The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XLVII
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND CORRECTIONS

Chapter 940
EXECUTIVE CLEMENCY

View Entire Chapter

CHAPTER 940

EXECUTIVE CLEMENCY

940.01 Clemency; suspension or remission of fines and forfeitures, reprieves, pardons, restoration of civil rights, and commutations.

940.03 Application for executive clemency.

940.031 Clemency counsel when sentence of death imposed.

940.04 Copy of information or indictment to be furnished without charge.

940.05 Restoration of civil rights.

940.061 Informing persons about executive clemency, restoration of civil rights, and restoration of voting rights.

940.01 Clemency; suspension or remission of fines and forfeitures, reprieves, pardons, restoration of civil rights, and commutations.—

(1) Except in cases of treason and in cases when impeachment results in conviction, the Governor may, by executive order filed with the Secretary of State, suspend collection of fines and forfeitures, grant reprieves not exceeding 60 days, and, with the approval of two members of the Cabinet, grant full or conditional pardons, restore civil rights, commute punishment, and remit fines and forfeitures for offenses.

(2) In cases of treason, the Governor may grant reprieves until adjournment of the regular session of the Legislature convening next after the conviction, at which session the Legislature may grant a pardon or further reprieve; otherwise the sentence shall be executed.

History.—RS 2997; GS 4073; RGS 6177; CGL 8491; s. 1, ch. 69-29; ss. 10, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 1, ch. 88-193; s. 18, ch. 2003-6.

940.03 Application for executive clemency.—If a person intends to apply for remission of any fine or forfeiture or the commutation of any punishment, or for pardon or restoration of civil rights, he or she shall request an application form from the Florida Commission on Offender Review in compliance with such rules regarding application for executive clemency as are adopted by the Governor with the approval of two members of the Cabinet. Such application may require the submission of a certified copy of the applicant’s indictment or information, the judgment adjudicating the applicant to be guilty, and the sentence, if sentence has been imposed, and may also require the applicant to send a copy of the application to the judge and prosecuting attorney of the court in which the applicant was convicted, notifying them of the applicant’s intent to apply for executive clemency. An application for executive clemency for a person who is sentenced to death must be filed within 1 year after the date the Supreme Court issues a mandate on a direct appeal or the United States Supreme Court denies a petition for certiorari, whichever is later.

History.—s. 2, ch. 3018, 1877; RS 2999; GS 4075; RGS 6179; CGL 8493; s. 2, ch. 67-75; s. 2, ch. 69-29; s. 2, ch. 88-193; s. 321, ch. 92-279; s. 55, ch. 92-326; s. 9, ch. 96-290; s. 1844, ch. 97-102; s. 19, ch. 2003-6; s. 26, ch. 2014-191.

940.031 Clemency counsel when sentence of death imposed.—

(1) The Board of Executive Clemency may appoint private counsel to represent a person sentenced to death for relief by executive clemency at such time as the board deems appropriate for clemency consideration. The board shall maintain a list of private counsel available for appointment under this section.

(2) The appointed attorney shall be compensated by the board, not to exceed $10,000, for attorney fees and costs incurred in representing the person for relief by executive clemency, with compensation to be paid out of the General Revenue Fund from funds budgeted to the Florida Commission on Offender Review.

(3) It is the intent of the Legislature that the fee prescribed under this section comprises the full and complete compensation for appointed private counsel. It is further the intent of the Legislature that the fee in this section is prescribed for the purpose of providing counsel with notice of the limit on the amount of compensation for representation under this section. Appointment of counsel for executive clemency under this section shall be at the board’s sole discretion. The provision of counsel for executive clemency under this section does not create a statutory right to counsel in such proceedings.

History.—s. 5, ch. 2014-59; s. 98, ch. 2015-2.

940.04 Copy of information or indictment to be furnished without charge.—In the event any applicant for executive clemency is required to supply a certified copy of the applicant’s information, indictment, judgment, or sentence, said document shall be furnished by the clerk of court to the applicant free of charge and without delay.

