The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XXII
PORTS AND HARBORS

Chapter 309
PROTECTION OF PORTS AND HARBORS

View Entire Chapter

CHAPTER 309

PROTECTION OF PORTS AND HARBORS

309.01 Deposit of material in tidewater regulated.

309.02 Deposit of material on wharf or quay regulated.

309.01 Deposit of material in tidewater regulated.—

(1) It is not lawful for any person to discharge or cause to be discharged or deposit or cause to be deposited, in the tide or salt waters of any bay, port, harbor, or river of this state, any ballast or material of any kind other than clear stone or rock, free from gravel or pebbles, which said clear stone or rock shall be deposited or discharged only in the construction of enclosures in connection with wharves, piers, quays, jetties, or in the construction of permanent bulkheads connecting the solid and permanent portion of wharves. It is lawful to construct three characters of bulkheads for retention of material in solid wharves. First, clear stone or rock enclosures, or bulkheads, may be built upon all sides to a height not less than 21/2 feet above high watermark; and after the enclosures have been made so solid, tight, and permanent as to prevent any sand, mud, gravel, or other material that may be discharged or deposited in them from drifting or escaping through such enclosures, any kind of ballast may be discharged or deposited within the enclosures. The enclosures may be constructed of wood, stone, and rock combined, the stone and rocks to be placed on the outside of the wood to a height not less at any point than 21/2 feet above high watermark. Second, a bulkhead may be built by a permanent wharf consisting of thoroughly creosoted piles not less than 12 inches in diameter at the butt end, to be driven close together and to be capped with timber not less than 10 or 14 inches drift, bolted to each pile, and one or more longitudinal stringers to be placed on the outside of the bulkhead and securely anchored by means of iron rods to piles driven within the bulkheads, clear rock to be on the inside of the bulkhead, to a height of not less than 21/2 feet above high water; and after this is done, ballast or other material may be deposited within the permanent enclosure so constructed. Third, a bulkhead may be constructed to consist of creosoted piles, as described herein, driven not exceeding 4 feet apart from center to center, inside of which two or more longitudinal stringers may be placed and securely bolted to the piles. Inside of these longitudinal pieces, two thicknesses of creosoted sheet piling are to be driven, each course of the sheet piling to make a joint with the other so as to form an impenetrable wharf; and within this permanent bulkhead so constructed, any ballast or other material may be deposited. No such enclosure, pier, quay, or jetty shall be begun until the point whereat it is to be built shall have been connected by a substantial wharf with a shore or with a permanent wharf; except that the owners of wharves may at any time, with the consent of the Board of Pilot Commissioners of the Division of Professions of the Department of Business and Professional Regulation, build wharves of clear stone or rock, or creosoted walls as hereinafter provided, on each side of their wharves from the shore to a point at which the water is not more than 15 feet deep, and when such walls have attained a height of 21/2 feet above high watermark and have been securely closed at the deepwater end by stone or creosoted walls of the same height, any kind of ballast may be deposited in them. Nothing contained in this section shall interfere with any rights or privileges now enjoyed by riparian owners. While this section empowers those who desire to construct the several characters of wharves, piers, quays, jetties, and bulkheads provided for and described herein, nothing in this section shall be so construed as to require any person not desiring to construct a permanent wharf by filling up with ballast, stone, or other material to construct under the specifications contained herein; and nothing in this chapter shall be so construed as to prevent any person from constructing any wharf or placing any pilings, logs, or lumber in any waters where the person would have heretofore had the right so to do.

(2) This section shall not prohibit Escambia County from placing in Pensacola Bay, on the Escambia County side, beside the old Pensacola Bay Bridge, certain materials, as recommended by the Department of Environmental Protection, in coordination with the Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, to increase the number of fish available for persons fishing from the old Pensacola Bay Bridge.

