The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XLVIII
EARLY LEARNING-20 EDUCATION CODE

Chapter 1003
PUBLIC K-12 EDUCATION

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 1003.31

1003.31 Students subject to control of school.—

(1) Subject to law and rules of the State Board of Education and of the district school board, each student enrolled in a school shall:

(a) During the time she or he is being transported to or from school at public expense;

(b) During the time she or he is attending school;

(c) During the time she or he is on the school premises participating with authorization in a school-sponsored activity; and

(d) During a reasonable time before and after the student is on the premises for attendance at school or for authorized participation in a school-sponsored activity, and only when on the premises,

be under the control and direction of the principal or teacher in charge of the school, and under the immediate control and direction of the teacher or other member of the instructional staff or of the bus driver to whom such responsibility may be assigned by the principal. However, the State Board of Education or the district school board may, by rules, subject each student to the control and direction of the principal or teacher in charge of the school during the time she or he is otherwise en route to or from school or is presumed by law to be attending school. Each district school board, each district school superintendent, and each school principal shall fully support the authority of teachers, according to s. 1003.32, and school bus drivers to remove disobedient, disrespectful, violent, abusive, uncontrollable, or disruptive students from the classroom and the school bus and, when appropriate and available, place such students in an alternative educational setting.

(2) There is a rebuttable presumption that the term “reasonable time” means 30 minutes before or after the activity is scheduled or actually begins or ends, whichever period is longer. A school or district school board may, by policy or other formal action, assume a longer period of supervision. Casual or incidental contact between school district personnel and students on school property shall not result in a legal duty to supervise outside of the reasonable times set forth in this section, provided that parents shall be advised in writing twice per year or by posted signs of the school’s formal supervisory responsibility and that parents should not rely on additional supervision. The duty of supervision shall not extend to anyone other than students attending school and students authorized to participate in school-sponsored activities.

(3) Nothing shall prohibit a district school board from having the right to expel, or to take disciplinary action against, a student who is found to have committed an offense on school property at any time if:

(a) The student is found to have committed a delinquent act which would be a felony if committed by an adult;

(b) The student has had adjudication withheld for a delinquent act which, if committed by an adult, would be a felony; or

However, if the student is a student with a disability, the disciplinary action must comply with the procedures set forth in State Board of Education rule.

(4) Each student enrolled in a school may be required to take the following school child’s daily conduct pledge:

(a) I will be respectful at all times and obedient unless asked to do wrong.

(b) I will not hurt another person with my words or my acts, because it is wrong to hurt others.

(d) I will not steal, because it is wrong to take someone else’s property.

(e) I will respect my body, and not take drugs.

(f) I will show strength and courage, and not do something wrong, just because others are doing it.

(g) I pledge to be nonviolent and to respect my teachers and fellow classmates.

History.—s. 126, ch. 2002-387; s. 35, ch. 2003-391.

F.S. 1003.31 on Google Scholar

F.S. 1003.31 on Casetext

Amendments to 1003.31

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 1003.31

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 1003.31.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

PINEDA, v. G. WHITAKER,, 908 F.3d 836 (1st Cir. 2018)

. . . . § 1003.31(c). . . .

NAZARI- HERNANDEZ, AKA v. B. SESSIONS III,, 712 F. App'x 704 (9th Cir. 2018)

. . . . §§ 1003.29, 1003.31(c); Ahmed, 569 F.3d at 1012 (listing factors to consider); Lata v. . . .

ROJAS- CRUZ, v. B. SESSIONS III,, 712 F. App'x 716 (9th Cir. 2018)

. . . . §§ 1003.29 (an IJ “may grant a motion for continuance for good cause shown”); 1003.31(c) (applications . . .

BARRAZA, v. B. SESSIONS III,, 709 F. App'x 478 (9th Cir. 2018)

. . . . §§ 1003.29, 1003.31(c); Taggar v. . . .

STEVENS, v. U. S. OSUNA,, 877 F.3d 1293 (11th Cir. 2017)

. . . . §§ 1003.31, 1003.34, 1003.35, and are entitled to written notice of the Immigration Judge’s decision . . . information subject to a protective order under § 1003.46, which has been filed under seal pursuant to § 1003.31 . . .

