Cases from cite.case.law:

ROLLAS, v. DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION,, 243 So. 3d 474 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . of a real estate licensee in the transaction; provided the act was a violation proscribed in section 475.25 . . .

JESTER v. PAWLEY,, 245 So. 3d 859 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . Practices Act (FDUTPA, Chapter 501, Florida Statutes (2016)), violation of sections 475.42(1)(e) and 475.25 . . .

KJELLANDER KC v. J. ABBOTT, L. J. d b a LLC d b a, 199 So. 3d 1129 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . See §§ -455.227(l)(a), 475.25(l)(b), 475.278(4)(a)l.-2., 475.42(l)(e), (l)(n), Fla. . . .

R. M- G. A. R. a v. BOARD OF EDUCATION FOR THE LAS VEGAS CITY SCHOOLS, A. R. R. M- G. R M- G. v. v. R. M- G. A. R., 645 F. App'x 672 (10th Cir. 2016)

. . . it awarded the entire amount requested, $7,179.02 ($6,250 in fees; $453.77 in gross receipts tax; $475.25 . . .

HENDRICKS, v. DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION,, 183 So. 3d 1172 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . Section 475.25(l)(b), Florida Statutes (2014), includes “fraud, misrepresentation, concealment, false . . . argument that Appellants did not obtain judgments against the Licensees for acts prohibited by section 475.25 . . . These judgments fall squarely within the scope of section 475.25. See Dullea v. Dep’t of Bus. . . . [licensee] committed fraud in the course of the real estate transaction, as contemplated by section 475.25 . . . Appellants have shown that they obtained judgments for acts prohibited by section 475.25. . . .

SMITH, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION,, 182 So. 3d 767 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . under Section 120.57(2),■ Florida Statutes* (2013), the Commission concluded' that he violated section 475.25 . . . A real estate broker violates section 475.25(l)(u) when he fails to. . . . .” § 475.25(l)(u), Fla. Stat. (2013). . . . Smith had violated section 475.25(l)(u), Florida Statutes (2013), a. . . . Smith was violating section 475.25(l)(u) in supervising other companies for which he was a broker, and . . .

SMITH, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION,, 159 So. 3d 1017 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . The complaint concluded that the appellant’s license was due to be suspended pursuant to section 475.25 . . .

COMAS, v. DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, REAL ESTATE COMMISSION,, 40 So. 3d 878 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . Webb, 367 So.2d 201 (Fla.1979); § 475.25(1), Fla. Stat. (1999-2008). . . .

W. DORCELY, v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, 22 So. 3d 834 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . capacity of a real estate licensee in the transaction; provided the act was a violation proscribed in s. 475.25 . . .

E. CAMBAS, v. DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION,, 6 So. 3d 668 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . turpitude or fraudulent or dishonest dealings, and thus, were not subject to discipline pursuant to section 475.25 . . . Section 475.25(1)(f), Florida Statutes, allows the Commission to discipline a real estate licensee who . . . Section 475.25 does not define what constitutes moral turpitude. . . .

TAYLOR, v. DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE,, 975 So. 2d 626 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . Division of Real Estate, filed an administrative complaint claiming that appellant had violated section 475.25 . . .

GOODSON, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE,, 978 So. 2d 195 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . Appellant was charged with violating numerous provisions of section 475.25(1), Florida Statutes, regulating . . .

K. BEMENDERFER, v. DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION,, 955 So. 2d 659 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . The DBPR-DRE guideline calling for an eight-year suspension applies to violations of section 475.25(1 . . . Similarly, in this case FREC’s use of a “catch-all” may be authorized by section 475.25(1)(e), but the . . . DBPR-DRE's administrative complaint alleged: (1) culpable negligence or breach of trust, under § 475.25 . . . (1)(b); (2) failure to account for or deliver funds, under § 475.25(1)(d)(1); (3) failure to maintain . . . licensee to properly prepare monthly written escrow account reconciliations, under § 475.25(1)(e); and . . .

