Cases from cite.case.law:

OKPOSIO, v. BARRY UNIVERSITY MAIN CAMPUS, 252 So. 3d 1290 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . . § 760.01(2), Fla. Stat. (2016). . . .

JACKSON, v. KLEEN LLC,, 238 So. 3d 378 (Fla. App. Ct. 2017)

. . . Chapter 760, § 760.01 et seq., Florida Statutes (2016). . . .

MOHAMMED, v. JACKSONVILLE HOSPITALISTS, P. A. a, 712 F. App'x 872 (11th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 760.01 et seq. . . .

DAGNESSES, v. TARGET MEDIA PARTNERS, a a, 711 F. App'x 927 (11th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 760.01 et seq. . . .

H. MOSER, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,, 709 F. App'x 985 (11th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 760.01(1). . . .

LAMBERT, v. WORLDWIDE MARKETING TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, a, 708 F. App'x 559 (11th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 760.01(1), and discriminated against based on her age, in violation of the Florida Civil Rights Act . . .

F. STEPHEN, v. H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE LIFETIME CANCER SCREENING CENTER, INC., 259 F. Supp. 3d 1323 (M.D. Fla. 2017)

. . . . § 760.01 et seq. (“FCRA”). . . .

MAHOLANYI, v. SAFETOUCH OF TAMPA, INC. d. b. a., 686 F. App'x 765 (11th Cir. 2017)

. . . . §§ 760.01-.il. . . .

IN RE STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CIVIL CASES- REPORT NO., 214 So. 3d 552 (Fla. 2017)

. . . new Section 417, Unlawful Discrimination, based upon the Florida Civil Rights Act (FCRA), sections 760.01 . . . F.S. 760.01-760.11. 417.1 INTRODUCTION Members of the jury, you have now heard and received all of the . . .

LEME, v. SOUTHERN BAPTIST HOSPITAL OF FLORIDA, INC., 248 F. Supp. 3d 1319 (M.D. Fla. 2017)

. . . . § 760.01, et. seq. See generally Amended Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial (Doc. 2; Complaint). . . .

In MATTER OF AMR CORPORATION C. v. AMR, 566 B.R. 657 (S.D.N.Y. 2017)

. . . Stat. 760.01 (“FCRA”), negligent hiring and supervision, and vicarious liability for alleged physical . . .

HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES PROJECT, v. SPV REALTY, LC,, 212 So. 3d 419 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . rental discrimination under the Florida Fair Housing Act, for violating his civil rights under sections 760.01 . . . Section 760.11 states in relevant part that “[a]ny person aggrieved by a violation ss. 760.01-760.10 . . . engrafted the exhaustion requirement in the Florida Civil Rights Act, Part I of Chapter 760 (sections 760.01 . . .

A. PERRY, v. CITY OF AVON PARK, FLORIDA,, 662 F. App'x 831 (11th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 760.01 et seq. . . .

DIAZ, v. FLORIDA,, 219 F. Supp. 3d 1207 (S.D. Fla. 2016)

. . . Stat. 760.01 et seq. . . .

WILSON, v. DALE ERNHARDT JR. CHEVROLET,, 669 F. App'x 980 (11th Cir. 2016)

. . . . §§ 760.01-760.11. We affirm. . . .

RUSSELL, v. CITY OF TAMPA,, 652 F. App'x 765 (11th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 760.01 et seq. . . .

CAPORICCI, v. CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL, INC., 189 F. Supp. 3d 1314 (M.D. Fla. 2016)

. . . . §§ 760.01, et seq., and in retaliation for her exercise of rights under Family Medical Leave Act (“ . . .

DAVIS, v. BOB EVANS FARMS, LLC,, 649 F. App'x 869 (11th Cir. 2016)

. . . . §§ 760.01 et seq., for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. . . .

NOEL, v. TERRACE OF ST. CLOUD, LLC,, 212 F. Supp. 3d 1193 (M.D. Fla. 2016)

. . . . §§ 760.01-.il. . . .

L. WARING, v. MIAMI- DADE COUNTY,, 172 F. Supp. 3d 1343 (S.D. Fla. 2016)

. . . . § 760.01, et seq. (“FCRA”). . . .