History.—s. 3, ch. 3018, 1877; RS 3000; GS 4076; RGS 6180; CGL 8494; s. 44, ch. 73-334; s. 3, ch. 88-193.

940.05 Restoration of civil rights.—Any person who has been convicted of a felony may be entitled to the restoration of all the rights of citizenship enjoyed by him or her before conviction if the person has:

(1) Received a full pardon from the Board of Executive Clemency;

(2) Served the maximum term of the sentence imposed upon him or her; or

(3) Been granted his or her final release by the Florida Commission on Offender Review.

History.—s. 1, ch. 3467, 1883; RS 3001; GS 4077; RGS 6181; CGL 8495; s. 3, ch. 69-29; s. 494, ch. 81-259; s. 47, ch. 88-122; s. 1595, ch. 97-102; s. 167, ch. 2008-4; s. 27, ch. 2014-191.

940.061 Informing persons about executive clemency, restoration of civil rights, and restoration of voting rights.—The Department of Corrections shall inform and educate inmates and offenders on community supervision about the restoration of civil rights and the restoration of voting rights resulting from the removal of the disqualification to vote pursuant to s. 4, Art. VI of the State Constitution. Each month, the Department of Corrections shall send to the Florida Commission on Offender Review by electronic means a list of the names of inmates who have been released from incarceration and offenders who have been terminated from supervision who may be eligible for restoration of civil rights.

History.—s. 3, ch. 96-312; s. 6, ch. 2010-64; s. 28, ch. 2014-191; s. 27, ch. 2019-162.

F.S. 940 on Google Scholar

F.S. 940 on Casetext

Amendments to 940

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 940

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 940.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

J. TRUMP, v. MAZARS USA, LLP, J. v. AG,, 140 S. Ct. 2019 (U.S. 2020)

. . . See 940 F.3d 710, 767-771 (CADC 2019) (Rao, J., dissenting). . . . Circuit affirmed, 940 F.3d 710 (2019). . . . See 943 F.3d at 656-670 ; 940 F.3d at 724-742. . . . separation-of-powers concerns still linger in the air," and therefore it did not afford deference to the House. 940 . . . the gravity of seeking the removal of a constitutional officer at the head of a coordinate branch. 940 . . .

ESPINOZA, v. MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,, 140 S. Ct. 2246 (U.S. 2020)

. . . East Longmeadow , 885 F.2d 940 (CA1 1989) (BREYER, J., for the court). . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, v. THURAISSIGIAM, 140 S. Ct. 1959 (U.S. 2020)

. . . American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Comm. , 525 U.S. 471, 486, 119 S.Ct. 936, 142 L.Ed.2d 940 (1999) ( . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, v. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, J. v., 140 S. Ct. 1891 (U.S. 2020)

. . . American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Comm. , 525 U.S. 471, 482, 119 S.Ct. 936, 142 L.Ed.2d 940 (1999). . . . American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Comm. , 525 U.S. 471, 484, 119 S.Ct. 936, 142 L.Ed.2d 940 (1999) (internal . . . American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Comm. , 525 U.S. 471, 484, 119 S.Ct. 936, 142 L.Ed.2d 940 (1999). . . .

NASRALLAH, v. P. BARR,, 140 S. Ct. 1683 (U.S. 2020)

. . . American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Comm. , 525 U.S. 471, 482, 119 S.Ct. 936, 142 L.Ed.2d 940 (1999) (stating . . .

BANISTER, v. DAVIS,, 140 S. Ct. 1698 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Davis , 940 F.3d 892, 898 (CA5 2019) (adding "the district court's denial of funding, the district court's . . .

GONZALEZ- DE LEON, v. P. BARR,, 140 S. Ct. 2739 (U.S. 2020)

. . . No. 19-940. Supreme Court of the United States. . . .