ROMANO, v. DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL,, 948 So. 2d 938 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . the Florida Real Estate Commission, (the “Commission”), which found him guilty of violating section 475.25 . . . (l)(f), Florida Statutes, and one violation of section 475.25(l)(p), Florida Statutes. . . . This argument is based on the fact that unlike section 475.25(l)(p), section 475.25(l)(f) references . . . Because Romano pled guilty, counsel argues, section 475.25(l)(f) does not apply. . . . Finally, section 475.25(l)(p) must be read as a whole with the rest of the statute. Montgomery v. . . .

v. Co., 31 Ct. Int'l Trade 49 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2007)

. . . in whole or in part of hydrocarbons derived in whole or in part from petroleum), HTSUS, rather than 475.25 . . .

UNITED STATES v. GOLDEN GATE PETROLEUM CO., 469 F. Supp. 2d 1338 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2007)

. . . in whole or in part of hydrocarbons derived in whole or in part from petroleum), HTSUS, rather than 475.25 . . .

v. Co., 30 Ct. Int'l Trade 174 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2006)

. . . The Government liquidated the Portland entry as “motor fuel” under item 475.25, TSUS, the same tariff . . . immediate effect on Golden Gate Petroleum’s classification and initial deposit of duties under item 475.25 . . . classification of the merchandise in item 432.10, TSUS, claiming that it was properly classifiable under item 475.25 . . . Petroleum had been “grossly negligent” in classifying the gasoline from Russia as “motor fuel” under 475.25 . . .

METEOR MOTORS, INC. d b a v. THOMPSON HALBACH ASSOCIATES,, 914 So. 2d 479 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . See, e.g., § 475.25(l)(h), Fla. Stat. (2004); Winchester v. . . .

DJOKIC v. DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE, STATE OF FLORIDA,, 875 So. 2d 693 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . The administrative complaint principally charged the licensees with violations of section 475.25(l)(d . . . [the section (l)(d) charge], as well as section 475.25(l)(k) [the section (l)(k) charge] for their failure . . . See §§ 475.25(l)(d)l.; (k), Fla. Stat. (2003). . . . has not been satisfied in accordance with the terms of the judgment within a reasonable time.... ” § 475.25 . . . Dep’t of Prof'l Regulation, Div. of Real Estate, 592 So.2d 1136 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992) (section 475.25 is . . .

JONES, v. DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL,, 873 So. 2d 1266 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . this chapter at the time which had been agreed upon or is required by law,” in violation of section 475.25 . . . (l)(d)(l) and “dishonest dealing by trick, scheme or device,” in violation of section 475.25(l)(b). . . . (l)(b), affirm as to its findings on section 475.25(l)(d)(l) and remand for reconsideration of the penalty . . . It found, and Jones does not dispute, that he violated section 475.25(l)(d)(l). . . . Because the finding of guilt as to section 475.25(l)(b) must be reversed, we remand this cause to the . . .

SALTMARSH, CLEVELAND GUND, P. A. a SC G L. C. a v. J. PAPPAS P. A. a, 799 So. 2d 348 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . See e.g., § 475.25(l)(h), Fla. . . .

In ABRASS, v. K., 268 B.R. 665 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2001)

. . . If White is successful in his claim, Florida Statute § 475.25 provides that FREC can take certain disciplinary . . . against the Debtor if it finds that the Debtor committed any infraction listed in Florida Statute § 475.25 . . . capacity of a real estate licensee in the transaction; provided the act was a violation proscribed in s. 475.25 . . . Stat. § 475.25 reads as follows: (1) The commission may deny an application for licensure, registration . . . Stat. § 475.25 (2000). . . .

BOUSA, f k a U. S. A. v., 25 Ct. Int'l Trade 386 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2001)

. . . Service (“Customs”), correctly classified an entry of a petroleum product as “Motor Fuel” under item 475.25 . . . The parties stipulate that if the merchandise is not classifiable under item 475.25 TSUS, then it should . . . Customs announced that “ [classification of an imported petroleum product as a motor fuel under item 475.25 . . . As item 475.25 is a “chief use” provision, classification of merchandise thereunder is controlled by . . . Customs also argues that item 475.25 TSUS covers motor fuels other than automotive gasoline. . . .

STARR, v. DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE,, 729 So. 2d 1006 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . The judge specifically found she had violated the provisions of section 475.25(l)(m) (“Has obtained a . . . Rather, appellant argues that section 475.25, Florida Statutes (1997), does not empower the Florida Real . . .