CIMINO, s v. AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. a, 183 So. 3d 1242 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . .” § 760.01(2), Fla. Stat. (2014). . . . “Any person aggrieved by a violation of ss. 760.01-760.10 may file a complaint with' the commission within . . . purposes stated [in chapter 760] and the special purposes of the particular provision involved.” § 760.01 . . .

SHERIDAN, v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH,, 182 So. 3d 787 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . .” § 760.01(2), Fla. Stat. (2012). . . . . § 760.01(3). . . .

CORBETT, v. BESELER,, 635 F. App'x 809 (11th Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 760.01 et seq. She alleged hostile work environment, gender discrimination, and retaliation. . . .

L. BROWN, v. LASSITER- WARE, INC., 620 F. App'x 888 (11th Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 760.01, et seq.; and denying the defendant’s motion with respect to the plaintiffs claims arising . . .

ALVINO, v. EQUINOX HOLDINGS, INC., 629 F. App'x 847 (11th Cir. 2015)

. . . . §§ 760.01 et seq. . . .

GONZALEZ, v. STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES,, 124 F. Supp. 3d 1317 (S.D. Fla. 2015)

. . . . § 760.01. . . .

DESISTO, v. CITY OF DELRAY BEACH,, 618 F. App'x 558 (11th Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 760.01 (FCRA), action in Florida state court, alleging disability discrimination against Delray Beach . . .

RUSTOWICZ, v. NORTH BROWARD HOSPITAL DISTRICT n k a, 174 So. 3d 414 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . Sections 760.01-760.11 and 509.092, Florida Statutes (2013), are formally cited as the "Florida Civil . . .

LOBERGER, v. DEL- JEN INC. J J, 616 F. App'x 922 (11th Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 760.01. After careful review, we affirm. I. . . .

ASHKENAZI, v. SOUTH BROWARD HOSPITAL DISTRICT d. b. a., 607 F. App'x 958 (11th Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 760.01, et seq. . . .

HELLWEGE, v. TAMPA FAMILY HEALTH CENTERS, L., 103 F. Supp. 3d 1303 (M.D. Fla. 2015)

. . . . § 760.01 et seq. (TFHC only). (See Id.). Lindsey filed a Motion to Dismiss on February 18, 2015. . . .

In LEHMAN BROTHERS INC. L. P. L. P. v. W. SIPA, 533 B.R. 362 (S.D.N.Y. 2015)

. . . . ¶ 760.01. . See, e.g., In re Lehman Bros. . . .

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. v. FENYK,, 780 F.3d 59 (1st Cir. 2015)

. . . . §§ 760.01-760.il. . . .

A. HAMILTON, M. D. v. SHERIDAN HEALTHCORP INC. a M. D. M. D., 602 F. App'x 485 (11th Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 760.01 et seq. Dr. Hamilton raises three arguments on appeal. . . .

R. MARGOLIS, M. D. v. PUBLIC HEALTH TRUST OF MIAMI- DADE COUNTY d b a, 89 F. Supp. 3d 1343 (S.D. Fla. 2015)

. . . . §§ 760.01 (“FCRA”), and the Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution through 42 U.S.C . . .

AYALA, v. SHERIFF, BROWARD COUNTY FLORIDA, Al, 594 F. App'x 602 (11th Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 760.01. . . .

CARTER, v. COLUMBIA COUNTY,, 597 F. App'x 574 (11th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 760.01 et seq. . . .

MARCHMAN, v. ST. ANTHONY S HOSPITAL, INC., 152 So. 3d 830 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . discrimination based on physical disability in contravention of the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, §§ 760.01 . . .

OLSON, v. DEX IMAGING, INC., 63 F. Supp. 3d 1353 (M.D. Fla. 2014)

. . . . § 760.01 et seq.; gender discrimination under the FCRA; retaliation arising under the FCRA; unpaid . . .

CRANE, v. LIFEMARK HOSP. OF FLA. INC., 149 So. 3d 718 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . discrimination because of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, handicap, or marital status .... ” § 760.01 . . . Civil Rights Act includes specific statutory sections in both chapters 760 and 509, Florida Statutes. § 760.01 . . . Stat. (2011) (“Sections 760.01-760.11 and 509.092 shall be cited as the 'Florida Civil Rights Act of . . . 1992' ”); § 760.02(1) (" ‘Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992’ means ss. 760.01-760.11 and 509.092”). . . . .