NEW YORK STATE RIFLE PISTOL ASSOCIATION, INC. v. CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK,, 140 S. Ct. 1525 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Himelein , 221 App.Div.2d 138, 144-145, 644 N.Y.S.2d 934, 940 (1996). . . .

ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY, v. A. CHRISTIAN,, 140 S. Ct. 1335 (U.S. 2020)

. . . . ----, ----, 137 S.Ct. 929, 939-940, 197 L.Ed.2d 263 (2017) (explaining the same principle for "notwithstanding . . .

RAMOS, v. LOUISIANA, 140 S. Ct. 1390 (U.S. 2020)

. . . United States , 940 F.3d 1282, 1293 (CA11 2019) (per curiam ); Snider v. . . .

SHULAR, v. UNITED STATES, 140 S. Ct. 779 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Hansen , 772 F.2d 940, 948 (C.A.D.C. 1985) (Scalia, J., for the court)); see also Kavanaugh, Fixing Statutory . . .

C. ROTKISKE, v. KLEMM,, 140 S. Ct. 355 (U.S. 2019)

. . . Id., at 940-941. The District Court dismissed the action. . . .

UNITED STATES v. B. LOWRY,, 935 F.3d 638 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Horton , 611 F.3d 936, 940 (8th Cir. 2010) (quoting Terry v. Ohio , 392 U.S. 1, 22 (1968)). . . .

L. SMITH, v. SHARP,, 935 F.3d 1064 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . Id. at 940-44. . . .

UNITED STATES v. R. GREEN,, 935 F.3d 677 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . App'x 937, 940 (9th Cir. 2004); United States v. Thompson, 49 F. App'x 749, 750 (9th Cir. 2002). . . .

UNITED STATES v. HAWKINS, a. k. a. D III, a. k. a., 934 F.3d 1251 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Strickland , 902 F.2d 937, 940 (11th Cir. 1990) ). . . .

UNITED STATES v. A. ADAMS,, 934 F.3d 720 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Aljabari , 626 F.3d 940, 944 (7th Cir. 2010) ; see generally Gates , 462 U.S. at 235, 103 S.Ct. 2317. . . .

BACA v. COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF STATE, G. T. L. M., 935 F.3d 887 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . City of Chicago , 445 F.3d 940, 948 (7th Cir. 2006) (holding that a damage claim saved the case from . . .

BOWLES, v. DESANTIS,, 934 F.3d 1230 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Phillips, 455 U.S. 209, 221, 102 S.Ct. 940, 71 L.Ed.2d 78 (1982) ("Federal courts hold no supervisory . . . Dep't of Corr., 742 F.3d 940, 944 (11th Cir. 2014) ("The Supreme Court has long held that there is no . . .

BARNES, v. CHASE HOME FINANCE, LLC, a USA, N. A. a JP Co. a IBM a, 934 F.3d 901 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Corey , 913 F.3d 940, 951 (9th Cir. 2019) (law of the case doctrine); Edgerly v. . . .

UNITED STATES v. NEJAD,, 933 F.3d 1162 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Elbeblawy , 899 F.3d 925, 940-41 (11th Cir. 2018) ; United States v. . . .

OSBORNE, v. HALL,, 934 F.3d 428 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Knight , 368 F.3d 936, 940 (7th Cir. 2004) ; see also Easterwood v. . . .

ODDO, v. BIMBO BAKERIES U. S. A. INC., 391 F. Supp. 3d 466 (E.D. Pa. 2019)

. . . Buffets Inc., 940 F. Supp. 1255, 1261-62 (N.D. . . .

COEUR D ALENE TRIBE, a v. W. HAWKS A., 933 F.3d 1052 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Pala Band of Mission Indians , 940 F.2d 1269, 1272 n.5 (9th Cir. 1991). . . .

