Cases from cite.case.law:

STOP THE BEACH RENOURISHMENT, INC. v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 560 U.S. 702 (U.S. 2010)

. . . . § 161.201. . . .

STOP THE BEACH RENOURISHMENT, INC. v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 177 L. Ed. 2d 184 (U.S. 2010)

. . . . § 161.201. . . .

WALTON COUNTY, v. STOP BEACH RENOURISHMENT, INC. v., 998 So. 2d 1102 (Fla. 2008)

. . . STBR further argued that the littoral rights, which are expressly preserved by section 161.201 of the . . . See § 161.201. The Act also protects the upland owners’ rights to boating, bathing, and fishing. . . . See § 161.201. . . . See § 161.201. . . . See §§ 161.201; 161.141. Given these significant differences, Belvedere does not apply here. III. . . . See §§ 161.141, 161.191, 161.201, Fla. Stat. (2005). . . . .

SAVE OUR BEACHES, INC. v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION,, 27 So. 3d 48 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . Moreover, the legislature explicitly recognizes in section 161.201 that common law riparian rights continue . . . See § 161.201, Fla. . . . It is not enough to provide, as in section 161.201, rights of ingress and egress to the water over the . . . The Department relied on section 161.201 to rule that the landowners’ riparian rights are not affected . . . Although section 161.201 has language describing a preservation of common law riparian rights, it does . . .

WALLACE CORPORATION, v. CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, 793 So. 2d 1134 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . finding that the beachwalk project is a “structure required for the prevention of erosion” under section 161.201 . . . Section 161.201, Florida Statutes (1997), provides that any structure constructed seaward of the ECL, . . . As a result, the ALJ found that Wallace lacked standing to make a challenge under section 161.201. . . . With respect to the interpretation of section 161.201, the Secretary of DEP adopted the determination . . . Section 161.201, Florida Statutes Section 161.201 provides, in pertinent part, that [T]he state shall . . .

FLO- SUN, INC. v. R. KIRK, v. R., 783 So. 2d 1029 (Fla. 2001)

. . . regulatory scheme, despite the existence of a cumulative remedy/savings clause codified as section 161.201 . . .

HILLSBORO ISLAND HOUSE CONDOMINIUM APARTMENTS, INC. v. TOWN OF HILLSBORO BEACH, a, 263 So. 2d 209 (Fla. 1972)

. . . . § 161.201, F.S.A., the Town will exercise its police powers over this improved area. . . .