Cases from cite.case.law:

IN RE STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES- REPORT, 260 So. 3d 941 (Fla. 2018)

. . . Stat.§ 895.02(8)(a)1.-50. that is alleged in the charging document). 3. . . . Stat.§ 895.02(8)(a)1.-50. that is alleged in the charging document). b. . . . Stat.§ 895.02(8)(a)1.-50. that is alleged in the charging document); [or] b. . . . Stat.§ 895.02(8)(a)1.-50. that is alleged in the charging document). 3. . . . Stat. § 895.02 (8)(a)1.-50. that is alleged in the charging document ). . . .

CASTILLO, v. STATE, 254 So. 3d 477 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . . § 895.02(4), Fla. Stat. (2007). . . . the last of such incidents occurred within 5 years after a prior incident of racketeering conduct. § 895.02 . . .

UNITED STATES v. L. MASINO, L., 869 F.3d 1301 (11th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 895.02(8)(a)(45). . . .

VASS, v. STATE, 224 So. 3d 279 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . See § 895.02(7), Fla. . . .

GODINEZ, v. STATE, 217 So. 3d 103 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . .” § 895.02(4), Fla. Stat. (2008) (emphasis added). . . .

CASTILLO, v. STATE, 213 So. 3d 930 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . other and therefore did not meet the definition of a “pattern of racketeering activity” under section 895.02 . . . the last of such incidents occurred within 5 years after a prior incident of racketeering conduct.” § 895.02 . . .

GODINEZ, v. STATE, 192 So. 3d 1289 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . See §§ 895.02(4), 895.03(3), Fla. . . .

CASTILLO, v. STATE, 170 So. 3d 112 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . See § 895.02(3), Fla. Stat. (2007). . . . “Racketeering activity” is defined in 895.02(1), Florida Statutes (2007), as: to commit, to attempt to . . . A “[p]attern of racketeering activity” is defined in 895.02(4), Florida Statutes (2007), as: engaging . . . court should have stricken that act, because at the time of the information the RICO statute, section 895.02 . . . Moreover, the Legislature clearly intended to include within the ambit of section 895.02, Florida Statutes . . .

KINGLAND ESTATES, LTD. v. DAVIS,, 170 So. 3d 825 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . making false entries in the books of a corporation (KEL) in violation of sections 817.034, 817.15, and 895.02 . . . harassing, or retaliating against a witness, victim, or informant in violation of sections 914.22 and 895.02 . . . Section 895.02, Florida Statutes (2003), defines the terms contained in section 895.03(3) and (4): • . . . any crime chargeable by indictment or information under specifically enumerated criminal statutes. § 895.02 . . . relevant part, as "any ... group of individuals associated in fact although not a legal entity.” § 895.02 . . .

S. HARDIE, a k a v. STATE, 162 So. 3d 297 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . . § 895.02(l)(a)(32), Fla. Stat. (2009). . . .

DE LA OSA, v. STATE, 158 So. 3d 712 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . Section 895.02, Florida Statutes (2003), defines the terms contained in section 895.03(3) and (4): • . . . relevant part, as “any ... group of individuals associated in fact although not a legal entity.” § 895.02 . . . State, 405 So.2d 173, 174 (Fla.1981); § 895.02(l)(b), Fla. Stat. (2003); 18 U.S.C. § 1961(1). . . . See § 895.02(l)(b), Fla. Stat. (2003). . . . See § 895.02(l)(a)32., (b), Fla. Stat. (2003). . . . .

MAROLF v. MIAMI- DADE COUNTY,, 172 So. 3d 450 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . . § 895.02 Fla. Stat. (2014). . . .

CASCO, v. STATE, 150 So. 3d 838 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . found the defendant guilty of three predicate criminal acts when only two were necessary under section 895.02 . . .

