The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . . § 1003.33, Consequently, Chuai has not shown an abuse of discretion in the denial of his request for . . .
. . . . § 1003.33's requirement that translated documents be accompanied by a translator's certification, respondent . . . emails, however, petitioner has not included a translator's certification as required by 8 C.F.R. § 1003.33 . . .
. . . . § 1003.33; and the record does not compel the conclusion that his wife’s wording was the result of . . .
. . . . § 1003.33. During removal proceedings, the Immigration Judge (IJ) questioned Chhetri. . . . the documentary evidence originally written in Nepali was not properly translated under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.33 . . .
. . . . § 1003.33. Xie’s translation certificate complied with these requirements. . . .
. . . . § 1003.33. . . . .
. . . . § 1003.33 (describing requirements for translation of documents). . . .
. . . . § 1003.33. J.A. 143. . . .
. . . . § 1003.33 (describing requirements for translation of documents). . . .
. . . . § 1003.33 (foreign language documents must be translated into English and must be accompanied by translator's . . .
. . . . § 1003.33. . . .
. . . reacted.’ ” To the extent that Li challenges the IJ’s exclusion of documentary evidence pursuant to § 1003.33 . . . exclusion of the documentary evidence in question did not in any way violate Li’s due process rights. § 1003.33 . . . Li did not provide translations for her Chinese-language documents, in violation of § 1003.33. . . . Ashcroft, 260 F.3d 448, 452-53 (5th Cir.2001). . 8 C.F.R. § 1003.33 . See id.; Lin v. . . .
. . . . § 1003.33, and that illegible documents are often useless. . . .
. . . . § 1003.33 (“Any foreign language document offered by a party in a proceeding shall be accompanied by . . .
. . . . § 1003.33. Because of these deficiencies, the IJ would not admit the card into the record. . . .
. . . . § 1003.33; Zhen Nan Lin v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice, 459 F.3d 255, 268 (2d Cir.2006). . . .
. . . . § 1003.33 because they were not accompanied by a certification of translation. . . .
. . . . § 1003.33, and the notification of divorce referenced in the document was not submitted to the court . . . absence of evidence — the absence of an adequately-translated Jordanian divorce document, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.33 . . .
. . . . § 1003.33. . . . documents where “the English translations did not contain the certification required by 8 C.F.R. § 1003.33 . . .
. . . . § 1003.33 (2005). The Board upheld this ruling and we find no error. . . . and practice of accepting documents at an immigration hearing that were not translated pursuant to § 1003.33 . . .
. . . . § 1003.33. . . . and with one exception, were not accompanied by the Chinese originals as required under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.33 . . . Further, the English translations did not contain the certification required by 8 C.F.R. § 1003.33; thus . . . document submission had passed, 8 C.F.R. § 1003.31(c), and the translations were not certified, 8 C.F.R. § 1003.33 . . .
. . . . § 1003.33, any foreign language document offered at an immigration hearing “shall be accompanied by . . .
. . . . § 1003.33), which required the attachment of an English translation and certification by the translator . . .
. . . . § 1003.33. . . . See 8 C.F.R. §§ 1003.19, 1003.33. . . .
. . . . § 1003.33 Because the record demonstrates that petitioners never moved the IJ for a continuance in . . .
. . . . § 1003.33. . . .
. . . . § 1003.33 (requiring a foreign language document to be accompanied by an English language translation . . .
. . . . § 1003.33) states: Any foreign language document , offered by a party in a proceeding shall be accompanied . . .
. . . that even if discharge into the environment had the same meaning in this case as it does under Section 1003.33 . . . of the IEPA, this .would not help the defendants because 1003.33 only excludes workplace discharges . . .
