The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XXXV
AGRICULTURE, HORTICULTURE, AND ANIMAL INDUSTRY

Chapter 599
VITICULTURE

View Entire Chapter

CHAPTER 599

VITICULTURE

599.0005 Florida Viticulture Policy Act; short title.

599.001 Legislative declaration of public policy respecting viticulture.

599.002 Viticulture Advisory Council.

599.003 State Viticulture Plan.

599.004 Florida Farm Winery Program; registration; logo; fees.

599.012 Viticulture Trust Fund; creation.

599.0005 Florida Viticulture Policy Act; short title.—This chapter may be cited as the “Florida Viticulture Policy Act.”

History.—s. 1, ch. 85-111.

599.001 Legislative declaration of public policy respecting viticulture.—

(1) The Legislature declares that viticulture, the production and utilization of grapes, is an underdeveloped agricultural commodity enterprise in this state. The Legislature recognizes that Florida possesses many resources and geographic advantages that favor the expansion and growth of present-day viticulture into a broad-based, economically viable industry. The growth potential of the present industry offers good opportunities for local economic development and supply trade. The development of viticulture is compatible with the economies, lifestyles, and interests of both rural and urban Florida.

(2) Further, the Legislature finds that factors such as minimal new grape cultivar development, lack of printed information on production and processing, minimal understanding of winemaking techniques and requirements that will capitalize on the unique characteristics of available grape cultivars, minimal understanding of grape juice processing requirements, lack of fresh fruit handling and processing technology specifically for muscadine grape cultivars, lack of quality standards for wine and other processed grapes, lack of assistance and printed information for overall business planning and marketing, and lack of coordination of the many diverse interests and expertises which could contribute to the further development of viticulture in the state are inhibitory to the development of viticulture to the potential of which it is reasonably capable, going into the 21st century.

(3) The Legislature further declares that, in order to effectively support the efficient and expeditious development and growth of viticulture into a broad-based, economically sound industry, there is a need for leadership and statewide viticultural planning.

History.—ss. 2, 6, ch. 84-295; s. 5, ch. 91-429; s. 6, ch. 94-296.

599.002 Viticulture Advisory Council.—

(1) There is created within the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services the Viticulture Advisory Council, to consist of eight members as follows: the president of the Florida Grape Growers’ Association or a designee thereof; a representative from the Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences; a representative from the viticultural science program at Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University; and five additional commercial members, to be appointed for a 2-year term each by the Commissioner of Agriculture, including a wine producer, a fresh fruit producer, a nonwine product (juice, jelly, pie fillings, etc.) producer, and a viticultural nursery operator.

(2) The meetings, powers and duties, procedures, and recordkeeping of the Viticulture Advisory Council shall be pursuant to s. 570.232.

(3) The primary responsibilities of the Viticulture Advisory Council are to submit to the Commissioner of Agriculture, annually, the industry’s recommendations for viticultural research, promotion, and education and, as necessary, the industry’s recommendations for revisions to the State Viticulture Plan.

History.—ss. 3, 6, ch. 84-295; s. 4, ch. 85-62; s. 5, ch. 91-429; s. 85, ch. 93-169; s. 3, ch. 94-296; s. 29, ch. 94-335; s. 59, ch. 2011-206; s. 157, ch. 2014-150; s. 33, ch. 2023-154.

599.003 State Viticulture Plan.—

(1) The Commissioner of Agriculture, in consultation with the Viticulture Advisory Council, shall develop and coordinate the implementation of the State Viticulture Plan, which shall identify problems and constraints of the viticulture industry, propose possible solutions to those problems, and develop planning mechanisms for the orderly growth of the industry, including:

(a) Criteria for viticultural research, service, and management priorities.

(b) Additional proposed legislation that may be required.

(c) Plans and goals to improve research and service capabilities at Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University and the University of Florida in their efforts to address current and future needs of the industry.

(d) The potential for viticulture products in terms of market and needs for development.

(e) Evaluation of wine policy alternatives, including, but not limited to, continued improvement in wine quality, blending considerations, promotion and advertising, labeling and vineyard designations, and development of production and marketing strategies.

(f) Evaluation of production and fresh fruit policy alternatives, including, but not limited to, setting minimum grades and standards, promotion and advertising, development of production and marketing strategies, and setting minimum standards on types and quality of nursery plants.

(g) Evaluation of policy alternatives for nonwine processed products, including, but not limited to, setting minimum quality standards and development of production and marketing strategies.

