Cases from cite.case.law:

KOBEL, v. STATE, 745 So. 2d 979 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . State, 397 So.2d 741 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981), which held that “the underlying purpose of section 769.03 . . . .

HOWELL v. WOODS,, 489 So. 2d 154 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . because the trial court had omitted from the charge, after agreeing to include the language of section 769.03 . . .

ORR, v. UNITED STATES, 486 F.2d 270 (5th Cir. 1973)

. . . Section 769.03 of the Florida Statutes provides that “the amount of recovery shall be such a proportion . . .

RAILWAY EXPRESS AGENCY, INC. a v. V. FULMER,, 227 So. 2d 870 (Fla. 1969)

. . . instruction, the trial court and parties agreed that the jury be charged in the language of Florida Statute § 769.03 . . . instant case would be unable to assign as error the trial court’s omission of the last half of F.S. § 769.03 . . .

B. FULMER, v. RAILWAY EXPRESS AGENCY, INC. a, 215 So. 2d 48 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1968)

. . . recovery, but in giving his instructions to the jury, the judge gave only the first sentence of Section 769.03 . . . The second sentence of Section 769.03 provides that if the express company and the employee are both . . .

RAILWAY EXPRESS AGENCY, INC. a v. WYNN, Jr., 204 So. 2d 912 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1967)

. . . Strong, 130 Fla. 755, 179 So. 289; §§ 769.01, 769.02, 769.03, 769.04, Fla.Stat., F.S.A. . . .

SIR FRANCIS DRAKE HOTEL CO. OF CALIFORNIA v. UNITED STATES, 75 F. Supp. 668 (N.D. Cal. 1947)

. . . the sum of $6,664.47, together with interest thereon in the sum of $801.07; that of said interest $769.03 . . .