Cases from cite.case.law:

FIGUEREDO, v. STATE, 275 So. 3d 229 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . license for driving privilege restricted to business or employment purposes only, as defined by s. 322.271 . . .

WILLIAMS, III, v. STATE, 244 So. 3d 356 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . 2016) (seemingly equating "driving privileges" with "driver license or learner's driver license"); § 322.271 . . . Stat. (2016) (stating, "[t]he privilege of driving ... given to a nonresident"); § 322.271(1)(a), Fla . . .

STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. WALSH,, 204 So.3d 169 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . sought early reinstatement of his driving privileges, petitioning for a “hardship license” under section 322.271 . . . that alcohol is a drug for purposes of determining the scope of what “drug-free” means under section 322.271 . . .

PITTS, v. STATE, 199 So. 3d 1106 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . -4680, 2016 WL 3607204, at *6 (Fla. 2d DCA July 6, 2016) (en banc) (“Because sections 322.34(5) and 322.271 . . .

BURGESS, v. STATE, 198 So. 3d 1151 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . To reach that conclusion, we relied on section 322.271(l)(b), Florida Statutes (1997), which deals with . . . In sum, Carroll held (a) that the term “driving privilege” in section 322.271(l)(b) carries a broader . . . the term “driver’s license” in section 322.34 means the same thing as “driving privilege” in section 322.271 . . . The driving privilege that is the subject of an application for restoration under section 322.271(l)( . . . Because sections 322.34(5) and 322.271(l)(b) operate harmoniously without denying “driver’s license” . . .

STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. PEACOCK,, 185 So. 3d 632 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . The' Department reliés upon sections 322.271(5)(c) and 322.28(5), Florida Statutes (2015), in support . . . Section 322.271 is entitled “Authority to modify revocation, cancellation, or suspension order.’’ . . . . § 322.271(5), Fla.’ Stat. (2015). . . . Section 322.271(5)(e) provides, “The petitioner -must assume the reasonable costs of- supervision. . . . Nor does it cite to section 322.271 as it does sections 322.2615 and 322.2616. . . .

GORDON, v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES,, 166 So. 3d 902 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . See, e.g„ §§ 322.2615(8)(a),(b) and 322.271(2)(a), Fla. Stat. (2013). . . .

STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. HARTZOG,, 148 So. 3d 816 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . denying respondent’s request for reinstatement, the hearing officer noted the requirement in section 322.271 . . . determination with respect to respondent’s qualifications, fitness, or need to drive as required by section 322.271 . . . The pertinent law in this case is section 322.271(5), Florida Statutes (2012), which provides in part . . .

STATE v. AIDEN,, 118 So. 3d 264 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . See § 322.271, Fla. . . .

GIL, v. STATE, 118 So. 3d 787 (Fla. 2013)

. . . to be relicensed for a minimum of 5 years from the date of revocation, except as provided for in s. 322.271 . . . to be relicensed for a minimum of 5 years from the date of revocation, except as provided for in s. 322.271 . . .

J. STANGARONE, v. STATE, 94 So. 3d 652 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . See § 322.271(5), Fla. Stat. (2010). . . .

CRAIN, v. STATE, 79 So. 3d 118 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . to be relicensed for a minimum of 5 years from the date of revocation, except as provided for in s. 322.271 . . . For example, section 322.271(l)(b), Florida Statutes (2009), which is referenced in section 322.27(5) . . .

BRADSHEER K. v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES,, 20 So. 3d 915 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . placement (see § 322.2715(4)) or upon review of the offender's application for license reinstatement (see § 322.271 . . .

STATE v. CLAYTON,, 994 So. 2d 388 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . license for driving privileges restricted to business or employment purposes only, as defined by s. 322.271 . . .

BOLWARE, v. STATE, 995 So. 2d 268 (Fla. 2008)

. . . to be relicensed for a minimum of 5 years from the date of revocation, except as provided for in s. 322.271 . . .

LESCHER, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES,, 985 So. 2d 1078 (Fla. 2008)

. . . Section 322.271(4), Florida Statutes (1997), formerly provided that drivers whose licenses had been permanently . . . See § 322.271(4), Fla. Stat. (1997). . . . See 322.271(4), Fla. Stat. (Supp. 1998). . . . Neither section 322.28(2)(e) (the license revocation provision) nor section 322.271(4) (the hardship . . . Further, section 322.271(4) now contains no provision for such a felon to obtain a hardship license. . . .