L. WHITE, v. DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION,, 715 So. 2d 1130 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . or device, culpable negligence or breach of trust in a business transaction, in violation of section 475.25 . . . That constitutes violations of sections 475.25(l)(b), 475.25(l)(d)l. and 475.25(l)(k). . . . that White has been found guilty on more than two occasions of misconduct warranting suspension. § 475.25 . . . Section 475.25(1) provides that: The commission may ... revoke a license ... if it finds that the licensee . . .

F. PHILLIPS, Ph. D. v. DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE,, 737 So. 2d 553 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . Florida Administrative Code, and section 475.451, Florida Statutes (1995), in violation of section 475.25 . . .

v., 22 Ct. Int'l Trade 730 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1998)

. . . was liquidated by defendant the United States Customs Service (“Customs”) as “Motor Fuel” under Item 475.25 . . .

K. MAZUREK, v. DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE,, 711 So. 2d 199 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . for six months based upon the Commission’s conclusion that Mazu-rek was guilty of violating section 475.25 . . .

M. ARIAS, v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE,, 710 So. 2d 655 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Real Estate, finding that the agent had violated section 475.25 . . . The Commission issued a final order finding that Arias had violated section 475.25(l)(b), suspending . . . The statute at issue, section 475.25(l)(b) provides: (1) The commission may deny an application for licensure . . . Disciplinary Guideline 6IJ2-24.001, provides in pertinent part: VIOLATIONS (c) 475.25(l)(b) Guilty of . . . 455.2273, we agree with the licensee’s position that the legislature could not have intended section 475.25 . . .

G. MILLIKEN, v. DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION,, 709 So. 2d 595 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . of the Florida Real Estate Commission (FREC), which found him guilty of having violated subsections 475.25 . . . (l)(f) and 475.25(l)(n), Florida Statutes, and imposed a penalty of suspension of his real estate license . . . also argues that possession of cocaine with intent to distribute is not a crime which violates section 475.25 . . . Section 475.25(1) provides FREC may suspend a license for a period not to exceed ten years. . . .

B. B. NELSON, v. DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION,, 707 So. 2d 378 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . Specifically, the Department alleged that Nelson was in violation of section 475.25(1)©, Florida Statutes . . . The purpose of section 475.25, he contends, is to protect the public from dishonest real estate salesmen . . . possession of a controlled substance does not establish moral turpitude within the purview of section 475.25 . . . ; discipline by the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation, pursuant to section 475.25 . . .

L. WALKER, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION,, 705 So. 2d 652 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . DBPR alleged that Munch was subject to discipline pursuant to section 475.25(l)(b) of the Florida Statutes . . . Section 475.25(1) of the Florida Statutes authorizes FREC to revoke a real estate salesperson’s license . . . if it finds that the salesperson violated the provisions of section 475.25(l)(m). . . . Having concluded that Walker had violated section 475.25(l)(m), it was within the agency’s discretion . . . Section 475.25(l)(m), Florida Statutes (1995), provides: 475.25 Discipline.— (1) The commission may deny . . . . § 475.25(l)(m), Fla. Stat. (1995); See Ferris v. . . .

HAAS, v. DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL REGULATION,, 699 So. 2d 863 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . Section 475.25(1), Florida Statutes, provides that the commission may suspend a license up to a maximum . . . upon certification that Haas has complied with the terms and conditions of the disciplinary order. § 475.25 . . .

J. VOGT, Jr. v. DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE,, 698 So. 2d 1374 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . See § 475.25(1X0, (1)(p), Fla. Stat. (1995); Florida Real Estate Comm’n v. . . .

In BULK OIL USA INC. BOUSA, INC. f k a USA v. UNITED STATES, 209 B.R. 29 (S.D.N.Y. 1997)

. . . entries under the classification of “motor fuel,” subject to a duty rate of $.0125 per gallon under item 475.25 . . .

CLARENDON MARKETING, INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 955 F. Supp. 1501 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1997)

. . . , which carried a rate of duty at .25 cents per gallon); Motor fuel (TSUS Part 10, Schedule 4, item 475.25 . . .

v., 21 Ct. Int'l Trade 59 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1997)

. . . , which carried a rate of duty at .25 cents per gallon); Motor fuel (TSUS Part 10, Schedule 4, item 475.25 . . .