(h) Research and service priorities for further development of the viticulture industry.

(i) The identification of state agencies and public and private institutions concerned with research, education, extension, services, planning, promotion, and marketing functions related to viticultural development and the delineation of contributions and responsibilities.

(j) Business planning, investment potential, financial risks, and economics of production and utilization.

(2) A revision and update of the State Viticulture Plan shall be submitted biennially to the President of the Senate, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, and the chairs of appropriate committees of the Senate and House of Representatives, and a progress report and budget request shall be submitted annually.

History.—ss. 4, 6, ch. 84-295; s. 2, ch. 85-111; s. 5, ch. 91-429; s. 4, ch. 94-296.

599.004 Florida Farm Winery Program; registration; logo; fees.—

(1) The Florida Farm Winery Program is established within the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services. Under this program, a winery may qualify as a tourist attraction only if it is registered with and certified by the department as a Florida Farm Winery. A winery may not claim to be certified unless it has received written approval from the department.

(a) To qualify as a certified Florida Farm Winery, a winery must:

1. Produce or sell less than 250,000 gallons of wine annually of which 60 percent of the wine produced is made from state agricultural products.

2. Maintain a minimum of 5 acres of owned or managed land in Florida which produces commodities used in the production of wine.

3. Be open to the public for tours, tastings, and sales at least 30 hours each week.

4. Make annual application to the department for recognition as a Florida Farm Winery, on forms provided by the department.

5. Pay an annual application and registration fee of $100.

(b) To maintain certification and recognition as a Florida Farm Winery, a winery must comply with the qualifications provided in this section. The Commissioner of Agriculture is authorized to officially recognize a certified Florida Farm Winery as a state tourist attraction.

(2)(a) The department, in coordination with the Viticulture Advisory Council, shall develop and designate by rule a Florida Farm Winery logo, emblem, and directional sign to guide the public to certified Florida Farm Winery tourist attractions. The logo and emblem of certified Florida Farm Winery signs shall be uniform.

(b) Upon the request of a certified Florida Farm Winery, the Department of Transportation shall acquire and place Florida Farm Winery logo, emblem, and directional signs on the rights-of-way of interstate highways and primary and secondary roads. All costs for placing each sign shall be paid by the certified Florida Farm Winery requesting the sign. However, the cost of placing a sign shall not exceed $250 and the annual permit fee shall not exceed $50.

(c) Each certified Florida Farm Winery shall pay to the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services a licensing fee of $10 each year for each Florida Farm Winery logo, emblem, and directional sign in place.

(3) All fees collected, except as otherwise provided by this section, shall be deposited into the Viticulture Trust Fund and used to develop consumer information on the native characteristics and proper use of wines.

History.—s. 30, ch. 92-151; s. 10, ch. 2012-83.

599.012 Viticulture Trust Fund; creation.—

(1) There is established the Viticulture Trust Fund within the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services. The department shall use the moneys deposited in the trust fund pursuant to subsection (2) to do all the following:

(a) Develop and coordinate the implementation of the State Viticulture Plan.

(b) Promote viticulture products manufactured from products grown in the state.

(2) Fifty percent of the revenues collected from the excise taxes imposed under s. 564.06 on wine produced by manufacturers in this state from products grown in the state will be deposited in the Viticulture Trust Fund in accordance with that section.

History.—s. 16, ch. 88-308; ss. 5, 6, ch. 94-296.

F.S. 599 on Google Scholar

F.S. 599 on Casetext

Amendments to 599

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 599

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S599.9335 3 - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - REMOVED - M: F

S599.9335 4 - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - REMOVED - M: F

S599.9335 9 - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - REMOVED - M: F

S599.9335 10 - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - REMOVED - M: F

S599.9335 11a - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - REMOVED - M: F

S599.9335 11b - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - REMOVED - M: F

S599.9335 11c - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - REMOVED - M: F

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

LITTLE, v. RECLAIM IDAHO,, 140 S. Ct. 2616 (U.S. 2020)

. . . American Constitutional Law Foundation, Inc. , 525 U.S. 182, 191, 119 S.Ct. 636, 142 L.Ed.2d 599 (1999 . . . S. ----, 140 S.Ct. 599, 206 L.Ed.2d 115 (2020) ; Republican National Committee v. . . .

