Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 571.05 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 571.05 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 571.05

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XXXV
AGRICULTURE, HORTICULTURE, AND ANIMAL INDUSTRY
Chapter 571
AGRICULTURAL ADVERTISING
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 571.05
571.05 Rules.The department by rule may design, determine, and adopt seals of quality for use in publicizing, advertising, and promoting agricultural products; prescribe minimum standards of quality and grade of agricultural products with which a seal of quality may be used; name and define market packages of agricultural products; fix a reasonable and equitable advertising and promotion fee for such market package of agricultural products; and otherwise adopt rules pursuant to ss. 120.536(1) and 120.54 to implement the provisions of this part.
History.s. 1, ch. 63-378; ss. 14, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 10, ch. 90-323; s. 188, ch. 98-200.

F.S. 571.05 on Google Scholar

F.S. 571.05 on Casetext

Amendments to 571.05


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 571.05
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 571.05.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

In ASPARTAME ANTITRUST LITIGATION, 817 F. Supp. 2d 608 (E.D. Pa. 2011)

. . . Scanning 270.79 270.79 Ajinomoto Master CD Replication 211.50 211.50 Ajinomoto Master DVD Replication 571.05 . . . 571.05 Ajinomoto Master CD/DVD Creation 50.00 50.00 Ajinomoto DVD containing extracted data 35.00 35.00 . . .

ROBERT F. GOODWIN, SYDNEY BURT GOODWIN, WILLIAM A. GOODWIN, SARA J. GOODWIN, JOHN A. WITMER AND ANN WITMER V. THE UNITED STATES, 199 Ct. Cl. 1023 (Ct. Cl. 1972)

. . . Goodwin- 11, 571.05 William A. . . .

v. I. V. S. S. Co., 36 F. 569 (D.N.J. 1888)

. . . The invoice value of the damaged goods alone was $571.05; the actual price received for them was $184.85 . . .

v. Co., 24 F. 285 (S.D.N.Y. 1885)

. . . for the whole in the foreign market was $2,901.85., The invoice value of tho damaged goods alone was $571.05 . . . Their invoice value was $571.05. Their value at St. Thomas, if sound, would have been $742.36. . . .