The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XXXV
AGRICULTURE, HORTICULTURE, AND ANIMAL INDUSTRY

Chapter 571
AGRICULTURAL ADVERTISING

View Entire Chapter

CHAPTER 571

AGRICULTURAL ADVERTISING

PART I

FLORIDA SEAL OF QUALITY LAW

(ss. 571.01-571.11)

PART II

FLORIDA AGRICULTURAL PROMOTIONAL CAMPAIGN
ACT

(ss. 571.21-571.301)

PART I

FLORIDA SEAL OF QUALITY LAW

571.01 Short title.

571.02 Purpose.

571.03 Definitions.

571.04 Powers and duties of the department.

571.05 Rules.

571.06 License; application, fee, and conditions.

571.07 Suspension or revocation of license.

571.08 Unlawful acts.

571.09 Penalties.

571.10 Injunction.

571.11 Eggs and poultry; seal of quality violations; administrative penalties.

571.01 Short title.—This part shall be known as the “Florida Seal of Quality Law.”

History.—s. 1, ch. 63-378; s. 6, ch. 90-323.

571.02 Purpose.—The purpose of this part is to authorize the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services to adopt seals of quality to be used in advertising and promoting the sale of agricultural products produced in Florida and to provide controls in the use of such seals of quality.

History.—s. 1, ch. 63-378; ss. 14, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 7, ch. 90-323.

571.03 Definitions.—As used in this part:

(1) “Department” means the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services.

(2) “Person” means an individual, firm, partnership, corporation, association, business, trust, legal representative, or any other business unit.

(3) “Seal of quality” means any word, device, emblem, or symbol adopted by the department for the purpose of identifying and promoting the sale of high-quality agricultural products produced in Florida.

(4) “Reproduce” means to stencil, emboss, print, engrave, impress, imprint, lithograph, or duplicate in any manner or to cause any such acts to be done.

(5) “Agricultural product” includes any fresh or processed horticultural, aquacultural, viticultural, dairy, poultry, apicultural, or other farm or garden product.

(6) “Use of seal of quality” means to imprint a seal of quality on any produce package or container or to attach a reproduction of any seal of quality to any Florida agricultural product package or container of same, or to cause any such acts to be done, for the purpose of identifying any such product in its preparation for market or in any of the various steps in marketing.

History.—s. 1, ch. 63-378; ss. 14, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 220, ch. 71-377; s. 6, ch. 87-367; s. 8, ch. 90-323.

571.04 Powers and duties of the department.—The duty of enforcing and administering this part is vested in the department, and the department is authorized to employ all agents and persons necessary therefor.

(1) All fees collected under this part shall be paid into the State Treasury and placed to the credit of the General Inspection Trust Fund, from which fund there shall be paid the expenses incurred in the enforcement and administration of this part to include publicizing, advertising, and promoting seals of quality and the agricultural products with which such seals of quality are used. The department may accept contributions of money or services to aid in any advertising or promotion work undertaken by it under authority of this part.

(2) The department may register any seal of quality with the Department of State of Florida, United States Patent Office, appropriate offices of other states of the United States and of foreign countries.

(3) The department, through its authorized representatives, is authorized to:

(a) Enter upon the premises, place of business, or vehicle of any applicant or licensee during normal business hours and conditions for the purpose of determining by inspection and examination the sufficiency of bookkeeping systems, accuracy of records, the agricultural products with which the seal of quality is used, articles purporting to be seals of quality or reproductions of same, and for the purpose of determining whether any other provision of this part or any rule adopted hereunder is being violated.

(b) Issue hold orders to owners and custodians and affix copy of same to seal of quality or reproduction of same in the possession of a nonlicensee; any seal of quality or reproduction of same that is an imitation or counterfeit; any agricultural product with which an imitation or counterfeit seal is used; any agricultural product on which a seal of quality is used after failure to make reports and remittance of advertising and promotion fees provided in this part and rules adopted hereunder; any agricultural product with which a seal of quality is used unless said product is labeled to indicate it is packaged by a licensee or to any agricultural product or article with which a seal of quality is used in violation of this part or rules adopted hereunder. Such hold order shall name and describe the product or article to which attached and the amount and address of same, give notice that the product or article to which attached is or is suspected of being sold, offered for sale, or held for the purpose of sale in violation of law or of rules specified in said order and said hold order shall give warning to all persons not to remove or dispose of such product or article by sale or otherwise until permission is granted by the department or by order of court.

History.—s. 1, ch. 63-378; ss. 10, 14, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 9, ch. 90-323.

571.05 Rules.—The department by rule may design, determine, and adopt seals of quality for use in publicizing, advertising, and promoting agricultural products; prescribe minimum standards of quality and grade of agricultural products with which a seal of quality may be used; name and define market packages of agricultural products; fix a reasonable and equitable advertising and promotion fee for such market package of agricultural products; and otherwise adopt rules pursuant to ss. 120.536(1) and 120.54 to implement the provisions of this part.

History.—s. 1, ch. 63-378; ss. 14, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 10, ch. 90-323; s. 188, ch. 98-200.

571.06 License; application, fee, and conditions.—

(1) Application for license to reproduce or use a seal of quality shall be made to the department on application forms supplied by the department. Anyone making application and payment of license fee in the amount of $10 and meeting other qualifications required under this part and rules adopted hereunder shall be granted license for which applied. Such license shall be valid for 1 year from date of issue. The department, however, may refuse to issue a license to any person whose license has been revoked until such person demonstrates to the department that he or she no longer will violate the provisions of this part or rules adopted hereunder.

(2) Issue of license shall be conditioned upon the applicant’s satisfying the department that he or she has an adequate bookkeeping system, that he or she keeps and will keep at all times all records necessary to indicate accurately the total volume of agricultural products on which the seal of quality has been used, that such records shall be open at all times for periodic inspection and examination by auditors of the department. The volume and kind of agricultural products on which the seal of quality has been used shall be reported monthly, quarterly, semiannually, or annually as prescribed by rule of the department and such report shall be made with remittance of the advertising and promotion fee applicable not later than the 20th day of the month following the period covered by the report. The report shall be made under oath and on forms furnished by the department. If the report is not filed and advertising and promotion fee paid on the date due or if the report be false, the amount of fee due is subject to a penalty of 10 percent, which shall be added to the advertising and promotion fee and paid therewith.

History.—s. 1, ch. 63-378; ss. 14, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 11, ch. 90-323; s. 900, ch. 97-103.

571.07 Suspension or revocation of license.—The department, after finding that a licensee has violated any of the provisions of this part or rules adopted hereunder, may revoke the license of any licensee or suspend such license for not more than 1 year.

History.—s. 1, ch. 63-378; ss. 14, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 6, ch. 78-95; s. 12, ch. 90-323.

571.08 Unlawful acts.—It is unlawful for any person:

(1) To remove or dispose of any hold order or any detained agricultural product or article by sale or otherwise without permission of the department or by order of court.