MCGIRT, v. OKLAHOMA, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Rosebud Sioux Tribe , 430 U.S., at 599, n. 20, 604, 97 S.Ct. 1361. . . .

P. BARR, v. AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF POLITICAL CONSULTANTS, INC., 140 S. Ct. 2335 (U.S. 2020)

. . . American Constitutional Law Foundation, Inc. , 525 U.S. 182, 186-187, 119 S.Ct. 636, 142 L.Ed.2d 599 . . .

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, v. BOOKING. COM B. V., 140 S. Ct. 2298 (U.S. 2020)

. . . See, e.g. , In re Cordua Restaurants, Inc. , 823 F.3d 594, 599 (CA Fed. 2016) ; Nartron Corp. v. . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, v. THURAISSIGIAM, 140 S. Ct. 1959 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Rev. 575, 599-600 (2008) (Halliday & White). . . .

C. LIU, v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, 140 S. Ct. 1936 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Schild , 161 U.S. 10, 25-26, 16 S.Ct. 443, 40 L.Ed. 599 (1896). . . . Schild , 161 U.S. 10, 25-26, 16 S.Ct. 443, 40 L.Ed. 599 (1896) ("The defendants, in any such suit, are . . .

J. THOLE, v. U. S. BANK N. A, 140 S. Ct. 1615 (U.S. 2020)

. . . See Bogert & Bogert § 599. . . .

UNITED STATES, v. SINENENG- SMITH, 140 S. Ct. 1575 (U.S. 2020)

. . . . ----, 194 L.Ed.2d 599 (2016) (ordering briefing on whether the plaintiffs could obtain relief without . . .

MAINE COMMUNITY HEALTH OPTIONS, v. UNITED STATES v. v. v., 140 S. Ct. 1308 (U.S. 2020)

. . . United States , 178 Ct.Cl. 599, 607, 372 F.2d 1002, 1009 (1967) ). . . .

ROMAG FASTENERS, INC. v. FOSSIL, INC., 140 S. Ct. 1492 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Plate , 40 Cal. 593, 597-599 (1871) ; Hemmeter Cigar Co. v. . . .

ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY, v. A. CHRISTIAN,, 140 S. Ct. 1335 (U.S. 2020)

. . . United States , 556 U.S. 599, 602, 129 S.Ct. 1870, 173 L.Ed.2d 812 (2009). . . .

RAMOS, v. LOUISIANA, 140 S. Ct. 1390 (U.S. 2020)

. . . . ----, ----, 136 S.Ct. 718, 728, 193 L.Ed.2d 599 (2016) ; Danforth v. . . .

C. MOHORNE, v. BEAL BANK,, 140 S. Ct. 1554 (U.S. 2020)

. . . No. 19-599. Supreme Court of the United States. March 9, 2020. Petition for rehearing denied. . . .

KANSAS, v. GARCIA v. v., 140 S. Ct. 791 (U.S. 2020)

. . . alien who uses another's Social Security information in an I-9." 306 Kan. at 1130-1131, 401 P.3d at 599 . . . Id. , at 1131, 401 P.3d at 599. . . . Petroleum Corp. , 485 U.S. 495, 503, 108 S.Ct. 1350, 99 L.Ed.2d 582 (1988) ; see also Whiting , 563 U.S. at 599 . . .

SHULAR, v. UNITED STATES, 140 S. Ct. 779 (U.S. 2020)

. . . on the "sense in which the term is now used in the criminal codes of most States." 495 U.S. at 598-599 . . . Cf., e.g. , Taylor , 495 U.S. at 590-599, 110 S.Ct. 2143 (discussing "burglary"). . . .

WOLF, v. COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS,, 140 S. Ct. 681 (U.S. 2020)

. . . . ----, 140 S.Ct. 599, --- L.Ed.2d ---- (2020) (New York cases). . . . Id. , at ----, 140 S.Ct. 599, --- L.Ed.2d ----. . . . S. ----, 140 S.Ct. 599, --- L.Ed.2d ---- (2020). . . . Id. , at ----, 140 S.Ct. 599, --- L.Ed.2d ---- ( GORSUCH , J., concurring in grant of stay) (slip op. . . .

RITZEN GROUP, INC. v. JACKSON MASONRY, LLC, 140 S. Ct. 582 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Carpenter , 558 U.S. 100, 106, 130 S.Ct. 599, 175 L.Ed.2d 458 (2009) ; internal quotation marks omitted . . .

