The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . Schaffer , 429 U.S. 1325, 1330, 97 S.Ct. 14, 50 L.Ed.2d 56 (1976) (Marshall, J., in chambers); see also . . . Schaffer , 429 U.S. 1325, 1330, 97 S.Ct. 14, 50 L.Ed.2d 56 (1976) (Marshall, J., in chambers) (concluding . . .
. . . respondents could not identify the first such legislative subpoena at oral argument, Tr. of Oral Arg. 56 . . .
. . . Muller , 296 U.S. 207, 210, 56 S.Ct. 183, 80 L.Ed. 158 (1935) ). . . . Trapp , 224 U.S. 665, 667, 32 S.Ct. 565, 56 L.Ed. 941 (1912). . . .
. . . Id ., at 55-56. . . .
. . . Americans with employer-sponsored health insurance are enrolled in a grandfathered plan, while only 56% . . .
. . . Rev. 56 (2014) ; see also Movsesian, Severability in Statutes and Contracts, 30 Ga. L. . . .
. . . TVA , 297 U.S. 288, 347, 56 S.Ct. 466, 80 L.Ed. 688 (1936) (Brandeis, J., concurring)). . . .
. . . See Tr. of Oral Arg. 55-56. But other firms may prove less restrained. . . .
. . . TVA , 297 U.S. 288, 346-348, 56 S.Ct. 466, 80 L.Ed. 688 (1936) (opinion of Brandeis, J.). . . . Id. , at 347, 56 S.Ct. 466. . . . Id. , at 346, 56 S.Ct. 466. . . . Scalia, The Rule of Law as a Law of Rules, 56 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1175, 1182 (1989). . . .
. . . Tr. of Oral Arg. 55-56. We decline to embrace such an uncertain and elastic approach to the text. . . . Rev. 56, 85 (2014) ). . . .
. . . Charlestone Stone Products Co. , 436 U.S. 604, 610, 616, 98 S.Ct. 2002, 56 L.Ed.2d 570 (1978). . . . to increase the sexual appeal or attraction of-usu. used with up < titles must be ~ed up to attract 56 . . . Dead, Friendship Wks. 1711 IV. 56 We have had enough of these Christians, and sure there can be no worse . . . to increase the sexual appeal or attraction of-usu. used with up < titles must be ~ed up to attract 56 . . .
. . . Rev. 1, 56-60. . . .
. . . Id. , at 56-57. . . .
. . . See Leibowitz, The Applicability of Federal Law to the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, 56 Geo. . . . Oregon , 223 U.S. 118, 149, 32 S.Ct. 224, 56 L.Ed. 377 (1912) (same). . . . Stat. 210-211 (Nevada); Act of Mar. 2, 1861, § 4, 12 Stat. 240 (Dakota); Act of Feb. 24, 1863, ch. 56 . . .
. . . United States , 298 U.S. 167, 169-170, 56 S.Ct. 706, 80 L.Ed. 1118 (1936) ("The judge had plenary power . . .
. . . Morales , 527 U.S. 41, 56, 119 S.Ct. 1849, 144 L.Ed.2d 67 (1999) (opinion of Stevens, J.). . . .
. . . See id ., at 2-56; see also Op. Comp. Gen., B-193573 (Dec. 19, 1979). . . .
. . . New York City Dept. of Social Servs. , 436 U.S. 658, 695-701, 98 S.Ct. 2018, 56 L.Ed.2d 611 (1978). . . . See Brief for Professors of Second Amendment Law et al. as Amici Curiae 10-12; see also App. 51, 56, . . .
. . . 195 L.Ed.2d 161 (2016) (THOMAS, J., dissenting); see also Scalia, The Rule of Law as a Law of Rules, 56 . . .
. . . Triplex Safety Glass Co. , 298 U.S. 448, 456-457, 56 S.Ct. 792, 80 L.Ed. 1274 (1936). . . .
. . . Dist., Oct. 11, 2018), App. 56-57; see also Frampton, The Jim Crow Jury, 71 Vand. L. . . . Roberts , 448 U.S. 56, 100 S.Ct. 2531, 65 L.Ed.2d 597 (1980), abrogated by Crawford v. . . . See ante , at 1404 - 1405, n. 56. . . .
