Cases from cite.case.law:

VITELLI v. HAGGER, 268 So. 3d 246 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . See § 704.04, Fla. . . .

IN RE LEEDS,, 589 B.R. 186 (Bankr. Nev. 2018)

. . . See generally 3 COLLIER ON BANKRUPTCY , ¶ 323.02[2] and 6 COLLIER ON BANKRUPTCY , ¶ 704.04[1] (Richard . . .

IN RE J S PROPERTIES, LLC, LLC, v. M. J S LLC J S LLC, 872 F.3d 138 (3d Cir. 2017)

. . . See 6 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 704.04[1], p. 704-13 (Alan N. Resnick & Henry J. . . .

IN RE J S PROPERTIES, LLC, LLC, v. M. J S LLC J S LLC, 872 F.3d 138 (3d Cir. 2017)

. . . See 6 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 704.04[1], p. 704-13 (Alan N. Resnick & Henry J. . . .

R. MESSER J. v. SANDER, 182 So. 3d 795 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . . § 704.04, Fla. Stat. (2014). . . . Section 704.04 provides that attorney’s fees and costs are owed to either party for “unreasonable refusal . . . to comply with the provisions of section] 704.01(2).” § 704.04, Fla. . . .

IN RE BELTWAY LAW GROUP, LLP, a k a, 514 B.R. 341 (Bankr. D.D.C. 2014)

. . . See D.C.Code §§ 29-702.01(c), 29-703.03 and 29-704.04(a). . . . See D.C.Code §§ 29-703.03 and 29-704.04(a). . . .

R. MESSER J. v. SANDER, 144 So. 3d 566 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . the trial court’s determination that Appellees are entitled to attorney’s fees pursuant to section 704.04 . . . We remand for the trial court to make all findings and take any actions required by section 704.04 when . . .

ELAT, v. NGOUBENE,, 993 F. Supp. 2d 497 (D. Md. 2014)

. . . other than the witness’s view of how the verdict should read’ ” (quoting Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 704.04 . . .

In HOPKINTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL, INC., 499 B.R. 158 (Bankr. D.N.H. 2013)

. . . Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 704.04 (Alan N. Resnick & Henry J. Sommer eds., 16th ed.). . . .

FLICKINGER, O. D. O. D. D. J. F. a J. B. F. a v. TOYS R US- DELAWARE, INC., 492 F. App'x 217 (3d Cir. 2012)

. . . Berger, Weinstein’s Federal Evidence, § 704.04[1] (Joseph M. . . .

UNITED STATES v. POULIN,, 461 F. App'x 272 (4th Cir. 2012)

. . . Offill, 666 F.3d 168, 174-75 (4th Cir.2011) (quoting Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 704.04[2][a] (2d . . .

UNITED STATES v. OFFILL, Jr., 666 F.3d 168 (4th Cir. 2011)

. . . information other than the witness’s view of how the verdict should read,” Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 704.04 . . . could reasonably be expected to shed some light in a shadowy domain”); Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 704.04 . . .

In R. WOOLSEY ASSOCIATES, INC. R. v. J., 454 B.R. 782 (Bankr. D. Idaho 2011)

. . . See generally 6 Collier ¶ 704.04 at 704-12. . . . .

BORGWARNER, INC. v. HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., 750 F. Supp. 2d 596 (W.D.N.C. 2010)

. . . .”); Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 704.04[2][a] (2d ed. 2003) (“The most common reason for excluding . . .

L. BARTLETT v. MUTUAL PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY, INC., 742 F. Supp. 2d 182 (D.N.H. 2010)

. . . See 4 Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 704.04[1], at 704-10 (2d ed.1997) (citing Andrews v. Metro N. . . .

RAFTER, v. STEVENSON,, 680 F. Supp. 2d 275 (D. Me. 2010)

. . . Practice-Civil, § 704.04[e] (Matthew Bender 3d ed.) (same); Robert Force, Admiralty & Mar. . . .

In METHYL TERTIARY BUTYL ETHER MTBE PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. v., 643 F. Supp. 2d 482 (S.D.N.Y. 2009)

. . . Weinstein, et al., Weinstein’s Federal Evidence, § 704.04[1], at 704-13 n. 9 (2d ed. 2008) (collecting . . .