FLORENCE, v. NOVO NORDISK INC., 569 F. App'x 906 (11th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 760.01 et seq. and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et . . .

STANLEY, v. GREAT GLAM, INC., 161 So. 3d 457 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . pregnancy discrimination under the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, which is codified at sections 760.01 . . .

SIUDOCK, v. VOLUSIA COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD,, 568 F. App'x 659 (11th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 760.01 et seq., and (4) state law breach of contract. . . .

TELFAIR, v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION,, 567 F. App'x 681 (11th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 760.01(1)(a), and religious discrimination and failure to accommodate, in violation of FCRA. . . .

TOOMER, v. CACI, INC. FEDERAL,, 566 F. App'x 886 (11th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 760.01. We affirm. . . .

CALIBUSO, v. BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION,, 299 F.R.D. 359 (E.D.N.Y. 2014)

. . . . §§ 760.01 et seq.; Missouri Human Rights Act, Mo. Ann. . . .

DELVA, v. CONTINENTAL GROUP, INC., 137 So. 3d 371 (Fla. 2014)

. . . .” § 760.01(3), Fla. Stat. (2011). . . . Id. at 1121 (citing § 760.01(3), Fla. Stat.). We granted review of Delva to address the conflict. . . . to construing the FCRA specifically, this Court is guided by the stated statutory purpose in section 760.01 . . . As to the purposes of the FCRA, section 760.01(2), Florida Statutes, explains that “[t]he general purposes . . . “to secure for all individuals within the state freedom from discrimination because of ... sex.” § 760.01 . . .

SMITH, v. BREVARD OPTOMETRY ASSOCIATES,, 136 So. 3d 761 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . discrimination lawsuit against BOA pursuant to the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992 (FCRA), sections 760.01 . . .

SAMSON, v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION,, 746 F.3d 1196 (11th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 760.01, et seq. . . .

SMART, v. CITY OF MIAMI BEACH,, 1 F. Supp. 3d 1350 (S.D. Fla. 2014)

. . . . § 760.01 et seq. (Compl. ¶¶ 1, 22-34.) . . . Stat. § 760.01 et seq. . . .

L. JOHNSON, v. GREAT EXPRESSIONS DENTAL CENTERS OF FLORIDA, P. A., 132 So. 3d 1174 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . Johnson subsequently brought the underlying suit under the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, section 760.01 . . .

H. JONES, v. BANK OF AMERICA,, 985 F. Supp. 2d 1320 (M.D. Fla. 2013)

. . . . §§ 760.01 et seq. . . .

BLANCO, v. MONIQUE ME, INC. d b a CWF LLC,, 116 So. 3d 639 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . Blanco brought an action against her employers under the Florida Civil Rights Act (FCRA), sections 760.01 . . .

MARCHETTI v. SCHOOL BOARD OF BROWARD COUNTY,, 117 So. 3d 811 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . Sections 760.01-.il, 509.092, Florida Statutes (2005). . . .

GLASS, v. CAPTAIN KATANNA S, INC., 950 F. Supp. 2d 1235 (M.D. Fla. 2013)

. . . and to “liberally” construe the FCRA “to further the general purposes stated in this section ____” § 760.01 . . . general welfare, and to promote the interests, rights, and privileges of individuals within the state.” § 760.01 . . .

SHEDRICK, v. DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF MIAMI- DADE COLLEGE,, 941 F. Supp. 2d 1348 (S.D. Fla. 2013)

. . . Stat. 760.01, et seq. . . .

CATALDO, v. DAYTONA STATE COLLEGE,, 110 So. 3d 990 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . complaint on September 21, 2011, alleging violations of the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, sections 760.01 . . .

V. DUCHATEAU, v. CAMP, DRESSER McKEE, INC., 713 F.3d 1298 (11th Cir. 2013)

. . . . §§ 509.092, 760.01-760.11, (ii) interference with her rights under the Family Medical Leave Act, 29 . . .

TELFAIR v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION,, 934 F. Supp. 2d 1368 (S.D. Fla. 2013)

. . . . § 760.01 et seq. . . . Stat., § 760.01 et seq. . . .