STATE v. REYAN,, 145 So. 3d 133 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . The term “racketeering activity” as defined in section 895.02(1), Florida Statutes (2003) “means to commit . . . which is defined as “any ... group of individuals associated in fact although not a legal entity[.]” § 895.02 . . . the last of such incidents occurred within 5 years after a prior incident of racketeering conduct. § 895.02 . . . See § 895.02(1), Fla. Stat. . . . racketeering activity consisting of at least two (2) incidents of racketeering activity enumerated in Section 895.02 . . .

In STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES- REPORT NO., 123 So. 3d 54 (Fla. 2013)

. . . Stat. 895.02 that is alleged in the charging document). 3. . . . Stat. 895.02 that is alleged in the charging document). b. . . . Stat. 895.02 that is alleged in the charging document); [or] b. . . . Stat. 895.02 that is alleged in the charging document). 3. . . . Stat. 895.02 that is alleged in the charging document). . . .

CASTRO, v. STATE, 122 So. 3d 912 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . . § 895.02(3), Fla. Stat. (2012) (emphasis supplied). . . .

STATE v. LEVITAN, v., 115 So. 3d 1065 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . Compare § 775.0844(3)-(4), with § 895.02. . . .

L. VASQUEZ, v. STATE, 111 So. 3d 273 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . See §§ 895.02(1), 895.03(3), (4), 893.13(6)(a), Fla. Stat. (2008-09). We have jurisdiction. . . .

F. NEGRETE, E. Ow, v. ALLIANZ LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, B. v., 927 F. Supp. 2d 870 (C.D. Cal. 2013)

. . . . § 895.02(l)(a), and the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act, which by its terms does not . . .

J. CHAMBLEE, v. STATE, 93 So. 3d 1184 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . . §§ 895.02(1), (3)-(4) and 895.03(3), Fla. Stat. (2008); State v. . . .

HEADLEY, v. STATE, 90 So. 3d 912 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . Compare § 775.0844(3)-(4), with § 895.02. . . .

SANCHEZ, v. STATE, 89 So. 3d 912 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . See § 895.02(l)(a)(24), (38) (defining the predicate acts as “racketeering activity”); § 895.02(4) (defining . . . See § 895.02(l)(a)(21), (22), (28). . . .

HAGOPIAN, v. JUSTICE ADMINISTRATIVE COMMISSION,, 18 So. 3d 625 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . To accomplish this end, section 895.02(l)(a) was amended to include violations of chapter 874, relating . . . Similarly, section 895.02(3) was also amended to provide that “[a] criminal street gang, as defined in . . .

BAKER, v. STATE, 990 So. 2d 1221 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . See § 895.02(l)(a)25„ Fla. Stat. (2006). . . .

DOORBAL, v. STATE v. A., 983 So. 2d 464 (Fla. 2008)

. . . Lugo, 845 So.2d at 97; see also § 895.02(3), Fla. Stat. (2006). . . .

BRADENTON GROUP, INC. v. STATE, 970 So. 2d 403 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . the predicate acts under RICO — bingo—constituted a pattern of racketeering activity under section 895.02 . . . (citing section 895.02(l)(a)(32), Fla. Stat. (1991)). . . . The court denied summary judgment in August 2003, accepting the State’s argument that section 895.02( . . . (citing § 895.02(1)(a)(32), Fla. Stat. (1995)). . . . Importantly, the “statutory scheme” already included section 895.02(l)(b), Florida Statutes (1995), by . . .

DEONARINE, v. STATE, 967 So. 2d 333 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . argues that his multiple violations of chapter 893 do not constitute racketeering as defined by section 895.02 . . . and it includes illicit as well as licit enterprises and governmental, as well as other, entities.” § 895.02 . . .

STATE v. RUBIO,, 967 So. 2d 768 (Fla. 2007)

. . . Thus, the defendants’ argument is that section 895.02(l)(a)(26) limits its predicate offenses to only . . . The Fifth District affirmed the dismissal, holding that the “relating to” language in section 895.02( . . . The State notes that the words following “relating to” in section 895.02 are the titles of the various . . . (l)(a)(9), then the specification of particular sections in section 895.02(l)(a)(8) was unnecessary. . . . Another example is section 895.02(l)(a)(18), which sets forth as a predicate offense “[ejhapter 784, . . .