PRADO- ACOSTA, v. B. SESSIONS III,, 703 F. App'x 588 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . . §§ 1003.29, 1003.31(c); Ahmed, 569 F.3d at 1012 (listing factors to consider). . . .

JUAN- OSCORIO, v. B. SESSIONS III,, 698 F. App'x 377 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.31(c) (authorizing IJs to set filing deadlines and stating that an application not filed by . . .

MIRANDA v. B. SESSIONS III,, 698 F. App'x 491 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . . §§ 1003.29, 1003.31(c); Ahmed, 569 F.3d at 1012 (listing factors to consider). . . .

LUNA- CABRIALES, AKA C. v. B. SESSIONS III,, 694 F. App'x 553 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . . §§ 1003.31(c), 1003.32(a). . . .

CHENGMIN YAN, v. B. SESSIONS III,, 693 F. App'x 49 (2d Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.31(c); Dedji v. Mukasey, 525 F.3d 187, 191 (2d Cir. 2008). . . .

CRUZ- MONTOYA, v. B. SESSIONS III,, 692 F. App'x 400 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . . §§ 1003.29, 1003.31(c); Ahmed, 569 F.3d at 1012 (factors considered in determining whether the denial . . .

LOERA, v. B. SESSIONS III,, 691 F. App'x 484 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.31(c). . . .

SILAIS, v. B. SESSIONS III,, 855 F.3d 736 (7th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.31(c) (“If an application or document is not filed within the time set by the Immigration Judge . . .

BONILLA, v. B. SESSIONS III,, 687 F. App'x 611 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.31(c); Sandoval-Luna, 526 F.3d at 1247; Lata v. . . .

MARTINEZ- HERRERA, AKA v. B. SESSIONS III,, 687 F. App'x 631 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.31(c) (if an application “is not filed within the time set by the [IJ], the opportunity to file . . .

GHAZARIAN, v. B. SESSIONS, III,, 683 F. App'x 6 (1st Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.31(c) to deem a late application waived. . . .

SINGH, v. B. SESSIONS III,, 686 F. App'x 28 (2d Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.31(c). . . .

PATEL, v. ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,, 674 F. App'x 158 (3d Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 1003.31(c) for abuse of discretion). . Contreras v. Atty. . . . Khan, 448 F.3d at 235. . 8 C.F.R. § 1003.31(c). . Id. . . . .

NOCELOTL, v. E. LYNCH,, 671 F. App'x 658 (9th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 1003.31 (applications in removal proceedings must be filed with the immigration court, and if an . . .

SEGURA, v. E. LYNCH,, 670 F. App'x 642 (9th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 1003.31(c), an IJ may set a filing deadline and deem waived any application not filed before that . . .

GUTIERREZ- BARRAGAN, v. E. LYNCH,, 658 F. App'x 341 (9th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 1003.31 (applications in removal proceedings must be filed with the immigration court, and if an . . . error and prejudice to prevail on due process challenge), Gutierrez-Barragan contends that 8 C.F.R. §§ 1003.31 . . .

ESTRADA- ROSALES, v. E. LYNCH,, 660 F. App'x 492 (9th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 1003.31(c))). . . .

SINGH, v. E. LYNCH,, 657 F. App'x 39 (2d Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 1003.31(c). . . .

SINGH, v. E. LYNCH, U. S., 655 F. App'x 464 (6th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 1003.31(c)). . . .

BUGAJSKA, AKA AKA AKA v. E. LYNCH,, 652 F. App'x 568 (9th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 1003.31(c). Therefore, the IJ did not err in allowing the government’s late-filed evidence. . . .

HERNANDEZ- CHAVEZ, v. E. LYNCH,, 650 F. App'x 532 (9th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 1003.31. The IJ had previously granted several continuances. . . . within his discretion in deeming Petitioner’s opportunity to apply for relief waived under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.31 . . . cannot use a motion to reopen or remand to submit an application that was deemed waived under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.31 . . .