(2) To reproduce or use any seal of quality without license or in violation of the provisions of this part or rules adopted hereunder.

(3) To supply any seal of quality or reproduction of same to any unauthorized person.

(4) To make, reproduce, or use any seal of quality that is an imitation or counterfeit.

(5) To market any agricultural product with which an imitation or counterfeit seal of quality is used.

(6) To market any agricultural product with which a seal of quality is used unless the container of such product is labeled to indicate the name of the licensee.

(7) To fail to report the volume and kind of agricultural product on which a seal of quality has been used and make remittance of advertising and promotion fee when due as provided by rule.

(8) To mislead or deceive, use any imitation, counterfeit, or likeness of the seal of quality on any label, tag, seal, container, sign, or otherwise of any agricultural product of any kind or description for any purpose whatsoever or to mislead or deceive, use any emblem or counterfeit likeness thereof upon or in connection with any offer to sell or advertise for sale or use of any agricultural product of any kind or description which does not in fact lawfully bear a seal of quality.

(9) To fail to do any act required or to do any act prohibited by this part or rules adopted hereunder.

History.—s. 1, ch. 63-378; ss. 14, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 13, ch. 90-323.

571.09 Penalties.—Any person violating any of the provisions of this part or rules adopted hereunder shall for the first offense be guilty of a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083, and for each succeeding offense shall be guilty of a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.

History.—s. 1, ch. 63-378; s. 585, ch. 71-136; s. 14, ch. 90-323.

571.10 Injunction.—In addition to the remedies provided in this part and notwithstanding the existence of any adequate remedy at law, the department is authorized to make application for injunction to a circuit judge, and such circuit judge shall have jurisdiction upon a hearing and for cause shown to grant a temporary or permanent injunction, or both, restraining any person from violating or continuing to violate any of the provisions of this part or from failing or refusing to comply with the requirements of this part or any rule adopted hereunder, such injunction to be issued without bond.

History.—s. 1, ch. 63-378; ss. 14, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 15, ch. 90-323.

571.11 Eggs and poultry; seal of quality violations; administrative penalties.—

(1) The Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services may impose an administrative fine in the Class II category pursuant to s. 570.971 against any dealer, as defined in s. 583.01(4), in violation of the guidelines for the Florida seal of quality for eggs or poultry programs. All fines, when imposed and paid, shall be deposited by the department into the General Inspection Trust Fund.

(2) Whenever any administrative order has been made and entered by the department imposing a fine pursuant to this section, the order shall specify the amount of fine and time limit for payment thereof, not exceeding 15 days, and, upon failure of the dealer to pay the fine within that time, the permit of the dealer issued under s. 500.12 shall be subject to suspension.

History.—s. 3, ch. 86-215; s. 37, ch. 92-180; s. 117, ch. 2014-150.

PART II

FLORIDA AGRICULTURAL
PROMOTIONAL CAMPAIGN ACT

571.21 Short title.

571.22 Legislative intent.

571.23 Definitions.

571.24 Purpose; duties of the department.

571.25 Registration and fees.

571.26 Florida Agricultural Promotional Campaign Trust Fund.

571.265 Promotion of Florida thoroughbred breeding and of thoroughbred racing at Florida thoroughbred tracks; distribution of funds.

571.27 Rules.

571.29 Unlawful acts; administrative remedies; criminal penalties.

571.301 Injunction.

571.21 Short title.—This part may be cited as the “Florida Agricultural Promotional Campaign Act.”

History.—s. 16, ch. 90-323.

571.22 Legislative intent.—The Legislature finds that there is a need for a Florida Agricultural Promotional Campaign to increase consumer awareness and expand the market for Florida’s agricultural products. The Legislature further finds that the Florida Agricultural Promotional Campaign is a partnership between industry and the state to efficiently promote and advertise such products.

History.—s. 16, ch. 90-323.

571.23 Definitions.—For purposes of this part, the following terms shall have the following meanings:

(1) “Department” means the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services.

(2) “Person” means an individual, firm, partnership, corporation, association, business, trust, legal representative, or any other business unit.

(3) “Reproduce” means to stencil, emboss, print, engrave, impress, imprint, lithograph, or duplicate in any manner or to cause any such acts to be done.

(4) “Agricultural product” means any fresh or processed horticultural, aquacultural, viticultural, fish or seafood, dairy, poultry, apicultural, or other farm or garden product.

(5) “Division” means the Division of Marketing and Development of the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services.

History.—s. 16, ch. 90-323; s. 43, ch. 92-291; s. 40, ch. 93-169.

571.24 Purpose; duties of the department.—The purpose of this part is to authorize the department to establish and coordinate the Florida Agricultural Promotional Campaign. The Legislature intends for the Florida Agricultural Promotional Campaign to serve as a marketing program to promote Florida agricultural commodities, value-added products, and agricultural-related businesses and not as a food safety or traceability program. The duties of the department shall include, but are not limited to:

(1) Developing logos and authorizing the use of logos as provided by rule.

(2) Registering participants.

(3) Assessing and collecting fees.

(4) Collecting rental receipts for industry promotions.

(5) Developing in-kind advertising programs.

(6) Contracting with media representatives for the purpose of dispersing promotional materials.

(7) Adopting rules pursuant to ss. 120.536(1) and 120.54 to implement the provisions of this part.

(8) Enforcing and administering the provisions of this part, including measures ensuring that only Florida agricultural or agricultural based products are marketed under the “Fresh From Florida” or “From Florida” logos or other logos of the Florida Agricultural Promotional Campaign.

History.—s. 16, ch. 90-323; s. 189, ch. 98-200; s. 10, ch. 99-391; s. 76, ch. 2000-158; s. 11, ch. 2014-43; s. 16, ch. 2016-61; s. 37, ch. 2017-3; s. 19, ch. 2020-144.

571.25 Registration and fees.—

(1) Any person who participates in the Florida Agricultural Promotional Campaign shall register annually with the department in a form and manner as required by the department. Each person shall renew his or her registration on the anniversary date of his or her original membership.

(2) The department is hereby authorized to establish by rule, registration and renewal fees sufficient to cover the cost of administering the Florida Agricultural Promotional Campaign, including all personnel costs. Fees shall be deposited in the Florida Agricultural Promotional Campaign Trust Fund.

History.—s. 16, ch. 90-323; s. 8, ch. 98-396.

¹571.26 Florida Agricultural Promotional Campaign Trust Fund.—There is hereby created the Florida Agricultural Promotional Campaign Trust Fund within the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services to receive all moneys related to the Florida Agricultural Promotional Campaign. Moneys deposited in the trust fund shall be appropriated for the sole purpose of implementing the Florida Agricultural Promotional Campaign, except for money deposited in the trust fund pursuant to s. 212.20(6)(d)6.h., which shall be held separately and used solely for the purposes identified in s. 571.265.