C. MOHORNE, v. BEAL BANK,, 140 S. Ct. 901 (U.S. 2020)

. . . No. 19-599 Supreme Court of the United States. . . .

IN RE BOWLES,, 935 F.3d 1210 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Ct. 718, 193 L.Ed.2d 599 (2016), "undermined the reasoning of Kilgore and In re Henry." Smith v. . . .

BOWLES v. FLORIDA,, 140 S. Ct. 2589 (U.S. 2019)

. . . . ----, 136 S.Ct. 718, 193 L.Ed.2d 599 (2016). . . .

GALDERMA LABORATORIES L. P. S. A. S. A. v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., 390 F. Supp. 3d 582 (D. Del. 2019)

. . . Applera Corp. , 599 F.3d 1325, 1337-39 (Fed. Cir. 2010). IV. . . .

DIVERSE POWER, INC. v. CITY OF LAGRANGE, GEORGIA,, 934 F.3d 1270 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Ct. 599, 175 L.Ed.2d 458 (2009) (attorney-client privilege); Will v. Hallock, 546 U.S. 345, 126 S. . . .

UNITED STATES v. A. HOPPER,, 934 F.3d 740 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Jumah , 599 F.3d 799, 807 (7th Cir. 2010). At the hearing on Mr. . . .

COLE v. CARSON, v., 935 F.3d 444 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Ct. 596, 599, 160 L.Ed.2d 583 (2004) ). . . .

BACA v. COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF STATE, G. T. L. M., 935 F.3d 887 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . Bd. of Regents , 599 F.3d 1114, 1117 (10th Cir. 2010) (explaining that state agencies, as arms of the . . .

CONILLE v. COUNCIL AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, 935 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2019)

. . . Ct. 1266, 1271, 197 L.Ed.2d 599 (2017). . . .

UNITED STATES v. WILLIAMS, 934 F.3d 804 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Rutherford , 599 F.3d 817, 821 (8th Cir. 2010). The Guidelines do not mandate concurrent sentences. . . . Rutherford , 599 F.3d at 820, citing Gall v. . . .

SENNE v. KANSAS CITY ROYALS BASEBALL CORP. LLC LLC LP St. LLC LLC LLC LLC L. P. L. P. LLC LLC L. P. AZPB L. P. P LLC LLC LP LLP LLC LLC,, 934 F.3d 918 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . interest test is far from a mechanical or rote application of various factors," Hairu Chen , 7 Cal.5th at 599 . . .

BOXILL, v. P. O GRADY E. E. T., 935 F.3d 510 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Jopke , 370 F.3d 580, 599 (6th Cir. 2004) ("Without an unlawful action ... . . .

JEFFERIES, v. UNC REGIONAL PHYSICIANS PEDIATRICS, 392 F. Supp. 3d 620 (M.D.N.C. 2019)

. . . LLC, 599 F.3d 403, 409 n.8 (4th Cir. 2010). B. . . .

J. MALOUF, v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,, 933 F.3d 1248 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . Ct. 1266, 1271, 197 L.Ed.2d 599 (2017) (declining to decide whether the requirement to timely file a . . .

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR GUN RIGHTS, INC. v. MANGAN, G. J., 933 F.3d 1102 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . FEC , 599 F.3d 686, 697 (D.C. . . . reporting requirements" as a single "disclosure regime" subject to exacting scrutiny); SpeechNow.org , 599 . . . Constitutional Law Found., Inc. , 525 U.S. 182, 194-95, 119 S.Ct. 636, 142 L.Ed.2d 599 (1999). . . .

MARTIN, v. MARINEZ,, 934 F.3d 594 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Bd. of Educ. , 599 F.3d 617, 622 (7th Cir. 2010) ). . . .

UNITED STATES v. R. PAUP,, 933 F.3d 1226 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . Ct. 1266, 1270, 197 L.Ed.2d 599 (2017), where it addressed a notice of appeal filed after an initial . . .

UNITED STATES v. TREVINO,, 388 F. Supp. 3d 901 (W.D. Mich. 2019)

. . . Dewey , 452 U.S. 594, 598-599, 101 S.Ct. 2534, 69 L.Ed.2d 262 (1981) ). . . .

MARKS JLF, a GWF, a GJH, a GJR, v. HUDSON, 933 F.3d 481 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Kramer , 455 U.S. 745, 753-54, 102 S.Ct. 1388, 71 L.Ed.2d 599 (1982). . . .