STERLINSKI, v. CATHOLIC BISHOP OF CHICAGO,, 934 F.3d 568 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Supp. 3d 940 (N.D. Ill. 2018). . . .

CONSTANCE S. v. SAUL,, 389 F. Supp. 3d 583 (N.D. Ill. 2019)

. . . Supp. 3d 935, 940 (N.D. Ill. 2019) ; Rivera v. Berryhill , 2018 WL 319317, at *2 (N.D. Ill. . . .

BERGAMATTO, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE NYSA ILA PENSION FUND, 933 F.3d 257 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Am., Inc. , 532 F.3d 940, 945 (9th Cir. 2008) (citing Moran v. Aetna Life Ins. . . .

GONZALEZ- DE LEON, v. P. BARR,, 932 F.3d 489 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Sessions , 892 F.3d 940, 943 (8th Cir. 2018) (concluding that former taxi drivers from El Salvador are . . .

IN RE DOBOS, s v., 603 B.R. 31 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Corey , 913 F.3d 940, 949 (9th Cir. 2019) (citing Yakima Valley Mem'l Hosp. v. Wash. . . .

BENAVIDEZ v. HOWARD,, 931 F.3d 1225 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . Volkswagenwerk , 940 F.2d 1369, 1373 n.4 (10th Cir. 1991) ; see also Scott , 216 F.3d at 908-10 (holding . . .

UNITED STATES v. D. RIVERA- CARRASQUILLO, a k a KX, a k a a k a a k a n V a k a, 933 F.3d 33 (1st Cir. 2019)

. . . David, 940 F.2d 722, 737 (1st Cir. 1991) (noting that arguments adopted by reference "must be readily . . .

STEWARD HOLY FAMILY HOSPITAL, INC. v. MASSACHUSETTS NURSES ASSOCIATION,, 932 F.3d 14 (1st Cir. 2019)

. . . Local 27, United Paperworkers Int'l Union, 864 F.2d 940, 945 n.2 (1st Cir. 1988) ("Although the collective . . .

UNITED STATES v. DUKE,, 932 F.3d 1056 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Duke , 940 F.2d 1113, 1120-21 (8th Cir. 1991). . . . See Duke , 940 F.2d at 1115-16. . . .

YEARWOOD, v. BARR,, 391 F. Supp. 3d 255 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee, 525 U.S. 471, 119 S.Ct. 936, 142 L.Ed.2d 940 (1999), to . . .

IN RE RAYNOR, v. P., 602 B.R. 703 (B.A.P. 8th Cir. 2019)

. . . American Sharecom, Inc. , 210 F.3d 928, 940 n. 13 (8th Cir.2000) (emphasis in original), aff'd after . . .

UNITED STATES v. HALL, III,, 931 F.3d 694 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Ct. 929, 940, 197 L.Ed.2d 263 (2017) (discussing expressio unius canon). . . .

L. JACKSON, v. BARTOW,, 930 F.3d 930 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Berge , 434 F.3d 940 (7th Cir. 2006), Jackson waived his right to challenge that earlier ruling when . . . Berge , 434 F.3d 940 (7th Cir. 2006), his valid guilty plea waived any defects in the proceedings before . . .

PEREZ v. DOES In In In In In In, 931 F.3d 641 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Fredericks, 940 F.2d 333, 336-38 (8th Cir. 1991) (holding that the derivative jurisdiction doctrine has . . .

MATSON, v. SANDERSON FARMS, INC., 388 F. Supp. 3d 853 (S.D. Tex. 2019)

. . . Ashford Place Apartments, L.L.C. , 914 F.3d 940, 946 (5th Cir. 2019) (quotation omitted). . . .

J. UCCARDI, v. LAZER SPOT, INC., 390 F. Supp. 3d 911 (N.D. Ill. 2019)

. . . Freightliner Corp. 940 F.2d 1019, 1025 (7th Cir.1991) ("...the record reveals that Parker never sought . . .

NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY P. v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,, 390 F. Supp. 3d 499 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . Dep't of Justice , 331 F.3d 918, 940 (D.C. Cir. 2003) ). . . .

ASSOCIATION FOR COMMUNITY AFFILIATED PLANS, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY,, 392 F. Supp. 3d 22 (D.D.C. 2019)

. . . Corp. , 940 F.2d 685, 698 (D.C. Cir. 1991) ). . . .

RAYNA P. v. CAMPUS COMMUNITY SCHOOL, M. P. v., 390 F. Supp. 3d 556 (D. Del. 2019)

. . . Cooper Health System, 940 F. . . .

INCLUSIVE COMMUNITIES PROJECT, INCORPORATED, v. LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY III, L. L. C. CPF PC L. L. C. HLI L. L. C. L. L. C., 930 F.3d 660 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Supp. 3d 940 (N.D. Cal. 2018) (same); Nat'l Fair Hous. All. v. Travelers Indent. . . .

IN RE ROUNDUP PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION v. Co. VC, 385 F. Supp. 3d 1042 (N.D. Cal. 2019)

. . . Williams , 549 U.S. 346, 355, 127 S.Ct. 1057, 166 L.Ed.2d 940 (2007). . . .

GREEN, v. KENNEWAY,, 390 F. Supp. 3d 275 (D. Mass. 2019)

. . . Pike , 431 Mass. 212, 726 N.E.2d 940, 944 (2000). . . .

S. R. NEHAD K. R. v. N. BROWDER, 929 F.3d 1125 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Groover , 940 F.2d 667, 1991 WL 136179, at *2 (9th Cir. 1991) (unpublished disposition); Kiles v. . . .

AUTOMOTIVE BODY PARTS ASSOCIATION, v. FORD GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,, 930 F.3d 1314 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . J.A. 940-41; see also J.A. 1312-13 (testifying that customers select performance parts because "[t]hey . . . See J.A. 940-41, 1312-13, 1330, 1340. . . .

LLOYD S SYNDICATE v. FLOATEC LLC,, 388 F. Supp. 3d 835 (S.D. Tex. 2019)

. . . Ashford Place Apartments L.L.C. , 914 F.3d 940, 946 (5th Cir. 2019) (quotation omitted). . . .

MERCK CO. INC. v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,, 385 F. Supp. 3d 81 (D.D.C. 2019)

. . . No. 110-85, § 901(d)(3)(A), 121 Stat. 940. . . .

PARTRIDGE, v. CITY OF BENTON, ARKANSAS, 929 F.3d 562 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . See Henderson , 909 F.3d at 940 (holding it was clearly established in 2012 that shooting a suspect who . . .

SIERRA CLUB v. J. TRUMP, T. K., 929 F.3d 670 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Norton , 420 F.3d 934, 940 (9th Cir. 2005) ("[P]urely economic interests do not fall within [the National . . .

MALDEN TRANSPORTATION, INC. v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. LLC,, 386 F. Supp. 3d 96 (D. Mass. 2019)

. . . Pursuant to § 2, paragraph (c) of Chapter 93A, the Massachusetts Attorney General promulgated 940 C.M.R . . . any political subdivision thereof intended to provide the consumers of this Commonwealth protection. 940 . . .

CTIA THE WIRELESS ASSOCIATION, v. CITY OF BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA, 928 F.3d 832 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Sea Shepherd Conservation Soc'y , 725 F.3d 940, 944 (9th Cir. 2013). . . .

PADILLA, v. U. S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT,, 387 F. Supp. 3d 1219 (W.D. Wash. 2019)

. . . AAADC, 525 U.S. 471, 481, 119 S.Ct. 936, 142 L.Ed.2d 940 (1999). . . .