(3) This section shall not prohibit Manatee County from placing in the Manatee County portions of Sarasota Bay and Tampa Bay and in the Manatee River, certain materials, as recommended by the Department of Environmental Protection, in coordination with the Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, to increase the number of fish available for persons fishing in the above areas.

(4) This section shall not prohibit Pinellas County from placing in Tampa Bay certain materials as recommended by the Department of Environmental Protection, in coordination with the Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, to increase the number of fish available for persons fishing in the bay.

History.—ch. 3298, 1881; RS 936; s. 1, ch. 4370, 1895; GS 1290; RGS 2460; CGL 3869; s. 1, ch. 61-11; s. 1, ch. 63-423; s. 1, ch. 65-26; ss. 25, 30, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 184, ch. 81-259; s. 31, ch. 94-218; s. 134, ch. 94-356; s. 890, ch. 95-148; s. 236, ch. 99-245.

309.02 Deposit of material on wharf or quay regulated.—It is not lawful for any person to deposit or cause to be deposited on any wharf or quay, any ballast, stone, earth, or like material, except such wharf or quay may be so secured as to prevent such ballast or other material from washing into the waters of the harbor.

History.—s. 3, ch. 3142, 1879; RS 937; GS 1291; RGS 2461; CGL 3870.

F.S. 309 on Google Scholar

F.S. 309 on Casetext

Amendments to 309

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 309

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S369.309 - CONSERVATION-ENVIRONMENT - AIRBOATS PROHIBITED ON WEKIVA RIVER - M: S

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

OUR LADY OF GUADALUPE SCHOOL, v. MORRISSEY- BERRU St. v., 140 S. Ct. 2049 (U.S. 2020)

. . . explained that her condition would require her to take time off from work. 911 F.3d at 606 ; App. 266-269, 309 . . .

LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR SAINTS PETER AND PAUL HOME, v. PENNSYLVANIA, J. v., 140 S. Ct. 2367 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Foundation , 454 U.S. 151, 168, 102 S.Ct. 205, 70 L.Ed.2d 309 (1981). . . .

JUNE MEDICAL SERVICES L. L. C. v. RUSSO, v. LLC., 140 S. Ct. 2103 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Tracy , 519 U.S. 278, 307-309, 117 S.Ct. 811, 136 L.Ed.2d 761 (1997). . . . Hallock , 309 U.S. 106, 119, 60 S.Ct. 444, 84 L.Ed. 604 (1940). . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, v. THURAISSIGIAM, 140 S. Ct. 1959 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Shaughnessy , 338 U.S. 537, 70 S.Ct. 309, 94 L.Ed. 317 (1950) ; Shaughnessy v. . . . See, e.g. , Knauff , 338 U.S. at 544, 70 S.Ct. 309 ("Whatever the procedure authorized by Congress is . . . followed in determining whether an alien should be admitted, see Knauff , 338 U.S. at 544, 70 S.Ct. 309 . . .

ROGERS, v. GREWAL,, 140 S. Ct. 1865 (U.S. 2020)

. . . J. 309, 344-345 (1991) (compiling laws from Alabama, Louisiana, and Mississippi). . . .

FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, v. AURELIUS INVESTMENT, LLC, LLC, III v. LLC, v. LLC, n De De La El Y v., 140 S. Ct. 1649 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Porto Rico , 258 U.S. 298, 309, 42 S.Ct. 343, 66 L.Ed. 627 (1922) ; Reid v. . . . Indiana); Act of Mar. 26, 1804, § 4, 2 Stat. 284 (Louisiana); Act of Jan. 11, 1805, ch. 5, § 2, 2 Stat. 309 . . .

NASRALLAH, v. P. BARR,, 140 S. Ct. 1683 (U.S. 2020)

. . . S. , 671 F.3d 303, 309-310 (CA3 2011) ; Oxygene v. . . . final order "concluding that the alien is deportable or ordering deportation." § 1101(a)(47)(A) ; see § 309 . . . U.S.C. § 1101(a)(47)(A) ; Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, 110 Stat. 1277; see § 309 . . .