History.—s. 16, ch. 90-323; ss. 40, 41, ch. 2023-157.

¹Note.—Section 41, ch. 2023-157, provides that “[t]he amendments made by this act to s. 571.26, Florida Statutes, expire on July 1, 2025, and the text of that section shall revert to that in existence on June 30, 2023, except that any amendments to such text enacted other than by this act must be preserved and continue to operate to the extent such amendments are not dependent upon the portions of the text which expire pursuant to this section.” Effective July 1, 2025, s. 571.26, as amended by s. 41, ch. 2023-157, will read:

571.26 Florida Agricultural Promotional Campaign Trust Fund.—There is hereby created the Florida Agricultural Promotional Campaign Trust Fund within the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services to receive all moneys related to the Florida Agricultural Promotional Campaign. Moneys deposited in the trust fund shall be appropriated for the sole purpose of implementing the Florida Agricultural Promotional Campaign.

571.265 Promotion of Florida thoroughbred breeding and of thoroughbred racing at Florida thoroughbred tracks; distribution of funds.—

(1) For purposes of this section, the term:

(a) “Association” means the Florida Thoroughbred Breeders’ Association, Inc.

(b) “Permitholder” has the same meaning as in s. 550.002(23).

(2) Funds deposited into the Florida Agricultural Promotional Campaign Trust Fund pursuant to s. 212.20(6)(d)6.h. shall be used by the department to encourage the agricultural activity of breeding thoroughbred racehorses in this state and to enhance thoroughbred racing conducted at thoroughbred tracks in this state as provided in this section. If the funds made available under this section are not fully used in any one fiscal year, any unused amounts shall be carried forward in the trust fund into future fiscal years and made available for distribution as provided in this section.

(3) The department shall distribute the funds made available under this section as follows:

(a) Five million dollars shall be distributed to the association to be used for the following:

1. Purses or purse supplements for Florida-bred or Florida-sired horses registered with the association that participate in Florida thoroughbred races.

2. Awards to breeders of Florida-bred horses registered with the association that win, place, or show in Florida thoroughbred races.

3. Awards to owners of stallions who sired Florida-bred horses registered with the association that win Florida thoroughbred stakes races, if the stallions are registered with the association as Florida stallions standing in this state.

4. Other racing incentives connected to Florida-bred or Florida-sired horses registered with the association that participate in thoroughbred races in Florida.

5. Awards administration.

6. Promotion of the Florida thoroughbred breeding industry.

(b) Five million dollars shall be distributed to Tampa Bay Downs, Inc., to be used as purses in thoroughbred races conducted at its pari-mutuel facilities and for the maintenance and operation of that facility, pursuant to an agreement with its local majority horsemen’s group.

(c) Fifteen million dollars shall be distributed to Gulfstream Park Racing Association, Inc., to be used as purses in thoroughbred races conducted at its pari-mutuel facility and for the maintenance and operation of its facility, pursuant to an agreement with the Florida Horsemen’s Benevolent and Protective Association, Inc.

(d) Two and one-half million dollars shall be distributed as follows:

1. Two million dollars to Gulfstream Park Racing Association, Inc., to be used as purses and purse supplements for Florida-bred or Florida-sired horses registered with the association that participate in thoroughbred races at the permitholder’s pari-mutuel facility, pursuant to a written agreement filed with the department establishing the rates, procedures, and eligibility requirements entered into by the permitholder, the association, and the Florida Horsemen’s Benevolent and Protective Association, Inc.

2. Five hundred thousand dollars to Tampa Bay Downs, Inc., to be used as purses and purse supplements for Florida-bred or Florida-sired horses registered with the association that participate in thoroughbred races at the permitholder’s pari-mutuel facility, pursuant to a written agreement filed with the department establishing the rates, procedures, and eligibility requirements entered into by the permitholder, the association, and the local majority horsemen’s group at the permitholder’s pari-mutuel facility.

(4) On or before the first day of the August following each fiscal year in which a recipient under this section received or used funds pursuant to this section, each such recipient must submit a report to the department detailing how all funds were used in the prior fiscal year.

(5) This section is repealed July 1, 2025, unless reviewed and saved from repeal by the Legislature.

History.—s. 42, ch. 2023-157.

571.27 Rules.—The department is authorized to adopt rules that implement, make specific, and interpret the provisions of this part. The department is further authorized to determine, by rule, the logos or product identifiers to be depicted for use in advertising, publicizing, and promoting the sale of Florida agricultural products or agricultural-based products in the Florida Agricultural Promotional Campaign. The department may also adopt rules consistent with the provisions of this part as in its judgment may be necessary for participant registration, renewal of registration, classes of membership, application forms, and other forms and enforcement measures ensuring compliance with this part.

History.—s. 16, ch. 90-323; s. 11, ch. 99-391; s. 17, ch. 2016-61.

571.29 Unlawful acts; administrative remedies; criminal penalties.—

(1) It is unlawful for any person to use, reproduce, or distribute the “Fresh From Florida” or “From Florida” logos or other logos of the Florida Agricultural Promotional Campaign without being registered with the department, or to otherwise violate the provisions of this part or any rules adopted under this part.

(2) It is unlawful for any person to use, reproduce, or distribute the “Fresh From Florida” or “From Florida” logos or other logos of the Florida Agricultural Promotional Campaign on any agricultural or agricultural-based products that are not Florida products.

(3) The department may enter an order imposing one or more of the following penalties against any person who violates any of the provisions of this part or any rules adopted under this part:

(a) Issuance of a warning letter.

(b) Imposition of an administrative fine in the Class I category pursuant to s. 570.971 for each violation for a first-time offender. For a second-time offender or a person who is shown to have willfully and intentionally violated this part or any rules adopted under this part, the administrative fine shall be in the Class II category pursuant to s. 570.971 for each violation. The term “each violation” means each incident in which a logo of the Florida Agricultural Promotional Campaign has been used, reproduced, or distributed in any manner inconsistent with this part or the rules adopted under this part.

The administrative proceedings that could result in the entry of an order imposing any of the penalties specified in paragraphs (a)-(c) shall be conducted pursuant to chapter 120.

(4) Any person who commits a violation of the provisions of this part or rules adopted under this part is, for the first offense, guilty of a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083, and is, for each succeeding offense, guilty of a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.

History.—s. 16, ch. 90-323; s. 12, ch. 99-391; s. 119, ch. 2014-150.

571.301 Injunction.—In addition to the remedies provided in this part and notwithstanding the existence of any adequate remedy at law, the department is authorized to make application for injunction to a circuit judge, and such circuit judge shall have jurisdiction upon a hearing for cause shown to grant a temporary or permanent injunction, or both, restraining any person from violating or continuing to violate any provisions of this part or from failing or refusing to comply with the requirements of this part or any rule adopted hereunder, such injunction to be issued without bond.