JIE ZHU, v. U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,, 648 F. App'x 957 (11th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 1003.31(c). See Tang v. U.S. . . . did not abuse its discretion in refusing to admit evidence after a deadline imposed under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.31 . . . Tang, 578 F.3d at 1276 (citing 8 C.F.R. § 1003.31(c)); see Moreta, 723 F.3d at 34 (“The regulations governing . . . limits for the filing of applications and related documents and responses thereto, if any.” 8 C.F.R. § 1003.31 . . . Att’y Gen., 681 F.3d 1227, 1235 (11th Cir.2012); 8 C.F.R. § 1003.31(c). . . .

CARRILLO- PALENCIA, v. E. LYNCH,, 644 F. App'x 9 (2d Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 1003.31(c). . . .

TOBIAS, v. E. LYNCH,, 637 F. App'x 453 (9th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 1003.31(c))); Lata v. . . .

CHEN CHONG, v. E. LYNCH,, 640 F. App'x 62 (2d Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 1003.31(c), the IJ may set a deadline for the submission of documents and after the deadline may . . .

MATHITA, v. LYNCH, U. S., 631 F. App'x 251 (5th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 1003.31(c). . . .

HANARASINGHA, v. E. LYNCH,, 638 F. App'x 77 (2d Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 1003.31(c). . . .

El SALEH, v. E. LYNCH,, 636 F. App'x 812 (2d Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 1003.31(c). . . .

CHOGE, v. E. LYNCH,, 806 F.3d 438 (8th Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 1003.31(c) “clearly states the IJ has the authority to deem applications waived when submitted after . . .

A. VILLATORO- ALVAREZ, v. E. LYNCH,, 618 F. App'x 329 (9th Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 1003.31(c))). . . .

ROMERO, v. E. LYNCH,, 610 F. App'x 683 (9th Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 1003.31(c) (an IJ “may set and extend time limits for the filing of applications” and if an application . . .

EL- ABAIDY, v. U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,, 622 F. App'x 816 (11th Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 1003.31(c). . . .

GIRI, v. E. LYNCH,, 793 F.3d 797 (7th Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 1003.31(c). . . . See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.31(c). Therefore, the IJ’s decision was not an abuse of discretion. . . .

CHANGJIAN CHEN, v. E. LYNCH,, 618 F. App'x 708 (2d Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 1003.31(c), an IJ may set a deadline for the submission of documents, and after the deadline, may . . .

CORNELIO- CASTRO, v. E. LYNCH,, 608 F. App'x 421 (7th Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 1003.31(c) (“If an application or document is not filed within the time set by the Immigration Judge . . .

VENTURA- REYES, v. E. LYNCH,, 797 F.3d 348 (6th Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 1003.31(c). . . . Pet’r’s Br. at 33 (citing 8 C.F.R. § 1003.31(c)) (emphasis added). . . .

XIAOLONG CHEN, v. H. HOLDER, Jr., 585 F. App'x 653 (9th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 1003.31(c); Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir.2000). . . .

CHHYUMI GURUNG, v. ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES, 593 F. App'x 99 (3d Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 1003.31(c) (emphasis added). . . .

OWINO, v. H. HOLDER, Jr., 771 F.3d 527 (9th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 1003.31(c). . . . If evidence in support of a CAT claim is proffered beyond deadlines prescribed pursuant to section 1003.31 . . .

ULESCENCO, a. k. a. v. H. HOLDER, Jr., 584 F. App'x 555 (9th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 1003.31(c))). . . .

ANTUNEZ, v. H. HOLDER, Jr., 582 F. App'x 762 (9th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 1003.31(c), and Chamu did not keep the court apprised of his medical condition or request more time . . .

SEA, v. H. HOLDER, Jr., 567 F. App'x 551 (9th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 1003.31(c) (“The Immigration Judge may set ... time limits for the filing of applications and related . . .

GARCIA- JUAREZ, v. H. HOLDER, Jr., 566 F. App'x 601 (9th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 1003.31(c) (authorizing the IJ to set filing deadlines and to deem abandoned any application not . . .

POKU, v. H. HOLDER, Jr., 559 F. App'x 91 (2d Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 1003.31(a) (“All documents and applications that are to be considered in a proceeding before an Immigration . . . with the Immigration Court having administrative control over the Record of Proceedings.”); 8 C.F.R. § 1003.31 . . . See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.31(c). . . .