In CITY OF VALLEJO, v. N. A. N. A., 408 B.R. 280 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 2009)

. . . Berger, Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 704.04[2][a] (2d ed.2009); Compare Peckham v. Cont'l Cas. . . .

In A. SMITH,, 400 B.R. 370 (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. 2009)

. . . P 704.04. . . .

SOMMERFIELD, v. CITY OF CHICAGO,, 254 F.R.D. 317 (N.D. Ill. 2008)

. . . City of Momence, 323 F.3d 557, 564 (7th Cir. 2003); 4 Weinstein’s Federal Evidence, § 704.04 (2008). . . . Weinstein’s, supra § 704.04[2] [b]. . . . Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 704.04 (2008) (footnotes omitted). . . .

In MUSHROOM TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, INC. L. v., 366 B.R. 414 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 2007)

. . . trustees” and to secure possession of all the property and collect debts due. 6 Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 704.04 . . . Id., ¶ 704.04[2] at 704-10. A debtor in possession has an identical duty. . . .

UNITED STATES v. SAFA,, 484 F.3d 818 (6th Cir. 2007)

. . . Berger, Weinstein’s Federal Evidence, § 704.04[1] (Joseph M. . . .

CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. v. J. VOSIKA,, 943 So. 2d 996 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . See § 704.04, Fla. Stat. (2003). . . .

UNITED STATES v. A. McIVER,, 470 F.3d 550 (4th Cir. 2006)

. . . Barile, 286 F.3d 749, 760 n.7 (4th Cir.2002) (quoting Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 704.04[2][a] (2d . . .

UNITED STATES v. PERKINS,, 470 F.3d 150 (4th Cir. 2006)

. . . not helpful to the trier of fact”) (internal quotation marks omitted); Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 704.04 . . . Barile, 286 F.3d 749, 760 n. 7 (4th Cir.2002)(quoting Weinstein's Federal Evidence § 704.04[2][a] (2d . . .

UNITED STATES v. W. R. GRACE, R. A. W. J. J. O. C., 455 F. Supp. 2d 1156 (D. Mont. 2006)

. . . to the jury, and thus, admissible.’ " 286 F.3d at 760 n. 7 (quoting Weinstein's Federal Evidence § 704.04 . . .

STATEN, v. M. GONZALEZ- FALLA, III, 904 So. 2d 498 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . Section 704.04, Florida Statutes (2001), provides for compensation to the servient owner and states in . . . When section 704.01(2) and section 704.04 are read in pari materia, it is clear that the legislature . . .

SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY, At s, v. LYNNHAVEN INLET FISHING PIER CORPORATION C. D. C. t a d b a, 113 F. App'x 526 (4th Cir. 2004)

. . . See Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 704.04[1] (2004) (“In general, testimony about a legal conclusion, . . .

H. BLANTON, v. CITY OF PINELLAS PARK,, 887 So. 2d 1224 (Fla. 2004)

. . . See § 704.04, Fla. Stat. (2003). . . . When this judicial remedy is utilized, section 704.04 expressly provides that “[t]he éasement shall date . . . See § 704.04. . . . See 472 So.2d at 546 (concluding that the “portion of section 704.04 which provides that ‘[t]he easement . . . Section 704.04, Florida Statutes (2003), provides in full: 704.04. . . .

CIRELLI, L. v. ENT, T., 885 So. 2d 423 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . . § 704.04, Fla. Stat. (2002); Parham; Sapp. . . . compensation is judicially determined, “[t]he easement shall date from the time the award is paid.” § 704.04 . . .

In MUSHROOM TRANSPORTATION CO. INC. L. v., 282 B.R. 805 (E.D. Pa. 2002)

. . . Sommer, Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 704.04[1] at 704-9 (15th Ed. Rev.2002). . . .

YKK CORPORATION YKK U. S. A. v. JUNGWOO ZIPPER CO. LTD. YPP U. S. A., 213 F. Supp. 2d 1195 (C.D. Cal. 2002)

. . . the legal implications of evidence is inadmissable under Rule 704.” 4 Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 704.04 . . .