History.—s. 13, ch. 99-391.

F.S. 571 on Google Scholar

F.S. 571 on Casetext

Amendments to 571

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 571

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S571.08 1 - OBSTRUCT CRIMINAL INVEST - REMOVE HOLD AGRICULTURAL PRODUCT SUBSQ OFFENSE - M: F

S571.08 1 - OBSTRUCT CRIMINAL INVEST - REMOVE HOLD AGRICULTURAL PRODUCT 1ST OFF - M: S

S571.08 2 - FORGERY OF - USE AGRICULTURAL SEAL QUALITY WO LIC SUBSQ OFF - M: F

S571.08 2 - FORGERY OF - USE AGRICULTURAL SEAL QUALITY WO LIC 1ST OFF - M: S

S571.08 3 - FRAUD - SUPPLY AGRICLTR SEAL UNAUTH PERSON SUBSQ OFF - M: F

S571.08 3 - FRAUD - SUPPLY AGRICLTR SEAL UNAUTH PERSON 1ST OFF - M: S

S571.08 4 - COUNTERFEITING OF - AGRICULTURAL SEAL SUBSQ OFF - M: F

S571.08 4 - COUNTERFEITING OF - AGRICULTURAL SEAL 1ST OFF - M: S

S571.08 4 - PASS COUNTERFEITED - USE AGRICULTURAL SEAL SUBSQ OFF - M: F

S571.08 4 - PASS COUNTERFEITED - USE AGRICULTURAL SEAL 1ST OFF - M: S

S571.08 5 - PASS FORGED - AGRICLTR PRODUCT SEAL QUALITY MARKET SUBSQ OFF - M: F

S571.08 5 - PASS FORGED - AGRICLTR PRODUCT SEAL QUALITY MARKET 1ST OFF - M: S

S571.08 5 - PASS COUNTERFEITED - AGRICULTURAL PRODUCT SEAL MARKET SUBSQ OFF - M: F

S571.08 5 - PASS COUNTERFEITED - AGRICULTURAL PRODUCT SEAL MARKET 1ST OFF - M: S

S571.08 6 - FOOD-MISBRANDED - MARKET AGRICLTR PRODUCT WO LIC NAME SUBSQ OFF - M: F

S571.08 6 - FOOD-MISBRANDED - MARKET AGRICLTR PRODUCT WO LIC NAME 1ST OFF - M: S

S571.08 7 - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - FAIL REPORT SEAL QUALITY ADVERTISEMENT 1ST OFF - M: S

S571.08 7 - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - FAIL REPORT SEAL QUALITY ADVRT SUBSQ OFF - M: F

S571.08 8 - PASS FORGED - IMITATION SEAL QUALITY TO SELL ADVRT SUBSQ OFF - M: F

S571.08 8 - PASS FORGED - USE IMITATION SEAL QUALITY SELL ADVRT 1ST OFF - M: S

S571.08 8 - PASS COUNTERFEITED - SEAL QUALITY TO SELL ADVERTISEMENT SUBSQ OFF - M: F

S571.08 8 - PASS COUNTERFEITED - SEAL OF QUALITY TO SELL ADVERTISEMENT 1ST OFF - M: S

S571.08 8 - FRAUD - MISREP SEAL OF QUALITY TO SELL ADVRT SUBSQ OFF - M: F

S571.08 8 - FRAUD - MISREP SEAL OF QUALITY TO SELL ADVRT ST OFF - M: S

S571.08 9 - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - FTC SEAL QUALITY AGRICLTR PRODUCT SUBSQ OFF - M: F

S571.08 9 - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - FTC SEAL QUALITY AGRICULTURAL PRODUCT 1ST OFF - M: S

S571.09 - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - OTHER VIOL FLORIDA SEAL OF QUALITY SUBSQ OFF - M: F

S571.09 - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - OTHER VIOL FLORIDA SEAL OF QUALITY 1ST OFF - M: S

S571.29 4 - FORGERY - REPROD FL AGRICULTURE CAMPAIGN LOGO 1ST OFF - M: S

S571.29 4 - FORGERY - REPRODUC FL AGRICULTURE CAMPGN LOGO SUBSQ OFF - M: F

S648.571 3c1 - FRAUD - BOND AGENT FAIL RETURN COLLATERAL UND 100 DOLS - M: F

S648.571 3c2 - FRAUD - BOND AGENT NO RET COLLAT 100 TO UND 1500 DOLS - F: T

S648.571 3c3 - FRAUD - BOND AGENT NO RET COLLAT 1500 TO UND 10K DOLS - F: S

S648.571 3c4 - FRAUD - BOND AGENT NO RETURN COLLATRL 10K DOLS OVER - F: F

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

B. CHIAFALO, v. WASHINGTON, 140 S. Ct. 2316 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Siegel , 571 U.S. 415, 422, 134 S.Ct. 1188, 188 L.Ed.2d 146 (2014) ). . . .

ESPINOZA, v. MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,, 140 S. Ct. 2246 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Society of Sisters , 268 U.S. 510, 534-535, 45 S.Ct. 571, 69 L.Ed. 1070 (1925). . . .

AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, v. ALLIANCE FOR OPEN SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL, INC., 140 S. Ct. 2082 (U.S. 2020)

. . . See 515 U.S. at 571, 115 S.Ct. 2338. . . .

JUNE MEDICAL SERVICES L. L. C. v. RUSSO, v. LLC., 140 S. Ct. 2103 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Society of Sisters , 268 U.S. 510, 535-536, 45 S.Ct. 571, 69 L.Ed. 1070 (1925). . . . Jacobs , 571 U.S. 69, 77, 134 S.Ct. 584, 187 L.Ed.2d 505 (2013) ). . . .

BOSTOCK, v. CLAYTON COUNTY, GEORGIA v. Jr. Co- R. G. G. R. v., 140 S. Ct. 1731 (U.S. 2020)

. . . United States , 571 U.S. 204, 211-212, 134 S.Ct. 881, 187 L.Ed.2d 715 (2014). . . .

ROGERS, v. GREWAL,, 140 S. Ct. 1865 (U.S. 2020)

. . . In re Preis , 118 N.J. 564, 571, 573 A.2d 148, 152 (1990). . . .

FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, v. AURELIUS INVESTMENT, LLC, LLC, III v. LLC, v. LLC, n De De La El Y v., 140 S. Ct. 1649 (U.S. 2020)

. . . . §§ 203(d), 204(a), id. , at 569, 571. . . .

VF JEANSWEAR LP v. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, 140 S. Ct. 1202 (U.S. 2020)

. . . EEOC , 493 U.S. 182, 190, 110 S.Ct. 577, 107 L.Ed.2d 571 (1990). . . .

GUERRERO- LASPRILLA, v. P. BARR, v. P., 140 S. Ct. 1062 (U.S. 2020)

. . . FMR LLC , 571 U.S. 429, 459-460, 134 S.Ct. 1158, 188 L.Ed.2d 158 (2014) (Scalia, J., concurring in principal . . .