RAMOS, v. LOUISIANA, 140 S. Ct. 1390 (U.S. 2020)

. . . 2726 (Douglas, J., concurring); id ., at 265-269, 92 S.Ct. 2726 (Brennan, J., concurring); id ., at 309 . . .

CITGO ASPHALT REFINING COMPANY, v. FRESCATI SHIPPING COMPANY, LTD., 140 S. Ct. 1081 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Restatement (Second) of Contracts, p. 309 (1979) (Restatement (Second)). . . . See Restatement (Second), at 309 (obligor who wishes to avoid strict liability for breach may "limi[t . . .

GUERRERO- LASPRILLA, v. P. BARR, v. P., 140 S. Ct. 1062 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Wickard , 321 U.S. 288, 309, 64 S.Ct. 559, 88 L.Ed. 733 (1944) ; see also Board of Governors, FRS v. . . .

SWARTZ, v. RODRIGUEZ, J. A., 140 S. Ct. 1258 (U.S. 2020)

. . . No. 18-309 Supreme Court of the United States. . . .

MCKINNEY, v. ARIZONA, 140 S. Ct. 702 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Lane , 489 U.S. 288, 309-310, 109 S.Ct. 1060, 103 L.Ed.2d 334 (1989) (plurality opinion)-has little purchase . . .

L. BALDWIN, Et Ux. v. UNITED STATES, 140 S. Ct. 690 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Laird, 1 Cranch 299, 309, 2 L.Ed. 115 (1803) ("[I]t is sufficient to observe, that practice and acquiescence . . .

ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHDIOCESE OF SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO v. ACEVEDO FELICIANO,, 140 S. Ct. 696 (U.S. 2020)

. . . argued that the Church could not bring suit because it was not a juridical person. 210 U.S. at 308-309 . . .

C. CARNEY, v. R. ADAMS, 140 S. Ct. 602 (U.S. 2019)

. . . ADAMS No. 19-309 Supreme Court of the United States. . . .

WATTS, v. WATTS,, 935 F.3d 1138 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . Id. at 309. . . .

TIMS, v. LGE COMMUNITY CREDIT UNION,, 935 F.3d 1228 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . State , 309 Ga.App. 338, 711 S.E.2d 314, 317 (2011) (quoting Martinez v. . . .

L. SMITH, v. SHARP,, 935 F.3d 1064 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . cutoff IQ score for the intellectual function prong of the mental retardation definition." 536 U.S. at 309 . . . scores falls outside the intellectually disabled range "between 70 and 75 or lower," Atkins, 536 U.S. at 309 . . . Atkins, 536 U.S. at 316 & 309 n.5, 122 S.Ct. 2242 ("[A]n IQ between 70 and 75 or lower ... is typically . . .

UNITED STATES v. HAYMOND,, 935 F.3d 1059 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . Ct. 398, 202 L.Ed.2d 309 (2018). . . .

IN RE BOWLES,, 935 F.3d 1210 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . See 536 U.S. at 309 n.5, 122 S. . . .

NICHOLSON J. H. a J. N. G. a v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES a a, 935 F.3d 685 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Ct. 305, 309, 193 L.Ed.2d 255 (2015) (per curiam)). . . .

JANVRIN, J J v. CONTINENTAL RESOURCES, INC., 934 F.3d 845 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Chief Indus., Inc., 309 F.3d 479, 482 (8th Cir. 2002) ). . . . Schmitt, 309 N.W.2d 838, 840 (S.D. 1981) (quoting defendant's proposed jury instruction). . . .

COLE v. CARSON, v., 935 F.3d 444 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Id . at 309. . . . Ct. at 309 (citing Brosseau v. Haugen , 543 U.S. 194, 199, 125 S. . . . These cases "reveal[ed] the hazy legal backdrop against which Mullenix acted," Id. at 309. . . . Id. at 309. Id. at 309-10. Id. Id. at 311. Id. at 312. Cole , 68 F. Supp. 3d at 645. Id. at 643. . . .

