Cases from cite.case.law:

CHERINGTON, Sr. v. STATE, 24 So. 3d 658 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . community sanction violation is committed by a violent felony offender of special concern as defined in s. 918.06 . . .

HERNANDEZ, v. STATE, 572 So. 2d 969 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . State, 486 So.2d 1373 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); see also § 918.06, Fla.Stat. (1989). . . .

KIGHT, v. STATE, 512 So. 2d 922 (Fla. 1987)

. . . to discharge the jury based on the trial court’s failure to admonish the jury as required by section 918.06 . . . Section 918.06 provides in pertinent part: Separation and detention of jurors; admonition by court. — . . .

J. BERNARD, v. UNITED STATES,, 11 Cl. Ct. 437 (Cl. Ct. 1986)

. . . Party $107.00 10-1 E Casual Corner $ 22.34 10-3 D Gift for Referral $ 31.64 1980 Total $385.68 TOTAL $918.06 . . .

BUSQUET, v. STATE, 498 So. 2d 1353 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . Nor does section 918.06, Florida Statutes (1979), which provides the court with discretion to either . . .

ULLOA, v. STATE, 486 So. 2d 1373 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . Presumably, "instructions” refers to the admonitions then required by Section 918.06, Florida Statutes . . . Justice Drew, concurring specially in Raines, would have reversed on the ground that Section 918.06 was . . .

LIVINGSTON, v. STATE, 458 So. 2d 235 (Fla. 1984)

. . . Nor does section 918.06, Florida Statutes (1979), which provides the court with discretion to either . . .

ENGLE, v. STATE, 438 So. 2d 803 (Fla. 1983)

. . . Appellant also contends, in relation to the separation of the jury, that section 918.06, Florida Statutes . . .

TEJEDA- BERMUDEZ, v. STATE, 427 So. 2d 1096 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . jury for the weekend after it had reported the deadlock without the admonitions required by Section 918.06 . . .

McDERMOTT, v. STATE, 383 So. 2d 712 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . to separate overnight for a period of fifteen hours without the admonition now required by Section 918.06 . . .

McNEIL, v. STATE, 208 So. 2d 628 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1968)

. . . court was justified in concluding that the jurors had not violated his admonition given pursuant to § 918.06 . . .

WORTHINGTON, v. STATE, 183 So. 2d 728 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966)

. . . in examining the complained of instruction, we find that the trial judge adequately complied with § 918.06 . . .

D. HAMILTON, v. STATE, 152 So. 2d 793 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1963)

. . . the scene individually without admonishing the jury to the contrary, in violation of sections 918.05, 918.06 . . .

FERRERI, v. STATE LEE, v. STATE, 109 So. 2d 578 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1959)

. . . Section 918.06, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., requires the court to admonish the jury that it is their duty . . .

KENNICK, v. STATE, 107 So. 2d 59 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1958)

. . . . § 918.06, F.S.A., is mandatory only in its application to the jurors finally sworn to try the issues . . .

RAINES v. STATE, 65 So. 2d 558 (Fla. 1953)

. . . The plain mandate of the Legislature, section 918.06, F.S.A., was violated by the lower court in this . . . jury may be allowed to separate in the course of a criminal trial are expressly delineated by sections 918.06 . . . Section 918.06 provides, in effect, that after the jurors have been sworn but before the cause has been . . . together during the trial but have been allowed to separate in accordance with the provisions of section 918.06 . . .

CHARLIE HOLLOWAY v. STATE OF FLORIDA, 156 Fla. 135 (Fla. 1945)

. . . question relates to the failure of the court to admonish the jurors to remain together, pursuant to Sec. 918.06 . . .