Cases from cite.case.law:

SHADY GROVE ORTHOPEDIC ASSOCIATES, P. A. v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE CO., 559 U.S. 393 (U.S. 2010)

. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 124.01[1] (3d ed. 2009) (hereinafter Moore). . . .

SHADY GROVE ORTHOPEDIC ASSOCIATES, P. A. v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, 176 L. Ed. 2d 311 (U.S. 2010)

. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 124.01[1] (3d ed. 2009) (hereinafter Moore). . . . .

PARADIGM ALLIANCE, INC. v. CELERITAS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, LLC v., 659 F. Supp. 2d 1167 (D. Kan. 2009)

. . . Bell Tel., L.P., 37 Kan.App.2d 358, 362, 153 P.3d 561, 565 (2007) (citing PIK Civ.3d 124.01). . . . .

JP MORGAN TRUST COMPANY, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, FI FLI, v. MID- AMERICA PIPELINE COMPANY,, 413 F. Supp. 2d 1244 (D. Kan. 2006)

. . . Pattern Instructions Kansas 3d, Civil § 124.01-A; Commercial Credit Corp. v. . . .

HEARTLAND ACADEMY COMMUNITY CHURCH, s v. WADDLE, s, 317 F. Supp. 2d 984 (E.D. Mo. 2004)

. . . Waddle states that Missouri Supreme Court Rule 124.01 authorized the search warrants issued in this case . . .

BRITVIC SOFT DRINKS LTD. v. ACSIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 265 F. Supp. 2d 1179 (D. Kan. 2003)

. . . PIK — Civil 3d 124.01-A. . . .

A DONAHOO, v. OHIO DEPARTMENT OF YOUTH SERVICES,, 237 F. Supp. 2d 844 (N.D. Ohio 2002)

. . . See Ohio Rev.Code §§ 5139.02, 124.01 et seq., and Schatzman v. . . .

WEATHERBY, v. BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY,, 209 F. Supp. 2d 1155 (D. Kan. 2002)

. . . Lanewala, 147 F.Supp.2d 1069, 1077-78 (D.Kan.2001) (listing these five elements; citing PIK-Civil 3d § 124.01 . . .

COOPER, v. EAGLE RIVER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, INC., 270 F.3d 456 (7th Cir. 2001)

. . . The second, Wisconsin Code HFS § 124.01 (“Section 124.01”) requires hospitals to maintain “written policies . . .

In L. ENGLAND M. L. M. v. U. S., 264 B.R. 38 (Bankr. D. Idaho 2001)

. . . including gasoline, license fees, maintenance and one traffic ticket were $196.62, $94.50, $245.90 and $124.01 . . .

SWEENEY, v. CITY OF STEUBENVILLE,, 147 F. Supp. 2d 872 (S.D. Ohio 2001)

. . . occurs in the position of Chief of Police, the City shall suspend the provisions of Ohio Revised Code §§ 124.01 . . .

ORI, INC. v. LANEWALA,, 147 F. Supp. 2d 1069 (D. Kan. 2001)

. . . See PIK-Civil 3d § 124.01-A (essential elements of breach of contract claim are: (1) the existence of . . .

C. TOUCHSTON, v. McDERMOTT, a a, 234 F.3d 1133 (11th Cir. 2000)

. . . . § 124.01(2) (providing for popular election of county commissioners); Fla. Const. . . .

L. SIEGEL, v. LEPORE, E., 234 F.3d 1163 (11th Cir. 2000)

. . . . § 124.01(2)) (providing for popular election of county commissioners); FI. Const. . . .

HARDMAN, v. THE UNIVERSITY OF AKRON,, 100 F. Supp. 2d 509 (N.D. Ohio 2000)

. . . See Ohio Rev.Code § 124.01(F); § 124.11(B). . . .

FDX SUPPLY CHAIN SERVICES, INC. v. NORTH FACE, INC., 98 F. Supp. 2d 1244 (D. Kan. 2000)

. . . See Pattern Instructions Kansas, Civil 3d § 124.01. . . .

