Cases from cite.case.law:

THURSTON, v. STATE FLORIDA ELECTIONS COMMISSION,, 210 So. 3d 684 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . Section 106.32 establishes an Election Campaign Financing Trust Fund. . . .

BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE HIGHLAND LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, DOE, a v., 208 F. Supp. 3d 850 (S.D. Ohio 2016)

. . . . § 106.32; id. § 106.33, and thus presumptively entitled to Auer deference. . . .

TEXAS v. UNITED STATES, 201 F. Supp. 3d 810 (N.D. Tex. 2016)

. . . For instance, § 106.32 permits educational institutions to provide separate housing for students on the . . . sessions for boys and girls when dealing with instruction concerning human sexuality. 34 C.F.R. §§ 106.32 . . .

G. G. v. GLOUCESTER COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, Ph. D. K. A O s IV s s s UCSF s s H. s d b a GLMA LGBT We M. D. M. D. R. In L. In Ph. D., 824 F.3d 450 (4th Cir. 2016)

. . . . §§ 106.32, 106.33, they can override these provisions by redefining sex to mean how any given person . . .

G. G. GRIMM, v. GLOUCESTER COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, Ph. D. K. A. O s IV s s s UCSF s s H. s d b a GLMA LGBT We M. D. M. D. R. In L. In Ph. D., 822 F.3d 709 (4th Cir. 2016)

. . . . §§ 106.32(b), 106.33. . . . ,” 20 U.S.C. § 1686, provided that the facilities are “proportionate” and “comparable,” 34 C.F.R. § 106.32 . . . Id. § 1686 (emphasis added); see also 34 C.F.R. § 106.32(b) (permitting schools to provide “separate . . . For example, § 106.32(b)(2) provides that “[h]ousing provided ... to students of one sex, when compared . . .

UNITED STATES v. A. BURGESS,, 172 F. App'x 125 (8th Cir. 2006)

. . . The district court sentenced Burgess based on 106.32 grams of pseudoephedrine, the total from all three . . .

PALM BEACH COUNTY CANVASSING BOARD, v. HARRIS, v. v., 772 So. 2d 1273 (Fla. 2000)

. . . Such fines shall be deposited into the Election Campaign Financing Trust fund, created by s. 106.32. . . .

PALM BEACH COUNTY CANVASSING BOARD, v. HARRIS, v. v., 772 So. 2d 1220 (Fla. 2000)

. . . Such fines shall be deposited into the Election Campaign Financing Trust fund, created by s. 106.32. . . .

CHILES, F. v. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, DIVISION OF ELECTIONS,, 711 So. 2d 151 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . Section 106.32, Florida Statutes, created the Election Campaign Financing Trust Fund which served as . . . reasoned that the termination of the trust fund did not render the Act inoperative, because section 106.32 . . . Smith, 638 So.2d 26 (Fla.1994), section 106.32(1) of the Florida Campaign Finance Law contains its own . . .

SECRETARY OF STATE, B. v. F. MILLIGAN,, 704 So. 2d 152 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . Our supreme court’s determination that section 106.32(1), Florida Statutes (1991), effects a valid appropriation . . . each year in which a general election is to be held for the election of the Governor and Cabinet,” § 106.32 . . . Smith, 638 So.2d 26, 28 (Fla.1994) (“section 106.32(1) is simply a section that makes an appropriation . . . “Section 106.32(1) was enacted in 1991, so the Legislature was not bound by the itemization requirement . . . . § 106.32(2) & (3), Fla. Stat. (1995). . . . In addition to these sources of funding for the Trust Fund, section 106.32(1) provided: ... . . . The appellants contend the appropriation contained in section 106.32(1) is to the Trust Fund, and that . . . Additionally, interpreting section 106.32(1) as continuing to provide a valid appropriation, the Division . . . Smith, 638 So.2d 26 (Fla. 1994), the supreme court found that sections 106.32(1) and 106.35 constituted . . .

J. PION, v. LIBERTY DAIRY COMPANY, a, 922 F. Supp. 48 (W.D. Mich. 1996)

. . . Defendant has claimed costs totalling $36,-106.32, broken down as follows: $7,856.33 for copying; $563.65 . . .

WILSON v. GLENWOOD INTERMOUNTAIN PROPERTIES, INC. D. L. E. K. S. R. M. E. W. C. a, 876 F. Supp. 1231 (D. Utah 1995)

. . . . § 106.32 “to the extent that it interferes with the University’s policy of requiring sex-segregated . . . Based on these principles, BYU has requested and is granted by this letter, exemption from 34 C.F.R. § 106.32 . . .

REPUBLICAN PARTY OF FLORIDA, v. SMITH,, 638 So. 2d 26 (Fla. 1994)

. . . We have for review a trial court order upholding the constitutionality of section 106.32(1), Florida . . . See § 106.32, Fla.Stat. (1991). In 1986 the Legislature appropriated $3 million to the Trust Fund. . . . The use or meaning of the word “transferred” in § 106.32, Fla.Stat., is ambiguous. 4. . . . That §§ 106.32(1) and 106.35, Fla. . . . Sections 106.32 and 106.35, Fla.Stat., comply with the itemization requirement of Art. . . . Under section 106.32(1), Florida Statutes (1991), the amount of money which will have to be transferred . . .

J. VAUGHNS, Jr. v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF PRINCE GEORGE S COUNTY, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF PRINCE GEORGE S COUNTY,, 627 F. Supp. 837 (D. Md. 1985)

. . . 49.34 Farquhar 16.65 0 16.65 Hassett 251.94 -17.00 234.94 Hollman 129.15 0 129.15 Keeney 111.07 -4.75 106.32 . . .

HILLSDALE COLLEGE, v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION AND WELFARE,, 696 F.2d 418 (6th Cir. 1982)

. . . . § 106.32), the health services provided to students (34 C.F.R. § 106.39), the students’ extracurricular . . .

W. R. W. R. v. Co., 115 Fla. 852 (Fla. 1934)

. . . .$ 106.32 ■Sumter County Times, printing constructive notice of condemnation suit ................... . . .