S. CASERTA, v. DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION,, 686 So. 2d 651 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . a three-count complaint against Caserta charging him with violating section 475.452 and paragraphs 475.25 . . .

T. WILLIAMS, Jr. t a v. DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION,, 683 So. 2d 670 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . The appellant licensee was subject to discipline under section 475.25(l)(m), Florida Statutes for misrepresenting . . .

M. WEISS, v. DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION,, 677 So. 2d 98 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . Section 475.25(1) allowed FREC to mete out a variety of punishments. . . .

K. SCHREIBER v. G. KELLOGG, 194 B.R. 559 (E.D. Pa. 1996)

. . . hours, or approximately 10 percent of 201.75 hours, from 495.25 hours for a new base line figure of 475.25 . . . We must now decide what part of the remaining 475.25 hours can be attributed to any benefit Schreiber . . . Schreiber at the 1993 trial and subsequent hearings, we find that one-half, or 238 of the remaining 475.25 . . .

A. VITI, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS,, 657 So. 2d 1277 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . He alleges that FREC erred by finding him guilty of violating section 475.25(l)(f), Florida Statutes . . . officer found Viti to have been convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude, a violation of section 475.25 . . . hearing officer also found that Viti was not guilty of a second count that charged a violation of section 475.25 . . . however, because FREC did not alter the hearing officer’s conclusion that no violation of subsection 475.25 . . . rejection of findings pertaining only to the hearing officer’s recitation and interpretation of section 475.25 . . .

J. GAUTHIER, v. FLORIDA REAL ESTATE COMMISSION,, 654 So. 2d 580 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . , artifice or trickery or by any other act which would constitute a violation proscribed in section 475.25 . . . pretenses, artifice, or trickery or by any other act which would constitute a violation proscribed in s. 475.25 . . . cause of action was based on a real estate brokerage transaction or any violation proscribed in s. 475.25 . . . See §§ 475.482(1), 475.483, & 475.25, Fla.Stat. (1991). . . .

BAIN, v. STATE, 642 So. 2d 578 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . . §§ 475.25, 494.0041, Fla.Stat. (1993). . . .

Co. f k a UPG v., 17 Ct. Int'l Trade 222 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1993)

. . . The Customs Service, upon liquidation, reclassified the merchandise under Item 475.25, TSUS, as “Motor . . .

J. SON, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE,, 608 So. 2d 75 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . The Commission filed an administrative complaint against Son pursuant to section 475.25(l)(f), Florida . . . In this case, the hearing officer correctly applied the Ayala court’s reasoning to section 475.25(l)( . . . Section 458.331(l)(c) contains virtually identical language as section 475.25(l)(f). . . .

THE FLORIDA BAR RE ADVISORY OPINION- NONLAWYER PREPARATION OF RESIDENTIAL LEASES UP TO ONE YEAR IN DURATION. THE FLORIDA BAR RE APPROVAL OF FORMS PURSUANT b OF THE RULES REGULATING THE FLORIDA BAR, 602 So. 2d 914 (Fla. 1992)

. . . . § 475.25; Rule 10-5, Rules Regulating The Florida Bar. . . .

DULLEA, v. DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REGULATION, FLORIDA REAL ESTATE COMMISSION,, 599 So. 2d 207 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . cause of action was based on a real estate brokerage transaction or any violation proscribed in s. 475.25 . . . Section 475.25 sets forth a number of violations for which real estate licensees may be disciplined, . . . and Waddle committed fraud in the course of the real estate transaction, as contemplated by section 475.25 . . . clear the citation included a typographical error and that the trial court intended to cite to section 475.25 . . .

A. ANGLICKIS v. DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE,, 593 So. 2d 298 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . Counts I and II alleged that appellants violated section 475.25(l)(b), Florida Statutes (1987) for culpable . . . Counts III and IV alleged that appellants violated section 475.25(l)(k), Florida Statutes (1987), as . . . Count VII alleged that Anglickis was in violation of section 475.25(i)(o), Florida Statutes (1987) for . . .