. . . White , 56 N. . . .
. . . Seminole Tribe , 517 U.S. at 56, 116 S.Ct. 1114 (internal quotation marks omitted); see Dellmuth v. . . .
. . . Gall , 552 U.S. at 56, 128 S.Ct. 586 ; see United States v. . . . Gall , 552 U.S. at 56, 128 S.Ct. 586. But that fact is not relevant to the issue here. . . .
. . . Proc. 56(c) ). . . .
. . . represents that custody of A.M.T. has so far been resolved only "on an interim basis," Brief for Respondent 56 . . . Brief for Respondent 56, n. 13. . . . Id. , ¶56 (emphasis added) (also considering, among other factors, the infant's physical presence and . . .
. . . See also Brown, Fact and Law in Judicial Review, 56 Harv. L. Rev. 899, 901 (1943) ; J. . . .
. . . Cuebas y Arredondo , 223 U.S. 376, 390, 32 S.Ct. 277, 56 L.Ed. 476 (1912). . . .
. . . No. 19-56 Supreme Court of the United States. . . .
. . . P. 56(c) ; see also Anderson v. . . . before a court, the court examines each motion separately, employing the familiar standard under Rule 56 . . .
. . . Michigan , 547 U.S. 586, 593, 126 S.Ct. 2159, 165 L.Ed.2d 56 (2006) ). . . .
. . . LEGAL STANDARD Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, a court must grant summary judgment "if the . . . No. 1] ¶¶ 55-56. The claims are similar but have some differences. . . .
. . . ."); Appellee's Br. 56-57; Appellant's Reply Br. 35-36 ("Both the public interest and the balance of . . .
. . . FDIC , 56 F.3d 1394, 1401 (D.C. Cir.1995). . . . Id . at 1155-56. Parker 's emphasis on bankruptcy court expertise has little salience here. . . . See Parker , 24 F.3d at 1155-56. . . .
. . . P. 56(a). We must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party. . . .
. . . I at 155-56. . . . P. 56(a). . . . P. 56(c)(1) (party disputing a fact must provide support for that assertion in the record); Fed. R. . . . P. 56(e) ("If a party ... fails to properly address another party's assertion of fact as required by . . . Rule 56(c), the court may ... consider the fact undisputed for purposes of the motion."). . . .
. . . Supp. 3d 848, 854-56, 856 n.4 (W.D. . . .
. . . Department of Social Services , 436 U.S. 658, 98 S.Ct. 2018, 56 L.Ed.2d 611 (1978) ] for municipal liability . . .
. . . P. 56(a). . . .
. . . Harris , 370 F.3d 945, 955-56 (9th Cir. 2004) ("[W]hether a statute of limitations for § 1983 actions . . .
. . . Department of Social Services , 436 U.S. 658, 98 S.Ct. 2018, 56 L.Ed.2d 611 (1978). . . .
. . . . # 56.) . . .
. . . P. 56(a). . . .
. . . Superior Court , 436 U.S. 84, 92, 98 S.Ct. 1690, 56 L.Ed.2d 132 (1978) (quoting Int'l Shoe Co. v. . . .
. . . S1-AR at 56 (2010 PRRB Decision at 10). . . . H-AR at 56-67 (Hillcrest Specialty Hosp. v. Novitas Solutions, Inc. , PRRB 2018-D3 (Nov. 6, 2017)). . . . See S2-Compl. at 56. . . . P. 56(a), (c) ; see Tolan v. . . . Id. at 355-56. . . .
. . . P. 56(a). . . . To state what should be obvious: An inmate is entitled to the safeguards of Rule 56 just like any other . . .
. . . Id. at col. 5 ll. 52-56. . . .
. . . (quoting Rule of the Court of Federal Claims 56(a) ). . . .
. . . (D.I. 253-56). By trial the parties had narrowed the case to three patents- U.S. . . .
. . . See Notices of Consent to Join (ECF Nos. 39, 44, 54, 56). . . .
. . . the Motion for Reconsideration, Debtor filed her Supplement to Motion for Reconsideration (ECF No. 56 . . .