BOWLES, v. DESANTIS,, 934 F.3d 1230 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Doe, 536 U.S. 273, 287, 122 S.Ct. 2268, 153 L.Ed.2d 309 (2002), and "phrased in terms of the persons . . .

GUPTA, v. MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY, LLC,, 934 F.3d 705 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . AT & T Corp. , 309 F.3d 404, 415 (7th Cir. 2002) (holding same under Illinois law). . . .

S. BLEDSOE, v. VANDERBILT,, 934 F.3d 1112 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . McQueen, 818 F.3d 309, 319 (7th Cir. 2016) ). But that is not quite how Plaintiff's case unfolded. . . .

HARVILLE, v. CITY OF HOUSTON, MISSISSIPPI,, 935 F.3d 404 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . CB Richard Ellis, Inc. , 309 F.3d 893, 899 (5th Cir. 2002) ("The issue at the pretext stage is whether . . .

NEW YORK STATE CITIZENS COALITION FOR CHILDREN, v. J. POOLE,, 935 F.3d 56 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Doe , 536 U.S. 273, 283, 122 S.Ct. 2268, 153 L.Ed.2d 309 (2002) (emphasis added). . . .

HAWKINS v. I- TV DIGITALIS TAVKOZLESI ZRT. f k a DMCC Rt. DIGI RCS RDS S. A. RCS S. A. DIGI N. V. v. i- TV f k a DMCC Rt. DIGI RCS RDS S. A. RCS S. A. DIGI N. V., 935 F.3d 211 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . Sheahan , 222 F.3d 309, 318 (7th Cir. 2000). That characterization may not be quite right. . . .

UNITED STATES v. NORMAN,, 935 F.3d 232 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . Id. at 309. . . .

PIZZUTO, Jr. v. BLADES,, 933 F.3d 1166 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . the cutoff IQ score for the intellectual function prong of the mental retardation definition," id. at 309 . . . Atkins , 536 U.S. at 308 n.3, 309 n.5, 317 n.22, 122 S.Ct. 2242. . . . Hall , 572 U.S. at 722, 134 S.Ct. 1986 (citation omitted) (quoting Atkins , 536 U.S. at 309 n.5, 122 . . . Hall , 572 U.S. at 722, 134 S.Ct. 1986 (citation omitted) (quoting Atkins , 536 U.S. at 309 n.5, 122 . . . score for the intellectual function prong of the mental retardation definition," Atkins , 536 U.S. at 309 . . .

ROMO, v. P. BARR,, 933 F.3d 1191 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Ashcroft , 309 F.3d 1193, 1198 (9th Cir. 2002). . . .

DOCTOR S ASSOCIATES, INC. v. ALEMAYEHU,, 934 F.3d 245 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Id. at 309. . . . Supp. 3d at 309. . . .

JEFFERIES, v. UNC REGIONAL PHYSICIANS PEDIATRICS, 392 F. Supp. 3d 620 (M.D.N.C. 2019)

. . . Garrison, 528 F.2d 309 (4th Cir. 1975). . . .

IN RE NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE S SUNDAY TICKET ANTITRUST LITIGATION, Jr. v. LLC LLC NFL LLC LLC LP LLC LLC NFL LP LLC LP LLC LP Co. LLC LP LLC, 933 F.3d 1136 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Microsoft Corp. , 309 F.3d 193, 215 (4th Cir. 2002) ("[W]e interpret these cases as standing for the . . .

IN RE DEEPWATER HORIZON v. L. L. C. v. Jr. Sr. M. a v. L. L. C. v. Jr. Sr. v. BP v. L. L. C. v. Jr. Sr. In v. L. L. C. v. Jr. Sr. M. a v. v. Jr. Sr. M. a v. L. L. C. v. Jr. Sr. v. BP v. v. Jr. Sr. In v. L. L. C., 934 F.3d 434 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Flint , 275 U.S. 303, 309, 48 S.Ct. 134, 72 L.Ed. 290 (1927) ; Wiltz v. Bayer CropScience, Ltd. . . .

