Cases from cite.case.law:

I. GESSA, v. MANOR CARE OF FLORIDA, INC., 86 So. 3d 484 (Fla. 2011)

. . . regarding liability of persons engaging in certain hazardous occupations, the Legislature has provided: 769.06 . . . persons mentioned in s. 769.01 from the liability prescribed by this chapter shall be illegal and void. § 769.06 . . .

ALTERRA HEALTHCARE CORPORATION M. v. ESTATE OF LINTON GRAHAM f k a, 953 So. 2d 574 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . Regarding liability of persons engaging in certain hazardous occupations, the legislature stated: 769.06 . . . persons mentioned in s. 769.01 from the liability prescribed by this chapter shall be illegal and void. § 769.06 . . .

L. BLAND, COKER, v. HEALTH CARE AND RETIREMENT CORPORATION OF AMERICA, d b a, 927 So. 2d 252 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . Petsch, 872 So.2d at 261; see, e.g., § 769.06 (prohibiting contracts limiting liability in context of . . .

In McNICHOLS,, 249 B.R. 160 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2000)

. . . Pursuant to the filed claims, there are secured claims of Aetna which total $22,-769.06 and Equity in . . .

In GOLDEN DISTRIBUTORS, LTD. Co. GOLDEN DISTRIBUTORS, LTD. v. GARCED, d b a Co., 134 B.R. 766 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1991)

. . . At this point, Liberty’s outstanding account balance with Golden was $236,-769.06. 8. . . .

CROSBY, v. REGIONAL UTILITY BOARD, CITY OF GAINESVILLE,, 400 So. 2d 1024 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . 440.11, Florida Statutes, was not the type of “contract, contrivance or device” prohibited in Section 769.06 . . .

J. MACARAGES, v. RAYMOND CONCRETE PILE COMPANY, HERRING, v. RAYMOND CONCRETE PILE COMPANY,, 220 F.2d 891 (5th Cir. 1955)

. . . The earlier law passed for the protection of workers in hazardous occupations, provides in Section 769.06 . . . contracting away its provisions; and that such inconsistency could be resolved only by holding that § 769.06 . . . This, then, is not the kind of “contract, contrivance or device”, prohibited in Section 769.06. . . .