STATE v. RUBIO, B., 917 So. 2d 383 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . fraudulent practices, false pretenses, fraud generally, and credit card crimes, (emphasis added) § 895.02 . . .

GHANEM, v. STATE, 910 So. 2d 434 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . “Enterprise” is defined in section 895.02(3) as: Any individual, sole proprietorship, partnership, corporation . . .

PIZZO, v. STATE, 910 So. 2d 287 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . .” § 895.02(3). . . . soliciting, coercing, or intimidating another person to commit any predicate crime listed in section 895.02 . . . (l)(a), which in this case is mortgage fraud, see § 895.02(l)(a)(25). . . . A corporation is an “enterprise.” § 895.02(3). . . . See § 895.02(l)(a)(25). . . .

NICOR INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION a k a v. EL PASO CORPORATION f k a El, 318 F. Supp. 2d 1160 (S.D. Fla. 2004)

. . . As provided in section 895.02 of the Florida Statutes, the term “racketeering activity” means the commission . . . Florida Statutes and “any conduct defined as ‘racketeering activity’ under 18 U.S.C. § 1961(1).” § 895.02 . . . The crimes enumerated in subsection (a) of section 895.02(1) include, but are not limited to, fraud under . . . 838 of the Florida Statutes, and obstruction of justice under Chapter 843 of the Florida Statutes. § 895.02 . . . commit, to conspire to commit, or to solicit, coerce, or intimidate another person to commit ...” § 895.02 . . .

NICOR INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION a k a v. EL PASO CORPORATION f k a El, 292 F. Supp. 2d 1357 (S.D. Fla. 2003)

. . . Section 895.02(4) defines “pattern of racketeering” activity to mean: “engaging in at least two incidents . . . that otherwise are interrelated by distinguishing characteristics and are not isolated incidents-” § 895.02 . . .

JACKSON, a k a v. STATE, 858 So. 2d 1211 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . . § 895.02(3). . . .

STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES- SUBMISSION, 850 So. 2d 1272 (Fla. 2003)

. . . See § 895.02(1), FlaStat. . . . See § 895.02(1), Fla.Stat. . . . Definitions § 895.02(2), Fla.Stat. . . . . § 895.02(3), Fla.Stat. . . . See § 895.02(1), Fla.Stat. . . .

LUGO, v. STATE, 845 So. 2d 74 (Fla. 2003)

. . . See §§ 895.02-895.03, Fla. Stat. (1995). . . . and it includes illicit as well as licit enterprises and governmental, as well as other, entities. § 895.02 . . . the last of such incidents occurred within 5 years after a prior incident of racketeering conduct. § 895.02 . . .

ALLOCCO, v. CITY OF CORAL GABLES, A A, 221 F. Supp. 2d 1317 (S.D. Fla. 2002)

. . . . § 895.02(4). . . . Stat. § 895.02(1). . . .

MESE, v. STATE, 824 So. 2d 908 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . See § 895.02(4), Fla. Stat. (1993). . . .

BLACK, v. STATE, 819 So. 2d 208 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . “The definition of ‘racketeering activity’ in subsection 895.02(1), Florida Statutes (1987), does not . . . indictment or information’ under the specific provisions of the Florida Statutes enumerated therein. § 895.02 . . .

HELMADOLLAR, v. STATE, 811 So. 2d 819 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . . § 895.02(3), Fla. Stat. . . .

THE REPUBLIC OF ECUADOR, v. PHILIP MORRIS COMPANIES, INC., 188 F. Supp. 2d 1359 (S.D. Fla. 2002)

. . . Additionally, Ecuador asserts causes of action under the Florida RICO statute, § 895.02, et seq. and . . .

