denial of a continuance . . .
. . . . § 1003.29; Ahmed v. . . .
. . . . §§ 1003.29, 1003.31(c); Ahmed, 569 F.3d at 1012 (factors considered in determining whether the denial . . .
. . . . § 1003.29 (an IJ may grant a continuance for good cause shown); Sandoval-Luna, 526 F.3d at 1247 (no . . .
. . . . § 1003.29; Singh v. . . .
. . . . § 1003.29; Singh, 638 F.3d at 1274 (IJ not required to grant a continuance based on speculation); Garcia . . .
. . . . § 1003.29; Ahmed, 569 F.3d at 1012 (factors considered in determining whether the denial of a continuance . . .
. . . . § 1003.29, an IJ ‘may grant a motion for continuance for good cause shown.’ ”). . . .
. . . . § 1003.29. . . .
. . . . § 1003.29, which may be shown by “a diligent good faith effort to be ready to proceed and that any . . .
. . . . § 1003.29 (2016). We review the denial of a motion for a continuance for abuse of discretion. . . .
. . . . § 1003.29. . . .
. . . . § 1003.29 (an IJ may grant a continuance for good cause shown); Gutierrez v. . . .
. . . . § 1003.29; Medina-Nunez v. . . .
. . . . § 1003.29 (providing that agency “may grant a motion for continuance for good cause shown”). . . .
. . . . § 1003.29; Zafar v. U.S. Att’y Gen., 461 F.3d 1357, 1362 (11th Cir. 2006). . . .
. . . . § 1003.29 (an IJ may grant a continuance for good cause shown); Sandoval-Luna, 526 F.3d at 1247 (“The . . .
. . . . § 1003.29 (an IJ may grant a motion for a continuance for good cause); Ahmed v. . . .
. . . . § 1003.29, The IJ abuses his discretion only if his “decision rests on an error of law (such as application . . .
. . . . § 1003.29 (2016). We review the denial of a motion for a continuance for abuse of discretion. . . .
. . . . § 1003.29) (internal quotation marks omitted). . Ponce-Leiva v. . . .
. . . . § 1003.29; Ahmed, 569 F.3d at 1012 (listing factors to consider when reviewing the denial of a continuance . . .
. . . . § 1003.29 (an IJ may grant a motion for a continuance for good cause). . . .
. . . . § 1003.29; Sandoval-Luna, 526 F.3d at 1247 (no abuse of discretion in denying a motion for a continuance . . .
. . . . § 1003.29 (“The Immigration Judge may grant a motion for continuance for good cause shown.”). . . .
. . . . § 1003.29 (an IJ may grant a continuance for good cause shown); Singh v. . . .
. . . . § 1003.29 (an IJ may grant a continuance for good cause shown); Garcia v. . . .
. . . . § 1003.29, and “abuse[s] his discretion in denying a continuance if ‘(1) [his] decision rests on an . . .
. . . . § 1003.29; Ahmed, 569 F.3d at 1012 (outlining factors for the reviewing court to consider when reviewing . . .
. . . . § 1003.29; Ahmed, 569 F.3d at 1012 (outlining factors to consider when reviewing the agency’s denial . . .
. . . . § 1003.29; Sandoval-Luna, 526 F.3d at 1247 (no abuse of discretion or denial of due process to deny . . .
. . . . § 1003.29. . . .
. . . . § 1003.29. . . .
. . . . § 1003.29; Ahmed, 569 F.3d at 1012 (factors considered in determining whether the denial of a continuance . . .
. . . . § 1003.29; Singh v. . . .
. . . . § 1003.29; Ahmed, 569 F.3d at 1012 (listing factors to consider when reviewing the denial of a continuance . . .
. . . . § 1003.29, and has the authority to set deadlines for the submission of documents, id. § 1003.31(c) . . .
. . . . § 1003.29; Sandoval-Luna v. . . .
. . . . § 1003.29; Palma-Martinez, 785 F.3d at 1150-51. . . .
. . . . § 1003.29. . . .
. . . . § 1003.29; Singh v. . . .
. . . . § 1003.29 (an IJ may grant a motion for a continuance for good cause shown); Ahmed, 569 F.3d at 1012 . . .
. . . . § 1003.29, and deemed Petitioner’s opportunity to file an application for relief waived in light of . . .
. . . . § 1003.29 (an IJ may grant a motion for a continuance for good cause shown); Sandoval-Luna, 526 F.3d . . .
. . . . § 1003.29 (“The Immigration Judge may grant a motion for continuance for good cause shown,”); Sandoval-Luna . . .
. . . . § 1003.29; Singh v. . . .
. . . . § 1003.29 (an IJ may grant a motion for a continuance for good cause shown). . . .
. . . . § 1003.29, and the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) affirmed. . . . argue that this situation constituted the required “good cause” for a continuance under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.29 . . .
. . . . § 1003.29 (an IJ may grant a continuance for good cause shown). . . .
. . . . § 1003.29; Ahmed, 569 F.3d at 1012 (factors considered in determining whether the denial of a continuance . . .
. . . . § 1003.29; Singh v. . . .
. . . . § 1003.29, and abuses his or her discretion only if his or her “decision rests on an error of law ( . . .
. . . . § 1003.29 (2015). We review the denial of a motion for a continuance for abuse of discretion. . . .
. . . . § 1003.29; Ahmed v. . . .
. . . . § 1003.29, we have jurisdiction to review an IJ’s denial of such a motion.” Young Hee Kwak v. . . . powerless to objectively and independently evaluate subsequent motions to continue under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.29 . . .
. . . . § 1003.29. . . .
. . . . § 1003.29. . . .
. . . . § 1003.29 (an IJ may grant a motion for a continuance for good cause shown); Sandoval-Luna v. . . .
. . . . § 1003.29 (an IJ may grant a motion for a continuance for good cause shown). . . .
. . . . § 1003.29. . . .
. . . . § 1003.29, and “abuse[s] his discretion in denying a continuance if (1) his decision rests on an error . . .
. . . . § 1003.29. . . .
. . . . § 1003.29, and “abuse[s] his discretion in denying a continuance if (1) his decision rests on an error . . .
. . . . § 1003.29; Ahmed v. . . .
. . . . § 1003.29. . . .