BRENDA L. v. SAUL,, 392 F. Supp. 3d 858 (N.D. Ill. 2019)

. . . App'x 596, 599 (7th Cir. 2012). . . .

T. SCHMITT v. LAROSE,, 933 F.3d 628 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Constitutional Law Found ., 525 U.S. 182, 191, 119 S.Ct. 636, 142 L.Ed.2d 599 (1999) ("States allowing . . . Constitutional Law Found., Inc. , 525 U.S. 182, 192, 119 S.Ct. 636, 142 L.Ed.2d 599 (1999) (citing Taxpayers . . .

ALONSO, LLP LLP S. v. J. WEISS, 932 F.3d 995 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . App. 3d 355, 380, 205 Ill.Dec. 599, 643 N.E.2d 1206 (1st Dist. 1994) (finding a "willful breach of a . . .

UNITED STATES v. THOMAS,, 933 F.3d 605 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . App'x 592, 599 (6th Cir. 2013). Turning to this case, the district court properly invoked § 3C1.1. . . .

UNITED STATES v. CARMAN,, 933 F.3d 614 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Ct. 1266, 1271, 197 L.Ed.2d 599 (2017). . . .

HUBBELL, v. FEDEX SMARTPOST, INC., 933 F.3d 558 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Arkansas , 566 U.S. 599, 606, 132 S.Ct. 2044, 182 L.Ed.2d 937 (2012) (quoting Weeks v. . . .

UNITED STATES v. BONNELL,, 932 F.3d 1080 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Rutherford , 599 F.3d 817, 820 (8th Cir. 2010), citing Gall v. . . . See Rutherford , 599 F.3d at 821 ("A sentencing court should consider the Guidelines calculation as a . . . , the Guidelines range, and the § 3553(a) factors in imposing a consecutive sentence); Rutherford , 599 . . .

JACKSON, v. DAVIS,, 933 F.3d 408 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . From this circuit, Jackson points to Hardy , 577 F. 3d at 599, in which we found diligent a petitioner . . . Hardy , 577 F.3d at 599 (citing Coker v. Quarterman , 270 F. . . . legal duty to notify him' that his state application had been denied" (quoting Hardy , 577 F.3d at 599 . . .

JONES, v. A. BERRYHILL,, 392 F. Supp. 3d 831 (M.D. Tenn. 2019)

. . . TR 90, citing TR 599-943, 944-1246. . . .

UNITED STATES v. KRAEMER,, 933 F.3d 675 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Taylor , 495 U.S. at 599, 110 S.Ct. 2143. . . .

UNITED STATES v. FELDMAN,, 931 F.3d 1245 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Frank , 599 F.3d 1221, 1240 (11th Cir. 2010) ; see also United States v. . . .

IN RE M. PALACIOS,, 931 F.3d 1314 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Ct. 718, 729-31, 193 L.Ed.2d 599 (2016) ("substantive rules must have retroactive effect regardless of . . .

J. GILLIAM, C. Ad v. SEALEY, E. C. T. A. Sr. C. T. A. WTVD LLC J. C. Ad v. C. T. A. E. C. T. A. Sr. WTVD LLC, 932 F.3d 216 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . Id. at 599-600, 68 S.Ct. 302. And in Ferguson v. . . .

OWENS, v. PARRIS,, 932 F.3d 456 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Warden , 599 F.3d 529, 537 (6th Cir. 2010). . . .

CRYSTALLEX INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION v. BOLIVARIAN REPUBLIC OF VENEZUELA De S. A. D. C. In De S. A., 932 F.3d 126 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Yugoimport , 745 F.3d 599, 614 (2d Cir. 2014). . . .

IN RE SCHATZ, v., 602 B.R. 411 (B.A.P. 1st Cir. 2019)

. . . Hernández-Ferrer, 599 F.3d 63, 67 (1st Cir. 2010) (citation omitted). . . .

UNITED STATES v. GLENN,, 931 F.3d 424 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Scroggins , 599 F.3d 433, 447 n.8 (5th Cir. 2010). . . .

PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTHWEST OHIO REGION v. DEWINE, 931 F.3d 530 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . We then considered that issue for the first time in McQueary , 614 F.3d at 599. . . . Id. at 599. . . . example, indicating that a per se ban would unjustly exclude certain deserving claimants. 614 F.3d at 599 . . .