ADVANCE AMERICA, LLC, v. STATE OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS,, 801 So. 2d 310 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . See §§ 895.02(l)(a)15 & (2)(a)3, Florida Statutes (2000). . . . .

BEE LINE ENTERTAINMENT PARTNERS, v. STATE, 791 So. 2d 1197 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . The pertinent portions are as follows: 895.02. . . .

GROSS, Jr. v. STATE, 765 So. 2d 39 (Fla. 2000)

. . . . § 895.02(3), Fla. Stat. (1997). . . . . § 895.02(3), Fla. Stat. (1993). . . . and it includes illicit as well as licit enterprises and governmental, as well as other, entities. § 895.02 . . . and that the last of such incidents occurred within 5 years after a prior incident of racketeering. § 895.02 . . .

BEJERANO, v. STATE, 760 So. 2d 218 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . . § 895.02(3), Fla. Stat. (1997). . . . HARRIS and PETERSON, JJ., concur. . §§ 895.02(4); 817.234(l)(a), Fla. . . .

STATE v. MARKS, P. A., 758 So. 2d 1131 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . . § 895.02(4)(1994). . . .

WEINACHT, v. STATE, 744 So. 2d 1197 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . An “enterprise” is defined by section 895.02, Florida Statutes (1993) as follows: (3) “Enterprise” means . . .

GROSS, Jr. v. STATE, 728 So. 2d 1206 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . Section 895.02(3), Florida Statutes (1993), defines enterprise as: “Enterprise” means any individual, . . .

STATE v. E. GUSOW,, 724 So. 2d 135 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . the chapter and/or section numbers in the definition of “racketeering activity” contained in section 895.02 . . . Because section 895.02(l)(a)ll. defines racketeering activity to include any crime chargeable by indictment . . . concern about the “relating to” clauses contained in the definition of “racketeering activity” in section 895.02 . . .

DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, v. BRADENTON GROUP, INC. v., 727 So. 2d 199 (Fla. 1998)

. . . section 849.0931, the bingo statute, from a listing of the statutes describing the scope of section 895.02 . . . of the gambling chapter that it punishes and does not include section 849.0931, the bingo statute: 895.02 . . . Section 84-9.09, s. 849.14, s. 849.15, s. 849.23, or s. 849.25, relating to gambling. § 895.02(l)(a)( . . .

CHEYENNE SALES, LTD. v. WESTERN UNION FINANCIAL SERVICES INTERNATIONAL, 8 F. Supp. 2d 469 (E.D. Pa. 1998)

. . . . § 895.02. Id. . . . .

SCHIMPF, S R v. GERALD, INC., 2 F. Supp. 2d 1150 (E.D. Wis. 1998)

. . . . § 895.02. . . . Section 895.02 thus treats claims for amounts in excess of actual damages as if they cannot survive against . . . double damages, permitting a WOC-CA claim to be brought against an estate would be inconsistent with § 895.02 . . .

BRADENTON GROUP, INC. v. DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, STATE OF FLORIDA,, 701 So. 2d 1170 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . violations are not identified among the statutes listed as “racketeering activity” under subsection 895.02 . . . ) of the Florida RICO statute, but violations of section 849.09, the lottery statute, are listed. § 895.02 . . .

STATE v. SOBIECK,, 701 So. 2d 96 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . . §§ 895.03(3), 895.02(3) and 895(4), Fla. Slat. (1995). . § 932.701-707, Fla. Slat. (1996). . U.S. . . .

STATE v. JACKSON,, 677 So. 2d 938 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . intentionally, and knowingly, while employed by or associated with an enterprise as defined by Section 895.02 . . . in such enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity within the meaning of Florida Statute 895.02 . . . (1) and 895.02(4), by committing crimes chargeable by indictment or information under Chapter 812, Florida . . . willfully, and knowingly engage in a pattern of racketeering activity as defined by Florida Statute 895.02 . . . and it includes illicit as well as licit enterprises and governmental, as well as other, entities.” § 895.02 . . .