. . . III at 155-56. . . .
. . . Dissenting Op. at 1155-56. . . .
. . . P. 56(a). . . .
. . . App'x 744, 752 (11th Cir. 2015) (quoting Dukagjini , 326 F.3d at 56 ). . . .
. . . Pereira , 783 F.3d 700, 704 (7th Cir. 2015) (quoting Johnson , 592 F.3d at 755-56 ). . . .
. . . Schriver, 255 F.3d at 56. . . . Arkansas, 483 U.S. 44, 56, 107 S.Ct. 2704, 97 L.Ed.2d 37 (1987). . . .
. . . Thus, even factoring in overtime, the per diems accounted for around 40-56% of Stone's total weekly income . . . P. 56(a). . . .
. . . for Rule 12(c) and provided no substantive analysis of the standard for summary judgment under Rule 56 . . . explicitly relied upon in the complaint," the "motion must be treated as one for summary judgment under Rule 56 . . . Conversion of a motion under Rule 12 to one for summary judgment requires that "the procedures of Rule 56 . . . the Pleadings both as "pursuant to Rule 12(c) because it attached factual materials" and "as a Rule 56 . . .
. . . Carson, 802 F.3d 752, 755-56, 758 (5th Cir. 2015), vacated sub nom. Hunter v. . . . Cotton , 572 U.S. 650, 655-56, 134 S.Ct. 1861, 188 L.Ed.2d 895 (2014) (per curiam). Id. Lytle v. . . .
. . . Craft , 436 U.S. 1, 8-9, 98 S.Ct. 1554, 56 L.Ed.2d 30 (1978) (implying that a "claim for damages [that . . . Valley Auth. , 297 U.S. 288, 348, 56 S.Ct. 466, 80 L.Ed. 688 (1936) (Brandeis, J., concurring) ("[T]he . . . Dep't's Br. at 56. . . . Dep't's Br. at 55-56. Federalist 68 cannot be read fairly to support this interpretation. . . .
. . . Id. at 555-56, 127 S.Ct. 1955. . . .
. . . Atkins , 487 U.S. 42, 56, 108 S.Ct. 2250, 101 L.Ed.2d 40 (1988) ; see also Carswell v. . . . Servs. , 436 U.S. 658, 691, 98 S.Ct. 2018, 56 L.Ed.2d 611 (1978). . . . Br. at 56. i. . . . K Mart Corp. , 894 F.2d 1150, 1155-56 (10th Cir. 1990) ; see also Settlegoode v. Portland Pub. . . . Wade , 461 U.S. 30, 56, 103 S.Ct. 1625, 75 L.Ed.2d 632 (1983) ; Hardeman v. . . .
. . . Hill , 890 F.3d 51, 56 (2d Cir. 2018), cert. denied , --- U.S. ----, 139 S. Ct. 844, 202 L. . . .
. . . determines a defendant's criminal history score based on his or her prior convictions," id. at 155-56 . . . Amendment 802 at 155-56. . . .
. . . Servs., 436 U.S. 658, 691, 98 S.Ct. 2018, 56 L.Ed.2d 611 (1978) ). . . .
. . . P. 56(a) ). . . .
. . . P. 56(a). . . . P. 56(a) ; see Nick's Garage, 875 F.3d at 113-114. . . .
. . . P. 56(a). . . .
. . . P. 56(a) ). Hays v. HCA Holdings, Inc. , 838 F.3d 605, 611 (5th Cir. 2016) (quoting Harris Cty. v. . . .
. . . P. 56(a). Thomas v. Tregre , 913 F.3d 458, 462 (5th Cir. 2019) (citing Anderson v. . . .
. . . Ekhator , 17 F.3d 53, 55-56 (2d Cir. 1994) (uncertainty whether sentencing judge "was aware" of authority . . .
. . . Dupont , 565 F.3d 56, 64-66 (2d Cir. 2009) (remanding so that the district court could resolve factual . . .
. . . P. 56(a) ; Strickland , 692 F.3d at 1154. . . . Clairson Indus., L.L.C. , 492 F.3d 1247, 1255-56 (11th Cir. 2007) ). . . . Dep't of Social Servs. , 436 U.S. 658, 98 S.Ct. 2018, 56 L.Ed.2d 611 (1978) ). . . .