SMART, v. CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA,, 933 F. Supp. 2d 1366 (S.D. Fla. 2013)

. . . . § 760.01 et seq. See PL’s Second Am. Compl., ECF No. 40. . . .

FORBES, v. CITY OF NORTH MIAMI,, 509 F. App'x 864 (11th Cir. 2013)

. . . . §§ 760.01-760.11. After thoroughly reviewing the record and briefs, we affirm. I. . . .

WRIGHT, v. SANDESTIN INVESTMENTS, LLC d b a, 914 F. Supp. 2d 1273 (N.D. Fla. 2012)

. . . . § 760.01(3); see also Woodham, 829 So.2d at 894. . . .

CASTRO, v. SCHOOL BOARD OF MANATEE COUNTY, FLORIDA,, 903 F. Supp. 2d 1290 (M.D. Fla. 2012)

. . . . § 760.01, et seq. (“FCRA”). . . .

ABRAM- ADAMS, v. CITIGROUP, INC., 491 F. App'x 972 (11th Cir. 2012)

. . . . §§ 760.01 and 760.07; and (4) assault and negligence under Florida common law. . . .

J. GRAY, v. CITY OF JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA,, 492 F. App'x 1 (11th Cir. 2012)

. . . . §§ 760.01 et seq. . . .

McGUIRE, v. PEABODY HOTEL GROUP,, 99 So. 3d 984 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . ), authorizes any person who was aggrieved by a violation of the Florida Civil Rights Act, sections 760.01 . . .

CALIBUSO, v. BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, Co., 893 F. Supp. 2d 374 (E.D.N.Y. 2012)

. . . . § 760.01 et seq. (“FCRA”), the Missouri Human Rights Act RSMo. § 213.010 et seq. . . .

J. P. M. C. M. R. G. M. C. M. C. M. a v. PALM BEACH COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, a Ph. D., 877 F. Supp. 2d 1309 (S.D. Fla. 2012)

. . . . § 760.01, et seq. . . .

SAMSON, v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION,, 874 F. Supp. 2d 1360 (M.D. Fla. 2012)

. . . . § 760.01, et seq. . . .

UPPAL, v. HOSPITAL CORPORATION OF AMERICA, d. b. a. HCA d. b. a. LP, d. b. a., 482 F. App'x 394 (11th Cir. 2012)

. . . . § 760.01 et seq. . . .

ROBINSON, v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH,, 89 So. 3d 1079 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . Woodham involved FCHR’s handling of a claim filed under the Florida Civil Rights Act, sections 760.01 . . .

DULANEY, v. MIAMI- DADE COUNTY,, 481 F. App'x 486 (11th Cir. 2012)

. . . . §§ 760.01-.11. After thorough review of the record and the parties’ arguments, we affirm. . . .

M. HOLLAND, v. A. GEE,, 677 F.3d 1047 (11th Cir. 2012)

. . . . §§ 760.01 et seq. Sheriff Gee filed an answer, denying liability. . . .

VALDES, v. MIAMI- DADE COLLEGE,, 463 F. App'x 843 (11th Cir. 2012)

. . . . § 760.01, et seq. . . .

BERRIOS, v. UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI,, 920 F. Supp. 2d 1274 (S.D. Fla. 2012)

. . . Stat. 760.01 et seq. (“FCRA”). . . . Stat. 760.01. . . .

SUNBEAM TELEVISION CORPORATION, v. A. MITZEL,, 83 So. 3d 865 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . She is protected by the age-discrimination provision of the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, §§ 760.01 . . .

V. DuCHATEAU, v. CAMP DRESSER McKEE, INC., 822 F. Supp. 2d 1325 (S.D. Fla. 2011)

. . . . §§ 760.01-760.11; (2) interfered with her rights under the Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”), see . . .

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, v. SHAPIRO,, 68 So. 3d 298 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . filed a complaint against DCF for violations of the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992 (FCRA), sections 760.01 . . .

W. WOOD, Jr. v. FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY BOARD OF TRUSTEES,, 432 F. App'x 812 (11th Cir. 2011)

. . . . §§ 760.01-760.11; and 42 U.S.C. § 1983. . . .