CHABAD LUBAVITCH OF THE QUAD CITIES, INC. v. CITY OF BETTENDORF, IOWA, P., 389 F. Supp. 3d 590 (S.D. Iowa 2019)

. . . Cty. of San Diego , 670 F.3d 957, 979 (9th Cir. 2011), cert. denied , 568 U.S. 940, 133 S.Ct. 423, 184 . . .

BAKER v. EQUITY RESIDENTIAL MANAGEMENT, L. L. C. EQR- LLC,, 390 F. Supp. 3d 246 (D. Mass. 2019)

. . . See 940 Mass. Code Regs. 3.17 ; S. Bos. Elderly Residences, 76 N.E.3d at 286. . . . See 940 Mass. Code Regs. 3.17. . . .

PROBODANU, v. B. SESSIONS, III,, 387 F. Supp. 3d 1031 (C.D. Cal. 2019)

. . . proceedings against them violated their constitutional rights. 525 U.S. 471, 474, 119 S.Ct. 936, 142 L.Ed.2d 940 . . .

UNITED STATES v. D. LICKERS,, 928 F.3d 609 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Aljabari , 626 F.3d 940, 944 (7th Cir. 2010). . . .

A. RUCHO, v. COMMON CAUSE, H. v. O., 139 S. Ct. 2484 (U.S. 2019)

. . . Id. , at 938-940. Before the District Court's decision, no court had reached a similar conclusion. . . . namely, that the voters should choose their representatives, not the other way around." 318 F.Supp.3d at 940 . . .

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, v. NEW YORK,, 139 S. Ct. 2551 (U.S. 2019)

. . . T. 2014, No. 14-940, p. 25 (inquiring about citizenship would "invariably lead to a lower response rate . . .

UNITED STATES v. HEARTLAND HOSPICE, INC., 386 F. Supp. 3d 884 (N.D. Ohio 2019)

. . . McKenzie, supra , 123 F.3d at 940. . . .

CATLIN SPECIALTY INSURANCE CO. v. J. J. WHITE, INC., 387 F. Supp. 3d 583 (E.D. Pa. 2019)

. . . Block, 744 S.W.2d 940, 942-43 (Tex. 1988) ; Elliott v. Hanover Ins. . . .

FESSENDEN, v. RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE INS. CO. USA,, 927 F.3d 998 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Combes, 294 F.3d 931, 940 (7th Cir. 2002) )). . . .

UNITED STATES v. DUNN, 928 F.3d 688 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Labron, 518 U.S. 938, 940, 116 S.Ct. 2485, 135 L.Ed.2d 1031 (1996) (per curiam). . . .

UNITED STATES v. WARE, Jr., 385 F. Supp. 3d 529 (E.D. Tex. 2019)

. . . Kincheloe , 848 F.2d 940, 945 (9th Cir. 1988). . . .

REHAIF, v. UNITED STATES, 139 S. Ct. 2191 (U.S. 2019)

. . . Smith , 940 F.2d 710, 713 (CA1 1991) ; United States v. . . .

RIVERA, v. STATE, 274 So. 3d 537 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . State, 894 So. 2d 935, 940 (Fla. 2005) ). . . .

ALCEDO v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, 391 F. Supp. 3d 452 (E.D. Pa. 2019)

. . . Co. , 596 Pa. 11, 940 A.2d 329, 334 (2007) ("Sackett II "); Sackett v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. . . .

MAXIM CRANE WORKS, L. P. v. ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, 392 F. Supp. 3d 731 (S.D. Tex. 2019)

. . . Ashford Place Apartments L.L.C. , 914 F.3d 940, 946 (5th Cir. 2019). . . .

GORDON, v. STATE, 274 So. 3d 1212 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . State, 940 So. 2d 389 (Fla. 2006) ; Williams v. State, 707 So. 2d 683 (Fla. 1998) ; Shortridge v. . . .

ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, v. ELECTRICITY MAINE, LLC LLC LLC, 927 F.3d 33 (1st Cir. 2019)

. . . Allocca, 169 A.3d at 940-41 ; Ben-Ami, 193 A.3d at 180-81. . . .

