Cases from cite.case.law:

W. BURKHART, Jr. v. JENNE, As, 814 So. 2d 1064 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . See § 941.10(1), Fla. Stat. (2000). . . .

F. BENTZEL, v. STATE, 585 So. 2d 1118 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . Based upon our conclusion that claimant was statutorily entitled to counsel pursuant to section 941.10 . . . clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment; and that he was statutorily entitled to counsel under section 941.10 . . . decline to reach the appellant’s constitutional arguments, because we find a statutory basis in section 941.10 . . . At the outset, it is necessary to explain why our decision is grounded upon section 941.10(1), which . . . Section 941.10(1) provides: No person arrested upon such warrant shall be delivered over to the agent . . .

L. SILVERS, v. COLEMAN,, 504 So. 2d 20 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . In his briefs, the appellant asserts that he has rights under section 941.10, Florida Statutes (1985) . . .

STATE v. DAVILA,, 481 So. 2d 486 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . that the scope of inquiry of the trial court, in habeas corpus proceedings brought pursuant to section 941.10 . . .

JOSEY, v. GALLOWAY,, 482 So. 2d 376 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . See section 941.10, Florida Statutes (1983). . . .

MANN, v. WARDEN OF EGLIN AIR FORCE BASE,, 771 F.2d 1453 (11th Cir. 1985)

. . . actually within its borders, and thus he argues that under Cuyler he should benefit from Florida Statute § 941.10 . . .

MASCIARELLI v. BRESCHER, In BROWARD COUNTY,, 459 So. 2d 1168 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . We do so upon the authority of Section 941.10, Florida Statutes (1983); Fauls v. . . .

TODD, Jr. v. FLORIDA PAROLE PROBATION COMMISSION,, 410 So. 2d 584 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . The extradition rights of an accused person are set forth in § 941.10, Florida Statutes (1979), a law . . .

G. MOORE, v. STATE, 407 So. 2d 991 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . . § 941.10, Fla.Stat. (1979). . . .

J. FAULS, v. SHERIFF OF LEON COUNTY,, 394 So. 2d 117 (Fla. 1981)

. . . Section 941.10, Florida Statutes (1979). . . .

A. B. G. INSTRUMENT ENGINEERING, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 593 F.2d 394 (Ct. Cl. 1979)

. . . We offer a 5% consideration or $1,847.06 for the total amount of both shipments of $36,-941.10. . . .

BREAZEALE, v. R. M. BRADLEY,, 582 F.2d 5 (5th Cir. 1978)

. . . . § 941.10 (West Supp.1978). . . .

A. PAYNE, v. O D. ASKEW, L., 350 So. 2d 831 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . application for habeas corpus because the trial court failed to follow the procedure set forth in Section 941.10 . . . Petitioner was arrested and in accordance with the provisions of Section 941.10(1) was taken before a . . . Section 941.10(1) states: “No person arrested upon such warrant shall be delivered over to the agent . . . arrest, failing to require him to file an application for writ of habeas corpus as required by Section 941.10 . . . At the initial proceeding under Section 941.10(1), the trial court is permitted to do no more than (1 . . .

STATE v. D. COX,, 306 So. 2d 156 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

. . . . § 941.10 (1973). In this habeas corpus proceeding, the extent of inquiry is narrow. . . .

STATE, LATINO v. BUCHANAN,, 27 Fla. Supp. 119 (Dade Cty. Cir. Ct. 1965)

. . . In the face of this record the court finds that the provisions of §941.10, Florida Statutes, have been . . .

Co. v., 7 B.T.A. 532 (B.T.A. 1927)

. . . Auto up-keep- 119.36 Light_ 18. 62 Stable_ 324. 00 Entertaining_ 440.55 Professional_ 60. 00 Rent_ 941.10 . . .