Z. J. a BY AND THROUGH Je JONES, v. KANSAS CITY BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS,, 931 F.3d 672 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . United States, 468 U.S. 796, 806, 104 S.Ct. 3380, 82 L.Ed.2d 599 (1984), which recognized that searches . . . United States , 468 U.S. 796, 806, 104 S.Ct. 3380, 82 L.Ed.2d 599 (1984). . . .

UNITED STATES v. COONCE, Jr., 932 F.3d 623 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Ct. 718, 193 L.Ed.2d 599 (2016) ; and Miller v. . . .

CALIFORNIA v. ABBVIE INC., 390 F. Supp. 3d 1176 (N.D. Cal. 2019)

. . . Lhotka , 599 F.3d 1102, 1107 (9th Cir. 2010) ). Any doubt about removal weighs in favor of remand. . . .

UNITED STATES v. RODRIGUEZ- SORIANO, a k a a k a, 931 F.3d 281 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . Green , 599 F.3d 360, 367 (4th Cir.), cert. denied , 562 U.S. 913, 131 S.Ct. 271, 178 L.Ed.2d 179 (2010 . . .

KRELL, v. M. SAUL,, 931 F.3d 582 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Universal Scaffolding & Equip., LLC , 839 F.3d 599, 607 (7th Cir. 2016) ("Perfunctory and undeveloped . . .

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION BY A. JAMES, v. QUINCY BIOSCIENCE HOLDING COMPANY, INC. LLC, d b a LLC,, 389 F. Supp. 3d 211 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . Apple Health & Sports Clubs, Ltd., Inc., 80 N.Y.2d 803, 807, 587 N.Y.S.2d 279, 599 N.E.2d 683 (1992). . . .

OBASI INVESTMENT LTD Wu v. TIBET PHARMACEUTICALS, INC Yu Z. L. III Co. L. L. P. L. III,, 931 F.3d 179 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Alloyd Co., 513 U.S. 561, 599, 115 S.Ct. 1061, 131 L.Ed.2d 1 (1995) (Ginsburg, J., dissenting), Congress . . .

COMMUNICATIONS, INCORPORATED, v. CRAWFORD, v., 930 F.3d 715 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Crockett , 734 F.3d 594, 599 (6th Cir. 2013) ; Herrington v. Waterstone Mortg. . . .

IN RE LICKING RIVER MINING, LLC, v. LLC,, 603 B.R. 336 (Bankr. E.D. Ky. 2019)

. . . Coast Miner, LLC (In re Licking River Mining, LLC) , No. 15-1004, 599 B.R. 552, 2019 WL 1430213 (Bankr . . . Licking River Mining , 599 B.R. at 580-84, 2019 WL 1430213, at *19-22. . . . Licking River Mining , 599 B.R. at 581, 2019 WL 1430213, at *19. . . . See Licking River Mining , 599 B.R. at ----, 2019 WL 1430213. . . .

IN RE TRONOX, v. LLP D. A., 603 B.R. 712 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . litigation proceeds would be allocated to the tort victim trust, and so the trust received approximately $599 . . .

FLORES, v. P. BARR,, 930 F.3d 1082 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Holder , 599 F.3d 973, 975-76 (9th Cir. 2010) (per curiam) (citing 8 C.F.R. § 214.14(c)(1) ). . . .

SOUTHERN HENS, INCORPORATED, v. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION R., 930 F.3d 667 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . No. 114-74, § 701, 129 Stat. 584, 599 (2015). . . .

VENCKIENE, v. UNITED STATES, 929 F.3d 843 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Ordinola , 478 F.3d at 599. . . . Ordinola , 478 F.3d at 599 (internal citation and quotation omitted). . . . plainly is an electoral conflict tainted by allegations of political corruption"); Ordinola , 478 F.3d at 599 . . .

ALARM DETECTION SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED, v. VILLAGE OF SCHAUMBURG, a, 930 F.3d 812 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Vill. of Hinsdale , 326 Ill.App.3d 372, 260 Ill.Dec. 599, 761 N.E.2d 782, 789 (2001) (holding that a . . .

PHILLIPS, v. V. SPENCER,, 390 F. Supp. 3d 136 (D.D.C. 2019)

. . . Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, LLP , 599 F. Supp. 2d 23, 32 (D.D.C. 2009) )). . . .

UNITED STATES v. RANKIN,, 929 F.3d 399 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Aguilar , 515 U.S. 593, 599, 115 S.Ct. 2357, 132 L.Ed.2d 520 (1995) ). . . .