VIRGINIA HOUSE OF DELEGATES, v. BETHUNE- HILL,, 139 S. Ct. 1945 (U.S. 2019)

. . . Chadha , 462 U.S. 919, 929-931, and nn. 5-6, 939-940, 103 S.Ct. 2764, 77 L.Ed.2d 317 (1983), that the . . .

HANCOCK, v. DAVIS,, 139 S. Ct. 2714 (U.S. 2019)

. . . No. 18-940. Supreme Court of the United States June 17, 2019. . . .

MAROUF, v. AZAR,, 391 F. Supp. 3d 23 (D.D.C. 2019)

. . . Dep't of Educ. , 366 F.3d 930, 940 (D.C. Cir. 2004) ; see also Animal Legal Defense Fund, Inc. v. . . . Nat'l Wrestling Coaches Ass'n , 366 F.3d at 940-41. . . . Nat'l Wrestling Coaches Ass'n , 366 F.3d at 940. And there is more. . . .

WARD, DOC v. STATE, 273 So. 3d 1172 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . State, 901 So. 2d 940, 941 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005) ("Prior to ordering restitution, a trial court must determine . . .

D. WILLIAMS, v. UNITED STATES, 927 F.3d 427 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Ct. 929, 940, 197 L.Ed.2d 263 (2017) (discussing the expressio unius canon). . . .

PROTECT OUR PARKS, INC. v. CHICAGO PARK DISTRICT, 385 F. Supp. 3d 662 (N.D. Ill. 2019)

. . . Pack , 224 Ill.2d 144, 308 Ill.Dec. 735, 862 N.E.2d 938, 940 (2007) ("The best indication of legislative . . .

LONTEX CORPORATION, v. NIKE, INC., 384 F. Supp. 3d 546 (E.D. Pa. 2019)

. . . O'Reilly Automotive Stores, Inc., 940 F. Supp. 2d 850, 866 (C.D. . . .

BAPTIST HOSPITAL OF MIAMI, INC. v. MEDICA HEALTHCARE PLANS, INC., 385 F. Supp. 3d 1289 (S.D. Fla. 2019)

. . . Health Options, Inc. , 940 So. 2d 1190, 1199 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) (finding that a medical provider stated . . .

BUNDY, v. B. SESSIONS, III,, 387 F. Supp. 3d 121 (D.D.C. 2019)

. . . Ct. 929, 940, 197 L.Ed.2d 263 (2017). . . .

HARALSON, v. U. S. AVIATION SERVICES CORP., 383 F. Supp. 3d 959 (N.D. Cal. 2019)

. . . Supp. 3d at 940 (finding problematic, among other things, the "seemingly arbitrary reduction of [the . . .

WADE, v. TOUCHDOWN REALTY GROUP, LLC, v. LLC d b a, 386 F. Supp. 3d 56 (D. Mass. 2019)

. . . Chapter 93A Claims (Count V) Under 940 Mass. . . . disclosure of which may have influenced the buyer or prospective buyer not to enter into the transaction." 940 . . .

CANCINO CASTELLAR v. MCALEENAN, U. S., 388 F. Supp. 3d 1218 (S.D. Cal. 2019)

. . . Cty. of Hennepin , 415 F.3d 936, 940 (8th Cir. 2005) (affirming the principle but rejecting claim that . . .

R. SABOFF, v. R. SABOFF,, 275 So. 3d 712 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . McGoldrick , 940 So. 2d 1275, 1277 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) (remanding for new trial before successor judge . . .

UNITED STATES v. MEDRANO,, 925 F.3d 993 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Cook, 454 F.3d 938, 940 (8th Cir. 2006). . . .