HODGETTS, v. CITY OF VENICE, FLORIDA,, 794 F. Supp. 2d 1265 (M.D. Fla. 2011)

. . . . § 12111, and the Florida Civil Rights Act, §§ 760.01-760.11. Fla. Stat. (FCRA). . . .

DULANEY, v. MIAMI- DADE COUNTY, 785 F. Supp. 2d 1343 (S.D. Fla. 2011)

. . . . § 760.01, et seq. (See Complaint, D.E. 1.) Dulaney raises three claims against the County. . . .

JENNINGS, v. WALGREEN CO., 805 F. Supp. 2d 1345 (S.D. Fla. 2011)

. . . . § 760.01-.11 (2009). . . .

BUTTS, v. AMERIPATH, INC. LLC,, 794 F. Supp. 2d 1277 (S.D. Fla. 2011)

. . . . § 760.01, et seq. (“FCRA”). . . .

SLATER, v. ENERGY SERVICES GROUP INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED, a. k. a. ESG LLC. A, 634 F.3d 1326 (11th Cir. 2011)

. . . . § 760.01, et seq. (FCRA), and the Florida Whistleblower Act, Fla. . . .

MIAMI- DADE COUNTY, v. EGHBAL,, 54 So. 3d 525 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . sued for age discrimination and retaliation under the Florida Civil Rights Act (“the FCRA”), sections 760.01 . . .

MENA, v. LIFEMARK HOSPITALS OF FLORIDA, INC. d b a, 50 So. 3d 759 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . Analysis Section 760.01(2), Florida Statutes, explains that the “general purposes” of the Act are to . . . Pursuant to section 760.01(1), Florida Statutes: "Sections 760.01-760.11 and 509.092 shall be cited as . . .

J. D. NETTLES, Jr. v. CITY OF LEESBURG- POLICE DEPARTMENT, A FNU, 415 F. App'x 116 (11th Cir. 2010)

. . . . § 760.01, et. seq., and Fla. Stat. § 768.01 et. seq. . . .

A. GLEASON, v. ROCHE LABORATORIES, INC., 745 F. Supp. 2d 1262 (M.D. Fla. 2010)

. . . . §§ 760.01, et seq. . . .

WASHINGTON, v. SCHOOL BOARD OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY,, 731 F. Supp. 2d 1309 (M.D. Fla. 2010)

. . . . § 1983, and the Florida Civil Rights Act, Florida Statute Section 760.01; (2) age discrimination in . . .

GOSSARD, v. JP MORGAN CHASE CO. a, 389 F. App'x 936 (11th Cir. 2010)

. . . state court alleging discrimination in violation of the Florida Civil Rights Act, Florida Statutes § 760.01 . . .

GROGAN, v. HERITAGE NH, LLC,, 126 So. 3d 262 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . action against Heritage for sexual harassment and retaliation under Florida’s Civil Rights Act, sections 760.01 . . .

M. HOLLAND, v. A. GEE,, 719 F. Supp. 2d 1361 (M.D. Fla. 2010)

. . . to this Court on December 11, 2008, alleging a violation of the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, § 760.01 . . .

INDUSTRIAL AFFILIATES, LTD. v. FISH,, 25 So. 3d 629 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . See §§ 760.01-760.11, Fla. Stat. (2009). . . .

NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY, INC. a v. JACOBSON,, 25 So. 3d 82 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . discriminatory manner on the basis of a disability in violation of the Florida Civil Rights Act, section 760.01 . . .

LOPERENA, v. SCOTT, a, 356 F. App'x 240 (11th Cir. 2009)

. . . . § 760.01. . . .

BYRD, v. BT FOODS, INC. d b a s a, 26 So. 3d 600 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . . § 760.01 et seq., prohibits employers from discharging or otherwise discriminating against any employee . . .

ESCALA v. VICTORIA S SECRET STORES, LLC,, 727 F. Supp. 2d 1350 (S.D. Fla. 2009)

. . . . § 760.01 and Title VTI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, to Defendant . . .

ESCARRA, v. REGIONS BANK,, 353 F. App'x 401 (11th Cir. 2009)

. . . . § 760.01, and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a). . . . Stat. §§ 760.01-.il. . . .