Cases from cite.case.law:

STATE v. SANDOMENO,, 217 So. 3d 110 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . days after sentencing, and (2) its motion for entry of a civil restitution lien pursuant to section 960.292 . . . subsequent motion for entry of a civil restitution lien on behalf of the victims pursuant to section 960.292 . . . Section 960.292(2) provides that, “[u]pon motion by the state ... the court in which the convicted offender . . . State, 178 So.3d 538, 539 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015) (explaining that section 960.292(2) “permits the trial court . . .

J. CURTIS, v. STATE, 187 So. 3d 947 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . Section 960.292(1), Florida Statutes, provides in part that upon conviction, “the convicted offender . . . crime victims, the state, its local subdivisions, and aggrieved parties as set forth in s.960.293.” § 960.292 . . . Id. § 960.292(2) (emphasis added). . . . It then imposed costs of incarceration in accordance with sections 960.292 and 960.293. . . .

NICKERSON, v. STATE, 178 So. 3d 538 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . period of five years for the sole purpose of imposing civil restitution lien orders pursuant to section 960.292 . . . trial court had jurisdiction to rule on the State’s Motion to Retain Jurisdiction and because section 960.292 . . . sole purpose of entering civil restitution lien orders in favor of, the victim as set forth in section 960.292 . . . by defense counsel, the State filed its written Motion to Retain Jurisdiction pursuant . to section 960.292 . . .

C. KLEINTANK, v. STATE, 178 So. 3d 15 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . The State properly concedes that pursuant to section 960.292, Florida Statutes (2014), the proper remedy . . .

HARRIS, v. STATE, 157 So. 3d 345 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . .; 960.292(2), Fla. Stat. . . . .

E. RIGGINS, v. BESELER, Jr., 568 F. App'x 850 (11th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 960.292(1), (2). . . .

L. SMITH, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,, 27 So. 3d 124 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . . §§ 960.292(1), 960.293(2), Fla. Stat. . . . “The civil restitution lien shall be made enforceable by means of a civil restitution hen order.” § 960.292 . . . See §§ 960.292(1), 960.293(2), Fla. Stat. . . . See also § 960.292(1), Fla. Stat. . . . This argument is contrary to the plain language of sections 960.292(1) and 960.293(2), which state that . . .

GREEN, v. STATE, 998 So. 2d 1149 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . This motion sought a civil restitution lien under sections 960.292(2) and 960.293(2)(b) for “liquidated . . .

WILSON, v. STATE, 957 So. 2d 683 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . Section 960.292 details the procedure for imposing a civil restitution lien order, stating in pertinent . . . Department of Corrections, 845 So.2d 880, 884-85 (Fla.2003), section 960.292(2) explicitly provides that . . .

BARRETO, v. STATE, 936 So. 2d 1215 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . Pursuant to section 960.292, Florida Statutes (2005), the trial court was authorized to impose a civil . . .

LAWSON, v. STATE, 935 So. 2d 645 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . reversal is without prejudice to the State or the victim to pursue a civil restitution lien under section 960.292 . . .

RODRIGUEZ, v. STATE, 899 So. 2d 471 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . Section 960.292(2), Florida Statutes (2004) provides that the court “shall retain continuing jurisdiction . . .

G. RIDLEY, v. STATE, 890 So. 2d 1261 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . belief that neither the victim nor the State is precluded from pursuing restitution pursuant to section 960.292 . . .

M. RINALDO, a. k. a. v. G. CORBETT, B., 256 F.3d 1276 (11th Cir. 2001)

. . . . § 960.292(2), "... upon petition of the local subdivision ... the court ... shall enter civil restitution . . .

MORIARITY, v. STATE, 751 So. 2d 1286 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . Section 960.292, Florida Statutes (1999), seems to contemplate continuing jurisdiction and there appears . . .

C. BUNCH, v. STATE, 745 So. 2d 400 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . Furches also petitioned the court to enter a civil restitution hen pursuant to section 960.292(2), Florida . . . Sanderson, 625 So.2d 471 (Fla.1993); see also § 960.292(2) (“The court shall retain continuing jurisdiction . . . convicted offender is convicted shall enter civil restitution lien orders in favor of crime victims.... ” § 960.292 . . .

CRUZ, v. STATE, 742 So. 2d 489 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . Miami-Dade County moved for and was granted a civil restitution lien upon him pursuant to sections 960.292 . . . Our conclusion is based on the determination that a 960.292 lien is a collateral, rather than a direct . . . Affirmed. . 960.292 Enforcement of the civil restitution lien through civil restitution lien order.— . . .

ALBERTS, v. STATE, 711 So. 2d 635 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . Further, section 960.292(2), Florida Statutes (1995), upon which the State rehes for its contention that . . .

ILKANIC, v. CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE,, 705 So. 2d 1371 (Fla. 1998)

. . . . §§ 960.292, 960.294, Fla. Stat. (Supp.1994). . . .

CORADI, v. STATE, 670 So. 2d 1112 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . constitute a restitution lien unless a separate order is entered imposing the lien pursuant to section 960.292 . . .

ROSERO, v. STATE, 668 So. 2d 1114 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . Although under section 960.292(2), the criminal trial court retains jurisdiction over the matter, the . . .

WINDHAM, v. STATE, 664 So. 2d 334 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . restitution lien order entered in this case, based on its noncompliance with the requirements of section 960.292 . . .

WHIDDON, v. STATE, 664 So. 2d 340 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . restitution lien order entered in this case, based on its noncompliance with the requirements of section 960.292 . . .

BARKER, v. STATE, 664 So. 2d 340 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . restitution lien order entered in this ease, based on its noncompliance with the requirements of section 960.292 . . .

KEYES, v. STATE, 664 So. 2d 1132 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . restitution lien order entered in this case, based on its noncompliance with the requirements of section 960.292 . . .

TAYLOR, v. STATE, 664 So. 2d 1133 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . restitution hen order entered in this ease, based on its noncomphance with the requirements of section 960.292 . . .

ROBERTS, v. STATE, 664 So. 2d 1133 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . restitution lien order entered in this case, based on its noncompliance with the requirements of section 960.292 . . .

HILL, v. STATE, 664 So. 2d 327 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . restitution lien order entered in this case, based on its noncompliance with the requirements of section 960.292 . . .

ANTONIK, v. STATE, 664 So. 2d 328 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . restitution lien order entered in this case, based on its noncompliance with the requirements of section 960.292 . . .

JOHNSON, v. STATE, 664 So. 2d 1105 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . restitution hen order entered in this ease, based on its noneompliance with the requirements of section 960.292 . . .

F. SNYDER, v. STATE, 664 So. 2d 1073 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . record is devoid of a separate order requiring restitution under the Act, as is required by section 960.292 . . . Section 960.292(3), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1994), states: . . .

LUND, v. STATE, 658 So. 2d 679 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . in that it does not identify the person or entity in whose favor the lien is imposed as required by 960.292 . . .