Cases from cite.case.law:

FIGUEREDO, v. STATE, 275 So. 3d 229 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . A driver whose license or driving privilege has been suspended or revoked under this section or s. 322.056 . . .

WILLIAMS, III, v. STATE, 244 So. 3d 356 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . (prohibiting driving without a valid Florida driver's license unless "authorized"); § 322.056, Fla. . . .

M. A. R. v. STATE, 67 So. 3d 232 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . K.R.G., 12 So.3d 1269, 1269 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) (applying to juvenile proceedings section 322.056(1)(a . . .

STATE v. K. R. G., 12 So. 3d 1269 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . The juvenile court did not have discretion to forego the dictates of section 322.056(l)(a)(l), Florida . . . , placed the juvenile on probation, and declined to comply with the mandatory provisions of section 322.056 . . . matter to the juvenile court for the entry of an order directed to the Department as required by section 322.056 . . .

STATE v. S. S., 8 So. 3d 425 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . See § 322.056(1), Fla. Stat. (2007). . . . Section 322.056(1) mandates suspension when a no contest plea is entered, adjudication is withheld, and . . .

STATE v. R. A. a, 928 So. 2d 1258 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . appeals the trial court’s failure to order the suspension of R.A.’s driver’s license pursuant to section 322.056 . . . mandatory and reverse with directions that R.A.’s driver’s license be suspended in accordance with section 322.056 . . . Fla. 2d DCA 1999), where the court held that the driver’s license suspension requirement of section 322.056 . . . R.N., 597 So.2d 862 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992), the court held that section 322.056 does not require adjudication . . . Furthermore, we agree that section 322.056 mandates revocation of driving privileges for a juvenile who . . .

STATE v. R. D. H. a, 779 So. 2d 465 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . the trial court failed to suspend R.D.H.’s driver’s license, contrary to the requirements of section 322.056 . . . marijuana, a violation of section 893.13, Florida Statutes (1997), and an enumerated offense under section 322.056 . . . has held that even when the trial court accepts a no contest plea and withholds adjudication, section 322.056 . . . remand for the trial court to suspend R.D.H.’s license in accordance with the requirements of section 322.056 . . .

STATE v. C. C. S. a, 779 So. 2d 465 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . the trial court failed to suspend C.C.S.’s driver’s license, contrary to the requirements of section 322.056 . . . twenty-one, a violation of section 562.111, Florida Statutes (1997), and an enumerated offense under section 322.056 . . . has held that even when the trial court accepts a no contest plea and withholds adjudication, section 322.056 . . . remand for the trial court to suspend C.C.S.’s lipense in accordance with the requirements of section 322.056 . . .

STATE v. R. P. E. a, 779 So. 2d 426 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . case and failed to order the suspension of R.P.E.’s driver’s license pursuant to sections 562.111 and 322.056 . . . The requirements of section 322.056(1) are mandatory, even when a no contest plea has been entered and . . . that the trial court suspend R.P.E. s driver s license in accordance with the requirements of section 322.056 . . .

STATE v. J. V. W. a, 739 So. 2d 173 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . juvenile court’s failure to order the suspension of the driver’s license of J.V.W., pursuant to section 322.056 . . . The requirements of section 322.056(1) are mandatory, even when a no contest plea has been entered and . . . directions that J.V.W.’s driver’s license be suspended in accordance with the requirements of section 322.056 . . .

STATE v. L. J. R. a, 723 So. 2d 389 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . contends that LJ.R.’s driving privileges should have been suspended for two years, pursuant to section 322.056 . . . 722 So.2d 259 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998), we hold that a six-month suspension was proper pursuant to section 322.056 . . .

STATE v. P. J. A. a, 723 So. 2d 389 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . contends that P.J.A.’s driving privileges should have been suspended for two years, pursuant to section 322.056 . . . 722 So.2d 259 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998), we hold that a two-year suspension is mandatory pursuant to section 322.056 . . .

STATE v. M. A. G. a, 723 So. 2d 390 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . contends that M.AG.’s driving privileges should have been suspended for two years, pursuant to section 322.056 . . . 722 So.2d 259 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998), we hold that a two-year suspension is mandatory pursuant to section 322.056 . . .

STATE v. M. L. R. a, 722 So. 2d 259 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . should have directed that M.L.R.’s driving privileges be suspended for two years, pursuant to section 322.056 . . . Section 322.056, Florida Statutes (1997), provides in pertinent part: 322.056 Mandatory revocation or . . . Section 322.056 requires the trial court to direct the suspension of a juvenile’s driving privileges . . . suspension and may order the suspension for “[n]ot less than 6 months and not more than 1 year.” § 322.056 . . . See § 322.056(l)(a)2., Fla. Stat. (1997). . . .

STATE v. M. A. P. a, 708 So. 2d 322 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . Section 322.056, Florida Statutes (1995), requires a trial court to direct that the driving privileges . . . The language of section- 322.056 leaves no discretion in the trial court. See State v. . . .

C. B. a v. STATE, 706 So. 2d 925 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . Because the trial court failed to follow the requirements of sections 39.052(4) and 322.056, Florida . . . See § 322.056, Fla. Stat. (1995). . . . 39.052(4) and also may direct the Department to suspend C.B.’s driving privileges pursuant to section 322.056 . . .

STATE v. M. D. a, 706 So. 2d 41 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . disposition in a delinquency case in order, it alleges, to avoid the legislative mandate of section 322.056 . . . will no longer be subject to the mandatory suspension of his driving privileges required by section 322.056 . . . after his eighteenth birthday, the trial court has created a small window between sections 322.055 and 322.056 . . . which the State has no remedy on direct appeal, as M.D. will have escaped the application of section 322.056 . . .

STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. LITSCH,, 664 So. 2d 25 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . approve the trial court’s conclusion that the effect of the reference to section 322.271 in section 322.056 . . .

STATE v. R. N. a, 597 So. 2d 862 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . Section 322.056, Florida Statutes (1991), provides: (1) Notwithstanding the provisions of s. 322.055, . . . in R.N.’s argument that the trial court’s failure to adjudicate him as a delinquent renders section 322.056 . . .