J. MUNCH, v. DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE,, 592 So. 2d 1136 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . device, culpable negligence or breach of trust in a business transaction,” in violation of Section 475.25 . . . a salesman for a person not registered as his employer,” in violation of Sections 475.-42(l)(b) and 475.25 . . . Therefore, he concluded, further, that no violation of Section 475.25(l)(b), as charged in Count I of . . . It is clear that Section 475.25(l)(b) is penal in nature. . . . Reading the first clause of Section 475.25(l)(b) (the portion of the statute which appellant was charged . . .

Co. v., 15 Ct. Int'l Trade 511 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1991)

. . . Liquidation for each entry was under TSUS item 475.25 as “Motor Fuel” atadutyrate of 1.25 cents per gallon . . .

FLORIDA LEAGUE OF CITIES, INC. v. ADMINISTRATION COMMISSION TOWN OF PEMBROKE PARK, v. STATE ADMINISTRATION COMMISSION, VILLAGE OF VIRGINIA GARDENS, v. STATE ADMINISTRATION COMMISSION, TOWN OF PEMBROKE PARK, v. STATE ADMINISTRATION COMMISSION,, 586 So. 2d 397 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . Webb, (maximum 2-year real estate license suspension under § 475.25(1), Fla.Stat. (1975)); Decola v. . . .

G. NORRIS, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE,, 579 So. 2d 390 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . probable cause to believe that a violation of the Florida Real Estate Practice Act occurred per Section 475.25 . . . at its meeting of June 19, 1990, the Commission finds the Respondent appellant guilty of violating § 475.25 . . .

RAMSEY, v. DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE,, 574 So. 2d 291 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . suspending for three years her license as a real estate broker for an alleged violation of section 475.25 . . .

A. WALLEN, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE,, 568 So. 2d 975 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . This complaint was amended to reflect a single claim of violation of section 475.25(l)(d) upon stipulation . . . The commission determined that Wallen had violated section 475.25(l)(d) in failing to timely institute . . .

R. HAMBLEY, v. DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE,, 568 So. 2d 970 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . Hambley was charged in a multiple-count administrative complaint with violations of section 475.25(l) . . . Additionally, the complaint alleged violations of section 475.25(l)(b), i.e., culpable negligence and . . . because that penalty was not added to the Commission’s statutory authority until October 1, 1988. § 475.25 . . .

MOYANT, v. R. BEATTIE,, 561 So. 2d 1319 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . judgment ... in any action wherein the cause of action was based on any violation proscribed in s. 475.25 . . .

E. BLACK, v. DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE,, 553 So. 2d 224 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . See § 475.25(1) & (2), Fla.Stat. (1987). . . .

C. PLUTO M. v. DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE,, 538 So. 2d 539 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . fraud, misrepresentation^ and culpable negligence in a business transaction, in violation of section 475.25 . . . The Commission stated that Thomas Pluto’s penalty was contrary to those authorized under section 475.25 . . . the increased penalty of Thomas Pluto by finding it contrary to the penalties authorized by section 475.25 . . . officer recommended a penalty of ninety days suspension and a reprimand, both authorized by section 475.25 . . .

H. SCHARRER, Sr. v. DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE,, 536 So. 2d 320 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . below, and that, accordingly, the appellant was subject to disciplinary action pursuant to Section 475.25 . . .

In S. MULLIN, Jr. G. E. BERRY v. S. MULLIN, Jr., 91 B.R. 175 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1988)

. . . . § 475.05, § 475.25(l)(d) and § 475.25(l)(k) (1988); Fla.Admin.Code Ann. 21V-14.011 (1988). . . .

M. LEWIS, F. B. L. M. v. STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE,, 529 So. 2d 751 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . convincing evidence existed to revoke the real estate licenses of all the appellants, pursuant to section 475.25 . . .

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION v COTTRELL, 30 Fla. Supp. 2d 154 (Fla. Div. Admin. Hearings 1988)

. . . possession of a controlled substance does not establish moral turpitude within the purview of Section 475.25 . . .

ANTEL, v. DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, FLORIDA REAL ESTATE COMMISSION,, 522 So. 2d 1056 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . . § 475.25(l)(f), Fla.Stat. (1985). .§ 475.17(l)(a), Fla.Stat. (1985). . . .