STATE v. S. NUCKOLLS, III,, 677 So. 2d 12 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . persons known and unknown to commit an offense, to wit: Racketeering, as defined in Florida Statute 895.02 . . . entity, for the purpose of engaging in racketeering activities within the meaning of Florida Statute 895.02 . . . said enterprise through engaging in a pattern of racketeering activity as defined in Florida Statute 895.02 . . . unknown, to violate the laws of the State of Florida, to-wit Racketeering, as defined in Florida Statute 895.02 . . . enterprise through a continuous pattern of racketeering activity, within the meaning of Florida Statute 895.02 . . .

BROWN, v. STATE, 652 So. 2d 877 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . contends the State failed to' establish that he was involved in an “enterprise” as defined in section 895.02 . . . Section 895.02(4) defines that term: “Pattern of racketeering activity” means engaging in at least two . . .

E. CLARK, v. STATE, 645 So. 2d 575 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . .” § 895.02(3). . . . . § 895.02(4). . . . defined as any of the crimes chargeable by indictment or information that are enumerated in section 895.02 . . .

PHILADELPHIA RESERVE SUPPLY COMPANY, v. NOWALK ASSOCIATES, INC., 864 F. Supp. 1456 (E.D. Pa. 1994)

. . . Fla.Stat. ch. 895.02(4). . . . .

BORDO, INC. v. STATE, 627 So. 2d 561 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . See § 895.02(l)(a)17 and 29, Fla.Stat. (1991). . . . .

STATE v. KESSLER,, 626 So. 2d 251 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . trial court did not accept appellant’s position that the phrase “relating to prostitution” in section 895.02 . . .

R. HARVEY, v. STATE, 617 So. 2d 1144 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . The definition of “racketeering activity” in subsection 895.02(1), Florida Statutes (1987), does not . . . indictment or information” under the specific provisions of the Florida Statutes enumerated therein. § 895.02 . . .

SHIMEK, Jr. v. STATE, 610 So. 2d 632 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . Section 895.02(3) defines "enterprise” to mean: Any individual, sole proprietorship, partnership, corporation . . . Section 895.02(4) defines “pattern of racketeering" activity to mean: engaging in at least two incidents . . .

COLONIAL PENN INSURANCE COMPANY, v. VALUE RENT- A- CAR INC. a k a d b a A- A- A- H., 814 F. Supp. 1084 (S.D. Fla. 1992)

. . . . § 895.02(l)(a) and (b) define an “incident” of racketeering activity under Florida RICO to include . . . Stat. § 895.02(l)(b), Colonial has sufficiently alleged the claims within the purview of Florida RICO . . .

A. BUTTERWORTH, v. A. CAGGIANO,, 605 So. 2d 56 (Fla. 1992)

. . . .” § 895.02(9), Fla.Stat. (1989). . . .

STATE v. LUCAS,, 600 So. 2d 1093 (Fla. 1992)

. . . . § 895.02(1). . . . . § 895.02(4). In Bowden v. . . .

NAPOLI, v. STATE, 596 So. 2d 782 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . See §§ 895.03 & 895.02(3), Fla.Stat. (1987); and Boyd v. . . .

POLAKOFF, v. STATE, 586 So. 2d 385 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . We further hold that to the extent that sections 895.03(3) and 895.02(2) involve the collection of a . . . "Racketeering activity" is defined in section 895.02(1), Florida Statutes. . . . . "Enterprise” is defined in section 895.02(3), Florida Statutes. See, Boyd v. . . . "Pattern of racketeering activity” is defined in section 895.02(4), Florida Statutes, and “racketeering . . . Section 895.02(2) provides: (2) "Unlawful debt” means any money or other thing of value constituting . . .

DAY, v. STATE, 573 So. 2d 1022 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . hearing on the ground that Day acting by himself did not constitute an “enterprise” as defined by section 895.02 . . .

