Cases from cite.case.law:

THURSTON, v. STATE FLORIDA ELECTIONS COMMISSION,, 210 So. 3d 684 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . Sections 106.30-106.36, Florida Statutes, are known as the Florida Election Campaign Financing Act (“ . . . the Act”). § 106.30. . . . The Legislature intends ss. 106.30-106.36 to alleviate these factors, dispel the misperception, and encourage . . . by candidates requesting matching funds must include all information required by Sections 106.07 and 106.30 . . .

L. SCOTT, v. K. ROBERTS, In Jr., 612 F.3d 1279 (11th Cir. 2010)

. . . . §§ 106.30-106.36). . . .

ZURAKOWSKI, v. D OYLEY,, 46 F. Supp. 2d 87 (D. Mass. 1999)

. . . litigation — surely the most stark form of civil rights litigation — the national average hourly rate is $106.30 . . .

CHILES, F. v. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, DIVISION OF ELECTIONS,, 711 So. 2d 151 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . The Florida Election Campaign Financing Act, sections 106.30-106.37, Florida Statutes, requires the state . . .

SECRETARY OF STATE, B. v. F. MILLIGAN,, 704 So. 2d 152 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . Election Campaign Financing Trust Fund did not repeal the Florida Election Campaign Financing Act, §§ 106.30 . . . . §§ 106.30-106.36, Fla. Stat. . . . general revenue in an amount sufficient to fund qualifying candidates pursuant to the provisions of ss. 106.30 . . .

DORSEY, v. TOMPKINS,, 917 F. Supp. 1195 (S.D. Ohio 1996)

. . . denied benefits in the amount of $120 per month, and plaintiff Webb alleges that he is entitled to $106.30 . . .

SMITH, v. CRAWFORD,, 645 So. 2d 513 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . err in ruling that Jim Smith was required by the Florida Election Campaign Financing Act, sections 106.30 . . . against the person claiming the benefit or privilege,” and concluded that the grant, under Section 106.30 . . . The Legislature intends ss. 106.30-106.36 to alleviate these factors, dispel the misperception, and encourage . . .

L. CONNOR, v. DIVISION OF ELECTIONS,, 643 So. 2d 75 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . . §§ 106.30-106.36, Fla.Stat. (1993). . . .

REPUBLICAN PARTY OF FLORIDA, v. SMITH,, 638 So. 2d 26 (Fla. 1994)

. . . general revenue in an amount sufficient to fund qualifying candidates pursuant to the provisions of ss. 106.30 . . . Financing Trust Fund in an amount sufficient to fund qualifying candidates pursuant to the provisions of §§ 106.30 . . . GRIMES, C.J., concurs with an opinion. . §§ 106.30-.36, Fla.Stat. (1991). . . . .

STATE A. BUTTERWORTH v. REPUBLICAN PARTY OF FLORIDA, STATE v. NRA POLITICAL VICTORY FUND,, 604 So. 2d 477 (Fla. 1992)

. . . . §§ 106.30-.36, Fla.Stat. (1991). . . . . The Legislature intends ss. 106.30-106.36 to alleviate these factors, dispel the misperception, and encourage . . .

In APEX OIL COMPANY, P. A. NOVELLY, v. A. PALANS, In APEX OIL COMPANY, APEX OIL COMPANY, v. A. PALANS,, 959 F.2d 728 (8th Cir. 1992)

. . . interested parties appealed the bankruptcy court’s decision to the district court which overturned the $170,-106.30 . . .

In APEX OIL COMPANY, P. A. NOVELLY, v. A. PALANS, In APEX OIL COMPANY, APEX OIL COMPANY, v. A. PALANS,, 960 F.2d 728 (8th Cir. 1992)

. . . interested parties appealed the bankruptcy court’s decision to the district court which overturned the $170,-106.30 . . .

v., 86 T.C. 627 (T.C. 1986)

. . . June 11, 1979 21.26 106.30 Totals for TYE June 30, 1979 4,273.22 21,336.10 As the above table indicates . . .

FORMULA, v. M. HECKLER,, 779 F.2d 743 (D.C. Cir. 1985)

. . . Id. § 106.30. . . . Id. § 106.30(a). . . . Id. § 106.30(b)(l)(ii). . . . Id. § 106.30(b)(3). . . . Id. § 106.30(c)(2). . . .

FORMULA, v. M. HECKLER,, 250 U.S. App. D.C. 353 (D.C. Cir. 1985)

. . . Id. § 106.30. . . . Id. § 106.30(a). . . . Id. § 106.30(b)(1)(h). . . . Id. § 106.30(b)(3). . . . Id. § 106.30(c)(2). . . .

FORMULA, v. S. SCHWEIKER,, 572 F. Supp. 862 (D.D.C. 1983)

. . . other statutorily specified nutrients are exempted from the verification process altogether, Id. at 106.30 . . . manufacturers to make of “at least one newly processed finished product batch” every three months. 21 C.F.R. § 106.30 . . .

SABLE, v. AMERIND SHIPPING CORPORATION, 181 F. Supp. 656 (S.D. Ala. 1959)

. . . value of $50 a ton, or a total of $2,742.90, leaving a balance of $5,723.81, plus storage charges of $106.30 . . .

KUTTROFF v. SUTHERLAND,, 56 F.2d 862 (S.D.N.Y. 1932)

. . . Though the charge of $55,909.83 was disallowed by the Supreme Court, the sums of $905.86 and $106.30, . . .

KUNGLIG JARNVAGSSTYRELSEN v. NATIONAL CITY BANK OF NEW YORK, 20 F.2d 307 (2d Cir. 1927)

. . . Malmo, Sweden, at a price of $114,-106.30, payment against delivery in New York of shipping documents . . .

CASTAGNINO v. MUTUAL RESERVE FUND LIFE ASS N, 157 F. 29 (6th Cir. 1907)

. . . unlawfully and arbitrarily increased the mortuary premiums from $13.35 to $15.05, every two months, or $106.30 . . .