BLANDIN, v. STATE, 976 So. 2d 1201 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . to be relicensed for a minimum of 5 years from the date of revocation, except as provided for in s. 322.271 . . .

E. QUIRK, v. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES,, 975 So. 2d 1270 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . , and certify the same question that this court certified in Lescher: Does the amendment to section 322.271 . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. A. JOHNSON,, 980 So. 2d 1118 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . subsequently entered a final declaratory judgment in his favor, holding that the amended version of section 322.271 . . . Stat. § 322.271 that existed prior to the enactment of Chapter 98-223 is currently in effect; and (2) . . . record does not reveal the date — Johnson petitioned to have his license reinstated pursuant to section 322.271 . . . ’s petition is the fact that in 1998, the Legislature enacted chapter 98-223, which amended section 322.271 . . . Accordingly, the amended version of section 322.271(4) became effective on July 1, 2003, and Johnson . . .

DENNIS, v. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, DIVISION OF DRIVER LICENSES OF STATE OF FLORIDA, O. T. N., 972 So. 2d 924 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . concluded that the appellant was not entitled to request a restricted, hardship license pursuant to section 322.271 . . . order addressing the appellant’s right to pursue a restricted, hardship license pursuant to section 322.271 . . .

STATE v. WELLS,, 965 So. 2d 834 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . A hearing may be requested pursuant to s. 322.271. . . .

STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. BUTLER,, 959 So. 2d 434 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . ‘Under section 322.271(2)(d), Florida Statutes (2005), the Department has legislative authority to require . . .

LEOPOLD, v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY MOTOR VEHICLES, BUREAU OF ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEWS,, 960 So. 2d 819 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . We certify the same question that this court-certified in Lescher: Does the amendment to section 322.271 . . .

MULDER, v. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES,, 946 So. 2d 1240 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . we certify the following question as one of great public importance: Does the amendment to section 322.271 . . .

LESCHER, v. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES,, 946 So. 2d 1140 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . In the past, section 322.271(4), Florida Statutes, authorized a person whose license had been revoked . . . The legislature then adopted the provision as an amendment to. : section 322.271(4), effective July 1 . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. GONZALEZ- ZAILA,, 920 So. 2d 1220 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . Section 322.271(2)(d), Florida Statutes (2003) allows the DMV to require use of an ignition interlock . . . application for reinstatement, may require use of an ignition interlock device pursuant to s. 316.1937.” § 322.271 . . . [e.s.] § 322.271(3), Fla. Stat. (2003). . . . However, section 322.271(2)(d) was not raised or addressed in Dickenson, and that statute clearly allows . . . The DMV clearly has the legislated authority to do so under section 322.271(2)(d), Florida Statutes ( . . .

DUCKWORTH, v. STATE, 923 So. 2d 530 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . records provisions of section 119.07(1), except that they may be admitted in proceedings under section 322.271 . . . from the provisions of § 119.07(1), except that the reports may be admitted in proceedings under § .322.271 . . . be used as evidence in any trial, except that the reports may be admitted in proceedings of Section 322.271 . . . applicant” (emphasis added), the sole exception being for administrative proceedings under sections 322.271 . . .

CORNELIUS, II, v. STATE, 913 So. 2d 1176 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . his plea as involuntary in light of the Legislature’s enactment, effective July 1, 1998, of section 322.271 . . . prevents persons with lifetime driver’s license suspensions from applying for work permit licenses. § 322.271 . . . See § 322.271(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (1997). . . . See § 322.271, Fla. Stat. (Supp.1998). . . . I am writing to point out that section 322.271, Florida Statutes (Supp.1998) may, as applied to Cornelius . . .

HILL, v. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES,, 891 So. 2d 1202 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . As Hill’s application was made in April 2004, the law in effect at that time was section 322.271(4), . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. W. GASKINS,, 891 So. 2d 643 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . Because the current version of section 322.271(4), Florida Statutes (2004), is applicable and does not . . . In 1996, pursuant to section 322.271(4), Florida Statutes (1995), Gaskins sought, and the Department . . . However, even if section 322.271(4) allows for unqualified reinstatement, based on Gaskins’ record and . . . the current version of section 322.271(4), Gaskins is not entitled to petition for any reinstatement . . . Gaskins contends that the 1995 version of section 322.271(4) is applicable and allows someone with his . . .