ACCURATE FINANCIAL CORPORATION, a v. BURMAN, G. Jr. a, 519 So. 2d 689 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . Section 475.25(l)(d)(l), Florida Statutes (1985). . . .

DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE v. ALFERT TOLEDO REALTY, INC., 29 Fla. Supp. 2d 237 (Fla. Div. Admin. Hearings 1987)

. . . Inc., licensed as a real estate broker and corporate broker, respectively, had violated Subsection 475.25 . . . business transaction and with having violated a duty imposed upon them by law as proscribed by Subsection 475.25 . . . Culpable negligence and breach of trust are not defined in Subsection 475.25(l)(b), nor by agency rule . . . conclusions of law, it is RECOMMENDED that respondents be found not guilty of violation Subsection 475.25 . . .

N. HECTOR, v. DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, FLORIDA REAL ESTATE COMMISSION,, 504 So. 2d 469 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . The Commission predicated its reprimand on the finding that Hector had violated section 475.25(l)(p), . . .

PREVIEWS, INC. a v. J. T. MURFF, Sr. J. T. Jr. d b a M- K, 502 So. 2d 1317 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . Further, Section 475.25(l)(h), Florida Statutes (1985), provides, in part: [HJowever, a licensed broker . . . Indeed, such appears to be clearly within the contemplation of Section 475.25(l)(h), supra. . . . That is, Eberhardt has not brought himself within the above quoted provisions of Section 475.25(l)(h) . . .

DOW CHEMICAL CO. v. UNITED STATES,, 647 F. Supp. 1574 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1986)

. . . That interpretation would render items 475.25 475.35, TSUS superfluous and result in a partial nullification . . .

Co. v., 10 Ct. Int'l Trade 550 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1986)

. . . That interpretation would render items 475.25 475.35, TSUS superfluous and result in a partial nullification . . .

DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, v. CLARK,, 21 Fla. Supp. 2d 208 (Fla. Div. Admin. Hearings 1986)

. . . against the Respondents, alleging all were guilty of fraud, misrepresentation, etc., contrary to Section 475.25 . . . Is the failure to report a rental to an owner a violation of Section 475.25(l)(b), Florida Statutes? . . . Is the failure to give a buyer a disclosure statement a violation of Section 475.25(l)(b), Florida Statutes . . . Section 475.25(l)(b) provides: (1) The commission may deny an application for licensure, registration . . . Neither Patricia Ann Clark or Caloosa were proven to violate Section 475.25(l)(b), Florida Statutes. . . .

DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE v. RICH HILL REALTY,, 24 Fla. Supp. 2d 258 (Fla. Div. Admin. Hearings 1985)

. . . Complaint in this case alleging in four Counts that Respondent had, in several respects, violated Section 475.25 . . . or device, culpable negligence and breach of trust in a business transaction in violation of Section 475.25 . . . Section 475.25 permits the Commission to discipline a licensee’s license if it finds that the licensee . . . In Count III of the Administrative Complaint, the Respondents are alleged to have violated Section 475.25 . . . deposit in an escrow account until disbursement had been properly authorized in violation of Section 475.25 . . .

H. MORRIS, Sr. v. DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION,, 474 So. 2d 841 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . Estate Commission which suspended his real estate license as a broker for one year, pursuant to section 475.25 . . . this case, the department filed an administrative ' complaint charging Morris with violating section 475.25 . . . concluded that Morris’ issuance of a check drawn on insufficient funds constituted a violation of section 475.25 . . . substance of the charges alleged against Morris, nor does the commission take this view of section 475.25 . . .

R. LaROSSA v. DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE,, 474 So. 2d 322 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . recommended that LaRossa and DuPont be found guilty of violating subsections (b) and (k) of section 475.25 . . . his only interest is as a broker, but also for such conduct in his own personal business affairs. § 475.25 . . . of dishonest dealing with regard to his personal use of his nephew’s money in violation of section 475.25 . . . We reach a different conclusion, however, as to the alleged violation of subsection 475.25(l)(k). . . . Department of Professional Regulation, 441 So.2d 1121 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983) (subsection 475.25(l)(d), Florida . . .

L. LLOYD, v. DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION,, 473 So. 2d 720 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . Hearings filed a recommended order urging that Lloyd’s salesman’s license be revoked for violating section 475.25 . . .