GUEDES, v. BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS AND EXPLOSIVES,, 140 S. Ct. 789 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Apel , 571 U.S. 359, 369, 134 S.Ct. 1144, 186 L.Ed.2d 75 (2014). . . .

INTEL CORPORATION INVESTMENT POLICY COMMITTEE, v. M. SULYMA, 140 S. Ct. 768 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Owens Corning Investment Review Comm. , 622 F.3d 564, 571 (CA6 2010) ("Actual knowledge does not require . . .

RITZEN GROUP, INC. v. JACKSON MASONRY, LLC, 140 S. Ct. 582 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Bauman , 571 U.S. 117, 124-125, 134 S.Ct. 746, 187 L.Ed.2d 624 (2014). . . .

C. ROTKISKE, v. KLEMM,, 140 S. Ct. 355 (U.S. 2019)

. . . United States , 247 U.S. 435, 38 S.Ct. 571, 62 L.Ed. 1200 (1918) ; Bailey v. . . . United States , 247 U.S. 435, 38 S.Ct. 571, 62 L.Ed. 1200 (1918), a company had unlawfully procured land . . . Id. , at 437, 438, 38 S.Ct. 571. . . . Id. , at 445, 38 S.Ct. 571. . . . Id. , at 449, 38 S.Ct. 571. . . .

INTEL CORPORATION, v. CONTINENTAL CIRCUITS LLC, 140 S. Ct. 648 (U.S. 2019)

. . . CONTINENTAL CIRCUITS LLC No. 19-571 Supreme Court of the United States. . . .

EAST BAY SANCTUARY COVENANT, v. BARR,, 391 F. Supp. 3d 974 (N.D. Cal. 2019)

. . . Id. at 571, 581. . . .

L. SMITH, v. SHARP,, 935 F.3d 1064 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . Titlow, 571 U.S. 12, 22-23, 134 S.Ct. 10, 187 L.Ed.2d 348 (2013) (noting the strong presumption that . . . Titlow, 571 U.S. at 23, 134 S.Ct. 10 (quotation omitted). . . .

UNITED STATES v. TOWN OF COLORADO CITY,, 935 F.3d 804 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . United States , 571 U.S. 204, 218, 134 S.Ct. 881, 187 L.Ed.2d 715 (2014) (alteration in original) (quoting . . .

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, v. QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, a Oy,, 935 F.3d 752 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Abbott Labs. , 571 F.3d 930, 931 (9th Cir. 2009) (holding that "allegations of monopoly leveraging through . . .

EDMO, v. CORIZON, INC. Al v. Al, 935 F.3d 757 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Mucos Pharma GmbH & Co. , 571 F.3d 873, 879 (9th Cir. 2009) (alteration in original) (quoting Anderson . . .

IN RE JUAREZ, v., 603 B.R. 610 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Siegel , 571 U.S. 415, 422 n.2, 134 S.Ct. 1188, 188 L.Ed.2d 146 (2014) (holding that exempt funds are . . .

IN RE J. BARIBEAU,, 603 B.R. 797 (Bankr. W.D. Tex. 2019)

. . . In re Transtexas Gas Corp. , 303 F.3d 571, 581 (5th Cir. 2002). " Rule 59(e) is properly invoked 'to . . .

J. GENZER, v. JAMES RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY,, 934 F.3d 1156 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . Atkinson , 16 Okla. 571, 85 P. 472 (1906). . . .

UNITED STATES v. A. HOPPER,, 934 F.3d 740 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . United States , 571 U.S. 801, 134 S.Ct. 146, 187 L.Ed.2d 2 (2013). . . . United States , 571 U.S. 801, 134 S.Ct. 146, 187 L.Ed.2d 2 (2013) (noting that "in conducting this large . . . United States , 571 U.S. 801, 134 S.Ct. 146, 187 L.Ed.2d 2 (2013). . . .

COLE v. CARSON, v., 935 F.3d 444 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Sims , 571 U.S. 3, 134 S. Ct. 3, 187 L.Ed.2d 341 (2013) ; Reichle v. Howards , 566 U.S. 658, 132 S. . . . Sims , 571 U.S. 3, 134 S.Ct. 3, 187 L.Ed.2d 341 (2013) (per curiam) (summarily reversing the Ninth Circuit . . .

BACA v. COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF STATE, G. T. L. M., 935 F.3d 887 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . Ct. 663, 669, 193 L.Ed.2d 571 (2016) (quoting Genesis Healthcare Corp. v. . . .

TURCO v. CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, NEW JERSEY,, 935 F.3d 155 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Kearney , 571 F.3d 318, 322 (3d Cir. 2009) ). Cornelius v. NAACP Legal Defense and Educ. . . .

SAM K. v. SAUL,, 391 F. Supp. 3d 874 (N.D. Ill. 2019)

. . . Berryhill , 864 F.3d 567, 571 (7th Cir. 2017) ("Part-time work is not good evidence of ability to engage . . .

SENNE v. KANSAS CITY ROYALS BASEBALL CORP. LLC LLC LP St. LLC LLC LLC LLC L. P. L. P. LLC LLC L. P. AZPB L. P. P LLC LLC LP LLP LLC LLC,, 934 F.3d 918 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. , 571 F.3d 935, 944 (9th Cir. 2009) (quoting Hanlon v. . . . Overtime Pay Litig ., 571 F.3d 953, 958 (9th Cir. 2009). . . . Overtime Pay Litig ., 571 F.3d at 958. . . . Overtime Pay Litig ., 571 F.3d at 958, and that predominance is "rarely" defeated in cases where such . . .

HAWKINS v. I- TV DIGITALIS TAVKOZLESI ZRT. f k a DMCC Rt. DIGI RCS RDS S. A. RCS S. A. DIGI N. V. v. i- TV f k a DMCC Rt. DIGI RCS RDS S. A. RCS S. A. DIGI N. V., 935 F.3d 211 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . Bauman , 571 U.S. 117, 134 S. Ct. 746, 751, 187 L.Ed.2d 624 (2014). . . . Fiore , 571 U.S. 277, 134 S. Ct. 1115, 1121 n.6, 188 L.Ed.2d 12 (2014). . . .

UNITED STATES v. G. WAGUESPACK,, 935 F.3d 322 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Stephens , 571 F.3d 401, 407 (5th Cir. 2009). . . . closing argument regarding a witness's availability and was not an attempt to shift the burden of proof. 571 . . . See Stephens , 571 F.3d at 408. . . .

UNITED STATES v. SCANZANI,, 392 F. Supp. 3d 210 (D. Mass. 2019)

. . . United States , 571 U.S. 320, 338, 134 S.Ct. 1090, 188 L.Ed.2d 46 (2014) ). . . .