IN RE HYUNDAI AND KIA FUEL ECONOMY LITIGATION, R. P. A. P. M. D. J. S. L. J. E. J. L. P. J. M. A. L. E. D J. A. v. In R. P. A. P. M. D. J. S. L. J. E. J. L. P. J. M. A. L. E. D J. A. v. In R. P. A. P. M. D. J. S. L. J. E. J. L. P. J. M. A. L. E. D J. A. v. In R. P. A. P. M. D. J. S. L. J. E. J. L. P. J. M. A. L. E. D J. A. v. In R. P. A. P. M. D. J. S. L. J. E. J. L. P. J. M. A. L. E. D J. A. v. In v., 926 F.3d 539 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Litig. , 654 F.3d 935, 940 (9th Cir. 2011) (quoting In re Mego Fin. Corp. Sec. . . . Bluetooth Headset , 654 F.3d at 940. . . . Canyons Inc. , 835 F.3d 1125, 1132 (9th Cir. 2016) (certification); Bluetooth Headset , 654 F.3d at 940 . . .

HEATHER M. v. A. BERRYHILL,, 384 F. Supp. 3d 928 (N.D. Ill. 2019)

. . . (R. 594, 773, 934, 940, 956, 960, 962, 967, 970, 985, 996, 998, 1037, 1041-42, 1172-73, 1177, 1199, 1201 . . .

FISCHER, v. FISCHER,, 274 So. 3d 393 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . Rosenbloom , 698 So. 2d 938, 940 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). . . .

ROKOSZ, v. HACCOUN,, 274 So. 3d 498 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . Keys Aqueduct Auth., 795 So. 2d 940, 948 (Fla. 2001) ("Procedural due process requires both fair notice . . .

NAJERA- RODRIGUEZ, v. P. BARR,, 926 F.3d 343 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Adair , 406 Ill.App.3d 133, 346 Ill.Dec. 292, 940 N.E.2d 292, 297 (2010) (citing Hagberg : "To convict . . .

FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, v. EDWARD E. GILLEN COMPANY,, 926 F.3d 318 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Wright , 121 U.S. 201, 206, 7 S.Ct. 940, 30 L.Ed. 932 (1887) ("Bills quia timet ... belong to the ancient . . .

U. S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, v. T. MNUCHIN,, 379 F. Supp. 3d 8 (D.D.C. 2019)

. . . Id. at 940, 103 S.Ct. 2764. . . .

F. LESSER, IV, v. RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,, 385 F. Supp. 3d 1356 (N.D. Ga. 2019)

. . . AR 940. AR 747-760 AR 747. AR 748 (emphasis in original). AR 1199-1206. AR 1199-1200. AR 1203. . . .

BARACH, v. SINCLAIR MEDIA III, INC. d b a WCHS- TV WVAH- TV,, 392 F. Supp. 3d 645 (S.D. W.Va. 2019)

. . . Teltech Corp. , 940 F.2d 99, 102 (4th Cir. 1991). . . .

TAGGART, v. A. LORENZEN,, 139 S. Ct. 1795 (U.S. 2019)

. . . High, Law of Injunctions § 1449, p. 940 (2d ed. 1880). . . .

M. AZAR, II, v. ALLINA HEALTH SERVICES,, 139 S. Ct. 1804 (U.S. 2019)

. . . Shalala , 205 F. 3d 937, 940-943, 947 (CA6 2000). • A provision governing whether certain hospital costs . . .

IN RE BLUE CHIP CAPITAL, DC, LLC,, 600 B.R. 735 (Bankr. D.C. 2019)

. . . Waldron (In re Waldron) , 785 F.2d 936, 940 (11th Cir. 1986) (solvent debtors, not in financial distress . . .

J. D. BY DOHERTY, v. COLONIAL WILLIAMSBURG FOUNDATION,, 925 F.3d 663 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . . § 5-421-940(A), (C). . . .

J. MURPHY, DOC v. STATE, 273 So. 3d 1147 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . State, 940 So. 2d 1215, 1216 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) ); see also Fla. R. Crim. . . .