Co. v., 9 Ct. Int'l Trade 197 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1985)

. . . Beach, California, and were classified by the Customs Service (Customs) as "motor fuels” under item 475.25 . . . For the purposes of this part— (b) "Motor Fuel” (item 475.25) is any product derived primarily from petroleum . . . Classified under: Schedule 4, Part 10: 475.25 Motor Fuel. 1.250 per gal. . . . Since item 475.25 is a chief use designation, and the chief use of the product in question concededly . . .

AMORIENT PETROLEUM CO. v. UNITED STATES, 607 F. Supp. 1484 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1985)

. . . Beach, California, and were classified by the Customs Service (Customs) as “motor fuels” under item 475.25 . . . For the purposes of this part— (b) “Motor Fuel” (item 475.25) is any product derived primarily from petroleum . . . Classified under: Schedule 4, Part 10: 475.25 Motor Fuel. 1.25475.25 is a chief use designation, and the chief use of the product in question concededly . . .

PARISER v. DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION FOWLER v. DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, 10 Fla. Supp. 2d 177 (Fla. Div. Admin. Hearings 1985)

. . . Such authority, for example, has been granted to the Florida Real Estate Commission by Section 475.25 . . .

EXPORTOS APPAREL GROUP, LTD. d b a Le v. CHEMICAL BANK,, 593 F. Supp. 1253 (S.D.N.Y. 1984)

. . . In September, 1982 Chemical credited Exportos’s account in the sum of $150,-475.25, representing the . . .

GOLUB, v. DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION,, 450 So. 2d 229 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . As pointed out by the majority, the Legislature amended the predecessor to section 475.25(1)(d) after . . . Senia or DPR an accounting or delivery of the commission due Senia violated the provisions of section 475.25 . . .

FLEISCHMAN, v. DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION,, 441 So. 2d 1121 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . Upon the holding that Section 475.25(l)(d), Florida Statutes (1981) does not, as the commission ruled . . . under these facts — that Fleischman was guilty of fraud, dishonest dealing or the like under Section 475.25 . . . and based its finding upon the conclusion only that his failure to return the $2,500 violated Sec. 475.25 . . . But this conclusion was based upon a violation of what is now Sec. 475.25(l)(b), which expressly proscribes . . .

J. PICCIONE J. v. DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION,, 440 So. 2d 474 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . found the appellant was guilty of fraud, misrepresentation, concealment, etc., and violated Section 475.25 . . .

R. WINCHESTER, v. AMRHEIN- HATCHER, INC. a a, 436 So. 2d 274 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . Lara-san, Inc., was entitled to a referral fee or the sharing of a commission as authorized by Section 475.25 . . .

AQUINO, v. DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, 430 So. 2d 598 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . occurred for Petitioner to overcome the statutory disqualification applicable to Petitioner pursuant to § 475.25 . . . Section 475.25, Florida Statutes (1981) provides the grounds upon which the Board may deny an application . . .

A. SANTANIELLO, v. DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION BOARD OF REAL ESTATE,, 432 So. 2d 82 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . Appellant was charged with violating section 475.42(l)(j), Florida Statutes (1979), and therefore section 475.25 . . .

INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, v. UNITED STATES Co., 561 F. Supp. 106 (E.D. Pa. 1983)

. . . Cannon is entitled to damages in the amount of $23,-475.25, calculated as follows: Principal - 23 x 476.25 . . .

TASSY a v. A. HALL, A. a, 429 So. 2d 30 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . Section 475.25(l)(h), Florida Statutes, expressly permits a licensed broker of this state to share a . . .

BEKIEMPIS v. DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION,, 421 So. 2d 693 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . the evidence was insufficient or that no intentional misrepresentation, as contemplated by Section 475.25 . . . The Department then asked that the Board find Bekiempis guilty of violating Section 475.25(l)(b), Florida . . .

O. B. LINKOUS O. B. v. DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, 417 So. 2d 802 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . Appellants are subject only to the penalties provided in section 475.25(1), Florida Statutes (1981), . . .

A. C. KIBLER, v. DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION,, 418 So. 2d 1081 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . Twenty on the agenda was an allegation that appellants and one Richard Testut had violated section 475.25 . . .