UNITED STATES v. BARILE,, 286 F.3d 749 (4th Cir. 2002)

. . . .”); Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 704.04[2][a] (2d ed. 2001) (“The most common reason for excluding . . . Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 704.04[2][a] (2d ed. 2001) ("For example, the testimony may be helpful . . .

UNITED STATES, v. D. LITTLEWOOD, U. S., 53 M.J. 349 (C.A.A.F. 2000)

. . . See generally 4 Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 704.04[1] (2d ed.2000) (legal conclusions in terms of . . .

In FREZZO,, 217 B.R. 985 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1998)

. . . Accord L.King, 4 Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶704.04[1] at 704-11 (15h ed.1996) (“a trustee is given a range . . .

SEA- LAND SERVICE, INC. v. J W IMPORT EXPORT, INC., 976 F. Supp. 327 (D.N.J. 1997)

. . . Moore, et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 704.04[2] (3d ed.1997). . . . Moore, supra, Moore’s Federal Practice § 704.04[2], No court has addressed the issue of whether a plaintiff . . .

v., 109 T.C. 21 (T.C. 1997)

. . . Commissioner, 92 T.C. 101, 126-129 (1989); Weinstein’s Federal Evidence, sec. 704.04[2][a], at 704-10 . . .

F. E. TRAMMELL v. T. WARD, H. E., 667 So. 2d 223 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . are entitled to additional compensation, it seems such claim should be brought pursuant to section 704.04 . . .

A. BELL, v. W. T. COX, Jr., 642 So. 2d 1381 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . .-01(2) and 704.04, Florida Statutes (1991), over a portion of property owned by Bell. . . . filed an answer and asserted a counterclaim seeking a declaratory judgment that sections 704.01 and 704.04 . . . First, Bell argues that sections 704.01 and 704.04, Florida Statutes (1991), are unconstitutional and . . . Section 704.04, Florida Statutes (1991), reads: When the owner or owners of such lands across which a . . . See § 704.04, Fla.Stat. (1991). . . . nonpublic purpose in contravention of Article X, Section 6(a), Florida Constitution (1968), upheld section 704.04 . . . Our present case apparently presents the first challenge to the constitutionality of section 704.04 on . . . To add insult to injury, section 704.04 permits, and the trial court awarded, attorney’s fees and costs . . . Payment is only required if the neighbor objects and insists on a judicial remedy under section 704.04 . . . Section 704.04 permits nothing less than an action in eminent domain brought by a private individual. . . . I agree with Judge Thompson that sections 704.01(2) and 704.04 are constitutional insofar as they provide . . . I would urge trial courts to use sparingly the provision of section 704.04 that allows assessment of . . .

In CHICAGO ART GLASS, INC., 155 B.R. 180 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 1993)

. . . Collier, at ¶ 704.04, p. 704-8 & 9; quoting, In re Modern Dairy Farms No. 1, 19 B.R. 322 (Bkrtcy.M.D.Fla . . .

H. HOFFMAN B. v. N. LAFFITTE,, 564 So. 2d 170 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . Section 704.04, Florida Statutes (1987), provides a judicial remedy for establishment of a statutory . . . It provides: 704.04 Judicial remedy and compensation to servient owner. — When the owner or owners of . . . establish the easement across appellee’s land, the trial court was nevertheless required by Section 704.04 . . .

M. PARHAM Jo v. K. REDDICK, 537 So. 2d 132 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . available to the servient owner of an implied easement is a suit for compensation pursuant to section 704.04 . . . In Sapp, the court explained that the “portion of section 704.04 which provides that ‘[t]he easement . . . nature of the easement, which in turn implicates the matter of compensation to the servient owner. § 704.04 . . . WIGGINTON and NIMMONS, JJ., concur. . § 704.04, Fla.Stat. (1985), provides: 704.04 Judicial remedy and . . .

In SAN JUAN HOTEL CORPORATION, LOPEZ- STUBBE, v. RODRIGUEZ- ESTRADA,, 847 F.2d 931 (1st Cir. 1988)

. . . and penalties, he may be surcharged to the extent of the interest and penalties. 4 Collier, supra, if 704.04 . . .

In SAN JUAN HOTEL CORPORATION, LOPEZ- STUBBE, v. RODRIGUEZ- ESTRADA,, 847 F.2d 931 (1st Cir. 1988)

. . . and penalties, he may be surcharged to the extent of the interest and penalties. 4 Collier, supra, If 704.04 . . .