FUSARO, v. R. COGAN, C. J. A. J. Jr., 930 F.3d 241 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . Inc. , 525 U.S. 182, 192, 119 S.Ct. 636, 142 L.Ed.2d 599 (1999) (explaining that First Amendment requires . . .

AUTOMOTIVE BODY PARTS ASSOCIATION, v. FORD GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,, 930 F.3d 1314 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . Convertible Top Replacement Co. , 365 U.S. 336, 346, 81 S.Ct. 599, 5 L.Ed.2d 592 (1961) ("[R]eplacement . . .

PRIME RATE PREMIUM FINANCE CORPORATION, INC. v. E. LARSON, A., 930 F.3d 759 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Hybrid Logistics, Inc. , 599 F. App'x 259, 259 (6th Cir. 2015) (per curiam) (citation omitted). . . .

SLIVKA, v. YOUNG MEN S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF PIKES PEAK REGION,, 390 F. Supp. 3d 1283 (D. Colo. 2019)

. . . See Nixon , 435 U.S. at 599, 98 S.Ct. 1306. . . .

IN RE J. TRUMP, D. H., 928 F.3d 360 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . Carpenter , 558 U.S. 100, 110-11, 130 S.Ct. 599, 175 L.Ed.2d 458 (2009). . . . "involves a new legal question or is of special consequence ," Mohawk , 558 U.S. at 111, 130 S.Ct. 599 . . . Mohawk , 558 U.S. at 111, 130 S.Ct. 599. . . . Ct. at 1932 ; see also Mohawk , 558 U.S. at 110-11, 130 S.Ct. 599. . . .

CORBITT, SDC, a v. VICKERS,, 929 F.3d 1304 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Ct. 596, 599, 160 L.Ed.2d 583 (2004) ). . . .

UNITED STATES v. BRIONES, Jr., 929 F.3d 1057 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Ct. 718, 193 L.Ed.2d 599 (2016), establishing that Miller 's substantive rule is to be given retroactive . . . Ct. 718, 193 L.Ed.2d 599 (2016), the Court clarified the requirements under Miller . . . .

TWUM, v. P. BARR,, 930 F.3d 10 (1st Cir. 2019)

. . . App'x 599, 601-02 (7th Cir. 2012) (unpublished) ("We have recognized that a contention that the Board . . .

UNITED STATES v. WILLIAMS,, 930 F.3d 44 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Id. at 599. . . . Spruill , 808 F.3d at 599 (finding true waiver where defendant's counsel did not "fall asleep at the . . .

W. WEINSTEIN, v. C. KRUMPTER, E. P. B. I- IV,, 386 F. Supp. 3d 220 (E.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . Ed. 2d 599 (2002) ). . . .

ATHENA DIAGNOSTICS, INC. LTD. E. V. v. MAYO COLLABORATIVE SERVICES, LLC,, 927 F.3d 1333 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . Convertible Top Replacement Co. , 365 U.S. 336, 344, 81 S.Ct. 599, 5 L.Ed.2d 592 (1961) ("[I]f anything . . .

KHAN, v. UNITED STATES, 928 F.3d 1264 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Bergman , 599 F.3d 1142, 1148 (10th Cir. 2010) (quoting Solina v. . . . Bergman , 599 F.3d at 1148. . . .

UNITED STATES v. B. LEDBETTER A. A. L., 929 F.3d 338 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Farah , 766 F.3d 599, 607 (6th Cir. 2014) ; Murr v. . . .

UNITED STATES v. GAWRON,, 929 F.3d 473 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Tyson , 863 F.3d 597, 599 (7th Cir. 2017). . . .

N. BROWN, v. UNITED STATES, 929 F.3d 554 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . included breaking and entering 'any booth or tent, or any boat or vessel, or railroad car.' " Id. at 599 . . . cars" are not included within the definition of generic burglary); see also Taylor I , 495 U.S. at 599 . . . Lewis , 599 S.W.2d 94, 96 (Mo. Ct. . . .

SIERRA CLUB v. J. TRUMP, T. K., 929 F.3d 670 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . State Tax Commission , 429 U.S. 318, 97 S.Ct. 599, 50 L.Ed.2d 514 (1977), a pre- Lexmark dormant Commerce . . . See 429 U.S. at 602 n.3, 97 S.Ct. 599. . . . state's power relative to that of Congress to regulate interstate commerce. 429 U.S. at 320 n.3, 97 S.Ct. 599 . . . Stock Exch. , 429 U.S. at 602 n.3, 97 S.Ct. 599 (allowing a plaintiff stock exchange with an interest . . .