F. LEWIS, v. DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION,, 410 So. 2d 593 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . The Department filed a complaint on January 31, 1980, charging Lewis violated section 475.25(l)(a), Florida . . .

W. ADAMS D. v. STATE PROFESSIONAL PRACTICES COUNCIL,, 406 So. 2d 1170 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . possession of a controlled substance does not establish moral turpitude within the purview of Section 475.25 . . .

E. KOUT v. DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, BOARD OF REAL ESTATE,, 405 So. 2d 435 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . 90 days on the asserted ground that the facts found by the officer established violations of Section 475.25 . . .

BRUNER, v. BOARD OF REAL ESTATE, DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION,, 399 So. 2d 4 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . been guilty of conduct that would have been grounds for revoking or suspending a license, and section 475.25 . . . On July 1, 1979, section 475.-25(l)(e), Florida Statutes was renumbered as section 475.25(l)(f), Florida . . .

G. PEARL, v. FLORIDA BOARD OF REAL ESTATE,, 394 So. 2d 189 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . Pearl’s sole point on appeal is this: “475.25(l)(e), FLORIDA STATUTES, WHICH PERMITTED THE BOARD TO SUSPEND . . . I agree with the majority that Section 475.25(l)(e), Florida Statutes (1977), is not unconstitutionally . . . whether convictions for possession of controlled substances evidence moral turpitude under Section 475.25 . . . possession of a controlled substance does not establish moral turpitude within the purview of section 475.25 . . . Finding no denial of due process for vagueness or other constitutional impediment, we hold that Section 475.25 . . . us that mere possession of a controlled substance is not a crime within the contemplation of section 475.25 . . .

TOMBERG REALTY, INC. v. BOARD OF REAL ESTATE,, 392 So. 2d 998 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . in Century Village) in depositing these checks to his personal account were in violation of Section 475.25 . . . Section 475.25(l)(i), Florida Statutes (1977) provides that funds must be placed in escrow “until disbursement . . . This was simply not the type transaction that falls within the requirement of Section 475.25(l)(i), Florida . . .

LLERA REALTY, INC. J. M. v. BOARD OF REAL ESTATE, 385 So. 2d 1131 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . ), place a high standard on applicants for registration as real estate brokers or salesmen; Section 475.25 . . .

BYER, v. FLORIDA REAL ESTATE COMMISSION,, 380 So. 2d 511 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . suspending Appellant Byer’s real estate license for six months upon a finding that she violated Sections 475.25 . . . (l)(a) and 475.25(3), Florida Statutes (1975). . . .

KOPF, v. FLORIDA REAL ESTATE COMMISSION,, 379 So. 2d 1327 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . Commission, were: “Based on the foregoing findings of fact, it is concluded that Kopf violated Subsection 475.25 . . . question remains, as first stated, whether the same conduct may be considered a violation of Section 475.25 . . . We hold that the present conduct does not amount to a “course of conduct” as contemplated by Section 475.25 . . . reversed and the cause is remanded for the imposition of a suspension of license pursuant to Section 475.25 . . . Reversed and remanded. . § 475.25(3), Fla.Stat. (1977), provides: “The registration of a registrant may . . .

C. SELLARS, v. FLORIDA REAL ESTATE COMMISSION,, 380 So. 2d 1052 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

. . . Real Estate Commission order revoking his real estate broker’s license for: (a) Violation of section 475.25 . . . (b) Violation of section 475.25(l)(h), authorizing discipline of a broker who “[r]end-ered an opinion . . . inform the purchaser before any portion of the purchase price is paid”; and (d) Violation of section 475.25 . . . Having found that the Commission may properly revoke the license of a broker who violates Sections 475.25 . . . (l)(a) and (d), and Section 475.25(3), Florida Statutes (1977), and Fla.Admin. . . . Second, the commission argues that Section 475.25(l)(h), Florida Statutes (1977), provides that registration . . . device, culpable negligence and breach of trust in the business transaction in violation of Section 475.25 . . . substantial evidence that Sellars attempted to cheat, trick or defraud anyone in violation of Section 475.25 . . . Finally, under Count 28 of the administrative complaint, the commission, as provided for under Section 475.25 . . .