GRATSCH, v. HAMILTON COUNTY SHERIFF S DEPARTMENT,, 91 F. Supp. 2d 1160 (S.D. Ohio 2000)

. . . . § 124.01. See In re Ford, 3 Ohio App.3d 416, 446 N.E.2d 214 (1982) paragraph 2 of syllabus. . . .

In DOW CORNING CORPORATION,, 244 B.R. 634 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 1999)

. . . Elder-Beerman Stores Corp., 222 B.R. 309, 311 (Bankr.S.D.Ohio 1998); 17 Moore’s Federal Practice 3d § 124.01 . . .

In BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF HOPEWELL INTERNATIONAL INSURANCE LTD., 238 B.R. 25 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1999)

. . . . § 1404(a) is governed by federal law); MooRe’s, ¶ 124.01[1], at 12-10; cf. . . .

SOLOMON, v. LIBERTY COUNTY, FLORIDA,, 957 F. Supp. 1522 (N.D. Fla. 1997)

. . . . § 124.01(2) (county commission); Fla.Stat. § 230.061(1) (school board); Fla.Stat. § 230.10 (school . . .

CHRISTOPHEL, v. KUKULINSKY,, 61 F.3d 479 (6th Cir. 1995)

. . . . §§ 124.01-124.99 (Anderson 1994). . . .

J. BETTIO, v. VILLAGE OF NORTHFIELD,, 775 F. Supp. 1545 (N.D. Ohio 1991)

. . . . § 124.01 et seq. . . . See O.R.C. § 124.01 et seq., Loudermill, 470 U.S. at 538-39, 105 S.Ct. at 1491-92 (the Ohio statute creates . . .

SOLOMON, v. LIBERTY COUNTY, FLORIDA, E. J. L. T. SOLOMON, v. LIBERTY COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, FLORIDA, W. L., 899 F.2d 1012 (11th Cir. 1990)

. . . . § 124.01 (1987) (commission); id. § 230.061 (school board). . . .

SOLOMON, v. LIBERTY COUNTY, FLORIDA, E. J. L. T. SOLOMON, v. LIBERTY COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, FLORIDA, C. W. L., 865 F.2d 1566 (11th Cir. 1988)

. . . . § 124.01 (same); id. § 230.061 (school board). . . .

L. CRAIG, v. CELESTE,, 646 F. Supp. 47 (S.D. Ohio 1986)

. . . Ohio Revised Code Section 124.01(C) provides: "Classified service" means the competitive classified civil . . .

D. DERYCK, v. AKRON CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT,, 633 F. Supp. 1180 (N.D. Ohio 1986)

. . . specific terms, R.C. 3319.081 can have no application to city school districts, which are governed by R.C. 124.01 . . .

NORTHROP CORPORATION, v. McDONNELL DOUGLAS CORPORATION,, 705 F.2d 1030 (9th Cir. 1983)

. . . . §§ 124.01, 124.06(a), and 124.12(a) (1981). . . .

FLAGLER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, a v. E. LIKINS W., 337 So. 2d 801 (Fla. 1976)

. . . . § 124.01(3), F.S.A., to be unconstitutional. We have jurisdiction. Fla.Const., art. . . . Fla.Stat. § 124.01(3), F.S.A., reads as follows: “The board of county commissioners shall from time to . . . That Florida Statute 124.01(3) is unconstitutional in that it takes away constitutional rights which . . . Recognizing the constant shift in the population of Florida, the Legislature by Fla.Stat. § 124.01(3) . . . Fla.Stat. § 124.01(3), F.S.A., was enacted to implement Fla.Const. art. VIII, § 1(e), F.S.A. . . .

DOZIER v. CHUPKA, 395 F. Supp. 836 (S.D. Ohio 1975)

. . . See also Ohio Revised Code, Sections 124.01(C), -.11(B) and -.23; Columbus, Ohio Charter, Sections 148 . . .

JOHN PRINCE, A. A. POSTON, LAKE LYTAL, C. Y. BYRD, PAUL RARDIN, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, T. HAROLD WILLIAMS, 157 Fla. 103 (Fla. 1946)

. . . Our conclusion is, however, that Sec. 124.01 is not in harmony with Sec. 5, Article VIII, as it now exists . . .