PAJAK, v. ROHM HAAS COMPANY, LLC, Co., 387 F. Supp. 3d 138 (D. Mass. 2019)

. . . Delta Air Lines, Inc., 599 F.3d 73, 77 (1st Cir. 2010) ; see also M.G.L. c. 152, §§ 23, 48. . . .

PEOPLE v. DEBT RESOLVE, INC., 387 F. Supp. 3d 358 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . Apple Health & Sports Clubs, Ltd., Inc., 80 N.Y.2d 803, 587 N.Y.S.2d 279, 599 N.E.2d 683, 686 (1992). . . .

DIAZ, Jr. v. BERRYHILL,, 388 F. Supp. 3d 382 (M.D. Pa. 2019)

. . . Supp. 2d 589, 599 (M.D. Pa. 2001). . . . Supp. 2d 589, 599 (M.D. Pa. 2001). . . .

PANGEA PRODUCE DISTRIBUTORS, INC. v. FRANCO S PRODUCE, INC., 275 So. 3d 240 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . . & Repairs, 185 So. 3d 599, 601 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016) (quoting Kay's Custom Drapes, Inc. v. . . .

R. BROWN, E. R. A. v. COLLIER, R. R. A. v., 929 F.3d 218 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Texas Department Of Criminal Justice , 529 F.3d 599 (5th Cir. 2008), we held that the TDCJ violated RLUIPA . . . Justice , 529 F.3d 599 (5th Cir. 2008) ; Baranowski v. . . . volunteers rather than any regulation directly prohibiting these ceremonies"). 393 F.3d at 571. 529 F.3d 599 . . . Dep't Of Criminal Justice , 529 F.3d 599, 608 (5th Cir. 2008) ("In prior cases where we have affirmed . . .

YANG, v. P. BARR,, 929 F.3d 26 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Manspeaker, 498 U.S. 184, 190, 111 S.Ct. 599, 112 L.Ed.2d 608 (1991); see also Griffin v. . . .

ATAIN SPECIALTY INSURANCE CO. v. BOSTON RICKSHAW LLC,, 387 F. Supp. 3d 157 (D. Mass. 2019)

. . . Co. , 444 Mass. 599, 601, 830 N.E.2d 186 (2005). . . .

J. CUNNINGHAM, v. WAWA, INC., 387 F. Supp. 3d 529 (E.D. Pa. 2019)

. . . Supp. 3d 599, 608 (W.D.N.Y. Jan. 5, 2016) (same); see also Amgen Inc. v. Conn. Ret. Plans & Tr. . . .

UNITED STATES v. DINKINS,, 928 F.3d 349 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . United States , 495 U.S. 575, 599, 110 S.Ct. 2143, 109 L.Ed.2d 607 (1990) (explaining that "minor variations . . .

W. HOLMES, v. GROOMS,, 391 F. Supp. 3d 536 (E.D. Va. 2019)

. . . Fernandez, 599 Fed. . . .

DOMINION ENERGY, INC. v. CITY OF WARREN POLICE AND FIRE RETIREMENT SYSTEM, v. GMBH, v. GMBH, v., 928 F.3d 325 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . Moore , 360 S.C. 241, 599 S.E.2d 467, 475 (S.C. Ct. App. 2004). . . .

DOE, v. PURDUE UNIVERSITY,, 928 F.3d 652 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Bd. of Trs. , 581 F.3d 599, 601 (7th Cir. 2009) (explaining that the "basic legal relation between a . . .

PROBODANU, v. B. SESSIONS, III,, 387 F. Supp. 3d 1031 (C.D. Cal. 2019)

. . . Ashcroft , 291 F.3d 594, 599 (9th Cir. 2002) (emphasis in original); see also Garcia-Herrera v. . . . See Jimenez , 291 F.3d at 599 (holding that section 1252(g)'s limitation on jurisdiction includes "not . . .

IN RE GRAVEL, In In, 601 B.R. 873 (Bankr. Vt. 2019)

. . . Jacksonville Paper Co., 336 U.S. 187, 192-93, 69 S.Ct. 497, 93 L.Ed. 599 (1949) ). . . .