MANSI, v. H. HOLDER, Jr. U. S., 553 F. App'x 450 (5th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 1003.31(c), which provides that the IJ “may set and extend time limits for the filing of applications . . .

DUBE, v. H. HOLDER, Jr. U. S., 553 F. App'x 420 (5th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 1003.31(c). . . .

QING ZHENG, v. H. HOLDER, Jr., 550 F. App'x 33 (2d Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 1003.31(c) (IJ’s are allowed to set filing deadlines and are permitted to reject late filings); Morgan . . .

MARTINEZ, v. U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,, 550 F. App'x 857 (11th Cir. 2013)

. . . . § 1003.31(c). . . . Tang, 578 F.3d at 1276; 8 C.F.R. § 1003.31(c). . . .

TAGGAR, v. H. HOLDER, Jr., 736 F.3d 886 (9th Cir. 2013)

. . . . § 1003.31, which allows the IJ to “set and extend time limits for the filing of applications and related . . . See 8 C.F.R. § 1208.16 (an alien must file an “application” under the Convention); 8 C.F.R. § 1003.31 . . .

SATKUNANATHAN, v. US ATTORNEY GENERAL,, 535 F. App'x 881 (11th Cir. 2013)

. . . . § 1003.31(c). . Where the BIA issues its own opinion, we review only the BIA's decision. . . .

MORETA, v. H. HOLDER, Jr., 723 F.3d 31 (1st Cir. 2013)

. . . . § 1003.31(a). . . . Id. § 1003.31(c) (emphasis added). . . . which involved a Due Process Clause challenge, the Sixth Circuit first noted that under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.31 . . . The Sixth Circuit went on to reject the noncitizen’s argument that 8 C.F.R. § 1003.31(c) violated his . . . Moreta has not styled her notice argument as a due process challenge to 8 C.F.R. § 1003.31(c), and, even . . .

HASSAN, v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,, 511 F. App'x 197 (3d Cir. 2013)

. . . . § 1003.31(c); see also Dedji v. . . . . § 1003.31(c) for abuse of discretion). . . .

CAMARA v. H. HOLDER, Jr., 705 F.3d 219 (6th Cir. 2013)

. . . . § 1003.31(c), an IJ has the discretion to set deadlines for submitting relevant documents. . . .

BEAD, v. H. HOLDER, Jr., 703 F.3d 591 (1st Cir. 2013)

. . . . §§ 1003.31, 1003.47. . . .

GARCIA, v. H. HOLDER, Jr., 487 F. App'x 420 (9th Cir. 2012)

. . . . § 1003.31(c) (empowering the IJ with authority to set and extend time limits for the filing of documents . . .

ARELLANO, v. H. HOLDER, Jr., 492 F. App'x 818 (9th Cir. 2012)

. . . . §§ 1003.31(c) and/or 1208.8(a), rather than grant Arella-no’s petition. . . .

JAMES, v. H. HOLDER, Jr., 698 F.3d 24 (1st Cir. 2012)

. . . . § 1003.31(c). . . .

d EL- GAZAWY, v. H. HOLDER, Jr., 690 F.3d 852 (7th Cir. 2012)

. . . . § 1003.31(c). . . .

GOMEZ- MEDINA, v. H. HOLDER, Jr., 687 F.3d 33 (1st Cir. 2012)

. . . . §§ 1003.31(c), 1240.1(c). . . . Mukasey, 269 Fed.Appx. 5, 7 (1st Cir.2008) (per curiam); Alsamhouri 484 F.3d at 123; see also 8 C.F.R. § 1003.31 . . .

KAITOV, v. H. HOLDER, Jr., 483 F. App'x 476 (10th Cir. 2012)

. . . . § 1003.31(c) (“If an application or document is not filed within the time set by the Immigration Judge . . .

PAWLOWSKI, v. H. HOLDER, Jr., 482 F. App'x 162 (7th Cir. 2012)

. . . . § 1003.31(c), and impose reasonable deadlines. Umezurike v. . . .

MAKIR- MARWIL, v. U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,, 681 F.3d 1227 (11th Cir. 2012)

. . . . § 1003.31(a) & (c). . . .

