Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 918.03 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 918.03 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 918.03

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XLVII
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND CORRECTIONS
Chapter 918
CONDUCT OF TRIAL
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 918.03
918.03 Procedure when offense committed outside state.When a court determines that it does not have jurisdiction because the offense charged was committed outside this state, the court may discharge the defendant or direct the clerk to communicate the location of the defendant to the chief executive of the state, territory, or district where the offense was committed. The court may commit the defendant to custody or admit him or her to bail for a reasonable period of time to await a requisition for his or her extradition. If a requisition is not received within the time set by the court, the defendant shall be discharged. If the defendant has been admitted to bail, the court shall order the bond canceled and any deposit of money or bonds returned.
History.s. 208, ch. 19554, 1939; CGL 1940 Supp. 8663(216); s. 112, ch. 70-339; s. 1536, ch. 97-102.

F.S. 918.03 on Google Scholar

F.S. 918.03 on Casetext

Amendments to 918.03


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 918.03
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 918.03.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

MATARRANZ, v. STATE, 133 So. 3d 473 (Fla. 2013)

. . . .” § 918.03(10), Fla. Stat.; see also Busby v. . . .

WADDELL, v. STATE, 458 So. 2d 1140 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . Section 918.03, Florida Statutes (1981), provides in pertinent part: A challenge for cause to an individual . . .

GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, a v. H. C. EVANS, E., 269 F. Supp. 151 (N.D. Cal. 1967)

. . . A jury verdict for the amount of $112,500 plus $918.03 costs was returned against the defendants. . . .