ESTATE OF ROMAIN, v. CITY OF GROSSE POINTE FARMS A. J., 935 F.3d 485 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Arnold , 862 F.3d 571, 575 (6th Cir. 2017) ; Nelson v. . . .

GREYER, v. ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, v., 933 F.3d 871 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Siegel , 571 U.S. 415, 421, 134 S.Ct. 1188, 188 L.Ed.2d 146 (2014). . . . Hoeper , 571 U.S. 237, 250, 134 S.Ct. 852, 187 L.Ed.2d 744 (2014) (materiality of a falsehood depends . . .

LIVADITIS, v. DAVIS,, 933 F.3d 1036 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Ryan , 571 F.3d 860, 870 (9th Cir. 2009) (quotations and punctuation omitted). . . . staggering" aggravating evidence weighed against a conclusion that defendant was prejudiced); Bible , 571 . . .

UNITED STATES v. M. SWARTZ,, 391 F. Supp. 3d 199 (N.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . Supp. 3d at 571 ("Title to such property vests in the United States 'upon commission of the act giving . . .

UNITED STATES v. PEDROZA- ROCHA,, 933 F.3d 490 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Ct. 663, 669, 193 L.Ed.2d 571 (2016). . . .

UNITED STATES v. L. HARPER,, 934 F.3d 524 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Alabama , 571 U.S. 263, 274, 134 S.Ct. 1081, 188 L.Ed.2d 1 (2014) ("An attorney's ignorance of a point . . .

ALBANY AIRPORT HIE, LLC HIE LLC, v. HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP, INC., 391 F. Supp. 3d 193 (N.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . In re Estates of Covert, 97 N.Y.2d 68, 75, 735 N.Y.S.2d 879, 761 N.E.2d 571 (2001). " 'Under New York . . .

IN RE GOOGLE INC. COOKIE PLACEMENT CONSUMER PRIVACY LITIGATION H., 934 F.3d 316 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Lane , 571 U.S. 1003, 134 S. . . .

UNITED STATES v. PRADO,, 933 F.3d 121 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Larsen , 345 U.S. 571, 575, 73 S.Ct. 921, 97 L.Ed. 1254 (1953) (holding that because "[a] cause of action . . . Larsen , 345 U.S. 571, 577, 73 S.Ct. 921, 97 L.Ed. 1254 (1953) ("While some [shipping laws] have been . . .

CANT v. M. MOODY S. S., 933 F.3d 414 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Risjord , 449 U.S. 368, 379, 101 S.Ct. 669, 66 L.Ed.2d 571 (1981) ; 11 Charles Alan Wright et al., Federal . . .

COFFEY, v. CARROLL, 933 F.3d 577 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Sims , 571 U.S. 3, 6, 134 S.Ct. 3, 187 L.Ed.2d 341 (2013) ("[F]ederal and state courts nationwide are . . .

UNITED STATES v. THIAM,, 934 F.3d 89 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Castro , 813 F.2d 571, 575-76 (2d Cir. 1987), cert. denied , 484 U.S. 844, 108 S.Ct. 137, 98 L.Ed.2d . . .

WARREN, v. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION,, 932 F.3d 378 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . McLemore , 978 S.W.2d 568, 571 (Tex. 1998). . . .

BREDA, v. CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, d b a, 934 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2019)

. . . Ct. 663, 667, 193 L.Ed.2d 571 (2016). . . .

PEOPLES GAS SYSTEM, a a v. POSEN CONSTRUCTION, INC. a, 931 F.3d 1337 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Lexow , 937 F.2d 569, 571 (11th Cir. 1991) ). . . .

KNUTSON, v. VILLAGE OF LAKEMOOR,, 932 F.3d 572 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Univ. , 870 F.3d 562, 571 (7th Cir. 2017). . . .

UNITED STATES, v. GAUDET,, 933 F.3d 11 (1st Cir. 2019)

. . . Cortés-Medina, 819 F.3d 566, 571 (1st Cir. 2016). . . .

UNITED STATES v. BOSYK,, 933 F.3d 319 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . California , 571 U.S. 292, 298, 134 S.Ct. 1126, 188 L.Ed.2d 25 (2014) ; see U.S. Const. amend. IV. . . . United States , 571 U.S. 320, 338, 134 S.Ct. 1090, 188 L.Ed.2d 46 (2014) ). . . .

UNITED STATES v. BUCHANAN,, 933 F.3d 501 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . United States , 690 F.2d 569, 571 (6th Cir. 1982) ("A party may not by-pass the fact-finding process . . .

FORCE, A. H. H. F. A. L. F. N. E. F, N. S. F. S. R. F. A. H. H. F. A. L. F. N. E. F. N. S. F. S. R. F. A. H. H. F. A. L. F. N. E. F, N. S. F. S. R. F. TZVI S. S. R. M. M. R. R. M. R. S. Z. R. S. S. R. M. M. R. R. M. R. S. Z. R. S. S. R. M. M. R. R. M. R. S. Z. R. v. FACEBOOK, INC., 934 F.3d 53 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . FMR LLC , 571 U.S. 429, 465, 134 S.Ct. 1158, 188 L.Ed.2d 158 (2014) (quoting FTC v. . . .

UNITED STATES v. CORNETTE,, 932 F.3d 204 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . White , 571 F.3d 365, 367 (4th Cir. 2009). III. . . .

DAVIS, v. GUAM M. C. F. P. F. I. M., 932 F.3d 822 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . . § 571-46(7) (providing visitation privileges for "parents, grandparents, and siblings" of child). . . .

GENETIC VETERINARY SCIENCES, INC. v. LABOKLIN GMBH CO. KG,, 933 F.3d 1302 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . Walden , 571 U.S. at 284, 134 S.Ct. 1115. . . . Fiore , 571 U.S. 277, 283 n.6, 134 S.Ct. 1115, 188 L.Ed.2d 12 (2014). . . .

IN RE SCHATZ, v., 602 B.R. 411 (B.A.P. 1st Cir. 2019)

. . . Siegel, 571 U.S. 415, 423, 134 S.Ct. 1188, 188 L.Ed.2d 146 (2014), wherein the Supreme Court ruled that . . . Law, 571 U.S. at 417, 134 S.Ct. 1188 (citing 11 U.S.C. § 541(a)(1) ). . . . is not liable' for the payment of 'any [pre-petition] debt' or 'any administrative expense.' " Law, 571 . . . Law, 571 U.S. at 418, 134 S.Ct. 1188 (citation omitted). The Supreme Court recognized in Law v. . . . carefully calibrated exceptions and limitations, some of which relate to the debtor's misconduct." 571 . . .

IN RE S. ANTONUCCI, v. S., 602 B.R. 618 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 2019)

. . . Siegel , 571 U.S. 415, 134 S.Ct. 1188, 188 L.Ed.2d 146 (2014), rendered the Debtor's entitlement to exempt . . .