QUINTANAR- OLIVERA, v. H. HOLDER, Jr., 472 F. App'x 701 (9th Cir. 2012)

. . . . § 1003.31(c) (authorizing IJ to set filing deadlines and deem waived any application not filed by the . . .

MOORE, v. H. HOLDER, Jr., 463 F. App'x 37 (2d Cir. 2012)

. . . . § 1003.31.” Dedji v. Mukasey, 525 F.3d 187, 191 (2d Cir.2008). . . .

A. MOODIE, v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF UNITED STATES,, 448 F. App'x 280 (3d Cir. 2011)

. . . . §§ 1003.35 & 1003.31(c). . . . .

CATY, v. U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,, 442 F. App'x 475 (11th Cir. 2011)

. . . . § 1003.31(c)) (holding that an alien “does not have a constitutionally protected liberty interest in . . .

SHEWCHUN, v. H. HOLDER, Jr., 658 F.3d 557 (6th Cir. 2011)

. . . See 8 CFR § 1003.31(c) (“If an application or document is not filed within the time set by the Immigration . . .

MELGAR, v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF UNITED STATES,, 442 F. App'x 695 (3d Cir. 2011)

. . . . § 1003.31(b); Umezurike v. Holder, 610 F.3d 997, 1004 (7th Cir.2010). . . .

CERDA- BECERRA, v. H. HOLDER, Jr., 444 F. App'x 992 (9th Cir. 2011)

. . . . § 1003.31(c) (IJ may set filing deadlines and deem waived an application not filed by the deadline) . . .

LOJA, v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF UNITED STATES,, 398 F. App'x 822 (3d Cir. 2010)

. . . . § 1003.31(c) (“The Immigration Judge may set and extend time limits for the filing of applications . . .

FEN DI CHEN, v. H. HOLDER, Jr., 399 F. App'x 609 (2d Cir. 2010)

. . . . § 1003.31(c) ("If an application or document is not filed within the time set by the [IJ], the opportunity . . . Holder, 603 F.3d 1111, 1113 (9th Cir.2010) (concluding that plain language of 8 C.F.R. § 1003.31(c) only . . .

DELEON- GRAMAJO, v. H. HOLDER, Jr., 397 F. App'x 422 (9th Cir. 2010)

. . . . § 1003.31(c) (IJ may set filing deadlines and deem waived an application not filed by the deadline) . . .

UMEZURIKE, v. H. HOLDER, Jr., 610 F.3d 997 (7th Cir. 2010)

. . . . § 1003.31 (“The Immigration judge may set and extend time limits for the filing of applications and . . . An immigration judge may set time limits for the filing of documents and evidence. 8 C.F.R. § 1003.31 . . .

LIU, v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF UNITED STATES,, 384 F. App'x 179 (3d Cir. 2010)

. . . . § 1003.31(c). . . .

PECI, v. H. HOLDER, Jr., 379 F. App'x 499 (6th Cir. 2010)

. . . . § 1003.31(c)). Peci relies heavily on Georgis v. . . . 233 Fed.Appx. 449, 453 (6th Cir.2007) (IJs can set and enforce their own deadlines (citing 8 C.F.R. § 1003.31 . . .

TURCIOS- OCAMPO, v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF UNITED STATES,, 382 F. App'x 154 (3d Cir. 2010)

. . . . § 1003.31(c) (authorizing the Immigration Judge to set time limits for the filing of applications and . . . Mukasey, 525 F.3d 187, 191 (2d Cir.2008) (reviewing application of 8 C.F.R. § 1003.31(c) for abuse of . . . Under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.31(b), an application requiring the payment of a fee must be accompanied by a fee . . .

PRECAJ, v. H. HOLDER, Jr., 376 F. App'x 553 (6th Cir. 2010)

. . . . § 1003.31(c) (“If an application or document is not filed within the time set by the Immigration Judge . . . waive CAT or asylum claims by failing to raise them at the time designated by the IJ under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.31 . . .