J. MORAN, v. W. BRAWNER,, 519 So. 2d 1131 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . necessity across the Brawner property pursuant to section 704.01(2), Florida Statutes (1985), and section 704.04 . . .

S. FORD L. v. W. MILLER J., 506 So. 2d 464 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . Millers state that it was with Fox in mind that they instituted their cause of action pursuant to section 704.04 . . .

In SAN JUAN HOTEL CORPORATION, B- A STUBBE, v. RODRIGUEZ ESTRADA,, 71 B.R. 413 (D.P.R. 1987)

. . . See 4 Collier on Bankruptcy para. . 704.04[2] at 704-13 (15th ed. 1985). . . .

In DELTA SERVICES INDUSTRIES, ETC. FOSTER SECURITIES, INC. v. W. SANDOZ,, 782 F.2d 1267 (5th Cir. 1986)

. . . See 4 Collier, supra, ¶ 704.04. . . .

SAPP, v. GENERAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a, 472 So. 2d 544 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . . § 704.04, Fla.Stat. (1983). . . . unreasonable, the only recourse available to the servient owner is to seek compensation under section 704.04 . . . That portion of section 704.04 which provides that “[t]he easement shall date from the time the award . . . As we interpret section 704.04, a servient owner cannot arbitrarily block the use of a statutory way . . .

D. W. FRANKLIN, Jr. v. A. BOATRIGHT,, 399 So. 2d 1132 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . , which found that the objections raised in South Dade Farms were cured by the enactment of Section 704.04 . . .

FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF BIRMINGHAM v. PERFECTION BEDDING CO. M. JACKSON, III, R. L. Sr. B. v. NATIONAL MATTRESS CO., 631 F.2d 31 (5th Cir. 1980)

. . . Alabama corporation, was in serious financial straits with an unaudited net worth of approximately $704.04 . . .

DESERET RANCHES OF FLORIDA, INC. v. BOWMAN,, 349 So. 2d 155 (Fla. 1977)

. . . Section 704.04, Florida Statutes (1975), provides a judicial remedy and compensation to the servient . . . They maintain that this deficiency was cured by the amendment adding Section 704.04, Florida Statutes . . . Section 704.04, Florida Statutes (1975), may be an elixir for the latter, but it is no cure for the former . . . Section 704.04, Florida Statutes, provides for judicial remedy if the servient owner objects to a claim . . . BSL Farms Co., 62 So.2d 350 (Fla.1950), have also been cured by the enactment of Section 704.04, Florida . . .

HANNA v. MEANS, 319 So. 2d 61 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

. . . necessity pursuant to § 704.01(2), F.S. 1971, upon payment of just compensation therefor as required by § 704.04 . . .

REYES v. PEREZ, 284 So. 2d 493 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1973)

. . . such easement for that, as stated, it is of common law origin and hence does not qualify under Section 704.04 . . .

P. P. v., 42 T.C. 72 (T.C. 1964)

. . . are not allowable; and that petitioners realized income from their airport business in the amount of $704.04 . . .

STEIN N. v. W. DARBY a, 126 So. 2d 313 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1961)

. . . Section 704.01(2), 704.04, F.S.A. . . . such a way of necessity upon the payment of compensation to the owner of the servient tenement, Sec. 704.04 . . . Sec. 704.01(2), 704.04, F.S.A. attempts to authorize such action it is to that extent unconstitutional . . . . §§ 704.01(2) and 704.04 F.S.A., with which we are concerned. . . . . § 704.04, F.S.A.: “Judicial remedy and compensation to servient owner. — When the owner or owners of . . . F.S. § 704.04, F.S.A. . . .

E. BRADSHAW D. v. W. PRASEK, 114 So. 2d 821 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1959)

. . . means of the nearest practical route, considering the use to which said lands are being put; * Section 704.04 . . .

GORDON, v. NORRIS,, 10 Fla. Supp. 77 (Lake Cty. Cir. Ct. 1956)

. . . of the opinion that the re-enactment of sections 704.01, 704.02, 704.03 and the addition of section 704.04 . . .