BOYD, v. STATE, 578 So. 2d 718 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . .” § 895.02(3), Fla.Stat. (1989). . . . will ordinarily operate as a “group of individuals associated in fact although not a legal entity_” § 895.02 . . . also defined to include any legitimate business entity, such as a corporation or partnership, id. § 895.02 . . . THE ENTERPRISE ELEMENT An enterprise is broadly defined in section 895.02(3), Florida Statutes (1989) . . . and it includes illicit as well as licit enterprises and governmental, as well as other, entities. § 895.02 . . .

WRIGHT, v. SHEPPARD,, 919 F.2d 665 (11th Cir. 1990)

. . . . §§ 1961(6), 1962(c), and the Florida statute, § 895.02(2) (Supp.1990), he was not required to prove . . .

R. DONOVAN, v. STATE, 572 So. 2d 522 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . Four counts of racketeering (RICO), sections 895.02(3), 895.03(1), Florida Statutes (1987): 30 years . . . the last of such incidents occurred within 5 years after a prior incident of racketeering conduct. § 895.02 . . .

STATE OF FLORIDA v. CAMPEAU, 48 Fla. Supp. 2d 169 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1990)

. . . defined in Section 896.101(l)(g) “means any ‘racketeering activity’ as defined in Florida Statutes 895.02 . . . Moreover, Section 896.101(2) refers to Section 895.02 which defines racketeering activity. . . .

KNIGHT, v. E. F. HUTTON AND CO. INC., 750 F. Supp. 1109 (M.D. Fla. 1990)

. . . . § 1961(4) (Federal RICO) and Florida Statutes, § 895.02(3), (Florida RICO). . . .

STALL, STATE LONG, v. STATE, 570 So. 2d 257 (Fla. 1990)

. . . Compare § 895.02(1)(a)28, Fla.Stat. (1989) (making sale or possession of obscene materials a racketeering . . .

HARPER, v. STATE, 567 So. 2d 28 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . , penalizing and deterring the financing of “racketeering activity” (see sections 896.101(l)(g) and 895.02 . . .

ALVAREZ- BOTERO, v. STATE, 562 So. 2d 783 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . The defendant was convicted of racketeering (§ 895.02(1), Fla.Stat.), trafficking in cocaine (§ 893.135 . . . racketeering (Count I) because such a conviction requires two or more “incidents of racketeering conduct” (§ 895.02 . . .

FIRST PACIFIC CORPORATION, a v. SOCIEDADE EMPREENDIMENTOS e CONSTRUCOES, LTDA., 566 So. 2d 3 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . agent, in Florida, for damages under the Florida Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act, § 895.02 . . .

STATE v. LUCAS,, 570 So. 2d 952 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . Section 895.02(3), Florida Statutes (1985), in turn, defines “enterprise” to mean, inter alia, “any . . . . .. group of individuals associated in fact although not a legal entity,” and Section 895.02(4), Florida . . . “Racketeering activity” is further defined by Section 895.02(1), Florida Statutes (1985), to include . . .

WATTS, v. STATE, 558 So. 2d 142 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . Section 895.02(4) defines “pattern of racketeering activity” as: engaging in at least two incidents of . . . the last of such incidents occurred within 5 years after a prior incident of racketeering conduct. § 895.02 . . .

GARCIA, v. STATE, 554 So. 2d 1223 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . See §§ 895.02(4) and 895.03(3), Fla.Stat. (1987). . . .

R. FOX, v. STATE, 554 So. 2d 627 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . See §§ 895.02, 895.03(4), 812.-014, 517.07, 517.12 and 517.301, Fla.Stat. . . .

BULLEN a k a a k a v. HER MAJESTY S GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED KINGDOM,, 553 So. 2d 1344 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . case sub judice is consistent with the law and public policy of the state of Florida,” citing sections 895.02 . . .

STATE v. P. ADKINS, Jr. B., 553 So. 2d 294 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . Section 895.02(4), Fla.Stat. (1987) of the Florida RICO Act proscribes conduct evidencing a “pattern . . .

