Cases from cite.case.law:

J. GIBSON G. v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N. A., 255 So. 3d 944 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . See § 655.79(1), Fla. . . . husband and wife shall be considered a tenancy by the entirety unless otherwise specified in writing." § 655.79 . . .

IN RE BENZAQUEN,, 555 B.R. 63 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2016)

. . . In order to resolve this dispute I must consider first, whether a 2008 change in Florida Statute § 655.79 . . . Stat. § 655.79, which, at the time Beal Bank was decided, included a presumption that an account held . . . following sentence to the end of Fla.Stat. § 655.79(1)— “Any deposit or account made in the name of . . . Stat. § 655.79(1) is reversed. b. Fla. . . . Stat. § 655.79 to suggest that the Legislature intended to upend the requirements necessary to create . . .

L. KEUL, v. HODGES BLVD. PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH, In, 180 So. 3d 1074 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . We held that the magistrate incorrectly applied section 655.79 of the Florida Statutes, as it relates . . .

REGIONS BANK, v. S. HYMAN,, 91 F. Supp. 3d 1234 (M.D. Fla. 2015)

. . . Section 655.79, Florida Statutes — tenancy by the entireties account with my wife. . . . Ch. 655.79, F.S. Deposits and accounts in two or more names; presumption as to vesting on death. 1. . . . Stat, and enacted Ch. 655.79. Fla. Stat, applicable to all financial institutions. . . . Under Ch. 655.79, Fla. . . . Ch. 655.79, Fla. . . .

H. BROWN, v. BROWN, Jr., 149 So. 3d 108 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . The magistrate ultimately issued a report concluding that section 655.79, Florida Statutes, governed . . . the disposition of all the above-listed accounts, and further that Appellee had satisfied section 655.79 . . . Examining the magistrate’s report in the instant case, we conclude first that section 655.79, by its . . . The statute reads, in pertinent part: 655.79 Deposits and accounts in two or more names; presumption . . . Consequently, the magistrate erred in applying the statutory presumption in section 655.79 and, more . . .

UNITED STATES v. A. McARTHUR,, 7 F. Supp. 3d 1220 (S.D. Ala. 2014)

. . . . § 655.79(1). . . .

E. KARR, v. VITRY,, 135 So. 3d 372 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . As argued by Karr, this gave rise to a presumption of survivorship in her favor by virtue of section 655.79 . . . Under section 655.79, no specific language of survivorship is required to give rise to the presumption . . .

WEXLER, v. RICH,, 80 So. 3d 1097 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . The parties have not argued the application of section 655.79(1), Florida Statutes (2009), apparently . . . Because it has not been briefed, we do not reach the issue of whether the 2008 amendment to section 655.79 . . .

LAURITSEN, v. WALLACE,, 67 So. 3d 285 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . See § 655.79, Fla. . . .

CAPUTO, v. NOUSKHAJIAN,, 871 So. 2d 266 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . Karen maintains that section 655.79, Florida Statutes (2000), allows the presumption permitting accounts . . .

BEAL BANK, SSB, v. ALMAND AND ASSOCIATES,, 780 So. 2d 45 (Fla. 2001)

. . . For example, section 655.79(1), Florida Statutes (2000), provides that when two people open an account . . . See § 655.79(2); see generally In re Estate of Combee, 601 So.2d 1165, 1166-67 (Fla.1992). . . .

In KELLMAN, P. v. I., 248 B.R. 430 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1999)

. . . . § 655.79 (1999) (presumption that account held in two names vests in survivor upon death of other may . . .

MILLER, v. J. BRISTOW, M., 704 So. 2d 727 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . Count I of the estate’s complaint against Miller was filed pursuant to section 655.79(2), Florida Statutes . . . Section 655.79(2) does not apply to these funds because they were not titled jointly in the name of Miller . . .

MULATO, v. MULATO,, 705 So. 2d 57 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . According to section 655.79, Florida Statutes (1995): [A] deposit account in the names of two or more . . . absence of proof of any donative intent or delivery, possession, dominion, control, or acceptance. § 655.79 . . .

In ESTATE OF H. H. HERRING, HERRING, v. A. HENDERSON,, 670 So. 2d 145 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . Herring as the survivor was presumed to own the certificate of deposit pursuant to section 655.79, Florida . . . This court examined Florida Statute § 655.79, which became effective on July, 1992, and determines that . . . It is apparent that the trial court concluded that, whether applying section 655.79 or section 658.56 . . . Herring argues that section 655.79 is applicable to determine the rights of the parties as it was the . . . Section 655.79, Florida Statutes (Supp.1992), provides: 655.79 Deposits and accounts in two or more names . . .

SITOMER, v. M. ORLAN,, 660 So. 2d 1111 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . However, for bank and credit union accounts, section 655.79, Florida Statutes (1993), creates the presumption . . .

In D. BOTTOM, R. DOLLINGER, D. v. D. BOTTOM,, 176 B.R. 950 (Bankr. N.D. Fla. 1994)

. . . . § 655.79 (West). . . .

In S. DUTTA, MATHENY, POIDMORE SEARS,, 175 B.R. 41 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 1994)

. . . Granted in part for $18,543.50 fees and $655.79 costs for the reasons set forth below. . . .

M. DAVIS, v. FOULKROD, L., 642 So. 2d 1129 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . [now codified as § 655.79, Fla.Stat. (1993)]. . . .