HUPP R. H. a v. COOK C. R., 931 F.3d 307 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . Sims , 571 U.S. 3, 5, 134 S.Ct. 3, 187 L.Ed.2d 341 (2013) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted . . . J.A. 219, 571. . . .

FACIANE, v. SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA,, 931 F.3d 412 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Co. , 571 U.S. 99, 106-07, 134 S.Ct. 604, 187 L.Ed.2d 529 (2013). . . . Heimeshoff , 571 U.S. at 105, 134 S.Ct. 604. . . . Heimeshoff , 571 U.S. at 105-06, 134 S.Ct. 604. . . . See Heimeshoff , 571 U.S. at 105-06, 134 S.Ct. 604 (explaining that a claim may accrue before administrative . . .

U. S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION, v. MONEX CREDIT COMPANY, 931 F.3d 966 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Woods , 571 U.S. 31, 45-46, 134 S.Ct. 557, 187 L.Ed.2d 472 (2013). . . . FMR LLC , 571 U.S. 429, 446, 134 S.Ct. 1158, 188 L.Ed.2d 158 (2014). . . .

WEST, v. CITY OF CALDWELL, 931 F.3d 978 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . California , 571 U.S. 292, 298, 134 S.Ct. 1126, 188 L.Ed.2d 25 (2014) (quoting Brigham City v. . . . Sims , 571 U.S. 3, 10, 134 S.Ct. 3, 187 L.Ed.2d 341 (2013) (per curiam), the officers here had time to . . .

ANDERSON, v. CITY OF ROCKFORD,, 932 F.3d 494 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Cain , 565 U.S. 73, 76, 132 S.Ct. 627, 181 L.Ed.2d 571 (2012). . . .

UNITED STATES v. COONCE, Jr., 932 F.3d 623 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Cheever , 571 U.S. 87, 93, 134 S.Ct. 596, 187 L.Ed.2d 519 (2013). . . .

PEERLESS INSURANCE COMPANY, v. TECHNOLOGY INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., 392 F. Supp. 3d 313 (E.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . American Honda Motor Co., 78 N.Y.2d 61, 63, 571 N.Y.S.2d 672, 672-73, 575 N.E.2d 90 (1991) (holding that . . .

HIGHPOINT TOWER TECHNOLOGY INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,, 931 F.3d 1050 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Woods, 571 U.S. 31, 134 S. . . . See also Woods, 571 U.S. at 41, 134 S. . . . Woods, 571 U.S. at 33, 134 S. Ct. at 560. . . . Woods, 571 U.S. at 39, 134 S. Ct. at 563. . . . (quoting Woods, 571 U.S. at 42, 134 S. . . .

STATE BY AND THROUGH TENNESSEE GENERAL ASSEMBLY, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE,, 931 F.3d 499 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Thompson , 252 F.3d 567, 571 (2d Cir. 2001). In 1971, the Supreme Court held in Graham v. . . . Reg. 16910, 16910-11 (June 27, 1973) ; see also Lewis , 252 F.3d at 571. . . .

GEMINI TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. SMITH WESSON CORP. a a, 931 F.3d 911 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Dist. of Texas , 571 U.S. 49, 134 S.Ct. 568, 187 L.Ed.2d 487 (2013) (" Atlantic Marine "). . . . Atlantic Marine , 571 U.S. at 63, 134 S.Ct. 568 (alteration in original) (quoting Stewart Org., Inc. . . .

UNITED STATES v. CORRALES- VAZQUEZ,, 931 F.3d 944 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Woods , 571 U.S. 31, 45, 134 S.Ct. 557, 187 L.Ed.2d 472 (2013) ). . . .

BRINDLEY, v. CITY OF MEMPHIS, TENNESSEE, 934 F.3d 461 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . front door of the post office," was a nonpublic forum. 497 U.S. 720, 727, 110 S.Ct. 3115, 111 L.Ed.2d 571 . . .

COMMANDER v. AMERICAN CRUISE LINES, INC., 389 F. Supp. 3d 180 (N.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . Dist. of Texas, 571 U.S. 49, 59, 134 S.Ct. 568, 187 L.Ed.2d 487 (2013). . . . Marine, 571 U.S. at 60, 134 S.Ct. 568. B. . . . Marine, 571 U.S. at 62, 134 S.Ct. 568. . . . Marine, 571 U.S. at 62-63, 134 S.Ct. 568. . . .

HARTMAN v. THOMPSON, 931 F.3d 471 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Kokinda , 497 U.S. 720, 725-26, 110 S.Ct. 3115, 111 L.Ed.2d 571 (1990) ("The Government, even when acting . . .

UNITED STATES v. LINDSAY,, 931 F.3d 852 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . United States , 571 U.S. 204, 134 S.Ct. 881, 187 L.Ed.2d 715 (2014). . . .

ZACARIAS v. STANFORD INTERNATIONAL BANK, LIMITED, L. v. S. S. v. a a v. De v. S. v. L. v. S. C. v. WGH De De De La v. De De De v. a a De v., 931 F.3d 382 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Green , 675 F.3d 503, 524 (5th Cir. 2012). 571 U.S. 377, 395-97, 134 S.Ct. 1058, 188 L.Ed.2d 88 (2014 . . . Troice , 571 U.S. 377, 390, 134 S.Ct. 1058, 188 L.Ed.2d 88 (2014) (quoting United States v. . . .

IN RE A. STEWART, P., 603 B.R. 138 (Bankr. W.D. Okla. 2019)

. . . Stewart (In re Stewart) , 571 B.R. 460 (Bankr. W.D. . . . Siegel , 571 U.S. 415, 134 S.Ct. 1188, 188 L.Ed.2d 146 (2014). . . .

IN RE LICKING RIVER MINING, LLC, v. LLC,, 603 B.R. 336 (Bankr. E.D. Ky. 2019)

. . . In re Phase I Molecular Toxicology, Inc. , 287 B.R. 571, 581 (Bankr. . . . Monday Coal, LLC (In re Licking River Mining, LLC) , 571 B.R. 241, 253 (Bankr. E.D. Ky. 2017). A. . . .

K. NARKIEWICZ- LAINE, v. C. DOYLE,, 930 F.3d 897 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Co. , 571 F.3d 611, 615 (7th Cir. 2009) (quoting Thornton v. Garcini , 382 Ill. . . .

MARINELARENA, v. P. BARR,, 930 F.3d 1039 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Mirowski Family Ventures, LLC , 571 U.S. 191, 198-200, 134 S.Ct. 843, 187 L.Ed.2d 703 (2014) ; see also . . .

K. GRIGGS, v. CHICKASAW COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI,, 930 F.3d 696 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Griggs "traveled and monitored 571 miles of county roads looking for illegal dumping"; 2. . . .

M. CROCE, v. NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY Jr., 930 F.3d 787 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Arnold , 862 F.3d 571, 577 (6th Cir. 2017). A. . . .