GUNIO v. V. I. D. INC., 40 Fla. Supp. 2d 150 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1989)

. . . The court finds that there was a pattern of racketeering activity as defined in § 895.02 Florida Statutes . . .

P. MASONOFF, v. STATE, 546 So. 2d 72 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . . § 895.02(l)(a)22, Florida Statutes (1987). . . . . § 895.02(3), Fla. Stat. (1987). It is clear that Mr. . . .

STATE v. LONG, E. CMH d b a, 544 So. 2d 219 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . Section 895.02, Florida Statutes (1985 and Supp.1986), provides: As used in ss. 895.01-895.08, the term . . .

In STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES, 543 So. 2d 1205 (Fla. 1989)

. . . Note to Judge Instruct as to five-year limitation period (F.S. 895.02(4)) if appropriate. . . . Give as applicable F.S. 895.02(9) “Real property” means land and whatever is erected on it. . . . Note to Judge Instruct as to five-year limitation period (F.S. 895.02(4)) if appropriate. . . . Definitions F.S. 895.02(2) 2. . . . Note to Judge Instruct as to five-year limitation period (F.S. 895.02(4)) if appropriate. . . .

FORT WAYNE BOOKS, INC. v. INDIANA, 489 U.S. 46 (U.S. 1989)

. . . . § 895.02(l)(a)(27) (1987); Ga. . . .

VICKERY, v. STATE NUNNARI, v. STATE, 539 So. 2d 499 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . maintain, directly or indirectly, any interest in or control of any enterprise or real property- Section 895.02 . . . Section 895.02(4) defines pattern of racketeering activity as: engaging in at least two incidents of . . .

CREWS, v. STATE, 537 So. 2d 656 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . was legally insufficient to charge “two incidents” of racketeering conduct, as required by section 895.02 . . .

DAY, v. STATE, 541 So. 2d 1202 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . argues that a lone robber acting by himself does not constitute an “enterprise” as defined in section 895.02 . . .

STATE v. SMITH,, 532 So. 2d 1112 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . An “enterprise” is defined in section 895.02(3), Florida Statutes (1987) as: ... any individual, sole . . .

TELFARE, v. STATE, 529 So. 2d 1278 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . 18, United States Code, section 1961(l)(d), and an act of racketeering activity as defined in F.S. 895.02 . . . participate, directly or indirectly, in such enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity_” Section 895.02 . . .

SHAKTMAN, J. v. STATE, 529 So. 2d 711 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . Section 849.25 is a specifically enumerated crime under the aegis of section 895.02. . . . that is, “at least two incidents of racketeering conduct,” which is the gravamen of a RICO offense. § 895.02 . . .

STATE v. SUN CITY OIL COMPANY, INC., 522 So. 2d 474 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . dismissed because a violation of that statute is not one of the predicate crimes listed in section 895.02 . . .

STATE v. NISHI,, 521 So. 2d 252 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . to dismiss, Nishi admitted that the robberies constituted racketeering activity pursuant to section 895.02 . . .

MARTINEZ v. C. HEINRICH,, 521 So. 2d 167 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . . § 895.02(l)(a)(23), Fla.Stat. . . .

In MARILL ALARM SYSTEMS, INC. MARILL ALARM SYSTEMS, INC. v. EQUITY FUNDING CORPORATION,, 81 B.R. 119 (S.D. Fla. 1987)

. . . . § 895.02(l)(a) (Florida RICO) and prays for treble damages thereunder. . . . usurious interest constitutes a sufficient pattern of racketeering activity as contemplated by Fla.Stat. § 895.02 . . . Section 895.02(l)(a)(8) provides that a violation pursuant to Fla.Stat. §§ 687 et seq. is a "racketeering . . . See Fla.Stat. § 895.02(l)(a)(8). . . .

In ALEXANDER GRANT CO. LITIGATION, ESM- NEWS AND SUN- SENTINEL CO., 820 F.2d 352 (11th Cir. 1987)

. . . . §§ 895.02 and 895.03 (West Supp.1986). . . .