UNITED STATES EX REL. CHARTE v. AMERICAN TUTOR, INC. Jr. Sr., 934 F.3d 346 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Borough of Jamesburg , 309 N.J.Super. 106, 706 A.2d 790, 792 (Ct. App. Div. 1998). . . .

CLARK, v. WARDEN,, 934 F.3d 483 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Sain , 372 U.S. 293, 309 n.6, 83 S.Ct. 745, 9 L.Ed.2d 770 (1963) ("By 'issues of fact' we mean to refer . . .

LOCAL INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, AFL- CIO, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD,, 934 F.3d 590 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . B. , 375 F.2d 385 (4th Cir. 1967) ; Int'l Paper Co. , 309 NLRB 31, 36 (1992) ). . . .

CONSTANCE S. v. SAUL,, 389 F. Supp. 3d 583 (N.D. Ill. 2019)

. . . Astrue , 627 F.3d 299, 309 (7th Cir. 2010) (reviewing doctor). . . .

UNITED STATES v. JOHNSON,, 932 F.3d 965 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Fessenden , 258 U.S. 254, 260, 42 S.Ct. 309, 66 L.Ed. 607 (1922) ("He may not complain if one sovereignty . . .

KELLY, v. HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., 933 F.3d 173 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . App'x at 309, 318 (alterations omitted). C. . . .

A. JALUDI, v. CITIGROUP, 933 F.3d 246 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Id. at 309. . . . Id. at 309-11. . . .

FRYE, v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., 933 F.3d 591 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Co. , 240 Mich. 133, 215 N.W. 308, 309-10 (1927). . . .

OXFORD UNIVERSITY BANK, A N. A. CDO CDO v. LANSUPPE FEEDER, LLC,, 933 F.3d 99 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Doe , 536 U.S. 273, 284, 122 S.Ct. 2268, 153 L.Ed.2d 309 (2002) (citations omitted). . . .

YARBROUGH, v. DECATUR HOUSING AUTHORITY,, 931 F.3d 1322 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Ct. 2268, 2275, 153 L.Ed.2d 309 (2002). . . .

INGRAM v. UNITED STATES, 932 F.3d 1084 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Ingram , 309 F. App'x 66, 68 (8th Cir. 2009). . . .

DOGAN, v. BARAK,, 932 F.3d 888 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Id. at 309-10, 130 S.Ct. 2278. . . .

K. W. P. By v. KANSAS CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS In In, 931 F.3d 813 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . City of Farmington , 309 F.3d 1054, 1061 (8th Cir. 2002) ("Because school officials initiated the investigation . . .

MITCHELL, v. MACLAREN,, 933 F.3d 526 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Id. at 309, 105 S.Ct. 1285. . . .

D. LISLE, Jr. v. WELBORN,, 933 F.3d 705 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Delie , 257 F.3d 309, 314 (3d Cir. 2001) (" § 1997e(e) does not bar claims seeking nominal damages to . . .

K. HASSEN, v. RUSTON LOUISIANA HOSPITAL COMPANY, L. L. C., 932 F.3d 353 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Area Rapid Transit , 383 F.3d 309, 317 (5th Cir. 2004) ). 850 F.3d 237, 242 (5th Cir. 2017). Id. . . .

UNITED STATES v. ABREU- GARC A, a k a a, a k a P a k a P, 933 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2019)

. . . Colón-Rosario, 921 F.3d 306, 309 (1st Cir. 2019). . . .

IN RE J. WELSCH,, 602 B.R. 682 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2019)

. . . Leentein , 309 F.3d 1210 (9th Cir. 2002), for the proposition that a party violates the stay by "continuing . . .