. . . Id. col. 6. ll. 32-56. . . . Appellant's Br. 56. . . . Placebo for Weight Loss in Obese Patients with Depressive Symptoms, 10 Obesity Res. 1049-56 (2002), J.A . . .
. . . Columbia , 831 F.3d at 56-57. Id. at 59. Id. at 57. Id. (emphasis added). . . .
. . . Walton , 56 F.3d 551, 555 (4th Cir. 1995) ; United States v. . . . in committing" a "conspiracy to distribute cocaine" constituted "aiding and abetting" under § 4B1.1. 56 . . .
. . . P. 56(a). A. . . .
. . . See 1 McLaughlin on Class Actions § 5:56 (15th ed. 2018) ("Breach of contract claims arising out of a . . . a motion for judgment on the pleadings under Rule 12(c) or a motion for summary judgment under Rule 56 . . .
. . . Delaware , 438 U.S. 154, 155-56, 98 S.Ct. 2674, 57 L.Ed.2d 667 (1978). . . .
. . . See id. at 655-56 & n.9. . . . See Pizzuto I , 202 P.3d at 655-56. The court concluded that the trial court did not err. . . .
. . . P. 56(a). . . .
. . . P. 56(a). . . .
. . . P. 56 ). . . . P. 56(a) (providing that a party may move for partial summary judgment); Biel v. St. . . .
. . . P. 56(a). . . . Blackstone, Commentaries *55-56). . . .
. . . P. 56(a) ; see Celotex Corp. v. . . . P. 56(c)(1)(A). . . .
. . . Hr'g Tr, p. 56 at 14-25; p. 57 at 1-14. . . . Among the cases construing the Brunner standard most generously is In re Bene , 474 B.R. 56 (Bankr. . . . Hr'g Tr. p. 56 at 14-25; p. 57 at 1-14. . . . 2004) (analyzing income-based repayment in the good faith context)); see also In re Bene , 474 B.R. 56 . . .
. . . The Amended Proof of Claim was filed 56 days after the filing of the original Proof of Claim, and 42 . . .
. . . The Rule 56(d) Issue A. . . . Rule 56(d) Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(b) provides that, unless local court rules or a case-specific . . . Appellate courts review decisions on Rule 56(d) motions for abuse of discretion. Sterk v. . . . Before the 2010 amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 56(d) was 56(f). . . . (f) remain applicable, but we describe them using the current designation of 56(d). . . .
. . . Id. at 1155-56. . . .
. . . IRS , 56 F.3d 832, 836 (7th Cir. 1995). . . .
. . . District Court outlined the legal standards for both Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and 56 . . . Valley Auth., 297 U.S. 288, 347, 56 S.Ct. 466, 80 L.Ed. 688 (1936) (Brandeis, J., concurring)). . . .
. . . P. 56(a). . . .
. . . Dedeaux , 481 U.S. 41, 56, 107 S.Ct. 1549, 95 L.Ed.2d 39 (1987) ). . . .
. . . Cory & Assocs., Inc. , 341 F.3d 644, 655-56 (7th Cir. 2003) ; Archer Daniels Midland Co. v. . . .
. . . Norden Sys., Inc. , 151 F.3d 50, 56 (2d Cir. 1998). . . . Columbia Univ. , 831 F.3d 46, 56 (2d Cir. 2016) (holding that, under Title IX, the claims of an accused . . . Danzer , 151 F.3d at 56 ; see note 47, ante . App. 1378. Id. at 1376. Id . at 1377. . . . Ct. 2018, 56 L.Ed.2d 611 (1978) (holding that § 1983 liability cannot be premised on "respondeat superior . . .
. . . Dissent Op. 355-56. . . .
. . . See id . at 155-56. . . .
. . . Irex Corp. , 909 F.3d 151, 155-56 (5th Cir. 2018) (citation omitted). . . . P. 56(c) ). . . .
. . . P. 56, on his suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the City of Chicago and several of its police officers . . . P. 56(a). . . .