Cases from cite.case.law:

M. WARD, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF INTERNAL IMPROVEMENT TRUST FUND,, 651 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . instant case, the challenged rules purported to implement the aquatic preserve act, which is sections 258.35 . . .

UNITED STATES v. ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, IN COUNTY OF DADE, STATE OF FLORIDA,, 657 F. Supp. 42 (S.D. Fla. 1986)

. . . Section 258.35-.46 (1985). . . .

BERKLEY, v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION,, 347 So. 2d 467 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . Biscayne Bay Aquatic Preserve Act is expressly excluded from Chapter 75-172, Laws of Florida [Sections 258.35 . . . Sections 258.35-258.46, Fla.Stat. (1975). .Section 258.40(1), Fla.Stat. (1975). .It is significant that . . .

BERKLEY, v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION,, 358 So. 2d 552 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . Biseayne Bay Aquatic Preserve Act is expressly excluded from Chapter 75-172, Laws of Florida [Sections 258.35 . . . Sections 258.35-258.46, Fla.Stat. (1975). . . . .

P. C. G. N., 107 Fla. 289 (Fla. 1932)

. . . total of $993.41, less the amount of costs adjudged in the decree against the defendants in the sum of $258.35 . . .