J. GILLIAM, C. Ad v. SEALEY, E. C. T. A. Sr. C. T. A. WTVD LLC J. C. Ad v. C. T. A. E. C. T. A. Sr. WTVD LLC, 932 F.3d 216 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . J.A. 309. . . .

UNITED STATES v. DITOMASSO,, 932 F.3d 58 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . than to ferret out evidence of criminal activity and thus constituted governmental action, see id . at 309 . . .

UNITED STATES v. GALECKI, v., 932 F.3d 176 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . Gary , 74 F.3d 304, 309-10 (1st Cir. 1996) (same). . . .

UNITED STATES v. DEL CARPIO FRESCAS,, 932 F.3d 324 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Bd. of Regents of Univ. of Wisconsin Sys. , 309 F.3d 433, 436 (7th Cir. 2002) (Easterbrook, J.) . . .

DINE CITIZENS AGAINST RUINING OUR ENVIRONMENT v. BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS U. S. LLC,, 932 F.3d 843 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . N.L.R.B. , 309 U.S. 350, 60 S.Ct. 569, 84 L.Ed. 799 (1940), in which the Court allowed a suit to proceed . . .

GENETIC VETERINARY SCIENCES, INC. v. LABOKLIN GMBH CO. KG,, 933 F.3d 1302 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . See J.A. 309, 349-51 (referencing California and Michigan sublicensees). . . . J.A. 309; see J.A. 307-09. . . .

IN RE SCHATZ, v., 602 B.R. 411 (B.A.P. 1st Cir. 2019)

. . . See Owen, 500 U.S. at 309, 111 S.Ct. 1833 [.] Pasquina v. . . .

UNITED STATES v. GLENN,, 931 F.3d 424 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . check processor reviewed its records and determined 524 counterfeit check cashing attempts in 2014 and 309 . . .

UNITED STATES v. DOE,, 932 F.3d 279 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Area Rapid Transit , 383 F.3d 309, 318 (5th Cir. 2004) (assuming one step of the McDonnell Douglas framework . . .

UNITED STATES v. VILLARREAL SILVA, a k a a k a, 931 F.3d 330 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . Shaughnessy , 338 U.S. 537, 542, 70 S.Ct. 309, 94 L.Ed. 317 (1950), and Nishimura Ekiu v. . . . Knauff , 338 U.S. at 544, 70 S.Ct. 309 ; see also Zadvydas v. . . .

LOVELACE v. WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE, 931 F.3d 698 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Ford Motor Co. , 309 F. Supp. 3d 714, 716 (W.D. Mo. 2018). . . .

UNITED STATES v. MUSCHETTE, 392 F. Supp. 3d 282 (E.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . Id. at 309. . . . See id. at 309-11. . . .

PEREZ, v. ABBOTT,, 390 F. Supp. 3d 803 (W.D. Tex. 2019)

. . . Id. at 309, 86 S.Ct. 803. . . . Katzenbach , 383 U.S. 301, 309, 86 S.Ct. 803, 15 L.Ed.2d 769 (1966). . . .

HEUTON v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, 930 F.3d 1015 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Ford Motor Co., 309 F. Supp. 3d 714, 719 (W.D. Mo. 2018). . . .

HARTMAN v. THOMPSON, 931 F.3d 471 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . App'x 303, 309 (6th Cir. 2006) (concluding that there was a genuine issue of material fact as to whether . . .

DIAZ- QUIRAZCO, v. P. BARR,, 931 F.3d 830 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Wright , 309 Or. 37, 785 P.2d 340 (1990) ; Bachman , 16 P.3d at 1189. . . . See Castillo , 729 F.3d at 309-10 (discussing various BIA decisions). . . .

MATSON, v. SANDERSON FARMS, INC., 388 F. Supp. 3d 853 (S.D. Tex. 2019)

. . . Area Rapid Transit , 383 F.3d 309, 317 (5th Cir. 2004). . . .

STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, v. AMAZON. COM, INC., 390 F. Supp. 3d 964 (W.D. Wis. 2019)

. . . Co. , 2008 WI 52, ¶ 22, 309 Wis. 2d 541, 749 N.W.2d 581. . . . As demonstrated by Richards , 2008 WI 52, ¶ 30, 309 Wis.2d 541, 749 N.W.2d 581, a legislative codification . . . See Richards , 2008 WI 52, ¶ 30, 309 Wis.2d 541, 749 N.W.2d 581 (citing Strenke v. . . . ("sell" is "[t]o transfer (property) by sale"); id. at 576-77, 309 Wis. 2d 541, 749 N.W.2d 581 ("distributor . . .

UNITED STATES v. A. GOODRIDGE,, 392 F. Supp. 3d 159 (D. Mass. 2019)

. . . No. 309.) . . . Holloway , 309 F.3d 649, 651 (9th Cir. 2002) (explaining that "[t]he House committee report stated the . . .

KERR, V. M. E. K. W. B. C. Ph. D. A. L. M. D. L. Re- E. a k a J. L. a k a L. P. W. Re- K. C. Re- J. Re- IJ G. v. POLIS,, 930 F.3d 1190 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . Found. , 454 U.S. 151, 160, 102 S.Ct. 205, 70 L.Ed.2d 309 (1981) ; Village of Arlington Heights v. . . .

WECKESSER, v. KNIGHT ENTERPRISES S. E. LLC,, 391 F. Supp. 3d 529 (D.S.C. 2019)

. . . PowerComm Constr., Inc. , 309 F.R.D. 349, 368 (D. Md. 2015). . . .

IN RE LICKING RIVER MINING, LLC, v. LLC,, 603 B.R. 336 (Bankr. E.D. Ky. 2019)

. . . Kimbler , 520 S.W.2d 309, 311 (Ky. 1975) ). . . . In re Financial Federated Title & Trust, Inc. , 309 F.3d 1325, 1332 (11th Cir. 2002). . . .

ANDERSON v. GHALY,, 930 F.3d 1066 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Doe , 536 U.S. 273, 283, 122 S.Ct. 2268, 153 L.Ed.2d 309 (2002) (emphasis omitted). . . .

MOLINA, v. PENNSYLVANIA SOCIAL SERVICE UNION,, 392 F. Supp. 3d 469 (M.D. Pa. 2019)

. . . Doe, 536 U.S. 273, 284-85, 122 S.Ct. 2268, 153 L.Ed.2d 309 (2002) ). . . .

UNITED STATES v. C. SCHMIDT,, 930 F.3d 858 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Delaware , 503 U.S. 159, 112 S.Ct. 1093, 117 L.Ed.2d 309 (1992). . . . Delaware , 503 U.S. 159, 165, 112 S.Ct. 1093, 117 L.Ed.2d 309 (1992) ). . . .

PARAMOUNT MEDIA GROUP, INC. v. VILLAGE OF BELLWOOD, 929 F.3d 914 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . McQueen , 818 F.3d 309, 323 n.7 (7th Cir. 2016). . . .

GRAVES, I. Y. M. Y. A. Y. v. A. LIOI L. Jr. I. Y. M. Y. A. Y. v. A. L. Jr., 930 F.3d 307 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . Id. at 309, 116 S.Ct. 834. . . .

UNITED STATES v. HANSEN,, 929 F.3d 1238 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . Gillies , 332 U.S. 708, 68 S.Ct. 316, 92 L.Ed. 309 (1948) (plurality opinion), then a reviewing court . . .

VENCKIENE, v. UNITED STATES, 929 F.3d 843 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Loisel , 259 U.S. 309, 316-17, 42 S.Ct. 469, 66 L.Ed. 956 (1922) (reaffirming distinction drawn in Charlton . . .

