Cases from cite.case.law:

F. JOHNSON, v. STATE, 238 So. 3d 726 (Fla. 2018)

. . . See § 910.05, Fla. . . . See § 910.05, Fla. Stat. . . . of the acts occurred if the acts constituting the offense were committed in two or more counties. § 910.05 . . .

NIBCO INC. v. CITY OF LEBANON,, 680 F. App'x 428 (6th Cir. 2017)

. . . See Nibco, 2016 WL 1110315 at *3 n.1 (quoting new § 910.05(D)(2): “undercharges may be billed and the . . .

STATE Of v. CISNEROS,, 106 So. 3d 42 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . See §§ 910.05 & 910.06, Fla. . . .

BRADDY, v. STATE, 111 So. 3d 810 (Fla. 2012)

. . . Section 910.05, Florida Statutes (1997), provides that “[i]f the acts constituting one offense are committed . . . Venue was thus properly laid under section 910.05 with respect to those offenses in Miami-Dade County . . .

STATE v. LOSADA,, 89 So. 3d 1104 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . .” § 910.05, Fla. Stat. (2011). . . .

KITCHEN, v. STATE, 965 So. 2d 252 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . .” § 910.05, Fla. Stat. . . .

MOSLEY, v. STATE, 842 So. 2d 855 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . See § 910.05, Fla. Stat. (1997). . . .

STATE v. J. WISE,, 664 So. 2d 1028 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . Section 910.05, Florida Statutes (1991), allows prosecution of a crime in the county where any of the . . . See § 910.05, Fla. Stat. . . .

DUBIN, v. E. F. HUTTON GROUP, INC. E. F., 878 F. Supp. 616 (S.D.N.Y. 1995)

. . . Thus, the final allocation of fees and expenses is as follows — Dubin: $87,562.41; Mehle: $787,-910.05 . . .

STATE v. CRIDER,, 625 So. 2d 957 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . A wrinkle on the venue rule is provided by section 910.05, Fla.Stat. (1991) for crimes where the acts . . .

STATE v. L. STEPHENS,, 586 So. 2d 1073 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . whether the expanded definition of burglary therein makes applicable the venue provision of section 910.05 . . . Section 910.05 makes venue proper in either county “[i]f the acts constituting one offense are committed . . . An exception to the strict venue rule is provided by section 910.05 for crimes where the acts constituting . . . Section 910.05, Fla.Stat. (1987). . . .

LONGO, v. STATE, 580 So. 2d 212 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . The state argues that venue was proper in Broward County on these counts, pursuant to section 910.05, . . .

MARTIN, v. STATE, 488 So. 2d 653 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . Because the indictment in the case at bar lists the counties in which the crime occurred, section 910.05 . . . If a single crime occurs in more than one known county, section 910.05 controls, and the case can be . . . We conclude that venue was properly placed in Duval County pursuant to section 910.05, in that the indictment . . . Section 910.05, Florida Statutes, states: If the acts constituting one offense are committed in two or . . .

BARRACK, v. STATE, 462 So. 2d 1196 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . . §§ 910.05, 910.06; Copeland v. State, 457 So.2d 1012 (Fla.1984); Tucker v. . . .

COPELAND, v. STATE, 457 So. 2d 1012 (Fla. 1984)

. . . . § 910.05, Fla. Stat. (1977); Barclay v. . . .

STATE v. KATZ,, 417 So. 2d 716 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . State, 178 So.2d 714 (Fla.1965), unless section 910.05, which provides that if the acts constituting . . .

In SARAH ALLEN HOME, INC. a a k a HAREWOOD v. SARAH ALLEN HOME FOR AGED, INC. M., 7 B.R. 732 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1980)

. . . See Advisory Note to Rule 910 of the Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure; 13 Collier on Bankruptcy ''910.05 . . .

BARCLAY Jr. v. STATE, 343 So. 2d 1266 (Fla. 1977)

. . . conjunctively and proof that the crime was committed in that area shall be sufficient.” and Section 910.05 . . .

CRITTENDON, v. STATE, 338 So. 2d 1088 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

. . . assembled, prepared themselves and picked up their victim in Duval County, claims the benefit of § 910.05 . . . The meaning of § 910.05’s critical phrase is illumined by its provisions before 1970, when legislation . . . Section 910.05, F.S.1969, provided: “Where several acts are requisite to the commission of an offense . . . Cox, 25 Ariz.App. 828, 543 P.2d 449 (1976), construed an Arizona venue statute which, like § 910.05, . . . Sec. 910.05, F.S.1975. . . .

S. FEWOX, v. STATE, 104 So. 2d 74 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1958)

. . . Secs. 910.05, 910.10, F.S.A. See Wharton’s Criminal Law and Procedure, Vol. IV, Sec. 1510. Cf. . . .