Cases from cite.case.law:

In S. BRUMLIK,, 185 B.R. 887 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1995)

. . . angles to, the East boundary of the NW 54 of the NW \ of said Section 23; run thence N 00°08'12" E 215.90 . . .

LUGO M. F. v. S. SCHWEIKER, U. S., 776 F.2d 1143 (3d Cir. 1985)

. . . Luna’s underpayment was only $215.90, and was offset by an identical overpayment; Terebieniec’s underpayment . . .

LUGO, M. F. v. SCHWEIKER, S., 599 F. Supp. 948 (E.D. Pa. 1984)

. . . of the benefits due to her for the period from October of 1978 to December 1980, in the amount of $215.90 . . .

F. W. Co. v., 59 Cust. Ct. 427 (Cust. Ct. 1967)

. . . enactment of the Tariff Schedules of the United States (schedule 2, part 3, p. 68) states: Items 245.80 and 215.90 . . .

v. v., 41 T.C. 888 (T.C. 1964)

. . . during its calendar taxable year 1951, South Bay distributed to its preferred shareholders the sum of $215.90 . . . The respondent’s statement as to the factual circumstance in respect to the character of the total $215.90 . . .

UNITED STATES v. CLEMENT, 25 F. Cas. 461 (E.D. Pa. 1843)

. . . We have seen that, while the custom-house deducts but $215.90 from the specific duty, as the required . . .