SEHNAL, v. STATE, 884 So. 2d 478 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . . § 322.271, Fla. Stat. (Supp. 1998). . . .

STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY MOTOR VEHICLES, v. FOUNTAIN,, 883 So. 2d 300 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . See § 322.271(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (1997). . . . Court ruled chapter 98-223, Laws of Florida, which created, in part, the 1998 versions of sections 322.271 . . . See § 322.271(4)(a)-(b), Pla. Stat. 1997. . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. P. BAILEY,, 870 So. 2d 47 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . On remand, the circuit court must determine, in light of the criteria set out in section 322.271(4), . . . contain the factual findings relevant to Bailey’s eligibility for a hardship permit under former section 322.271 . . . (stating the appropriate standard for second-tier certiorari review by a district court). .Section 322.271 . . .

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. P. CRITCHFIELD,, 842 So. 2d 782 (Fla. 2003)

. . . Section 9 amends section 322.271, Florida Statutes, which deals with petitions for reinstatement of driving . . .

CANTRALL, v. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES,, 828 So. 2d 1062 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . At that time, section 322.271(4), Florida Statutes (1987), provided that he could apply for a driver’ . . . Effective July 1, 1998, however, the legislature amended section 322.271(4) and removed the language . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. SCINTA,, 828 So. 2d 486 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . and directing the DHSMV to afford her a full and fair hearing utilizing the 1997 version of section 322.271 . . .

WEBB, v. STATE, 816 So. 2d 1190 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles for reinstatement after five years, pursuant to section 322.271 . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. P. CRITCHFIELD,, 805 So. 2d 1034 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . Section 9 amends section 322.271, Florida Statutes, which deals with petitions for reinstatement of driving . . .

BILOGAN, v. STATE, 802 So. 2d 459 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . See § 322.271, Fla. Stat. (Supp.1998). The trial court denied Bilogan’s motion as untimely. . . .

STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. DAVIS, Jr., 775 So. 2d 989 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . the order canceling his license, Davis could have requested an administrative hearing under section 322.271 . . . See § 322.271(l)(a), Fla. Stat. . . .

C. CARROLL, v. STATE, 761 So. 2d 417 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . to be relicensed for a minimum of 5 years from the date of revocation, except as provided for in s. 322.271 . . . However, in referring specifically to the revocation provided for in the above subsection, section 322.271 . . .

STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. G. ABBEY, Jr., 745 So. 2d 1024 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . The Department based this decision on its conclusion that section 322.271(4)(a)(S), Florida Statutes . . . The circuit court granted Abbey’s petition based on its conclusion that section 322.271 does not require . . . The hearing officer based this decision on section 322.271(4)(a)(3), which requires a hardship license . . . Section 322.271 does not specifically require an applicant to be alcohol-free for five years and, in . . . Section 322.271(4)(a)(1), Florida Statutes (1997), also requires an applicant to prove that he or she . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY, v. PARSONS,, 719 So. 2d 339 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . Section 322.271 provides that such hardship license is not available to persons refusing to take a breath . . . The order of the circuit court under review here suspended or stayed the effect of section 322.271 pending . . . employment purposes only if the person is otherwise eligible for the driving privilege pursuant to s. 322.271 . . . person is not eligible to receive a license for business or employment purposes only, pursuant to s. 322.271 . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. F. SINCLAIR, Jr., 697 So. 2d 230 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . has been convicted twice for DUI within five years, who has not fulfilled the requirements of Section 322.271 . . . Rather, we agree with DHSMV that in accordance with section 322.271(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1995), it . . . DHSMV is authorized to issue such a license under 322.271(l)(c) which allows DHSMV to issue a business . . . In addition, section 322.271(2)(b), limits a hardship reinstatement for drivers convicted twice of DUI . . .

N. DAVIS, v. STATE, 688 So. 2d 996 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . . § 322.271, Fla. Stat. (1993). . . .

STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. LITSCH,, 664 So. 2d 25 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . license for driving privilege restricted to business or employment purposes only, as defined in s. 322.271 . . . until successful completion of an approved substance abuse education course as required under section 322.271 . . . We approve the trial court’s conclusion that the effect of the reference to section 322.271 in section . . . trial court was of the added opinion that even if the substance abuse education contemplated under 322.271 . . . Section 322.271 requires an individual to take a substance abuse education class prior to obtaining a . . .