UNITED STATES v. C. SCHMIDT,, 930 F.3d 858 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Christiansen , 594 F.3d 571, 576 (7th Cir. 2010). . . .

MEZA- LOPEZ, v. UNITED STATES, 929 F.3d 1041 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Cheney, 571 F.3d 764, 769 (8th Cir. 2009) (internal quotation marks omitted). . . .

NAVAJO NATION, a a k a v. SAN JUAN COUNTY, a, 929 F.3d 1270 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . See id. at 571, 573 (noting that "the more numerous the districts," the "harder [it is] to create districts . . .

VUGO, INC. v. CITY OF NEW YORK,, 931 F.3d 42 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . IMS Health Inc. , 564 U.S. 552, 571-72, 131 S.Ct. 2653, 180 L.Ed.2d 544 (2011) ; United States v. . . . Id. at 571, 131 S.Ct. 2653. . . .

HAROUN, v. U. S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY U. S. T., 929 F.3d 1007 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Ct. 663, 669, 193 L.Ed.2d 571 (2016) (quoting Knox v. Serv. Empls. . . .

IN RE ROUNDUP PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION v. Co. VC, 385 F. Supp. 3d 1042 (N.D. Cal. 2019)

. . . App. 4th 757, 765 n.8, 70 Cal.Rptr.2d 571 (1998) ; see also Dkt. No. 3191. . . .

MURPHY, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA,, 390 F. Supp. 3d 59 (D.D.C. 2019)

. . . . § 2000e-3(a) (emphases added); see Fogleman, 283 F.3d at 571. " 'Discrimination' [here] refers to the . . . Fogleman, 283 F.3d at 571. . . . Supp. 2d at 35 (quoting Fogleman, 283 F.3d at 571 ). . . . Mercy Hosp., Inc., 283 F.3d 561, 571 (3d Cir. 2002) (holding that plaintiff states a retaliation claim . . . against any individual because such individual has [engaged in protected activity]." 283 F.3d 561, 571 . . .

UNIVERSAL CABLE PRODUCTIONS, LLC, a LLC, a v. ATLANTIC SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, a, 929 F.3d 1143 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Co. , 571 F. Supp. 1460, 1503 (S.D.N.Y. 1983). . . . Aetna Cas. & Surety Co. , 505 F.2d 989, 1012 (2d Cir. 1974) ; see also Holiday Inns , 571 F. . . . out by the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine fell within war exclusions); Holiday Inns , 571 . . . Restatement (Third) of Foreign Relations Law § 201 (1987) ; see also Holiday Inns , 571 F. . . . Supp. 1098, 1130 (S.D.N.Y. 1973), aff'd , 505 F.2d 989 ; see also Holiday Inns , 571 F. . . .

UNITED STATES v. RANKIN,, 929 F.3d 399 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Hess , 124 U.S. 483, 487, 8 S.Ct. 571, 31 L.Ed. 516 (1888) ). . . .

UNITED STATES v. MILLS,, 388 F. Supp. 3d 895 (E.D. Mich. 2019)

. . . Fell, 571 F.3d 264, 266 (2d Cir. 2009) (Raggi, J., concurring)). . . .

PRIME RATE PREMIUM FINANCE CORPORATION, INC. v. E. LARSON, A., 930 F.3d 759 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Atlas Global Grp., L.P. , 541 U.S. 567, 571, 124 S.Ct. 1920, 158 L.Ed.2d 866 (2004) (citing Capron v. . . .

C. MALCOLM, v. ASSOCIATION OF SUPERVISORS AND ADMINISTRATORS OF ROCHESTER ASAR, 388 F. Supp. 3d 242 (W.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . British Airways, PLC , 83 F.3d 566, 571 (2d Cir.1996) (citation and quotation marks omitted); see also . . .

SHULMAN v. CHAITMAN LLP LLP,, 392 F. Supp. 3d 340 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . did recognize that CAFA "abrogates the [traditional] rule against aggregating claims." 545 U.S. 546, 571 . . .

TQ DELTA, LLC, v. DISH NETWORK LLC,, 929 F.3d 1350 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . according to the 1995 ADSL Standard, and a [PHOSITA] would have looked to that [s]tandard for guidance"), 571 . . .

H. WILSON, v. SAFELITE GROUP, INC., 930 F.3d 429 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . United States , 571 U.S. 204, 210-11, 134 S.Ct. 881, 187 L.Ed.2d 715 (2014) (quoting 2 The New Shorter . . . Burrage , 571 U.S. at 210, 134 S.Ct. 881. . . .

FCS ADVISORS, LLC L. P. v. MISSOURI, 929 F.3d 618 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Co. , 25 S.W.3d 571, 587 (Mo. Ct. . . .

PHL VARIABLE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. TOWN OF OYSTER BAY,, 929 F.3d 79 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Corp ., 78 N.Y.2d 88, 91, 571 N.Y.S.2d 686, 687, 575 N.E.2d 104 (1991) ), the district court pointed . . .

UNITED STATES v. WILLIAMS,, 930 F.3d 44 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Castro , 813 F.2d 571, 575-76 (2d Cir. 1987) (noting that adverse party can demand that an omitted portion . . .

UNITED STATES v. FIGUEROA- FIGUEROA,, 388 F. Supp. 3d 70 (D. P.R. 2019)

. . . Chris Craft Corp. , 770 F.2d 245, 247 (1st Cir. 1985), cert. denied , 474 U.S. 1021, 106 S.Ct. 571, 88 . . .

EUROPA EYE WEAR CORP. v. KAIZEN ADVISORS, LLC AO v. LLC,, 390 F. Supp. 3d 228 (D. Mass. 2019)

. . . Of Texas , 571 U.S. 49, 134 S.Ct. 568, 187 L.Ed.2d 487 (2013). . . . Marine , 571 U.S. at 63, 134 S.Ct. 568 ("[W]hen a plaintiff agrees by contract to bring suit only in . . . Marine , 571 U.S. at 63-64, 134 S.Ct. 568. . . .

UNITED STATES v. AFRIYIE,, 929 F.3d 63 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . See Chestman , 947 F.2d at 571. . . .

FIREMEN S INSURANCE COMPANY OF WASHINGTON, D. C. v. ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, J. MP F. ACE v. s D. C., 390 F. Supp. 3d 267 (D. Mass. 2019)

. . . Dist. of Tex., 571 U.S. 49, 58-59, 134 S.Ct. 568, 187 L.Ed.2d 487 (2013). . . . Marine, 571 U.S. at 52, 134 S.Ct. 568. . . . Marine, 571 U.S. at 63, 134 S.Ct. 568 (alteration in original) (quoting Stewart Org., Inc. v. . . . Marine, 571 U.S. at 67, 134 S.Ct. 568 ; Claudio-De Leon, 775 F.3d at 48. . . .