CASARES- CASTELLON, a. k. a. v. H. HOLDER Jr., 603 F.3d 1111 (9th Cir. 2010)

. . . . § 1003.31(c) in its nonprecedential decision affirming the IJ’s decision to deem his application for . . . U.S. 452, 461, 117 S.Ct. 905, 137 L.Ed.2d 79 (1997); see also Bassiri, 463 F.3d at 931. 8 C.F.R. § 1003.31 . . . We need not decide whether the BIA’s interpretation of 8 C.F.R. § 1003.31(c) is “plainly erroneous,” . . .

VELIZ, v. H. HOLDER, Jr., 375 F. App'x 148 (2d Cir. 2010)

. . . . § 1003.31(c). Thus, the IJ did not err in declining to admit Carrera Veliz’s untimely evidence. . . .

GOMEZ, v. H. HOLDER Jr., 375 F. App'x 769 (9th Cir. 2010)

. . . . § 1003.31(c). . . .

HERNANDEZ- GONZALEZ, v. H. HOLDER Jr., 371 F. App'x 841 (9th Cir. 2010)

. . . . § 1003.31(c)(authorizing the IJ to set filing deadlines and to deem waived any application not filed . . .

JUAREZ v. H. HOLDER, Jr., 599 F.3d 560 (7th Cir. 2010)

. . . . § 1003.31(c) (application deemed waived if not timely filed). . . . In Juarez’s case the BIA explained that under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.31(c), a failure to comply with the deadline . . . judges to “set and extend time limits for the filing of applications and related documents.” 8 C.F.R. § 1003.31 . . .

FRANCIS, v. SCHOOL BOARD OF PALM BEACH COUNTY,, 29 So. 3d 441 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . . § 1003.31(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (2008). . . .

RIAZ, v. H. HOLDER, Jr. U. S., 367 F. App'x 281 (2d Cir. 2010)

. . . . § 1003.31(c), an “Immigration Judge may set and extend time limits for the filing of applications and . . .

SAMANO REYES v. H. HOLDER, Jr., 368 F. App'x 737 (9th Cir. 2010)

. . . . § 1003.31(c) (authorizing IJs to set filing deadlines and stating that an application not filed by . . .

DILAG, v. H. HOLDER Jr., 367 F. App'x 782 (9th Cir. 2010)

. . . . § 1003.31(c) (authorizing the IJ to set filing deadlines and to deem waived any application not filed . . .

BELLOT- PAUL, v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF UNITED STATES,, 363 F. App'x 940 (3d Cir. 2010)

. . . . § 1003.31(c), “[t]he Immigration Judge may set and extend time limits for the filing of applications . . . See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.31(c); Arellano-Hernandez, 564 F.3d at 911. . . .

EL MOSTAKIM, v. U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,, 364 F. App'x 542 (11th Cir. 2010)

. . . . § 1003.31(c)). . . . (citing § 1003.31(c)). . . .

MACIAS- BRITO, v. H. HOLDER, Jr., 363 F. App'x 773 (2d Cir. 2010)

. . . . § 1003.31(c). . . .

TINIZARAY- NARVAEZ, v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF UNITED STATES, 353 F. App'x 758 (3d Cir. 2009)

. . . . § 1003.31(c), but an IJ may “grant a motion for continuance for good cause shown,” 8 C.F.R. § 1003.29 . . . An IJ may set time limits for the filing of documents. 8 C.F.R. § 1003.31(c). . . .

STEINBERGA, v. H. HOLDER, Jr., 351 F. App'x 31 (6th Cir. 2009)

. . . . § 1003.31(a) and (c). . . .

SANTOS- MARTINEZ, v. H. HOLDER Jr., 333 F. App'x 290 (9th Cir. 2009)

. . . . § 1003.31(c). . . .

BERNACKI, v. H. HOLDER, Jr., 343 F. App'x 183 (9th Cir. 2009)

. . . . § 1003.31(c). PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. . . .

LOPEZ CHAVEZ, v. H. HOLDER, Jr., 342 F. App'x 328 (9th Cir. 2009)

. . . . § 1003.31(c) (permitting IJ to set filing deadlines and to deem applications abandoned when deadlines . . .

TANG, v. U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,, 578 F.3d 1270 (11th Cir. 2009)

. . . . § 1003.31(c). . . .