DAVIS, v. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, STATE OF FLORIDA,, 660 So. 2d 775 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . .” § 322.271(2)(b), Fla.Stat. (1993). . . . .” § 322.271(2)(b), Fla.Stat. (1993). Lakeview Center, Inc. . . . prior Florida Rules of Traffic Court, viz., Florida Administrative Code Rules 15A-10.000, et seq. §§ 322.271 . . .

CRAWFORD, v. STATE, 651 So. 2d 731 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . license for driving privileges restricted to business or employment purposes only, as defined by s. 322.271 . . .

STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. H. TREMMEL,, 634 So. 2d 742 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . The Florida Legislature, during its 1990 session, had amended section 322.271(4), Florida Statutes (1989 . . . attorney’s letter as a request for a discretionary restricted hardship license hearing under section 322.271 . . .

LITE, v. STATE, 617 So. 2d 1058 (Fla. 1993)

. . . license for driving privileges restricted to business or employment purposes only, as defined by s. 322.271 . . .

MARTIN, v. STATE, 618 So. 2d 737 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . license for driving privileges restricted to business or employment purposes only, as defined by s. 322.271 . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE FOR TRAFFIC COURTS, 608 So. 2d 451 (Fla. 1992)

. . . 1986, second and third offenders evaluated for eligibility for restricted licenses pursuant to section 322.271 . . .

STATE v. LEYVA,, 599 So. 2d 691 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . to be relicensed for a minimum of 5 years from the date of revocation, except as provided for in s. 322.271 . . .

STATE v. LITE,, 592 So. 2d 1202 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . license for driving privileges restricted to business or employment purposes only, as defined by § 322.271 . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. HAGAR,, 581 So. 2d 214 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . to be relicensed for a minimum of 5 years from the date of revocation, except as provided for in § 322.271 . . .

STATE OF FLORIDA v. GODDU, 42 Fla. Supp. 2d 222 (Volusia Cty. Ct. 1990)

. . . of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles to show cause why his license should not be revoked, see also § 322.271 . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE FOR TRAFFIC COURT RULE, 531 So. 2d 150 (Fla. 1988)

. . . 1986, second and third offenders evaluated for eligibility for restricted licenses pursuant to section 322.271 . . .

THE FLORIDA BAR. In RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE FOR TRAFFIC COURTS, 536 So. 2d 181 (Fla. 1988)

. . . 1986, second and third offenders evaluated for eligibility for restricted licenses pursuant to section 322.271 . . .

THE FLORIDA BAR. In RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE FOR TRAFFIC COURTS, 530 So. 2d 274 (Fla. 1988)

. . . 1986, second and third offenders evaluated for eligibility for restricted licenses pursuant to section 322.271 . . .

In FLORIDA RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE FOR TRAFFIC COURTS, 494 So. 2d 1129 (Fla. 1986)

. . . 1986, second and third offenders evaluated for eligibility for restricted licenses pursuant to section 322.271 . . .

STATE v. BROWNSTEIN,, 352 So. 2d 144 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . petition for certiorari in the circuit court alleges that Sections 322.264, 322.27(5) and (6), and 322.271 . . .

WHEELER, v. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES,, 297 So. 2d 128 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

. . . Kassab, supra. .A prehearing should not be confused with that provided in § 322.271 in which all those . . .

CHAITKIN, v. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES,, 294 So. 2d 352 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

. . . Section 322.271, Florida Statutes, F.S.A. . . .

L. LORD, v. DAVIS,, 288 So. 2d 260 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

. . . the enactment of provisions applying to the habitual traffic offender, the Legislature also amended § 322.271 . . .

NATIONAL UNION FIRE INS. CO. v. GARCIA,, 26 Fla. Supp. 78 (Dade Cty. Cir. Ct. 1965)

. . . . §322.271 (1) requires notice thereof to the insured upon such suspension. . . .

CASSESE v. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, 24 Fla. Supp. 54 (Dade Cty. Cir. Ct. 1964)

. . . S. 322.271 which read — Mr. H. N. . . . S. 322.271. . . . S. 322.271. . . . S. 322.271. . . . S. 322.271. . . .

JONES, v. H. N. KIRKMAN,, 138 So. 2d 513 (Fla. 1962)

. . . By Section 322.271, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., the Department of Public Safety is required to notify a . . .