UNIVERSAL CABLE PRODUCTIONS, LLC, a LLC, a v. ATLANTIC SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, a, 929 F.3d 1143 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Leather Co ., 246 U.S. 297, 302, 38 S.Ct. 309, 62 L.Ed. 726 (1918). . . .

CITY OF LOS ANGELES, v. P. BARR, R., 929 F.3d 1163 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Sessions , 309 F. Supp. 3d 289, 321 (E.D. Pa. 2018), aff'd in part, vacated in part sub nom. . . .

UNITED STATES v. BLUNT, v. III,, 930 F.3d 119 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . McGlory , 968 F.2d 309, 340 (3d Cir. 1992). . . .

UNITED STATES v. MONTALVO- FEBUS,, 930 F.3d 30 (1st Cir. 2019)

. . . Colón-Rosario, 921 F.3d 306, 309 (1st Cir. 2019). . . .

PENNSYLVANIA v. PRESIDENT UNITED STATES D. C., 930 F.3d 543 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Borough of Tenafly, 309 F.3d 144, 157 (3d Cir. 2002) ); accord Fed. R. Civ. P. 65. . . .

DILLARD v. CITY OF SPRINGDALE, ARKANSAS O L. P. L. P. USA, LLC v. O L. P. L. P. USA, LLC, 930 F.3d 935 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Acts 891 (amending § 9-27-309(j)). . . .

STARR INDEMNITY LIABILITY COMPANY, v. BRIGHTSTAR CORP., 388 F. Supp. 3d 304 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . Co., 309 F.3d 76, 86 (2d Cir. 2002) ; Lawyers' Fund for Client Prot. of State of N.Y. v. . . . Co., 309 F.3d 76, 88 n.7 (2d Cir. 2002). . . .

GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, v. S. NADKARNI,, 391 F. Supp. 3d 917 (N.D. Cal. 2019)

. . . Rptr. 509, 710 P.2d 309.) ... . . .

H. WILSON, v. SAFELITE GROUP, INC., 930 F.3d 429 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . App'x 305, 309 (6th Cir. 2015). . . .

UNITED STATES v. WILLIAMS,, 930 F.3d 44 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Quinones , 511 F.3d 289, 309 (2d Cir. 2007) (admitting evidence of uncharged criminal conduct in order . . .

JAMES, v. STATE, 275 So. 3d 250 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . SC18-309, 2018 WL 3097727 (Fla. June 25, 2018). Wetherell, Osterhaus, and Winokur, JJ., concur. . . .

ARIAS LEIVA, v. WARDEN,, 928 F.3d 1281 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Loisel , 259 U.S. 309, 312, 42 S.Ct. 469, 66 L.Ed. 956 (1922). . . .

UNITED STATES v. AFRIYIE,, 929 F.3d 63 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Nektalov , 461 F.3d 309, 313-14 (2d Cir. 2006) (internal quotation marks omitted). . . .

MERCK CO. INC. v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,, 385 F. Supp. 3d 81 (D.D.C. 2019)

. . . City of Arlington , 569 U.S. at 309, 133 S.Ct. 1863 (Breyer, J., concurring) (citing Gonzales v. . . . FCC , 309 F.3d 796, 805 (D.C. . . .

L. BANKS, v. NORTHERN TRUST CORPORATION, 929 F.3d 1046 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . See id. at 309-10. . . .

UNITED STATES v. SANTARELLI, No. In No., 929 F.3d 95 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Box 309, Suite 311, Scranton, PA 18503, Kate L. . . .

ATHENA DIAGNOSTICS, INC. LTD. E. V. v. MAYO COLLABORATIVE SERVICES, LLC,, 927 F.3d 1333 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . Chakrabarty , 447 U.S. 303, 309, 100 S.Ct. 2204, 65 L.Ed.2d 144 (1980) ); see also Parker v. . . . intended statutory subject matter to 'include anything under the sun that is made by man,' " id. at 309 . . .